Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Size Debate

Old 03-25-16, 11:36 AM
  #1  
one4smoke
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Nashville, TN.
Posts: 2,039

Bikes: 2020 Specialized Roubaix Comp SC - 2016 Specialized Roubaix SL4 - 2015 Giant Roam 2 Disc

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 214 Times in 151 Posts
Size Debate

I'm 6'4" with an inseam of 37". So, most of my height is from my legs and not my torso. My current bike is a Giant with an XL frame. Looking to buy a new road bike, and they have a 58 that feels pretty decent. I can obviously adjust the saddle to a proper height, and the reach is a bit shorter, not putting too much pressure on my hands, which is good. In another words, it works. But, I still believe a 61 would be a better fit. Not having it in stock, I can't compare, so they will have to order one.

Any thoughts on which size may or may not be better?
one4smoke is offline  
Old 03-25-16, 12:11 PM
  #2  
Tim_Iowa
Senior Member
 
Tim_Iowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 1,643

Bikes: 1997 Rivendell Road Standard 650b conversion (tourer), 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10 (gravel/tour), 2013 Foundry Auger disc (CX/gravel), 2016 Cannondale Fat CAAD 2 (MTB/winter), 2011 Cannondale Flash 29er Lefty (trail MTB)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
At your height, I'd highly recommend the 61 over the 58. If the 58 feels ok to you (but with plenty of extra standover), then the 61 should feel better. The 61 should have a taller stack; meaning the stem and bars are a bit higher (good for you).

The only drawback to the 61 would be the longer top tube, if that puts it out of the range of comfort. You could probably fine-tune it with a different-length stem.
Tim_Iowa is offline  
Old 03-25-16, 06:45 PM
  #3  
one4smoke
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Nashville, TN.
Posts: 2,039

Bikes: 2020 Specialized Roubaix Comp SC - 2016 Specialized Roubaix SL4 - 2015 Giant Roam 2 Disc

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 214 Times in 151 Posts
Originally Posted by Tim_Iowa View Post
At your height, I'd highly recommend the 61 over the 58. If the 58 feels ok to you (but with plenty of extra standover), then the 61 should feel better. The 61 should have a taller stack; meaning the stem and bars are a bit higher (good for you).

The only drawback to the 61 would be the longer top tube, if that puts it out of the range of comfort. You could probably fine-tune it with a different-length stem.
Thanks.
That's what I'm thinking too. I'd rather adjust the reach with a different stem, and have a bike that's the proper height.
one4smoke is offline  
Old 03-25-16, 10:26 PM
  #4  
Wheever
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Stamford, CT; Pownal, VT
Posts: 1,141

Bikes: 2015 Trek Domane 6 disk, 2016 Scott Big Jon Fat Bike

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
I dunno. I'm also long of leg/shorter torso, (albeit a lot shorter) and my cycling life was changed by realizing I needed to size down to find the right fit. I'm 5'9" with a 33" inseam, and everything and everyone on the planet puts me on a 54, but the first time I got on a 52, it was obviously perfect. (I had a 54 that I put a short stem on and the handling got twitchy. The 52 was night and day compared to that. I got rid of it and got the 52.)

my my point is, don't be so sure the 61 is the right size. I think it might be better to get the 58 and then put a longer stem on it if you needed more reach. If an average person 6'4" is "supposed" to ride a 61, I'd pick the 58.
Wheever is offline  
Old 03-25-16, 10:35 PM
  #5  
Dave Cutter
Senior Member
 
Dave Cutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,160

Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Yeah... not all 58's or 61's are created equal ether. Maybe most 60 or 61's would feel right... and a few 58's. Either way... if it feels right... it feels right.
Dave Cutter is offline  
Old 03-25-16, 11:03 PM
  #6  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 24,968
Mentioned: 202 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13047 Post(s)
Liked 1,730 Times in 1,309 Posts
I assume you are test-riding a new bike with an uncut ridiculously long steer tube.

So, if you think of the bike as having 3 points of contact, seat, pedals, and bars. Then you should be able to adjust both bikes to almost the same fit, to give a reasonable test ride. And, if you're ready to plunk down a few thousand on a new bike, the shop should be willing to help you with the fit on the demo (assuming you're not just yanking their chain).

Some of the angles will be slightly different so the seat forward/back position may appear different, but you should still be able to set them to almost the same position.

Assuming a casual rider, then I'd go with the 61, or even larger.

If you're doing competitive racing, then you might consider the smaller frame which would allow more lower handlebar adjustment.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 03-25-16, 11:24 PM
  #7  
McBTC
Senior Member
 
McBTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,798

Bikes: 2015 22 Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1512 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 13 Posts
61 over 58 for sure... squeeze into a 59 Lemond-type road bike with its exceptionally loooong top bar perhaps but as far as modern sizing goes, the 61 will never be too big.
McBTC is offline  
Old 03-25-16, 11:43 PM
  #8  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 24,968
Mentioned: 202 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13047 Post(s)
Liked 1,730 Times in 1,309 Posts
There may also be some calculations of optimum crank length for those taller riders.

There is a bit of a trade-off of cadence vs torque with longer cranks, but the power remains about the same with long or short so it may be rider preference.

175mm is common.
177.5 and 180mm is available from most major manufactures.
Longer is probably a special order item.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 03-26-16, 05:27 AM
  #9  
clydeosaur
Senior Member
 
clydeosaur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central PA
Posts: 629

Bikes: Cannondale Six5, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR & old Hard Rock

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I agree with the 61. I'm your height, but with a smaller inseam (more upper body). I've tried 58 - 60 and always feel cramped. a 61 -63cm frame lets me feel like I'm in the bike rather than on it. As well, you will have more wiggle room in the cockpit for adjustments with the taller headtube.
clydeosaur is offline  
Old 03-26-16, 09:45 AM
  #10  
Kedosto
Ambulophobic
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Leandro, CA
Posts: 1,248
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 492 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 121 Posts
61cm, no doubt about it. I'm 6'3" with 36" inseam and comfortably ride a bike with a 62.5cm effective top tube. If you must, you can always adjust your reach with a stem swap. As others have already mentioned, the larger frame will have a higher stack height which is an important consideration with bike fit.

Depending on your riding background, a 58cm might feel comfortable on the sales floor but out on the road things are different. True, you can just as easily swap stems on a small frame as a large, but the steering feel and handling deteriorates considerably (IMO) with extra long stems. Slight discomforts which seem to be small and inconsequential in the showroom grow larger the longer you ride.

I've spent a lifetime trying to fit myself onto bikes that were too small. I've been hunched over too small frames with long stems, toes overlapping front ends and seats slid back on offset seatposts. Mostly because the correct size wasn't readily available. "We can make it fit," they'd say. And me, always impatient and unwilling to wait for an ordered bike, wanted to believe.

I strongly recommend you find and ride a 60-62cm bike -- even if it's nothing you'd want to buy. Try it out for size and feel. Obviously, it would be best if you could find something with similar geometry as the bike you really want but even if it's not exactly the same it'll give you a better idea about what a larger frame size feels like to ride. Take note of top tube lengths and stem lengths for an idea about what feels best for your reach. If you can't find bikes to ride in your size at your local shops, remember Craigslist. Then, go order the bike you want in the size you need. Good Luck!


-Kedosto
Kedosto is offline  
Old 03-26-16, 09:39 PM
  #11  
one4smoke
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Nashville, TN.
Posts: 2,039

Bikes: 2020 Specialized Roubaix Comp SC - 2016 Specialized Roubaix SL4 - 2015 Giant Roam 2 Disc

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 589 Post(s)
Liked 214 Times in 151 Posts
Thanks, guys! I do believe 61 is the way to go.
one4smoke is offline  
Old 03-29-16, 06:02 AM
  #12  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 12,672

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 142 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6066 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times in 532 Posts
Surely you can go to various shops and actually try a few sizes?

I am a little shorter than you abut have similar proportions (maybe more extreme) with a lot of leg and a short torso, and I find that bikes which are "supposed" to fit me have too-long top tubes. It seems the smaller frames sometimes have slacker seat tube angles which means I can get the saddle back far enough by raising the seat tube, where on a slightly larger frame I need to push the saddle back further on the rails, while with the shorter top tube (and head tube and thus stack) I can run some extra spacers and a steeper stem angle (not length) to get what I need.

But ... it is rider-specific as well as bike specific. I strongly suggest trying several frames in several sizes. And as was mentioned above, if you really plan to buy a bike there, and they are not willing to bring in a 61 for you to test .... don't buy a bike there.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 03-29-16, 06:10 AM
  #13  
TK LP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 120
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 7 Posts
This is certainly a mileage varies thing, but I'm the same dimensions and ride a 66cm.
TK LP is offline  
Old 03-29-16, 06:14 AM
  #14  
GerryinHouston
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 540

Bikes: Novarra Randonee 2016, Trek Verve 2 2015

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I found that the Bike Fit Calculator worked very well for me. As a result, I got a bike one size larger than popular wisdom and the salesman recommended and it fits great!

Bike Fit Calculator | Find Your Bike Size | Competitive Cyclist

It will take the guessing out of the equation.
GerryinHouston is offline  
Old 03-29-16, 01:19 PM
  #15  
Viich
Hack
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 909

Bikes: 88 Bianchi Strada (currently Sturmey'd), 90's Giant Innova (now with drop bars), FMF Race BMX

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 224 Post(s)
Liked 40 Times in 29 Posts
Bike fit calculators put me on a 56cm, I ride a 58cm, and I find it maybe a little small. I wouldn't go to a 61, but it's close - but I'm only 6" (and almost 1/2"). I probably just need to get a longer seat post.
Viich is offline  
Old 03-29-16, 04:55 PM
  #16  
Cougrrcj 
Over forty victim of Fate
 
Cougrrcj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 3,609

Bikes: A few...

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times in 160 Posts
Heck, I'm only 5'8" with a 30" pants inseam, and I ride 23"/57-58cm bikes - Yes, 'the boys' would be in for a world of hurt if'n I was to come down flat-footed, but that has yet to be an issue in over 43 years of riding that size frame! I felt too cramped on 21"/53-54cm-frame bikes. Maybe I'd like a 22"/55-56cm, but that opportunity has never presented itself.

That said, all of my bikes are vintage diamond-frame steel frames. Maybe things have changed with new 'sizing'...
__________________
'75 Fuji S-10S bought new, 52k+ miles and still going!
'84 Univega Gran Tourismo
'84 Univega Viva Sport
'86 Miyata 710
'90 Schwinn Woodlands
Unknown brand MTB of questionable lineage aka 'Mutt Trail Bike'
Plus or minus a few others from time-to-time

Cougrrcj is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cam40S
General Cycling Discussion
4
02-21-16 12:57 AM
fronesis
Fitting Your Bike
7
06-22-14 09:48 PM
type36
Road Cycling
32
10-28-12 09:52 AM
moppeddler
Road Cycling
5
06-24-12 01:02 PM
speedqing
Road Cycling
13
10-03-11 08:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.