[Carbon Fiber] Would this bike scare you?
#76
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,279
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5120 Post(s)
Liked 8,456 Times
in
3,993 Posts
...and the marketing department would be trying to figure out how to walk back years of "lighter is better" propaganda.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7163 Post(s)
Liked 11,368 Times
in
4,858 Posts
For road riding on flat terrain, weight is no big deal. That's why I'm still happily riding 32h/3x alloy rims on my road bike. But I do a fair bit of gravel racing, which involves hills, changing terrain, etc -- i.e., LOTS of yo-yo'ing in the speed. So, when buying new race wheels for my gravel bike, I chose a 1410g wheelset with cf rims and lower spoke count.
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 701
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 406 Post(s)
Liked 390 Times
in
219 Posts
Another thing potentially to think about is your position on the bike and the clothing you wear, which can have a major aero impact.
#79
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,279
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5120 Post(s)
Liked 8,456 Times
in
3,993 Posts
This.
For road riding on flat terrain, weight is no big deal. That's why I'm still happily riding 32h/3x alloy rims on my road bike. But I do a fair bit of gravel racing, which involves hills, changing terrain, etc -- i.e., LOTS of yo-yo'ing in the speed. So, when buying new race wheels for my gravel bike, I chose a 1410g wheelset with cf rims and lower spoke count.
For road riding on flat terrain, weight is no big deal. That's why I'm still happily riding 32h/3x alloy rims on my road bike. But I do a fair bit of gravel racing, which involves hills, changing terrain, etc -- i.e., LOTS of yo-yo'ing in the speed. So, when buying new race wheels for my gravel bike, I chose a 1410g wheelset with cf rims and lower spoke count.
My recent HT MTB purchase came with sub-1300g CF wheels (Stan's Podiums). I've been pretty impressed with them. It's too bad 29" tires are so heavy.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,148
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4073 Post(s)
Liked 7,665 Times
in
3,076 Posts
...the problem in me discussing this with most of the people here, is that they have never ridden on steel rims. The changes have been incremental, and a lot of the stuff you've read online about it has been comparisons between wheel sets with little tiny differences in weight. Thus it's not unusual at all for me to have people saying stuff like this to me.
Like I don't understand the physics or the numbers. I try not to personalize it, but it's very hurtful. Bicycling does not happen under laboratory conditions, there are uphills, and wind, and **** like that, which mean that on any given 112 mile ride, you will be compelled to bring those wheels up to speed more than a few times. Were your statement true in the case of bicycle wheels, someone at R+D would be working on the steel, deep dish, aero rim even as I type this. They would be very fast downhill.
Like I don't understand the physics or the numbers. I try not to personalize it, but it's very hurtful. Bicycling does not happen under laboratory conditions, there are uphills, and wind, and **** like that, which mean that on any given 112 mile ride, you will be compelled to bring those wheels up to speed more than a few times. Were your statement true in the case of bicycle wheels, someone at R+D would be working on the steel, deep dish, aero rim even as I type this. They would be very fast downhill.
Wheel inertia effects in all cases are so small that they are arguably insignificant.
Furthermore, the 0.3kg/0.66lb difference in wheels, even if this mass is out at the rim, is so small compared to your body mass that the differences in wheel inertia will be unperceivable. Any difference in acceleration due to bicycle wheels that is claimed by your riding buddies is primarily due to cognitive dissonance, or the placebo effect
In summary, wheels account for almost 10% of the total power required to race your bike and the dominant factor in wheel performance is aerodynamics. Wheel mass is a second order effect (nearly 10 times less significant) and wheel inertia is a third order effect (nearly 100 times less significant).
Likes For tomato coupe:
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7163 Post(s)
Liked 11,368 Times
in
4,858 Posts
I'm a bit old school, so when I got my gravel race bike, I had the shop build some alloy-rimmed 32h wheels for it, and they've been flawless. But I've thrashed them enough that I decided to get some dedicated race wheels. Still old school enough that I wanted hooked rims, though -- otherwise there are a bunch of great options for hookless rims.
Likes For Koyote:
#82
Sock Puppet
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon, 2017 Jamis Renegade Exploit and too many others to mention.
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 863 Times
in
573 Posts
...while the forces we are discussing certainly are less than aerodynamics (probably by a factor of ten), that does not mean this statement you have just made is correct. Here is a long blog post about the subject. I'm not prepared or willing to argue it with you, because you give the impression that you are another true believer. I don't argue on Bike Forms with true believers, but I occasionally throw them a link. This is the same stuff that people argue endlessly, in road, about how wider tires are actually faster (even if they are heavier and run at lower pressures), and I realize that discussion of such topics simply wastes both your time and mine, You have misinterpreted some of the results coming out of the improvements with modern wheel aerodynamics as invalidating the established rotational weight dynamics, simply because they are a greater order of magnituce.
Fortunately, upgrading the wheels on an older bike to make it go faster is still OK advice, because the wheel upgrade will include both aspects. It's not a choice between one or the other.
Fortunately, upgrading the wheels on an older bike to make it go faster is still OK advice, because the wheel upgrade will include both aspects. It's not a choice between one or the other.
As far as aero gains, what I said was that aero would be more important for a tri-bike. For someone like myself who rides an upright endurance bike and has shoulders like a sail, aero wheels would be of little value.
#83
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,279
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5120 Post(s)
Liked 8,456 Times
in
3,993 Posts
These. They should be on the way soon, so no feedback for you.
I'm a bit old school, so when I got my gravel race bike, I had the shop build some alloy-rimmed 32h wheels for it, and they've been flawless. But I've thrashed them enough that I decided to get some dedicated race wheels. Still old school enough that I wanted hooked rims, though -- otherwise there are a bunch of great options for hookless rims.
I'm a bit old school, so when I got my gravel race bike, I had the shop build some alloy-rimmed 32h wheels for it, and they've been flawless. But I've thrashed them enough that I decided to get some dedicated race wheels. Still old school enough that I wanted hooked rims, though -- otherwise there are a bunch of great options for hookless rims.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#84
Sock Puppet
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon, 2017 Jamis Renegade Exploit and too many others to mention.
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 863 Times
in
573 Posts
...the problem in me discussing this with most of the people here, is that they have never ridden on steel rims. The changes have been incremental, and a lot of the stuff you've read online about it has been comparisons between wheel sets with little tiny differences in weight. Thus it's not unusual at all for me to have people saying stuff like this to me.
Like I don't understand the physics or the numbers. I try not to personalize it, but it's very hurtful. Bicycling does not happen under laboratory conditions, there are uphills, and wind, and **** like that, which mean that on any given 112 mile ride, you will be compelled to bring those wheels up to speed more than a few times. Were your statement true in the case of bicycle wheels, someone at R+D would be working on the steel, deep dish, aero rim even as I type this. They would be very fast downhill.
Like I don't understand the physics or the numbers. I try not to personalize it, but it's very hurtful. Bicycling does not happen under laboratory conditions, there are uphills, and wind, and **** like that, which mean that on any given 112 mile ride, you will be compelled to bring those wheels up to speed more than a few times. Were your statement true in the case of bicycle wheels, someone at R+D would be working on the steel, deep dish, aero rim even as I type this. They would be very fast downhill.
And wheels are not pizza. They are deep section rims, not deep dish rims.
#85
Senior Member
Does the bike scare me?
No, not if you are riding it.
This question has come up before (more than once) and my answer is "If you have to ask..."
No, not if you are riding it.
This question has come up before (more than once) and my answer is "If you have to ask..."
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,998
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 305 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26482 Post(s)
Liked 10,449 Times
in
7,248 Posts
This is laughable, really. Sounds like you enjoy playing the victim. There is a much bigger weight savings going from an old set of wheels with steel rims to modern alloy wheels in the 1600-1800g range than going from modern alloy wheels in the1600-1800g range to 1400g carbon wheels. I call false equivalency.
I don't know where you learned about this stuff, but you can call false equivalence, unfair advantage, or your mom. It won't change any of this conversation.
...says the guy who uses rolling weight to describe rotational mass. Go away, man.
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,998
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 305 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26482 Post(s)
Liked 10,449 Times
in
7,248 Posts
...and mine is that in an average tri ride, you are going to be losing speed, then bringing your wheel back up to speed a number of times. The causes can be terrain, wind, traffic, or even rest stops. Bike riding is not an idealized wheel in a physics equation. You have proposed a steady state equation, where there are, in reality, many variables intruding on your argument. This is exactly what true believers do. They simplify arguments, possibly because it makes them feel better about themselves. I honestly do not know or care. Just stop already.
Likes For 3alarmer:
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,998
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 305 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26482 Post(s)
Liked 10,449 Times
in
7,248 Posts
...of course I read it. That is why I've been telling you stuff like, it really does matter how much your rims and tires weigh.
Aerodynamics is a greater improvement by a factor of maybe ten. But that doesn't mean all the stuff about rotational mass goes away.
I'm now faced with you and this Lombard guy (who probably isn't really a resident of Lombardy anyway) going back and forth, telling me that my proposing we go back to making wheels from steel is ridiculous, when that's the very reason I brought it up. It's been so long since you've had to think about rotational mass as something to consider, because this change in materials and weight (both in wheel rims and in tires) has been accomplished to the point where, in your world view, you can make ridiculous statements like:
...your arguments here are not based on real world conditions. Nobody rides a bike 112 miles over varied terrain without slowing and accelerating a number of times.
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,148
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4073 Post(s)
Liked 7,665 Times
in
3,076 Posts
Wheel inertia effects in all cases are so small that they are arguably insignificant.
Likes For tomato coupe:
#90
Sock Puppet
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon, 2017 Jamis Renegade Exploit and too many others to mention.
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 863 Times
in
573 Posts
I stand corrected on rotating weight. Now take a pill.
#91
Sock Puppet
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon, 2017 Jamis Renegade Exploit and too many others to mention.
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 863 Times
in
573 Posts
...of course I read it. That is why I've been telling you stuff like, it really does matter how much your rims and tires weigh.
Aerodynamics is a greater improvement by a factor of maybe ten. But that doesn't mean all the stuff about rotational mass goes away.
I'm now faced with you and this Lombard guy (who probably isn't really a resident of Lombardy anyway) going back and forth, telling me that my proposing we go back to making wheels from steel is ridiculous, when that's the very reason I brought it up. It's been so long since you've had to think about rotational mass as something to consider, because this change in materials and weight (both in wheel rims and in tires) has been accomplished to the point where, in your world view, you can make ridiculous statements like:
and not expect any pushback. Because you have a limited experience with bicycle wheels, which has occurred in the modern era when changes were much less drastic. Then I simply state the obvious, that at the extreme, your claim would mean steel rims are fine on bikes, and the two of you have a hissy fit. Spare me. I don't know why I bother, so I'll stop bothering now.
...your arguments here are not based on real world conditions. Nobody rides a bike 112 miles over varied terrain without slowing and accelerating a number of times.
Aerodynamics is a greater improvement by a factor of maybe ten. But that doesn't mean all the stuff about rotational mass goes away.
I'm now faced with you and this Lombard guy (who probably isn't really a resident of Lombardy anyway) going back and forth, telling me that my proposing we go back to making wheels from steel is ridiculous, when that's the very reason I brought it up. It's been so long since you've had to think about rotational mass as something to consider, because this change in materials and weight (both in wheel rims and in tires) has been accomplished to the point where, in your world view, you can make ridiculous statements like:
and not expect any pushback. Because you have a limited experience with bicycle wheels, which has occurred in the modern era when changes were much less drastic. Then I simply state the obvious, that at the extreme, your claim would mean steel rims are fine on bikes, and the two of you have a hissy fit. Spare me. I don't know why I bother, so I'll stop bothering now.
...your arguments here are not based on real world conditions. Nobody rides a bike 112 miles over varied terrain without slowing and accelerating a number of times.
Likes For Lombard:
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,998
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 305 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26482 Post(s)
Liked 10,449 Times
in
7,248 Posts
#93
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,731
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1291 Post(s)
Liked 1,392 Times
in
708 Posts
The usual mud-slinging fest aside, it would be interesting to see an actual study or accurate mathematical model on the effects of a 500-gram lighter wheelset acceleration from 0 to 30kph. Then run the same test with 500 gram weight placed on the bike. My guess the difference is negligible. This myth that weight at the wheels is somehow much more relevant seems like bs. That said the gyroscopic forces would be stronger giving the bike a different feel thus the perception it is slower.
#94
Sock Puppet
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon, 2017 Jamis Renegade Exploit and too many others to mention.
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 863 Times
in
573 Posts
The usual mud-slinging fest aside, it would be interesting to see an actual study or accurate mathematical model on the effects of a 500-gram lighter wheelset acceleration from 0 to 30kph. Then run the same test with 500 gram weight placed on the bike. My guess the difference is negligible. This myth that weight at the wheels is somehow much more relevant seems like is bs. That said the gyroscopic forces would be stronger giving the bike a different feel thus the perception it is slower.
Likes For Lombard:
#95
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,279
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5120 Post(s)
Liked 8,456 Times
in
3,993 Posts
The usual mud-slinging fest aside, it would be interesting to see an actual study or accurate mathematical model on the effects of a 500-gram lighter wheelset acceleration from 0 to 30kph. Then run the same test with 500 gram weight placed on the bike. My guess the difference is negligible. This myth that weight at the wheels is somehow much more relevant seems like bs. That said the gyroscopic forces would be stronger giving the bike a different feel thus the perception it is slower.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#96
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,687
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2660 Post(s)
Liked 3,226 Times
in
1,843 Posts
The usual mud-slinging fest aside, it would be interesting to see an actual study or accurate mathematical model on the effects of a 500-gram lighter wheelset acceleration from 0 to 30kph. Then run the same test with 500 gram weight placed on the bike. My guess the difference is negligible. This myth that weight at the wheels is somehow much more relevant seems like bs. That said the gyroscopic forces would be stronger giving the bike a different feel thus the perception it is slower.
Ondrej Sosenka set the human-powered (i.e., Merckx-style) hour record in 2005 using an unusually heavy bike and heavy wheels. Quoting from The UCI Hour Record: Ondrej Sosenka:
"In his attempt, Sosenka was using a 54 x 13 gearing, a 3.2 kg wheel and 190 mm cranks, with his bike weighing a total of 9.8 kg. The reason for the heavy wheel was that although it was harder to get up to speed, it was easy to maintain it."
#97
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,279
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5120 Post(s)
Liked 8,456 Times
in
3,993 Posts
Different feel: I had an incredibly light set of aluminum Hi-E wheels (with rims that consisted of sheets of aluminum folded over and riveted) fitted with very light tubular/sewup tires. They accelerated fast, all right, but they always felt as if they were too light to maintain momentum from one pedal stroke to the next. Might have been in my head, but I'd swear that I could feel my cadence was more uneven with those wheels.
Ondrej Sosenka set the human-powered (i.e., Merckx-style) hour record in 2005 using an unusually heavy bike and heavy wheels. Quoting from The UCI Hour Record: Ondrej Sosenka:
"In his attempt, Sosenka was using a 54 x 13 gearing, a 3.2 kg wheel and 190 mm cranks, with his bike weighing a total of 9.8 kg. The reason for the heavy wheel was that although it was harder to get up to speed, it was easy to maintain it."
Ondrej Sosenka set the human-powered (i.e., Merckx-style) hour record in 2005 using an unusually heavy bike and heavy wheels. Quoting from The UCI Hour Record: Ondrej Sosenka:
"In his attempt, Sosenka was using a 54 x 13 gearing, a 3.2 kg wheel and 190 mm cranks, with his bike weighing a total of 9.8 kg. The reason for the heavy wheel was that although it was harder to get up to speed, it was easy to maintain it."
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#98
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,174
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7163 Post(s)
Liked 11,368 Times
in
4,858 Posts
The posters who are arguing over the relevance of weight (and of different types of weight -- rotating vs static) are probably each correct, to some degree. The effects may be present, but small.
I don't see anyone arguing that bike weight (or wheel weight, more specifically) is more important than fitness and rider weight. But then, those are not mutually exclusive: when I was road racing many years ago, I did some big climbing events. I did have a relatively light set of race wheels, and I also dieted down to the low 160-lb range (lowest was 163 lbs) at 6'2" tall. I can't really say whether the low weight made me faster, because I got to that weight partly by training a lot -- which made me faster.
#99
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,279
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5120 Post(s)
Liked 8,456 Times
in
3,993 Posts
There are several calculators like this one that allow you to quantify the effects of weight on speed, rolling time on a given course, etc...though they make no distinction between wheel weight vs static weight.
The posters who are arguing over the relevance of weight (and of different types of weight -- rotating vs static) are probably each correct, to some degree. The effects may be present, but small.
I don't see anyone arguing that bike weight (or wheel weight, more specifically) is more important than fitness and rider weight. But then, those are not mutually exclusive: when I was road racing many years ago, I did some big climbing events. I did have a relatively light set of race wheels, and I also dieted down to the low 160-lb range (lowest was 163 lbs) at 6'2" tall. I can't really say whether the low weight made me faster, because I got to that weight partly by training a lot -- which made me faster.
The posters who are arguing over the relevance of weight (and of different types of weight -- rotating vs static) are probably each correct, to some degree. The effects may be present, but small.
I don't see anyone arguing that bike weight (or wheel weight, more specifically) is more important than fitness and rider weight. But then, those are not mutually exclusive: when I was road racing many years ago, I did some big climbing events. I did have a relatively light set of race wheels, and I also dieted down to the low 160-lb range (lowest was 163 lbs) at 6'2" tall. I can't really say whether the low weight made me faster, because I got to that weight partly by training a lot -- which made me faster.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F: