Gas prices bust budgets for poor!
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,248
Bikes: This list got too long: several ‘bents, an urban utility e-bike, and a dahon D7 that my daughter has absconded with.
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 363 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times
in
48 Posts
Originally Posted by acroy
I honestly lean towards the belief that there is no excuse, no reason, for an able-bodied person to be poor. I know first-hand in my and my peer's jobs: companies have a hard time attacting and keeping good mid-paid people ($12-17/hr). All they really need to do is be reliable, just show up: no special skills needed! Yet the job market must be really good, cause they get bored after a few weeks, quit showing up, don't bother to call in... and get on "unemployment" till it runs out.
I don't give a tiny little rat's rear what your color is, where you used to live, what you watch on tv, what kind of accent you speak with, who you vote for; all I want is for you to show up on time and drive the dang forklift safely. In other words: to do the job you're getting paid for!
We have an epidemic of Laziness in this country. And a scarsity of personal responsibility, imho.
I don't give a tiny little rat's rear what your color is, where you used to live, what you watch on tv, what kind of accent you speak with, who you vote for; all I want is for you to show up on time and drive the dang forklift safely. In other words: to do the job you're getting paid for!
We have an epidemic of Laziness in this country. And a scarsity of personal responsibility, imho.
The facts are that when I return to the US I do not see things looking any better than they did when I left; and yes, I do regularly check the job and EDD websites. The jobs are just not there.
#52
Fattest Thin Man
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Directly above the center of the earth
Posts: 2,648
Bikes: Miyata 610, Vinco V, Rocky Mountain Element
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
It's true that it seems like people don't like to work. And it's true that companies aren't interested in keeping good employees (at sub $10 an hour level). So which came first? And who is going to be the first one to stop?
I'm semi retired and used to own a couple of my own businesses. It was always hard to find people that would show up, do what they said they would do, and get it right the first time. When I found people like that, I would do just about anything I could to keep them.
Now I'm working part time in retail, mainly for something to do. I started in management, but the corporate entity simply wasn't interested in giving me any ability to reward good employees. (Or do any real management, for that matter) Their attitude is simply "there's lots more where they came from". Now I'm part time, and a lot happier not to have to deal with the responsibility and the issues. Funny things is, I'm always on time, rarely miss any days (at least without a lot of advance notice) willing to fill in for people that don't show up on my day off, (a very common occurence) and even help out management by taking on some responsibilities that are not normally handled by non management employees, like opening/closing, inventory and training. And yet, when my yearly raise came around I was offered $0.18 an hour. Does that make sense?
With that kind of attitude it's pretty easy to see why employees don't care about thier jobs. There's no future in sticking with something like that.
And to stay on topic, I ride my bike to work every day that I can.
Az
I'm semi retired and used to own a couple of my own businesses. It was always hard to find people that would show up, do what they said they would do, and get it right the first time. When I found people like that, I would do just about anything I could to keep them.
Now I'm working part time in retail, mainly for something to do. I started in management, but the corporate entity simply wasn't interested in giving me any ability to reward good employees. (Or do any real management, for that matter) Their attitude is simply "there's lots more where they came from". Now I'm part time, and a lot happier not to have to deal with the responsibility and the issues. Funny things is, I'm always on time, rarely miss any days (at least without a lot of advance notice) willing to fill in for people that don't show up on my day off, (a very common occurence) and even help out management by taking on some responsibilities that are not normally handled by non management employees, like opening/closing, inventory and training. And yet, when my yearly raise came around I was offered $0.18 an hour. Does that make sense?
With that kind of attitude it's pretty easy to see why employees don't care about thier jobs. There's no future in sticking with something like that.
And to stay on topic, I ride my bike to work every day that I can.
Az
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Dahon.Steve
Agreed.
My post was not ment to attack the poor. The individual has hijacked my thread and hurled insults while offering no real solutions. Maybe he really believes the poor are doomed to live with costly motorized transport the rest of their lives.
I happen to believe there are solutions and it can be hard or easy. It depends on the circumstances.
My post was not ment to attack the poor. The individual has hijacked my thread and hurled insults while offering no real solutions. Maybe he really believes the poor are doomed to live with costly motorized transport the rest of their lives.
I happen to believe there are solutions and it can be hard or easy. It depends on the circumstances.
I've already explained myself, at length. I offer no "solutions" because I'm not an idiot, I've got enough neurons firing to realize the problem of the poor being squeezed by gas prices is a systemic, institutional one. I've already said, more than once, that I can't speak for the women in the article, and in fact I can't speak for any specific person getting squeezed. Of course they may be idiots, or course they may be lazy, of course they may be able to work closer to home, etc. My point is, again, that it is ridiculous, asinine, insulting, and fairly disgusting to look at problems in this country and effectively say, "These people are stupid. All they have to do is be like me." Which is where this thread quickly went, which is where the car-free forum often goes. Which, hell, is where lots of people go all the time.
But I hijacked your thread. Because I didn't jump in to say "yeah, those people are stupid for not being more like us"? I don't get it. I've been on topic, the thing is I just think you and others here, are completely wrong. And, even though I've explained this in painful detail, I guess I have to point it out again... not wrong in that those people in the article, or people in general may be lazy or stupid or may be able to live closer to work, etc., not wrong in that regard. That's just the particulars, and it's silly to say you're wrong because I don't know if you are- but more importantly, you don't know if you're right, so it just kind of makes it all pointless. You're wrong on a more basic level. Acroy and maddyfish and the other guy who hates taxes are wrong on an even more fundamental level, but they're pretty similar. You're wrong thinking societal problems are right now and individual. You're wrong thinking solutions for societal problems- and the price of gas severly effecting large numbers of people is one- are individual problems, personal lifestyle problems. Acroy and maddyfish are more deeply wrong in that they think societal problems are not only purely individual, but they are the manifestations of individual problems... sort of like, a labor or employment problem is a gestalt entity made up of a nation of lazy, stupid people. Basically they're wrong for not thinking there's anything outside their own experience that could possibly make any difference to their personal conclusions. You're all wrong for realistically not being able to distinguish between the individual and societal.
I'm sorry, some things I just can't be kind and accomodating any more. Life's too short to not say to a guy who... just an example, thinks taxes for public education is theft and he doens't like educating other people's children that, "You're an utter fool. It's not about you or your neighbor's kid or even if that kid does well or not, it's about maintenence of the republic, it's about a nation creating a context for it's people in which potential can most easily grow. It's not a dollar out of your pocket, it's a man on the moon." Some things are too important to *****foot around.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Az B
It's true that it seems like people don't like to work. And it's true that companies aren't interested in keeping good employees (at sub $10 an hour level). So which came first? And who is going to be the first one to stop?
I'm semi retired and used to own a couple of my own businesses. It was always hard to find people that would show up, do what they said they would do, and get it right the first time. When I found people like that, I would do just about anything I could to keep them.
Now I'm working part time in retail, mainly for something to do. I started in management, but the corporate entity simply wasn't interested in giving me any ability to reward good employees. (Or do any real management, for that matter) Their attitude is simply "there's lots more where they came from". Now I'm part time, and a lot happier not to have to deal with the responsibility and the issues. Funny things is, I'm always on time, rarely miss any days (at least without a lot of advance notice) willing to fill in for people that don't show up on my day off, (a very common occurence) and even help out management by taking on some responsibilities that are not normally handled by non management employees, like opening/closing, inventory and training. And yet, when my yearly raise came around I was offered $0.18 an hour. Does that make sense?
With that kind of attitude it's pretty easy to see why employees don't care about thier jobs. There's no future in sticking with something like that.
And to stay on topic, I ride my bike to work every day that I can.
Az
I'm semi retired and used to own a couple of my own businesses. It was always hard to find people that would show up, do what they said they would do, and get it right the first time. When I found people like that, I would do just about anything I could to keep them.
Now I'm working part time in retail, mainly for something to do. I started in management, but the corporate entity simply wasn't interested in giving me any ability to reward good employees. (Or do any real management, for that matter) Their attitude is simply "there's lots more where they came from". Now I'm part time, and a lot happier not to have to deal with the responsibility and the issues. Funny things is, I'm always on time, rarely miss any days (at least without a lot of advance notice) willing to fill in for people that don't show up on my day off, (a very common occurence) and even help out management by taking on some responsibilities that are not normally handled by non management employees, like opening/closing, inventory and training. And yet, when my yearly raise came around I was offered $0.18 an hour. Does that make sense?
With that kind of attitude it's pretty easy to see why employees don't care about thier jobs. There's no future in sticking with something like that.
And to stay on topic, I ride my bike to work every day that I can.
Az
Those kinds of jobs, and the service industry is I believe the largest segment of employers, reward incompetence. Failing to reward hard work or knowledge or whatever else is the same thing as rewarding incompetance (not the sort in my sig. btw). A slack-jawed drooler gets paid the same and treated the same- by the company- as a smart go-getter. This is why if you're in LA and you go into a department store, the last thing you ever, ever want to do is ask someone for help. We're talking barely conscious people. And every large retailer follows the low-pay, few-promotions, no-benefits, high-turnover model any more. REI used to be great. They opened a new on in Santa Monica and the bike mechanic didn't even know how a crankset worked, basically. I asked him if this park BB remover tool fit all shimano bb's or if there was a different standard for say, their newer octalink bb's and square-taper bb's (I didn't know at the time). He told me it was only for splined cranksets because the notches around the tool fit into the splines of the crankset. I said, 'this is to remove a bottom bracket'. He said, 'yeah, and these splines mate with the spines on the crankset, so it only works for splined cranksets.'
He's still the head mechanic. Why? Don't matter if he doesn't know what he's talking about, all they need is meat to fill the shoes.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
#55
Sophomoric Member
If you've always had a good education and opportunities for a good income, it's almost impossible to comprehend the trap that poverty represents.
For example, those who say "just move" just don't get it. First, truly poor people (disabled or making less than say $12 at a full-time job) are often forced to live in subsidized housing. That means they really can't afford to move some place else. There are usually waiting lists for public housing, and you're forced to live where they put you. Second, to move is expensive. First and last month, security deposit, plus the moving expenses themselves. A poor person is unable to save a couple grand to move. Third, if you're poor you know that the only way out for your kids is to get them a good education. In many parts of the country that means you must live in a suburb, because urban schools are just plain terrible.
You know, no matter how hard people try, a number of people are going to HAVE to take the low-paying jobs, a number are going to HAVE to be unemployed, a number are going to HAVE to suffer with disabling conditions. And yes, looking at distribution principles, a number are going to HAVE to possess less than average intelligence.
If you're too cheap to pay to help these unfortunate people, fine. That's between you and God. But at least don't fall into the cheap thinking that they deserve what happens to them, or that it's their own fault. That's adding stupidity to your innate lack of compassion.
For example, those who say "just move" just don't get it. First, truly poor people (disabled or making less than say $12 at a full-time job) are often forced to live in subsidized housing. That means they really can't afford to move some place else. There are usually waiting lists for public housing, and you're forced to live where they put you. Second, to move is expensive. First and last month, security deposit, plus the moving expenses themselves. A poor person is unable to save a couple grand to move. Third, if you're poor you know that the only way out for your kids is to get them a good education. In many parts of the country that means you must live in a suburb, because urban schools are just plain terrible.
You know, no matter how hard people try, a number of people are going to HAVE to take the low-paying jobs, a number are going to HAVE to be unemployed, a number are going to HAVE to suffer with disabling conditions. And yes, looking at distribution principles, a number are going to HAVE to possess less than average intelligence.
If you're too cheap to pay to help these unfortunate people, fine. That's between you and God. But at least don't fall into the cheap thinking that they deserve what happens to them, or that it's their own fault. That's adding stupidity to your innate lack of compassion.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#56
Sophomoric Member
Originally Posted by acroy
Personally, I have a real problem with how Diet Coke makes me FAT. I drink it all the time, and can't get rid of the last 10lbs!
j/k , though identifying Causality when it comes to race & economic background may be a fool's errand, due to the politically & emotionally explosive nature of the beast
I honestly lean towards the belief that there is no excuse, no reason, for an able-bodied person to be poor. I know first-hand in my and my peer's jobs: companies have a hard time attacting and keeping good mid-paid people ($12-17/hr). All they really need to do is be reliable, just show up: no special skills needed! Yet the job market must be really good, cause they get bored after a few weeks, quit showing up, don't bother to call in... and get on "unemployment" till it runs out.
I don't give a tiny little rat's rear what your color is, where you used to live, what you watch on tv, what kind of accent you speak with, who you vote for; all I want is for you to show up on time and drive the dang forklift safely. In other words: to do the job you're getting paid for!
We have an epidemic of Laziness in this country. And a scarsity of personal responsibility, imho.
j/k , though identifying Causality when it comes to race & economic background may be a fool's errand, due to the politically & emotionally explosive nature of the beast
I honestly lean towards the belief that there is no excuse, no reason, for an able-bodied person to be poor. I know first-hand in my and my peer's jobs: companies have a hard time attacting and keeping good mid-paid people ($12-17/hr). All they really need to do is be reliable, just show up: no special skills needed! Yet the job market must be really good, cause they get bored after a few weeks, quit showing up, don't bother to call in... and get on "unemployment" till it runs out.
I don't give a tiny little rat's rear what your color is, where you used to live, what you watch on tv, what kind of accent you speak with, who you vote for; all I want is for you to show up on time and drive the dang forklift safely. In other words: to do the job you're getting paid for!
We have an epidemic of Laziness in this country. And a scarsity of personal responsibility, imho.
The simple fact that low-paying jobs exist, and somebody will get stuck doing these jobs. I'm glad I was lucky enough that it wasn't me! Half of the population is "below average" when it comes to abilities, but people should not be forced into jobs that don't pay enough to support a family. Also, remember that the nation's largest employer is Walmart, and that explains a lot. Like Walmart, many large retail employers don't offer full-time schedules, and most don't offer adequate health benefits. If you break your collar bone riding your bike, you get fired, and you have no way to pay for your health care. You enter that poverty trap, and it is very difficult to escape.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#57
Plays in Traffic
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 484
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dahon.Steve
>>>>Single mom Esther Guzman is used to juggling her family finances. But lately, it's gotten harder to make ends meet. The 38-year-old mother of four's monthly gasoline bill has jumped to more than $300. Guzman, of Monmouth Junction, N.J., makes $11 an hour helping others apply for low-income energy aid, and receives $400 a month in child support<<<<<
This is insanity.
Wonder how far she drives her suv - you do know that anytime there's even the remote possibility of having more than two people in a vehicle in the next 7 years the purchase of a SUV is mandatory, right?
At the moment, our little car burns through about 110L/month.
Biking - it's a beautiful thing.
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dallas Suburbpopolis
Posts: 1,502
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by TimJ
I love the criticism of "offers no real solutions". That is fantastic. Like you've published a whitepaper by using three women in an article aw a springboard to repeat the car-free montra. Is there anything in the world "move closer to work, work closer to home, ride a bike" isn't a quick and easy solution to? You've practically founded another Brookings Institution by trotting that out one more time.
I've already explained myself, at length. I offer no "solutions" because I'm not an idiot, I've got enough neurons firing to realize the problem of the poor being squeezed by gas prices is a systemic, institutional one. I've already said, more than once, that I can't speak for the women in the article, and in fact I can't speak for any specific person getting squeezed. Of course they may be idiots, or course they may be lazy, of course they may be able to work closer to home, etc. My point is, again, that it is ridiculous, asinine, insulting, and fairly disgusting to look at problems in this country and effectively say, "These people are stupid. All they have to do is be like me." Which is where this thread quickly went, which is where the car-free forum often goes. Which, hell, is where lots of people go all the time.
But I hijacked your thread. Because I didn't jump in to say "yeah, those people are stupid for not being more like us"? I don't get it. I've been on topic, the thing is I just think you and others here, are completely wrong. And, even though I've explained this in painful detail, I guess I have to point it out again... not wrong in that those people in the article, or people in general may be lazy or stupid or may be able to live closer to work, etc., not wrong in that regard. That's just the particulars, and it's silly to say you're wrong because I don't know if you are- but more importantly, you don't know if you're right, so it just kind of makes it all pointless. You're wrong on a more basic level. Acroy and maddyfish and the other guy who hates taxes are wrong on an even more fundamental level, but they're pretty similar. You're wrong thinking societal problems are right now and individual. You're wrong thinking solutions for societal problems- and the price of gas severly effecting large numbers of people is one- are individual problems, personal lifestyle problems. Acroy and maddyfish are more deeply wrong in that they think societal problems are not only purely individual, but they are the manifestations of individual problems... sort of like, a labor or employment problem is a gestalt entity made up of a nation of lazy, stupid people. Basically they're wrong for not thinking there's anything outside their own experience that could possibly make any difference to their personal conclusions. You're all wrong for realistically not being able to distinguish between the individual and societal.
I'm sorry, some things I just can't be kind and accomodating any more. Life's too short to not say to a guy who... just an example, thinks taxes for public education is theft and he doens't like educating other people's children that, "You're an utter fool. It's not about you or your neighbor's kid or even if that kid does well or not, it's about maintenence of the republic, it's about a nation creating a context for it's people in which potential can most easily grow. It's not a dollar out of your pocket, it's a man on the moon." Some things are too important to *****foot around.
I've already explained myself, at length. I offer no "solutions" because I'm not an idiot, I've got enough neurons firing to realize the problem of the poor being squeezed by gas prices is a systemic, institutional one. I've already said, more than once, that I can't speak for the women in the article, and in fact I can't speak for any specific person getting squeezed. Of course they may be idiots, or course they may be lazy, of course they may be able to work closer to home, etc. My point is, again, that it is ridiculous, asinine, insulting, and fairly disgusting to look at problems in this country and effectively say, "These people are stupid. All they have to do is be like me." Which is where this thread quickly went, which is where the car-free forum often goes. Which, hell, is where lots of people go all the time.
But I hijacked your thread. Because I didn't jump in to say "yeah, those people are stupid for not being more like us"? I don't get it. I've been on topic, the thing is I just think you and others here, are completely wrong. And, even though I've explained this in painful detail, I guess I have to point it out again... not wrong in that those people in the article, or people in general may be lazy or stupid or may be able to live closer to work, etc., not wrong in that regard. That's just the particulars, and it's silly to say you're wrong because I don't know if you are- but more importantly, you don't know if you're right, so it just kind of makes it all pointless. You're wrong on a more basic level. Acroy and maddyfish and the other guy who hates taxes are wrong on an even more fundamental level, but they're pretty similar. You're wrong thinking societal problems are right now and individual. You're wrong thinking solutions for societal problems- and the price of gas severly effecting large numbers of people is one- are individual problems, personal lifestyle problems. Acroy and maddyfish are more deeply wrong in that they think societal problems are not only purely individual, but they are the manifestations of individual problems... sort of like, a labor or employment problem is a gestalt entity made up of a nation of lazy, stupid people. Basically they're wrong for not thinking there's anything outside their own experience that could possibly make any difference to their personal conclusions. You're all wrong for realistically not being able to distinguish between the individual and societal.
I'm sorry, some things I just can't be kind and accomodating any more. Life's too short to not say to a guy who... just an example, thinks taxes for public education is theft and he doens't like educating other people's children that, "You're an utter fool. It's not about you or your neighbor's kid or even if that kid does well or not, it's about maintenence of the republic, it's about a nation creating a context for it's people in which potential can most easily grow. It's not a dollar out of your pocket, it's a man on the moon." Some things are too important to *****foot around.
You have labeled those who disagree or question you as "wrong on a basic level", "utter fool", and "small-minded"! "I'm sorry, some things I just can't be kind and accomodating any more". You are very clear that you consider your opinion on the matter to be so very superior , that you will no longer discuss it! I would say, sir, that you are the small-minded, because I at least wish to debate.
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 384
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by acroy
This is not discussion, your posts are largely pollution. You make no friends and influence no people by throwing mud, and rabidly attacking the OP as above. I assume you are taking the time to write in such length and detail because you hope to influence others on this board. Please start showing enough maturity to debate in a reasonable manner. This is doing the forums no credit.
You have labeled those who disagree or question you as "wrong on a basic level", "utter fool", and "small-minded"! "I'm sorry, some things I just can't be kind and accomodating any more". You are very clear that you consider your opinion on the matter to be so very superior , that you will no longer discuss it! I would say, sir, that you are the small-minded, because I at least wish to debate.
You have labeled those who disagree or question you as "wrong on a basic level", "utter fool", and "small-minded"! "I'm sorry, some things I just can't be kind and accomodating any more". You are very clear that you consider your opinion on the matter to be so very superior , that you will no longer discuss it! I would say, sir, that you are the small-minded, because I at least wish to debate.
#60
Mistadobalina
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Clairemont
Posts: 577
Bikes: Trek Speed Concept Flo wheelset
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by acroy
Sorry, but my personal experience disproves it.
We have a glut of jobs, not enough people to fill them. A job requires work, and no matter what, there's some folks who would rather be taken care of at a bare minimum level than go to that extreme.
I am sure there are exceptions to every rule. But they are exceptions, not the rule.
I commute through the small poor area of this town every day. my schedule is sporadic: sometimes i go home at 2pm, sometimes 10pm. No matter what, if the weather is nice, there are a lot of obviously able-bodied people lounging around, not looking for work.
My cleaning crew has a terrible time retaining people, apaprently for a lot of the $7/hr crowd, 15hrs a week is just too much. Some of these folks are 30ish, able, guys living with their parents, nothing better to do than watch tv.
Maybe I have been poisoned. But so far my personal experiences have re-enforced the notion that no matter how cynical I become, i can't keep up.
Don't get me wrong, I wish all these people well, I just resent that most plans attempting to help the poor require me to help pay for it....
We have a glut of jobs, not enough people to fill them. A job requires work, and no matter what, there's some folks who would rather be taken care of at a bare minimum level than go to that extreme.
I am sure there are exceptions to every rule. But they are exceptions, not the rule.
I commute through the small poor area of this town every day. my schedule is sporadic: sometimes i go home at 2pm, sometimes 10pm. No matter what, if the weather is nice, there are a lot of obviously able-bodied people lounging around, not looking for work.
My cleaning crew has a terrible time retaining people, apaprently for a lot of the $7/hr crowd, 15hrs a week is just too much. Some of these folks are 30ish, able, guys living with their parents, nothing better to do than watch tv.
Maybe I have been poisoned. But so far my personal experiences have re-enforced the notion that no matter how cynical I become, i can't keep up.
Don't get me wrong, I wish all these people well, I just resent that most plans attempting to help the poor require me to help pay for it....
He guessed that it was the fear of the unknown that keeps people from moving on. The rational that it could always be worse.
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dallas Suburbpopolis
Posts: 1,502
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by AGGRO
I work with a guy from Africa here with a green card. We are both Software Engineers. Anyway, he's lived all over Europe and the US and he constantly re-iterates how lazy people are here and is amazed at the levels of poverty people will deal with without moving on to find better living conditions. He said he sees it back in Africa too but not as bad as what he has seen here.
He guessed that it was the fear of the unknown that keeps people from moving on. The rational that it could always be worse.
He guessed that it was the fear of the unknown that keeps people from moving on. The rational that it could always be worse.
Their comments re-enforce your point; many, many people here are LAZY!
We are fortunate in that we are a rich enough society that you can get away with being VERY lazy and still not go hungry, not freeze...
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by acroy
This is not discussion, your posts are largely pollution. You make no friends and influence no people by throwing mud, and rabidly attacking the OP as above. I assume you are taking the time to write in such length and detail because you hope to influence others on this board. Please start showing enough maturity to debate in a reasonable manner. This is doing the forums no credit.
You have labeled those who disagree or question you as "wrong on a basic level", "utter fool", and "small-minded"! "I'm sorry, some things I just can't be kind and accomodating any more". You are very clear that you consider your opinion on the matter to be so very superior , that you will no longer discuss it! I would say, sir, that you are the small-minded, because I at least wish to debate.
You have labeled those who disagree or question you as "wrong on a basic level", "utter fool", and "small-minded"! "I'm sorry, some things I just can't be kind and accomodating any more". You are very clear that you consider your opinion on the matter to be so very superior , that you will no longer discuss it! I would say, sir, that you are the small-minded, because I at least wish to debate.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dallas Suburbpopolis
Posts: 1,502
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by Dahon.Steve
The real solution requires breaking away from the motorcar lifestyle once and for all.
this country's current society & infrastructure was built on the assumption of cheap gas.
Before then, only the "rich" had horses and were able to "commute" to work! The rest of the poor schmucks had to live within walking distance of work!
As soon as gas got cheap, and Mr Ford started selling Model T's, the current situation started to evolve.
If and when it gets expensive, things will change again... it may be painful, much more so than what we see now.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
Most of the poor are not able-bodied adults. Most have a disability, physical or mental, that makes it hard or even impossible for them to work.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
#65
.³
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vulpes
I, for one find TimJ's posts insightful, informative and to the point. He seems to be far better informed and far more thoughtful and analytical than the vast majority. The only part he and I don't see eye to eye on is the federalist Libertarian slant. And that is only because my orientation is closer to Marxism than anything else. IMO, the systematic and institutional problems that TimJ so skilfully elucidates are a direct consequence of organizing society for production for profit. I don't think these problems CAN be fixed, because they are part and parcel of the system itself. The only way to fix these problems and many others, is to replace the current system of production for profit with a system based on democratically controlled production for use.
As for the original USAToday article, it's obvious (as someone pointed out earlier) that they were going for the most extreme examples possible -- I mean come on Tuscumbia, AL?! Population 7800, whose main claim to fame is the Helen Keller Museum? Yeah.
Anyway, what TimJ and I think Roody touched on are correct; it's no easy task to get up & make an instant life change when you have various issues that range from screwed up family history, lack of financial acumen to functional illiteracy (among a ton of others) to contend with. I'm not saying folks are all victims by any means, however I know from being around many individuals in this category that we can't always look at life through our own little perspective.
Oh yeah, to the guy talking about $19-$20 jobs no one wants, how about you post a link or something if it's a national company? I know quite a few people that would be up for it. A lot of you all are under the false impression that everyone knows that your job (or any other job you know of) is hiring and that people just don't want 'em.....or maybe the job just sucks.
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by AGGRO
I work with a guy from Africa here with a green card. We are both Software Engineers. Anyway, he's lived all over Europe and the US and he constantly re-iterates how lazy people are here and is amazed at the levels of poverty people will deal with without moving on to find better living conditions. He said he sees it back in Africa too but not as bad as what he has seen here.
He guessed that it was the fear of the unknown that keeps people from moving on. The rational that it could always be worse.
He guessed that it was the fear of the unknown that keeps people from moving on. The rational that it could always be worse.
Yeah, I agree, Americans aren't generally like that. But there's laziness and there's being an American. I thought, growing up, that America was about potential. I think it has been, off and on, but more so than anything now it's just a place to make a buck. I don't make a lot of money, probably because a lot of my energy, as much as I can muster, goes to writing and filmmaking and stuff like that. Am I lazy for not working my ass off, pursuing more money? To your friend I probably am. To a bunch of people I probably am. Personally I wish I had the balls to be even "lazier" so I could devote more time to what I love to do. I used to feel that's what this country was about, but more and more, especially as art becomes more and more commodified, I feel the answer is "no".
USA: Taxation is theft because the only important thing is wealth.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by vulpes
I, for one find TimJ's posts insightful, informative and to the point. He seems to be far better informed and far more thoughtful and analytical than the vast majority. The only part he and I don't see eye to eye on is the federalist Libertarian slant.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
#68
Conservative Hippie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wakulla Co. FL
Posts: 4,271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Everyone has to make certain choices in how they are going to live their lives.
I chose to locate where I am primarily for the fishing and outdoors. When my house got knocked down by the high water from Hurricane Dennis two years ago, the week before we were to move in, we chose a place 10 miles up the road. Because of my choices I have several excellent places to fish, both freshwater and inshore saltwater, canoeing/kayaking, hunting, swimming, golf, the job I chose after moving in, etc., all within bicycle distance, which means any of it can cost me as little as nothing per trip.
I set up my life to support what is important to me. Obviously the people refered to in the OP set up their lives on the false premise of always having a car and cheap fuel. They can make the choices to set up their lives to support what is important to them, just like I did, but they have to want to do this. That is the problem. Most people don't want to make choices, particularly not if the choices involve having to make a sacrifice.
I am a firm believer that people set themselves up to induce their own problems.
I chose to locate where I am primarily for the fishing and outdoors. When my house got knocked down by the high water from Hurricane Dennis two years ago, the week before we were to move in, we chose a place 10 miles up the road. Because of my choices I have several excellent places to fish, both freshwater and inshore saltwater, canoeing/kayaking, hunting, swimming, golf, the job I chose after moving in, etc., all within bicycle distance, which means any of it can cost me as little as nothing per trip.
I set up my life to support what is important to me. Obviously the people refered to in the OP set up their lives on the false premise of always having a car and cheap fuel. They can make the choices to set up their lives to support what is important to them, just like I did, but they have to want to do this. That is the problem. Most people don't want to make choices, particularly not if the choices involve having to make a sacrifice.
I am a firm believer that people set themselves up to induce their own problems.
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 384
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TimJ
Me? I'm federalist libertarian? I think libertarian is french for dumbass.
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by CommuterRun
Everyone has to make certain choices in how they are going to live their lives.
I chose to locate where I am primarily for the fishing and outdoors. When my house got knocked down by the high water from Hurricane Dennis two years ago, the week before we were to move in, we chose a place 10 miles up the road. Because of my choices I have several excellent places to fish, both freshwater and inshore saltwater, canoeing/kayaking, hunting, swimming, golf, the job I chose after moving in, etc., all within bicycle distance, which means any of it can cost me as little as nothing per trip.
I set up my life to support what is important to me. Obviously the people refered to in the OP set up their lives on the false premise of always having a car and cheap fuel. They can make the choices to set up their lives to support what is important to them, just like I did, but they have to want to do this. That is the problem. Most people don't want to make choices, particularly not if the choices involve having to make a sacrifice.
I am a firm believer that people set themselves up to induce their own problems.
I chose to locate where I am primarily for the fishing and outdoors. When my house got knocked down by the high water from Hurricane Dennis two years ago, the week before we were to move in, we chose a place 10 miles up the road. Because of my choices I have several excellent places to fish, both freshwater and inshore saltwater, canoeing/kayaking, hunting, swimming, golf, the job I chose after moving in, etc., all within bicycle distance, which means any of it can cost me as little as nothing per trip.
I set up my life to support what is important to me. Obviously the people refered to in the OP set up their lives on the false premise of always having a car and cheap fuel. They can make the choices to set up their lives to support what is important to them, just like I did, but they have to want to do this. That is the problem. Most people don't want to make choices, particularly not if the choices involve having to make a sacrifice.
I am a firm believer that people set themselves up to induce their own problems.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I too am sick of the news reports of people *****ing about gas prices while standing in front of a shiny new Navigator or F-350 Turbo. Maybe they have to own these cars and live 50 miles from work, I don't know, I don't care. It boggles my mind that they or the TV station think that I care.
Life is a series of choices, and the consequences of those choices. People who think otherwise and want to get something for nothing drive me up the wall.
I will strongly oppose any effort to use my tax dollars to support people making decisions for which they don't want to be held accountable. People should be forced to make a decision to adapt in one way or another.
It is a shame that the poor are feeling a squeeze at the gas pump. But I can't help but notice every time I ride the bus to work instead of bike, that it is cramed full of people who have found a way to work and live without using a car for commuting...
Life is a series of choices, and the consequences of those choices. People who think otherwise and want to get something for nothing drive me up the wall.
I will strongly oppose any effort to use my tax dollars to support people making decisions for which they don't want to be held accountable. People should be forced to make a decision to adapt in one way or another.
It is a shame that the poor are feeling a squeeze at the gas pump. But I can't help but notice every time I ride the bus to work instead of bike, that it is cramed full of people who have found a way to work and live without using a car for commuting...
#72
Conservative Hippie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wakulla Co. FL
Posts: 4,271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TimJ
We're all heros, in our own little ways.
I actually make very little money, but am very wealthy. I made these choices and set my life up the way I want to live it, in a manner that I can support. Therefore, I speak from experience. Anybody can do it, it's not rocket science.
I'd just about bet money that nobody told Mitzi she has to live 66 miles from her work, and nobody told Ester she has to spend $300+/month for gas. These are choices that they made on their own as responsible adults. Now they have to pay for their choices, but do they take the responsibility of making the decisions to make the changes to their lifestyle? To a lifestyle they can support? I don't know, maybe they did, but most people in this country and that situation wouldn't. Most of these people that whine and cry to the media about how poor and downtrodden they are, are merely victims of their own apathy.
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,959
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by CommuterRun
Well, the point is (can't believe I have to explain this) that if I can do it, anyone can.
I actually make very little money, but am very wealthy. I made these choices and set my life up the way I want to live it, in a manner that I can support. Therefore, I speak from experience. Anybody can do it, it's not rocket science.
I'd just about bet money that nobody told Mitzi she has to live 66 miles from her work, and nobody told Ester she has to spend $300+/month for gas. These are choices that they made on their own as responsible adults. Now they have to pay for their choices, but do they take the responsibility of making the decisions to make the changes to their lifestyle? To a lifestyle they can support? I don't know, maybe they did, but most people in this country and that situation wouldn't. Most of these people that whine and cry to the media about how poor and downtrodden they are, are merely victims of their own apathy.
I actually make very little money, but am very wealthy. I made these choices and set my life up the way I want to live it, in a manner that I can support. Therefore, I speak from experience. Anybody can do it, it's not rocket science.
I'd just about bet money that nobody told Mitzi she has to live 66 miles from her work, and nobody told Ester she has to spend $300+/month for gas. These are choices that they made on their own as responsible adults. Now they have to pay for their choices, but do they take the responsibility of making the decisions to make the changes to their lifestyle? To a lifestyle they can support? I don't know, maybe they did, but most people in this country and that situation wouldn't. Most of these people that whine and cry to the media about how poor and downtrodden they are, are merely victims of their own apathy.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
#74
Thread Killer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Marfan Syndrome-Clyde-DFW, TX
Posts: 1,845
Bikes: Fuji Touring Xtracycle, Merlin Road, Bacchetta Giro 26 (Sold), Challenge Hurricane, Cruzbike Sofrider
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CommuterRun
I'd just about bet money that nobody told Mitzi she has to live 66 miles from her work, and nobody told Ester she has to spend $300+/month for gas. These are choices that they made on their own as responsible adults. Now they have to pay for their choices, but do they take the responsibility of making the decisions to make the changes to their lifestyle? To a lifestyle they can support? I don't know, maybe they did, but most people in this country and that situation wouldn't. Most of these people that whine and cry to the media about how poor and downtrodden they are, are merely victims of their own apathy.
Every marketer around here commercial/roadsign/newspaper/magazine is telling people to move out in the burbs and find a nicer less expensive house. Nearly every representative is saying we should have lower energy prices. Elected officials are saying that people in the US shouldn't have to lower their quality of living so why should anyone think any differently? So there are lots of people saying their lifestyle is fine and heck really they need more more more.
For decades the price of energy has raised very slowly. Yes there is the saying past performance does not indicate future performance but the increase is tremendous in a short time given how everything is built around cheap gas.
When I moved to Texas just 3 years ago Gas was under $1.50. Now some signs I see here are $3 a gallon at the same station. If she saw a similar increase that means $150 a month extra for gas then she was paying just 3 years ago. Likely 2 full days wages for her after appropriate deductions.
Because of how ingrained driving long distances is to everywhere I've ever lived changing transportation models for people isn't as easy as some of you would like to think. There are over 4,000 people that work at the 3 locations near me. Other then me every single person drives whether it is the person I know who drive less then 1/4 mile to the one that drives 90 miles. I have the only bicycle around per security and my own observations..
#75
Banned
^^ Just cause everyone else is doing it doesnt make it right, and sometimes one must make that choice for themselves. Seems like a disingenuous copout to me to blame conditions or what everyone else is doing. Sometimes you have to think and act for yourself, those that cant or wont, will suffer somehow no matter what is going on.
energy could be free and unlimited and some people still wouldnt have enough of whatever it is they want or desire or even really need
energy could be free and unlimited and some people still wouldnt have enough of whatever it is they want or desire or even really need