Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Hmm, still not a fan of the triple crankset.

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Hmm, still not a fan of the triple crankset.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-20, 07:27 PM
  #126  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 946

Bikes: 2015 Spec. AWOL Elite,2022 Spec. Diverge, 1984 Trek 620 1985 Trek 620, 1979 Trek 710

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 194 Times in 110 Posts
6 pages of thread in 7 days on the topic of who does and who does not like triple cranks and why you're an idiot for believing what you do....not bad! Gottta love this lock down!

I suggest a slight change to the topic. I want to know who likes triple cranks AND DISK BRAKES?!

Just kidding...I don't really care. But I do.

...is it 'disk' or 'disc'....or both....so many things to think about and so much free time to think.....



jlaw is offline  
Likes For jlaw:
Old 04-23-20, 02:36 AM
  #127  
av1
Junior Member
 
av1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 94

Bikes: 1994 Specialized rockhopper comp , 1994 Scott Boulder Tange tubing, 1993 Bianchi 26inch tourer converted to drop bar with 28mm /1.1/ road tires

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by jlaw
6 pages of thread in 7 days on the topic of
triple cranks AND DISK BRAKES



Definitely a no go.😋
av1 is offline  
Old 04-23-20, 03:41 AM
  #128  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Saulkrasti, Latvia
Posts: 898

Bikes: Focus Crater Lake

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 391 Post(s)
Liked 337 Times in 204 Posts
Originally Posted by jlaw
I suggest a slight change to the topic. I want to know who likes triple cranks AND DISK BRAKES?!
I do. I have 3x9 gearing with a 44/32/22 triple crankset and a 11-25 casette, and hydraulic disc brakes, and am happy with this setup.
subgrade is offline  
Old 04-23-20, 08:08 AM
  #129  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,368

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6221 Post(s)
Liked 4,221 Times in 2,367 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
Your example of shifting from the 17 was stupid.
This is the second time you have called me stupid. Your need to be insulting just shows how poor your arguments are. I don’t question your intelligence and I expect the same from you.

The example I used is the same independent of which chainring/cog combination is chosen. By your own admission.

Originally Posted by DaveSSS
You picked this example to support your flawed analysis. Your idea that a 2 cog shift is hunting is also ridiculous. I make the same 2 cog shift, after nearly every chainring shift and it works perfectly. With Campy shifters, it's a 1 second event.
Your need for two shifts is the very definition of hunting. There is also no better example of a hole in the shift pattern than a need for a two cog upshift after a downshift. A shift pattern without holes wouldn’t require an upshift after a downshift. Triples aren’t perfect but the jump is much smaller and doesn’t usually need any upshift to adjust for cadence.

Originally Posted by DaveSSS
.... The compact gearing works fine and there is no hunting. In the mountainous terrain that I ride looks mean nothing. Gear changes are done by feel. I ride some roads that look to be level but aren't, due to the way they are carved out of a mountain.
Then what do you call a 2 cog upshift that you do every time you shift?

Gear changes are not just done by feel. They are a combination of feel and looking at the road. I ridden in Colorado my whole life and I don’t just look down at my wheels when I ride. Large and steep climbs don’t get any easier if you don’t look at them.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 04-23-20, 09:25 AM
  #130  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 946

Bikes: 2015 Spec. AWOL Elite,2022 Spec. Diverge, 1984 Trek 620 1985 Trek 620, 1979 Trek 710

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 194 Times in 110 Posts
Originally Posted by subgrade
I do. I have 3x9 gearing with a 44/32/22 triple crankset and a 11-25 casette, and hydraulic disc brakes, and am happy with this setup.
I have a similar 3x9 triple on my 'adventure' bike with an 11-32 in back - a really nice set-up for gravel roads and general cruising - shifting is excellent. And the TRP Spyre mechanical discs are solid in times of need.

I'd like to try some cable-actuated hydraulic discs some day. I have full hydraulic on my downhill bike and they are awesome! But I don't want the hassle of fluid-filled cables and giant brake levers/reservoir on a drop bar.



jlaw is offline  
Likes For jlaw:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.