Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

47MPH in a 25MPH Zone?!

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

47MPH in a 25MPH Zone?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-05 | 08:47 PM
  #51  
khuon's Avatar
DEADBEEF
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 12,234
Likes: 10
From: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA

Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte

HID = High Intensity Discharge light

The problem is that those things put out some nasty EM either from the element itself or from the ballast. They oftentimes interfere with wireless setups especially given the close proximity of the two units.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-05 | 09:23 PM
  #52  
Brian's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,681
Likes: 3
From: Between the mountains and the lake.

Bikes: 8 bikes - one for each day of the week!

If anyone happens to be riding in Ventura County, CA, I've got a hill for them. Wildwood Avenue in Thousand Oaks. Super steep, mildly twisty, and no cross traffic. I hit 52MPH without pedalling, on a Trek 1200. I thought my knees would have crimped the top tube. Now we call it quits at anything over about 60KPH on the tandem.
Brian is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-05 | 12:35 AM
  #53  
Dougmt's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Middle of Montana

Bikes: 1996 Specialized Stumpjumper

As Galileo proved a long time ago, the mass of an object does not affect how fast gravity pulls it down-->they're all still accelerated at 9.8m/s/s. The only thing would be the frontal surface area, affecting the drag.

I later read in the thread that this has been hashed a million times already... I too go much faster downhill than the rest of my family. Just coasting I pass them like they were standing still and no they are not on the brakes. I don't like going super fast... I can't help but thinking "what if I crash"
D
Dougmt is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-05 | 12:56 AM
  #54  
Brian's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,681
Likes: 3
From: Between the mountains and the lake.

Bikes: 8 bikes - one for each day of the week!

I think there's a difference between free-falling through air, and rolling down a hill. I could be wrong, but our tandem certainly rolls faster downhill than my single bike does. And the extra wheelbase does wonders for stability.
Brian is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-05 | 07:20 AM
  #55  
BlazingPedals's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,560
Likes: 799
From: Middle of da Mitten

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Bacchetta Quattro, Catrike Speed

Originally Posted by Dougmt
As Galileo proved a long time ago, the mass of an object does not affect how fast gravity pulls it down-->they're all still accelerated at 9.8m/s/s. The only thing would be the frontal surface area, affecting the drag.
Exactly. Rate of acceleration is the same, but you have to take air resistance into account. The frontal area of a heavy person is almost identical to the frontal area of a light person. With more weight, the force of acceleration is more (it takes more force to accelerate a heavier weight at the same rate) but the impeding effect of air resistance is not more.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-05 | 10:24 AM
  #56  
LowCel's Avatar
Throw the stick!!!!
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 18,150
Likes: 93
From: Charleston, WV

Bikes: GMC Denali

To me it seems that after I hit 50 - 52 mph pedaling is pretty much worthless. At that point just tucking down and getting as little wind resistance as possible seems to be the best. So far my top speed has been 57.5 mph. I'm hoping for 60 this year. Not sure if it will happen or not, I'm going to be missing the extra 30+ pounds on when going downhill, going to be loving it going up though.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-05 | 11:06 AM
  #57  
cab horn
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 28,353
Likes: 31
From: Toronto

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
Exactly. Rate of acceleration is the same, but you have to take air resistance into account. The frontal area of a heavy person is almost identical to the frontal area of a light person. With more weight, the force of acceleration is more (it takes more force to accelerate a heavier weight at the same rate) but the impeding effect of air resistance is not more.
Thank you.
operator is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-05 | 12:04 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,304
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, OH

Bikes: 2004 Trek 4600 SS, 2016 Cannondale Cujo 2 SS

Man, on my MTB I spun out in 44-11 and only hit about 42!! Good work
trekkie820 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-05 | 01:03 PM
  #59  
beer drinker
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: california

Bikes: trek 950

pretty sure galileo used a meter to measure time not distance. i wonder how far that tower has to lean before you can ride a bike down it.
spang621 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-03-05 | 03:08 PM
  #60  
webist's Avatar
Huachuca Rider
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC

Bikes: Fuji CCR1, Specialized Roubaix

There's an electrical sub-station near a microwave antenna about 18 miles into one of my routes. I have actually made it to 308 MPH in that stretch.

Also, there was one weekend where my riding partner replaced the battery in his computer. I was able to keep up with him while doing only 16 MPH while he was traveling at 23 MPH. He slowed down considerably when the LBS reprogrammed his computer however.
__________________
Just Peddlin' Around
webist is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.