Starting to dip into over kill
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
Starting to dip into over kill
Up until approx 1980 we had 10 speed bikes. After that the bike industry started their march to ever more gears by increasing the number of sprockets on the freewheel. Right now as far as I know we are up to 12 speeds in the rear. My question is isnt that overkill? I feel this is true especially when you throw into the mix that a good percentage of us have triples in front. So do we really need 36 speeds? Or is the march to ever more speeds just a marketing ploy to dip into the pockets of cyclist that need "the latest thing"?
#2
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
Up until approx 1980 we had 10 speed bikes. After that the bike industry started their march to ever more gears by increasing the number of sprockets on the freewheel. Right now as far as I know we are up to 12 speeds in the rear. My question is isnt that overkill? I feel this is true especially when you throw into the mix that a good percentage of us have triples in front. So do we really need 36 speeds? Or is the march to ever more speeds just a marketing ploy to dip into the pockets of cyclist that need "the latest thing"?
I agree that there is little need or advantage for most riders to have 10 or more speeds in back. It costs a lot more and is not as robust as the 5-8, and even 9 speed systems. Thankfully, many of us are smart enough to not fall for the hype of every "advancement"... if you can call it that.
#3
Senior Member
I have a 2x8 road bike and a 3x9 longtail. Interestingly, if you eliminate the duplicate gear combinations that have the same gear inches, I have 11 different speeds on the 2x8 and just 14! different speeds on the longtail.
Keith
Keith
#4
The Recumbent Quant
Up until approx 1980 we had 10 speed bikes. After that the bike industry started their march to ever more gears by increasing the number of sprockets on the freewheel. Right now as far as I know we are up to 12 speeds in the rear. My question is isnt that overkill? I feel this is true especially when you throw into the mix that a good percentage of us have triples in front. So do we really need 36 speeds? Or is the march to ever more speeds just a marketing ploy to dip into the pockets of cyclist that need "the latest thing"?
And it isn't a question of how many speeds, it's a question of total gear range and how close are they spaced.
So, no, it's not overkill.
#5
rebmeM roineS
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,216
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 347 Times
in
226 Posts
And we were all doing just fine with friction shifting until that Shimano Index System thing was forced onto us in the Eighties. Why can't things just stay the way they are?? If something works OK, why mess with it?
(But, don't touch my trigger shifters.)
(But, don't touch my trigger shifters.)
__________________
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
I know when you posted "Up until approx 1980 we had 10 speed bikes" you were actually referring to 5 speed freewheels at the rear.
I agree that there is little need or advantage for most riders to have 10 or more speeds in back. It costs a lot more and is not as robust as the 5-8, and even 9 speed systems. Thankfully, many of us are smart enough to not fall for the hype of every "advancement"... if you can call it that.
I agree that there is little need or advantage for most riders to have 10 or more speeds in back. It costs a lot more and is not as robust as the 5-8, and even 9 speed systems. Thankfully, many of us are smart enough to not fall for the hype of every "advancement"... if you can call it that.
Ben
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
The more gears combined with electronic shifting is the thing. Not many do it because of the $$. Those who do, I think like it for several reasons.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
High sprocket counts work best in the high-end groupsets for which they were designed, with advanced materials and design. Once you try and replicate the count using simple stamped steel sprocket, you get issues.
Thin cogs in larger sizes can get flexy as the required precision gets tighter.
As high sprocket counts trickle down the groupsets, it will become increasingly hard to create low-geared drop-bar bikes for touring that are durable and easy to maintain.
Thin cogs in larger sizes can get flexy as the required precision gets tighter.
As high sprocket counts trickle down the groupsets, it will become increasingly hard to create low-geared drop-bar bikes for touring that are durable and easy to maintain.
#9
Old Fart
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348
Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I see most of the so-called "advancements" in bicycles as nothing but pure marketing and planned obsolescence.
I'm actually yearning for downtube shifters. (Brifters just don't give you the same control; the same speed and ease of quickly shifting to the extremes)
I had to try a modern CF bike, just to see what all the fuss is about- so I bought a used Venge. I like it well enough- but mainly just because it is new and different. In practical terms, I think many aspects of it (like flange-less hubs and nipple-less rims) are stupid. They offer no real advantage, and yet make simple maintenance tasks more difficult.
I was perfectly satisfied with my old 8-speed bike; and ditto my 9-speed Klein. When I ride the Venge, I don't say "Boy, this 10-speed stuff is just so much better!". In-fact, I can't tell the difference. No advantage- but there is a disadvantage, as the wheels and other components are not compatible with my 9-speed! There must be 1000 different BB's out there now...everything's becoming proprietary.... it really disgusts me.
I refuse to buy 11-speed. Don't need it; don't want it; won't have a skinnier chain. Whether bikes or motor vehicles, as they keep foisting all this non-sense on us, and get further and further away from the things that really matter, I'm tending to buy older and older stuff.
My Venge, for all it's fancy modern technology, does not have a THING on my 18 year-old Klein! Not A THING.
The pinnacle of great engineering, is to be able to achieve flawless performance via the simplest means possible. Bicycles reached that point many years ago. Anything beyond that becomes a liability; and is purely a trade-off, for show/aesthetics/marketing.
And don't even get me started on electronic shifting! [Sorry, guys...] To me, that is just LUDICROUS.
I'm actually yearning for downtube shifters. (Brifters just don't give you the same control; the same speed and ease of quickly shifting to the extremes)
I had to try a modern CF bike, just to see what all the fuss is about- so I bought a used Venge. I like it well enough- but mainly just because it is new and different. In practical terms, I think many aspects of it (like flange-less hubs and nipple-less rims) are stupid. They offer no real advantage, and yet make simple maintenance tasks more difficult.
I was perfectly satisfied with my old 8-speed bike; and ditto my 9-speed Klein. When I ride the Venge, I don't say "Boy, this 10-speed stuff is just so much better!". In-fact, I can't tell the difference. No advantage- but there is a disadvantage, as the wheels and other components are not compatible with my 9-speed! There must be 1000 different BB's out there now...everything's becoming proprietary.... it really disgusts me.
I refuse to buy 11-speed. Don't need it; don't want it; won't have a skinnier chain. Whether bikes or motor vehicles, as they keep foisting all this non-sense on us, and get further and further away from the things that really matter, I'm tending to buy older and older stuff.
My Venge, for all it's fancy modern technology, does not have a THING on my 18 year-old Klein! Not A THING.
The pinnacle of great engineering, is to be able to achieve flawless performance via the simplest means possible. Bicycles reached that point many years ago. Anything beyond that becomes a liability; and is purely a trade-off, for show/aesthetics/marketing.
And don't even get me started on electronic shifting! [Sorry, guys...] To me, that is just LUDICROUS.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
It has never been a better time to be a cyclist. Though I fondly remember the 10 speed era, I am not nostalgic for it. While 11 speed cassettes seem like overkill, the advance from 5 speed freewheels to 8 speed freehubs seems like a big advance. In my experience as far as geared bikes go, for me, the jump from 6 to 7 speed, and friction to indexed shifting, and clipless pedals were the biggest advances. Some years ago after riding a 3 x 7 Bianchi hybrid, I switched back to a friction shifting 3 x 6 Schwinn LeTour Luxe touring bike. The two things I really noticed and not in a good way were the friction shifters, and the 6 speed freewheel.
Today I ride a steel Salsa Casseroll with 9 speed brifters and a Brooks Saddle. Old school meets modern. Best of both worlds, IMO.
Today I ride a steel Salsa Casseroll with 9 speed brifters and a Brooks Saddle. Old school meets modern. Best of both worlds, IMO.
Last edited by MRT2; 01-31-15 at 12:05 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,248
Bikes: Kuota Ksano. Litespeed T5 gravel - brilliant!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Up until approx 1980 we had 10 speed bikes. After that the bike industry started their march to ever more gears by increasing the number of sprockets on the freewheel. Right now as far as I know we are up to 12 speeds in the rear. My question is isnt that overkill? I feel this is true especially when you throw into the mix that a good percentage of us have triples in front. So do we really need 36 speeds? Or is the march to ever more speeds just a marketing ploy to dip into the pockets of cyclist that need "the latest thing"?
Regarding the number of gears. Use the ones you want/need and ignore the others. I have combinations I want using all three of my front rings but there are some combinations I don't use. YMMV.
Last edited by cale; 01-31-15 at 11:51 AM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
I see most of the so-called "advancements" in bicycles as nothing but pure marketing and planned obsolescence.
I'm actually yearning for downtube shifters. (Brifters just don't give you the same control; the same speed and ease of quickly shifting to the extremes)
I had to try a modern CF bike, just to see what all the fuss is about- so I bought a used Venge. I like it well enough- but mainly just because it is new and different. In practical terms, I think many aspects of it (like flange-less hubs and nipple-less rims) are stupid. They offer no real advantage, and yet make simple maintenance tasks more difficult.
I was perfectly satisfied with my old 8-speed bike; and ditto my 9-speed Klein. When I ride the Venge, I don't say "Boy, this 10-speed stuff is just so much better!". In-fact, I can't tell the difference. No advantage- but there is a disadvantage, as the wheels and other components are not compatible with my 9-speed! There must be 1000 different BB's out there now...everything's becoming proprietary.... it really disgusts me.
I refuse to buy 11-speed. Don't need it; don't want it; won't have a skinnier chain. Whether bikes or motor vehicles, as they keep foisting all this non-sense on us, and get further and further away from the things that really matter, I'm tending to buy older and older stuff.
My Venge, for all it's fancy modern technology, does not have a THING on my 18 year-old Klein! Not A THING.
The pinnacle of great engineering, is to be able to achieve flawless performance via the simplest means possible. Bicycles reached that point many years ago. Anything beyond that becomes a liability; and is purely a trade-off, for show/aesthetics/marketing.
And don't even get me started on electronic shifting! [Sorry, guys...] To me, that is just LUDICROUS.
I'm actually yearning for downtube shifters. (Brifters just don't give you the same control; the same speed and ease of quickly shifting to the extremes)
I had to try a modern CF bike, just to see what all the fuss is about- so I bought a used Venge. I like it well enough- but mainly just because it is new and different. In practical terms, I think many aspects of it (like flange-less hubs and nipple-less rims) are stupid. They offer no real advantage, and yet make simple maintenance tasks more difficult.
I was perfectly satisfied with my old 8-speed bike; and ditto my 9-speed Klein. When I ride the Venge, I don't say "Boy, this 10-speed stuff is just so much better!". In-fact, I can't tell the difference. No advantage- but there is a disadvantage, as the wheels and other components are not compatible with my 9-speed! There must be 1000 different BB's out there now...everything's becoming proprietary.... it really disgusts me.
I refuse to buy 11-speed. Don't need it; don't want it; won't have a skinnier chain. Whether bikes or motor vehicles, as they keep foisting all this non-sense on us, and get further and further away from the things that really matter, I'm tending to buy older and older stuff.
My Venge, for all it's fancy modern technology, does not have a THING on my 18 year-old Klein! Not A THING.
The pinnacle of great engineering, is to be able to achieve flawless performance via the simplest means possible. Bicycles reached that point many years ago. Anything beyond that becomes a liability; and is purely a trade-off, for show/aesthetics/marketing.
And don't even get me started on electronic shifting! [Sorry, guys...] To me, that is just LUDICROUS.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,248
Bikes: Kuota Ksano. Litespeed T5 gravel - brilliant!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I see most of the so-called "advancements" in bicycles as nothing but pure marketing and planned obsolescence.
I'm actually yearning for downtube shifters. (Brifters just don't give you the same control; the same speed and ease of quickly shifting to the extremes)
I had to try a modern CF bike, just to see what all the fuss is about- so I bought a used Venge. I like it well enough- but mainly just because it is new and different. In practical terms, I think many aspects of it (like flange-less hubs and nipple-less rims) are stupid. They offer no real advantage, and yet make simple maintenance tasks more difficult.
I was perfectly satisfied with my old 8-speed bike; and ditto my 9-speed Klein. When I ride the Venge, I don't say "Boy, this 10-speed stuff is just so much better!". In-fact, I can't tell the difference. No advantage- but there is a disadvantage, as the wheels and other components are not compatible with my 9-speed! There must be 1000 different BB's out there now...everything's becoming proprietary.... it really disgusts me.
I refuse to buy 11-speed. Don't need it; don't want it; won't have a skinnier chain. Whether bikes or motor vehicles, as they keep foisting all this non-sense on us, and get further and further away from the things that really matter, I'm tending to buy older and older stuff.
My Venge, for all it's fancy modern technology, does not have a THING on my 18 year-old Klein! Not A THING.
The pinnacle of great engineering, is to be able to achieve flawless performance via the simplest means possible. Bicycles reached that point many years ago. Anything beyond that becomes a liability; and is purely a trade-off, for show/aesthetics/marketing.
And don't even get me started on electronic shifting! [Sorry, guys...] To me, that is just LUDICROUS.
I'm actually yearning for downtube shifters. (Brifters just don't give you the same control; the same speed and ease of quickly shifting to the extremes)
I had to try a modern CF bike, just to see what all the fuss is about- so I bought a used Venge. I like it well enough- but mainly just because it is new and different. In practical terms, I think many aspects of it (like flange-less hubs and nipple-less rims) are stupid. They offer no real advantage, and yet make simple maintenance tasks more difficult.
I was perfectly satisfied with my old 8-speed bike; and ditto my 9-speed Klein. When I ride the Venge, I don't say "Boy, this 10-speed stuff is just so much better!". In-fact, I can't tell the difference. No advantage- but there is a disadvantage, as the wheels and other components are not compatible with my 9-speed! There must be 1000 different BB's out there now...everything's becoming proprietary.... it really disgusts me.
I refuse to buy 11-speed. Don't need it; don't want it; won't have a skinnier chain. Whether bikes or motor vehicles, as they keep foisting all this non-sense on us, and get further and further away from the things that really matter, I'm tending to buy older and older stuff.
My Venge, for all it's fancy modern technology, does not have a THING on my 18 year-old Klein! Not A THING.
The pinnacle of great engineering, is to be able to achieve flawless performance via the simplest means possible. Bicycles reached that point many years ago. Anything beyond that becomes a liability; and is purely a trade-off, for show/aesthetics/marketing.
And don't even get me started on electronic shifting! [Sorry, guys...] To me, that is just LUDICROUS.
#14
Old Fart
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348
Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
On the older bikes, I never said to myself "Gee, I wish I had more gears!" Or "If only I could change gears by moving the brake levers!" or "These square-taper BB's sure suck; I sure wish someone would invent a plastic press-fit BB...yeah, that'd be the ticket!"
I never knew anyone who had complaints with their bicycles of any era. What I saw instead, was manufacturers coming out with new things, and then convincing consumers "why they need them". 100 years ago, businesses in the free market provided what consumers demanded. Then, starting with print media in the 1920's, and more so with the advent of TV in the 50's, marketing became all about "creating a need" for what you are selling. Google Edward Bernays, if you are not familiar (Sigmund Freud's nephew)....
#15
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
I think BikeSnobNYC hit the nail on the head with his theory of the "Retrogrouch Breaking Point" -- that each person finds for themselves the point at which newer technology doesn't impress them enough to use. Cog count is a great example, because as the percentage of change keeps going down (from 5 to 6 cogs was a 20% increase -- very handy; 10 to 11 was only 10% -- hmm, did it shift or not?) you'll see more people coming out of the woodwork to question whether it's worth it. But as long as the stuff works, there won't be much real pushback.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
I do enjoy my rides- whether riding my old Klein, or my '13 Venge....or [25 years ago] riding a department-store junker I resuscitated from a junk pile. But that's the thing- it's not about the equipment; it's about the ride and the rider.
On the older bikes, I never said to myself "Gee, I wish I had more gears!" Or "If only I could change gears by moving the brake levers!" or "These square-taper BB's sure suck; I sure wish someone would invent a plastic press-fit BB...yeah, that'd be the ticket!"
I never knew anyone who had complaints with their bicycles of any era. What I saw instead, was manufacturers coming out with new things, and then convincing consumers "why they need them". 100 years ago, businesses in the free market provided what consumers demanded. Then, starting with print media in the 1920's, and more so with the advent of TV in the 50's, marketing became all about "creating a need" for what you are selling. Google Edward Bernays, if you are not familiar (Sigmund Freud's nephew)....
On the older bikes, I never said to myself "Gee, I wish I had more gears!" Or "If only I could change gears by moving the brake levers!" or "These square-taper BB's sure suck; I sure wish someone would invent a plastic press-fit BB...yeah, that'd be the ticket!"
I never knew anyone who had complaints with their bicycles of any era. What I saw instead, was manufacturers coming out with new things, and then convincing consumers "why they need them". 100 years ago, businesses in the free market provided what consumers demanded. Then, starting with print media in the 1920's, and more so with the advent of TV in the 50's, marketing became all about "creating a need" for what you are selling. Google Edward Bernays, if you are not familiar (Sigmund Freud's nephew)....
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,248
Bikes: Kuota Ksano. Litespeed T5 gravel - brilliant!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I do enjoy my rides- whether riding my old Klein, or my '13 Venge....or [25 years ago] riding a department-store junker I resuscitated from a junk pile. But that's the thing- it's not about the equipment; it's about the ride and the rider.
On the older bikes, I never said to myself "Gee, I wish I had more gears!" Or "If only I could change gears by moving the brake levers!" or "These square-taper BB's sure suck; I sure wish someone would invent a plastic press-fit BB...yeah, that'd be the ticket!"
I never knew anyone who had complaints with their bicycles of any era. What I saw instead, was manufacturers coming out with new things, and then convincing consumers "why they need them". 100 years ago, businesses in the free market provided what consumers demanded. Then, starting with print media in the 1920's, and more so with the advent of TV in the 50's, marketing became all about "creating a need" for what you are selling. Google Edward Bernays, if you are not familiar (Sigmund Freud's nephew)....
On the older bikes, I never said to myself "Gee, I wish I had more gears!" Or "If only I could change gears by moving the brake levers!" or "These square-taper BB's sure suck; I sure wish someone would invent a plastic press-fit BB...yeah, that'd be the ticket!"
I never knew anyone who had complaints with their bicycles of any era. What I saw instead, was manufacturers coming out with new things, and then convincing consumers "why they need them". 100 years ago, businesses in the free market provided what consumers demanded. Then, starting with print media in the 1920's, and more so with the advent of TV in the 50's, marketing became all about "creating a need" for what you are selling. Google Edward Bernays, if you are not familiar (Sigmund Freud's nephew)....
Now, I would be willing to bet that you would prefer a manual transmission to an automatic if given a choice and were you interested in driving a car. It would mesh with the comment you made earlier about the "pinnacle of engineering". You might also disagree with the notion that a vehicle with a continuously variable transmission (no set gear ratios but a smooth continuum of ratios) offers any benefits whatsoever. Yet many car manufacturers, responding to a demand for better fuel economy from their cars, have adopted continuously variable transmissions for the vehicles they sell to satisfy the demand for efficiency.
A human body is similar to a car engine. Both tend to operate most efficiently at a particular level of effort. That is the reason behind the increase in demand for more ratios in both cars and bikes. The ability to tune the gearing smoothly between the motor, or cyclist, and the effort at which it operates most efficiently is the benefit that you are apparently unaware of or missing out because of poor technique.
#18
Old Fart
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348
Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Seriously, Cale. "Conspiracy theories"? You obviously know nothing about advertising/marketing. Why do you think it is that in ads, instead of touting the benefits/durability/etc of a product, as they used to, today they use "pretty" women; or images of very carefully chosen types of people having a good time and smiling, to sell a product? Ditto why some bike manufacturers spend a lot of money sponsoring racers.....
And yes, I do prefer a manual transmission, because of the level of control it offers; and because of it's durability. Many cars of 40-50 years ago, with a 4cyl. or straight 6 and a stick could get as good/better MPGs than todays so-called "economy cars", while being more durable and offering more room and cargo capacity. The CVT might get a mile or 2 MPG out of a small engine pulling around a small car- but it's disposable- and any modest savings in the cost of fuel are more than offset by the fact that when the tranny goes south long before the rest of the car wears out, you basically have to throw it out and buy a new one, for many thousands of dollars- or just junk the whole car. Such is very typical of today's mentality and false economy.
Don't tell me people are demanding CVTs- LOL- most people didn't even know what they were a year or two ago. I know plenty of people who want sticks, but can't get them.
And yes, I do prefer a manual transmission, because of the level of control it offers; and because of it's durability. Many cars of 40-50 years ago, with a 4cyl. or straight 6 and a stick could get as good/better MPGs than todays so-called "economy cars", while being more durable and offering more room and cargo capacity. The CVT might get a mile or 2 MPG out of a small engine pulling around a small car- but it's disposable- and any modest savings in the cost of fuel are more than offset by the fact that when the tranny goes south long before the rest of the car wears out, you basically have to throw it out and buy a new one, for many thousands of dollars- or just junk the whole car. Such is very typical of today's mentality and false economy.
Don't tell me people are demanding CVTs- LOL- most people didn't even know what they were a year or two ago. I know plenty of people who want sticks, but can't get them.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
i doubt if there is anything actually planned about the obsolescence (i understand it's just a common term and not to be taken literally, so no offense intended), anymore than a beagle with it's nose to the ground is planning on ending up anywhere in particular, it just follows the scent. the scent in this case is the sweet smell of money. and i pretty much agree with the rest of the post, i just removed it because it got in the way.
#21
Banned
There is a Requirement to have something new every year And the Corporations Making stuff a re competing with each other for attention ..
OTOH Companies like the German Rohloff they put the engineering in at the front , and just have done subtile changes that dont get Press
because its Not High profile Bike Racer stuff . with TV time and a Bunch of writers and bloggers which need something to do .. to promote it all .
even calling it Speeds is a fallacy.. its not like a Car tranny where all the gears are a sequence of increasing ratios ..
enjoy your kool-aide..
OTOH Companies like the German Rohloff they put the engineering in at the front , and just have done subtile changes that dont get Press
because its Not High profile Bike Racer stuff . with TV time and a Bunch of writers and bloggers which need something to do .. to promote it all .
even calling it Speeds is a fallacy.. its not like a Car tranny where all the gears are a sequence of increasing ratios ..
enjoy your kool-aide..
Last edited by fietsbob; 01-31-15 at 01:18 PM.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shanghai, West Virginia
Posts: 524
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
4 Posts
Da@n, Cale, I'm gonna' embroider that quote onto my underpants! It cuts through the paranoid crapola about the poor vulnerable consumer, bereft of a mind of his own.
#23
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
I think BikeSnobNYC hit the nail on the head with his theory of the "Retrogrouch Breaking Point" -- that each person finds for themselves the point at which newer technology doesn't impress them enough to use. Cog count is a great example, because as the percentage of change keeps going down (from 5 to 6 cogs was a 20% increase -- very handy; 10 to 11 was only 10% -- hmm, did it shift or not?)
But as long as the stuff works, there won't be much real pushback.
#24
DancesWithSUVs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Griffin Cycle Bethesda,MD
Posts: 6,983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The push for more gears in the back is for the pros who spend all day on their bike during a race. The more constant they can keep their cadence,the less energy they expend,and the better their chances at winning. The issue is when this starts to trickle down to the lower groupos used on bikes that are used for daily transportation. I wish the manufacturers would give more attention to the average rider than to the guy winning the TdF. Unfortunately,with all the money involved,I doubt it will happen.
__________________
C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 87
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have two bikes, one with an 8 speed internal shimano alfine, the other a single speed. Have no need to buy into the bazillion speed craze. In reality, on the alfine 8 speed I typically only use 3 of the 8. Less is more for me.