Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Cost vs. Enjoyment?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!
View Poll Results: How do you rank the enjoyment of your bicycles?
I only own one bike. N/A.
12
16.00%
I enjoy my less expensive bikes more than my more expensive bikes.
10
13.33%
I enjoy all my bikes the same ammount regardless of cost.
32
42.67%
I enjoy my more expensive bikes more than my less expensive bikes.
21
28.00%
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll

Cost vs. Enjoyment?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-10 | 07:52 PM
  #26  
HandsomeRyan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Pants are for suckaz
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 1
From: Mt. Airy, MD

Bikes: Hardtail MTB, Fixed gear, and Commuter bike

Originally Posted by LUCAS
In most cases (not all), the real expensive recreational toys are expensive because they are better engineered and perform better.
In an apples-to-apples comparison this is probably true but since most of us who own multiple bikes use each bike for different things. For example I enjoy my very inexpensive singlespeed more than I enjoy my much more expensive mountain bike.

Also- Having six wheelsets for one bike seems like a sign of some sort of hoarding disorder.
HandsomeRyan is offline  
Reply
Old 02-02-10 | 08:03 PM
  #27  
Retro Grouch's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 30,225
Likes: 649
From: St Peters, Missouri

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Originally Posted by HandsomeRyan
As I was looking at my bikes piled in the corner of my living room I noticed that when I line them up from most fun to [relatively] least fun they are also in order from least expensive to most expensive.

I wondered if anyone else has found this to be true, that the cost of a bike does not necessarily mean it will be more enjoyable to ride than a less expensive bike?

What do you think...
I'm thinking that you're asking the wrong question.

If you took your most expensive bike and installed the wheelset from your least expensive bike I think most people would agree that you have decreased it's monitary value. Having done that, do you think you would find riding the bike more enjoyable?
Retro Grouch is offline  
Reply
Old 02-02-10 | 08:31 PM
  #28  
$ick3nin.vend3t's Avatar
Banned.
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
I own a '1988, 753 Reynolds Steel framed Raleigh. I also have a 2001 Trek 5900 USPS SuperLite. The trek doesn't even come close to the Raleigh's greatness...



$ick3nin.vend3t is offline  
Reply
Old 02-02-10 | 08:35 PM
  #29  
HandsomeRyan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Pants are for suckaz
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 1
From: Mt. Airy, MD

Bikes: Hardtail MTB, Fixed gear, and Commuter bike

Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
I'm thinking that you're asking the wrong question.

If you took your most expensive bike and installed the wheelset from your least expensive bike I think most people would agree that you have decreased it's monitary value. Having done that, do you think you would find riding the bike more enjoyable?
To me it isn't any one component or even a mix of components that make a bike more or less fun, it is the type of riding. Maybe it's because I'm not a racer and generally enjoy a moderate length rides at what most would consider a slow pace that having 'performace' bikes means less to me than it does to most. I think if I won a $5,000 race bike tomorrow it would be wasted on me because I'd still rather be lollygagging along the local MUP on it rather than training to race with Lance in the next TdF.
HandsomeRyan is offline  
Reply
Old 02-02-10 | 08:37 PM
  #30  
Jed19's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by HandsomeRyan
Also- Having six wheelsets for one bike seems like a sign of some sort of hoarding disorder.
Actually, I ended up with the wheelsets by paying ridiculously low prices for them. I have been wanting to build two new bikes-hence the wheelsets- but I found out I could have almost a "different bike" every weekend by switching wheelsets. And since I can afford them, what the heck. It is only money, and I really don't have any bad habit to spend money on, so wheelsets it is.

Remember, if you can afford it, it is no skin off anybody's nose. And it is definitely not hoarding.
Jed19 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-02-10 | 08:56 PM
  #31  
Administrator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,655
Likes: 2,706
From: Delaware shore

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

It depends on what you mean by enjoyment and what you want out of a bike. Todays bikes clearly out perform older bikes. But technology and prgress comes with a price tag. A modern CF bike with aero wheels and 10 or 11 speed group rides quicker and handles better than a 30 year old steel frame with a 5 speed freewheel. But if you like the feel of something that old, then you get enjoyment out of it. So if speed and handling are important, yes cost is the price of enjoyment.
StanSeven is offline  
Reply
Old 02-02-10 | 09:44 PM
  #32  
wunderkind's Avatar
Pro Paper Plane Pilot
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by *****3nin.vend3t
I own a '1988, 753 Reynolds Steel framed Raleigh. I also have a 2001 Trek 5900 USPS SuperLite. The trek doesn't even come close to the Raleigh's greatness...



Is it me or what that the bike is too small for the rider? Look at his right leg. At that pedal location, the legs should be nearly fully stretched. But it is fairly bent.
wunderkind is offline  
Reply
Old 02-02-10 | 10:26 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,685
Likes: 0

Bikes: S5 VWD & SL-7 S works Red.

Originally Posted by wunderkind
Is it me or what that the bike is too small for the rider? Look at his right leg. At that pedal location, the legs should be nearly fully stretched. But it is fairly bent.
Who said a good fit is key to enjoying a bike?

And lets not confuse a classic bike with a enjoyable bike to ride.

Last edited by v70cat; 02-02-10 at 10:33 PM.
v70cat is offline  
Reply
Old 02-02-10 | 10:42 PM
  #34  
trustnoone's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton AB

Bikes: 2011 Colnago World Cup, 2012 Eddy Merckx AMX-2

Originally Posted by MilitantPotato
I only enjoy my more expensive bike because it fits (custom job with 210mm cranks.)
Be careful in underground parking, tunnels, or riding under vertical traffic lights.

I ride 175's and find most of the world dreadfully underscaled (well, at least my head does).
trustnoone is offline  
Reply
Old 02-02-10 | 11:08 PM
  #35  
dynodonn's Avatar
On the lam
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 97
From: The Village
I enjoy riding my more expensive bikes since they are more tailor made for my riding needs, but I enjoy riding my inexpensive bikes as well since I don't have to fuss over them as much, and they are much easier to replace in case of theft; mainly, they are less for me to worry about. For me, it just depends on when, where, and what type of riding I'll be doing that will determine my level of enjoyment from any of my bikes.
dynodonn is offline  
Reply
Old 02-03-10 | 12:09 AM
  #36  
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
Banned.
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,894
Likes: 5
From: Upland Ca

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

...

Last edited by Mr. Beanz; 02-03-10 at 01:45 AM.
Mr. Beanz is offline  
Reply
Old 02-03-10 | 05:13 AM
  #37  
wahoonc's Avatar
Membership Not Required
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 16,853
Likes: 18
From: On the road-USA

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Originally Posted by HandsomeRyan
To me it isn't any one component or even a mix of components that make a bike more or less fun, it is the type of riding. Maybe it's because I'm not a racer and generally enjoy a moderate length rides at what most would consider a slow pace that having 'performace' bikes means less to me than it does to most. I think if I won a $5,000 race bike tomorrow it would be wasted on me because I'd still rather be lollygagging along the local MUP on it rather than training to race with Lance in the next TdF.
I completely agree! I would much rather be riding a bike I enjoy, even if it is one like my Raleigh Superbe that has a value of ~$300.

Originally Posted by StanSeven
It depends on what you mean by enjoyment and what you want out of a bike. Todays bikes clearly out perform older bikes. But technology and prgress comes with a price tag. A modern CF bike with aero wheels and 10 or 11 speed group rides quicker and handles better than a 30 year old steel frame with a 5 speed freewheel. But if you like the feel of something that old, then you get enjoyment out of it. So if speed and handling are important, yes cost is the price of enjoyment.
I am willing to bet that my 38 year old "All Steel Bicycle" Raleigh will still be around and being ridden long after a very large number of the $$$ wonder bikes have bit the dust. Increased cost does not necessarily mean durability. I rode steel road frames for years with things like Suntour Superbe Pro equipment, it was a good compromise between cost and performance. Unless you are a top shelf professional racer the biggest gains are made in the engine rather than the components. However if someone wants to spend $5,000 on a bike that is their choice, you could probably cover most of my collection of 25+ bikes for that dollar amount.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Reply
Old 02-03-10 | 05:27 AM
  #38  
HandsomeRyan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Pants are for suckaz
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 1
From: Mt. Airy, MD

Bikes: Hardtail MTB, Fixed gear, and Commuter bike

Originally Posted by LUCAS
Remember, if you can afford it, it is no skin off anybody's nose. And it is definitely not hoarding.
I was just teasing you in good fun, I hope you didn't think I was serious.
HandsomeRyan is offline  
Reply
Old 02-03-10 | 05:31 AM
  #39  
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 27,266
Likes: 152
From: YEG

Bikes: See my sig...

I have 13 bikes and enjoy them all on their own merits as each is unique and offers a different riding experience.

I figure my mtb is the most expensive bike I own... replacing that would cost about $3000.00 and it is the finest steel hard tail ever made (a hand built Rocky Mountain Blizzard).



At the other end of the spectrum it is probably my 1940 CCM that cost the least as the frame was free and it is cobbled together from salvaged parts save for the rear wheel that I had to build. This bike has given me a lot of joy as there is just something about riding it that really pleases me... she isn't the fastest or the most comfortable (the ride is pretty smooth) but she has some unique style.



My polo bike cost next to nothing to build and the fun factor when I ride that is off the scale...

Sixty Fiver is offline  
Reply
Old 02-04-10 | 01:20 PM
  #40  
Nightshade's Avatar
Humvee of bikes =Worksman
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,361
Likes: 7
I don't rate my bike by how I paid for them. I rate them for job I bought them to do which makes how much each one cost a non-issue if I did my job of selecting each one for the job right.
__________________
My preferred bicycle brand is.......WORKSMAN CYCLES
I dislike clipless pedals on any city bike since I feel they are unsafe.

Originally Posted by krazygluon
Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred, which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?
Nightshade is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-10 | 05:04 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,685
Likes: 0

Bikes: S5 VWD & SL-7 S works Red.

Originally Posted by Nightshade
I don't rate my bike by how I paid for them. I rate them for job I bought them to do which makes how much each one cost a non-issue if I did my job of selecting each one for the job right.
Well you must be very proud of yourself.
v70cat is offline  
Reply
Old 02-08-10 | 11:49 AM
  #42  
Monkey Face's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 619
Likes: 35
From: The Cotswolds, England

Bikes: Giant Revolt 2. Velo Orange Pass Hunter flat bar

It all depends upon what importance you place on the value of money.

If you were gifted a $3000 Cinelli Supercorsa, you might well find it your most enjoyable bike.

But... would you view it as your most expensive, or least expensive, bike... and what value would you place on your enjoyment of it?

I think you would be forced to value it in terms other than monetary... (ie. "It was a treasured gift from someone special", or "I worked hard for it", "I found it in a skip and re-built it" and so on)....

... which to me is a better way of looking at life in general. (Sorry if that's a bit deep )
Monkey Face is offline  
Reply
Old 02-08-10 | 08:25 PM
  #43  
Kimmitt's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 3
From: Long Beach, ca

Bikes: RadRunner Plus, Kona Dew Deluxe

Originally Posted by caloso
Horses for courses.
+1. I love my xtra townie to death, but after 15 miles, my rear is aching. But since I have a short commute and use it for errands, it's perfect most days.
Kimmitt is offline  
Reply
Old 02-08-10 | 10:38 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: Merrick, NY

Bikes: 2009 Mercier Galaxy (custom build), 2008 Argon 18 Mercury

My most fun bike is my most expensive one for a couple reasons

1. it was pro built and tuned so everything works like a fine watch

2. Its really freekin fast and easy to accelerate, and to me fun is hammering it as fast as possible like a guided missile.

That said I often get the most enjoyment out of my middle bike (the BD Mercier I built with Campy Parts), mainly because I can ride it more often... taking a triathlon bike out on the streets here is asking to become road pizza.
Rogue Leader is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EaglesFan1227
Hybrid Bicycles
6
08-27-18 10:42 AM
jaycb74
Hybrid Bicycles
18
07-12-14 07:46 PM
WilliamK1974
General Cycling Discussion
19
09-16-13 02:37 PM
sdoowe
Road Cycling
38
06-18-11 03:30 PM
Bob59
General Cycling Discussion
11
10-11-10 09:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.