Trek DS 3 waterloo blue
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trek DS 3 waterloo blue
Thoughts on this color bike? Is it more of a girls color?
Last edited by Klaista2k; 06-16-17 at 02:03 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 97
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I had the Waterloo blue matte on a Marlin MTB which i picked up until I got my Giant ATX It isn't bad in person and I had several compliments/comments on the color. Looks like that one might be a gloss though but overall the color isn't bad.
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,204
Bikes: ...a few.
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2012 Post(s)
Liked 409 Times
in
235 Posts
No, not necessarily, but the fact that you asked if it was a girl's colour, and that you asked for an opinion on said colour tells me that you either have some insecurities about what others might think if you rode a bike with a colour that may me considered a girls' colour, or that you're very young and naive, or that you're all three.
No offence taken. Your statement reveals more about you than me.
No offence taken. Your statement reveals more about you than me.
#10
Mostly Harmless
When you drop a lot of cash on a bike, I don't think it is at all unreasonable to expect it to look great, color included.
I bought a new bike this week. My choices were narrowed down to a Giant Roam 1 and a Trek DS 3. I don't like the Trek black, but I found the Waterloo Blue to be slightly off putting. I wouldn't call it a girls only color, to me it looks baby blue. Not very attractive. But I thought that if I got the bike, I'd get used to it.
I ended up buying the Roam 1. The main reasons were cost and component quality versus the DS 3. Color was a reason, but it was the smallest part.
If I had an infinite palette to chose from the Charcoal with Lime Green accents of the Roam 1 is not what I would chose. But I do like the look of the Charcoal. It's a gray or almost a dark silver that doesn't look half bad. Purely my personal opinion, but I think it looks a lot better than Trek's Waterloo Blue.
I bought a new bike this week. My choices were narrowed down to a Giant Roam 1 and a Trek DS 3. I don't like the Trek black, but I found the Waterloo Blue to be slightly off putting. I wouldn't call it a girls only color, to me it looks baby blue. Not very attractive. But I thought that if I got the bike, I'd get used to it.
I ended up buying the Roam 1. The main reasons were cost and component quality versus the DS 3. Color was a reason, but it was the smallest part.
If I had an infinite palette to chose from the Charcoal with Lime Green accents of the Roam 1 is not what I would chose. But I do like the look of the Charcoal. It's a gray or almost a dark silver that doesn't look half bad. Purely my personal opinion, but I think it looks a lot better than Trek's Waterloo Blue.
#11
Newbie
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 4
Bikes: 2017 DS 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a Waterloo blue DS3 and it looks great in the sun. Nice metallic shimmer. But I understand young Millennials have alot of things to question about themselves theses days it seems. Hate for someone to assume your gender based on the shade of blue.
#12
Senior Member
#13
Senior Member
A study was done - you are more apt to ride a bike if you love the color.
It's top 2 reasons people buy a bike.
That said ; this color is badass.
It's top 2 reasons people buy a bike.
That said ; this color is badass.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 199
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
3 Posts
I like the color. I don't think it's a girls color. I just ordered the women's version in California sky blue which is a much more feminine color.
I don't think it's silly to worry about color. I wouldn't buy a car in a color I didn't like. I actually almost bought the Neko 1 because I liked the color better and it was closer to my budget.
I don't think it's silly to worry about color. I wouldn't buy a car in a color I didn't like. I actually almost bought the Neko 1 because I liked the color better and it was closer to my budget.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I agree...color makes a huge difference. I want to love looking at my bike. And I want to look good on it, too.
I think the Trek DS is a gender-neutral color, whereas the WS Trek posted after it is more of a gender-specific color. I like them both.
When I bought my Surly LHT, I didn't like 2009's color choices, so I had the bike shop switch all the components to a 2008 blue frame they had left over. So for a lot of us, color is important!
I think the Trek DS is a gender-neutral color, whereas the WS Trek posted after it is more of a gender-specific color. I like them both.
When I bought my Surly LHT, I didn't like 2009's color choices, so I had the bike shop switch all the components to a 2008 blue frame they had left over. So for a lot of us, color is important!
#17
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No, not necessarily, but the fact that you asked if it was a girl's colour, and that you asked for an opinion on said colour tells me that you either have some insecurities about what others might think if you rode a bike with a colour that may me considered a girls' colour, or that you're very young and naive, or that you're all three.
No offence taken. Your statement reveals more about you than me.
No offence taken. Your statement reveals more about you than me.
#18
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
When you drop a lot of cash on a bike, I don't think it is at all unreasonable to expect it to look great, color included.
I bought a new bike this week. My choices were narrowed down to a Giant Roam 1 and a Trek DS 3. I don't like the Trek black, but I found the Waterloo Blue to be slightly off putting. I wouldn't call it a girls only color, to me it looks baby blue. Not very attractive. But I thought that if I got the bike, I'd get used to it.
I ended up buying the Roam 1. The main reasons were cost and component quality versus the DS 3. Color was a reason, but it was the smallest part.
If I had an infinite palette to chose from the Charcoal with Lime Green accents of the Roam 1 is not what I would chose. But I do like the look of the Charcoal. It's a gray or almost a dark silver that doesn't look half bad. Purely my personal opinion, but I think it looks a lot better than Trek's Waterloo Blue.
I bought a new bike this week. My choices were narrowed down to a Giant Roam 1 and a Trek DS 3. I don't like the Trek black, but I found the Waterloo Blue to be slightly off putting. I wouldn't call it a girls only color, to me it looks baby blue. Not very attractive. But I thought that if I got the bike, I'd get used to it.
I ended up buying the Roam 1. The main reasons were cost and component quality versus the DS 3. Color was a reason, but it was the smallest part.
If I had an infinite palette to chose from the Charcoal with Lime Green accents of the Roam 1 is not what I would chose. But I do like the look of the Charcoal. It's a gray or almost a dark silver that doesn't look half bad. Purely my personal opinion, but I think it looks a lot better than Trek's Waterloo Blue.
Did you consider the Trek DS 4 at all? I'm curious how the Roam 1 and DS 4 compare.
Last edited by Klaista2k; 06-19-17 at 12:01 AM.
#19
Mostly Harmless
I've had only one disappointment with the Roam. I'm short, at 5' 6", so I had to buy a size small frame. On my Roam, there is only one set of water bottle attachment lugs, not two sets as pictured on the Giant website. I'd guess that this is a common feature of small size frames.
I did not consider the Trek DS 4. The DS 4 is no doubt excellent. But it is priced well above what I'm willing to spend (I got my Roam 1 for $700).
The retail price of DS 4 is $1,150 versus $820 retail for the Roam 1. A $330 difference, the DS 4 is 40% higher than the Roam 1. At that price point, of course the DS 4 is a lot better than the Roam 1.
For a fair comparison, you'd compare the retail prices of the $880 DS 3 to the $820 Roam 1. The Roam 1 is $60 cheaper but still has substantially better drive components.
The DS 3 does have a few features that the Roam 1 lacks. Biggest by far is the tubeless ready rims. Two others are in frame cable routing, and remote (handlebar) control of the suspension fork lock out.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Missbumble
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
13
12-05-09 11:15 AM