> >
>

Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

08-02-16, 08:07 AM
#1
Senior Member

Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 116
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts

Hey All,

On a road bike, I've heard you never adjust reach by adjusting your saddle setback. I had a general body scan fitting and was told my setback should be about 3.25". My question is, do bikes within one size of each other (say 54 and a 56) differ with how much you'd need to set the saddle for/aft? In other words, say I had to set the saddle way back on a 54 to achieve the right setback. Would the seat need to be set back the same on the next size up? Assuming reach issues were settled all with the stem. It seems to me all things considered, the angles and rear triangle wouldn't make that much a difference setback-wise between sizes?
08-02-16, 08:16 AM
#2
Banned.

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ny
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If the saddle is the same height on the 2 different sizes and the seat tube angle the same ,the saddle set back would be the same. What usually changes is the length of the top tube. Keep in mind that these body scans and other fitting schemes are not the final word on what will work best for you, they are just a good starting point.
08-02-16, 08:22 AM
#3
Senior Member

Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 116
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
If the saddle is the same height on the 2 different sizes and the seat tube angle the same ,the saddle set back would be the same. What usually changes is the length of the top tube. Keep in mind that these body scans and other fitting schemes are not the final word on what will work best for you, they are just a good starting point.
Thanks. The defy series between a M and M/L is .5 degree difference in seat angles. So I'd imagine that wouldn't make a huge difference on how far back you'd have to set the seat on the rails?

And yes, the body scan thing I got told me "functional height" was 5'10.5" with shoes on, when all other measurements I've taken and at the doctor I'm 5'9.25" without shoes. No way shoes add almost and inch and a half of height!
08-02-16, 08:42 AM
#4
Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Liked 326 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by ejewels
Hey All,

On a road bike, I've heard you never adjust reach by adjusting your saddle setback. I had a general body scan fitting and was told my setback should be about 3.25". My question is, do bikes within one size of each other (say 54 and a 56) differ with how much you'd need to set the saddle for/aft? In other words, say I had to set the saddle way back on a 54 to achieve the right setback
Sometimes. Seat tube angles often flatten as the sizes grow.

With a 73cm saddle height there's 1.2cm more setback with the saddle rails in the same location moving from a smaller size with a 74 degree seat tube angle to a 73 degrees.

Sometimes not. The range of angles can be very small on the same frame model - 74 degrees through a 53, 73 through 59, 72.5 for a 61.

Look at the geometry charts and apply the necessary trigonometry.
08-02-16, 08:53 AM
#5
Senior Member

Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 116
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Drew Eckhardt
Sometimes. Seat tube angles often flatten as the sizes grow.

With a 73cm saddle height there's 1.2cm more setback with the saddle rails in the same location moving from a smaller size with a 74 degree seat tube angle to a 73 degrees.

Sometimes not. The range of angles can be very small on the same frame model - 74 degrees through a 53, 73 through 59, 72.5 for a 61.

Look at the geometry charts and apply the necessary trigonometry.
OK, so roughly speaking, if we're talking the difference of .5 degrees between a M and M/L, it would only be a difference of .6cm in saddle setback? Seems like no matter the size, I need to set that saddle back kinda far.
08-02-16, 04:10 PM
#6
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,282
Liked 816 Times in 486 Posts
Saddle setback is measured as a distance from the center of the bottom bracket with the saddle at a set height. The frame makes no difference to the setback of the saddle. It may change where the saddle rails fall on the seatpost, so you may need a seatpost with more or less setback to accomodate your needs.
08-02-16, 04:41 PM
#7

Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,776

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Liked 1,574 Times in 1,033 Posts
Originally Posted by dsaul
Saddle setback is measured as a distance from the center of the bottom bracket with the saddle at a set height. The frame makes no difference to the setback of the saddle. It may change where the saddle rails fall on the seatpost, so you may need a seatpost with more or less setback to accomodate your needs.
Since all saddles differ in shape, length, etc.. as well as where the rails reside in relation to the sitting surface, where on the saddle is the measurement to? Where the sitbones should be?
08-02-16, 05:14 PM
#8
Senior Member

Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 13,103

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Liked 4,130 Times in 2,664 Posts
For two frames with different seat angles, the setback will differ by the cosines of the seat angles X the distance from the seat to the BB.

Say one frame is 72.5 degrees and the other 73. Say BB to seat is 75 cm. The difference in setbacks is:

cos 72.5 X 75 - cos 73 X 75 = 22.55 - 21.93 = 0.63 cm. (Multiplying your BB-seat distance times 0.63 and dividing by 75 will get you pretty close.)

Ben
08-02-16, 06:26 PM
#9
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,282
Liked 816 Times in 486 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
Since all saddles differ in shape, length, etc.. as well as where the rails reside in relation to the sitting surface, where on the saddle is the measurement to? Where the sitbones should be?
There doesn't seem to be a consensus on that. Some go by the tip of the saddle, some use the center of the rails and others try to determine where the sitbones will be. None of them are all that good, unless you are using the same saddle on all of your bikes

For my own bikes with different saddles, I measure to where the saddle just reaches its widest point.
08-03-16, 10:25 AM
#10
Senior Member

Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301

Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Too much focus on the numbers.

Ride the bike, carry tools, and make small adjustments as needed, including seat setback, until you get it where you like it...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
08-04-16, 03:49 PM
#11
Junior Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
08-05-16, 04:47 AM
#12
Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,930

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Liked 677 Times in 517 Posts
I agree with giro_man, but I don't use the same saddles on different bikes. I measure setback on mine and on wife's from the BB plumb line to where the sit-bone pressure is. I find this by asking her to point to it - imprecise but she's consistent. Then I mark that point, measure and write it down. Same for my bike.

Interesting thing is, that point is usually just a little forward of the widest point for widely different saddles like Brooks B17, SelleAnatomica, and Specialized Toupe. Measuring to the nose of the saddle is only valid for saddles that are the same.

Worse, with a Selle Anatomica, the length and nose position changes as the saddle stretches and you restore fit by adjusting the tension bolt.
08-06-16, 08:37 PM
#13
Senior Member

Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 116
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by giro_man
that makes sense. I dont know ehat he used for reference or if he used a bike, I just know that setback number is what the body scan came up with.
Related Topics
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TiHabanero
21
12-10-18 04:37 PM
e30jean
27
01-14-16 07:46 AM
Kameleon
78
08-13-14 08:55 PM
rpenmanparker
34
01-12-14 10:07 PM
jimmuller
Classic & Vintage
68
09-01-13 05:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off