Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Living Car Free
Reload this Page >

Car free article in wikipedia

Search
Notices
Living Car Free Do you live car free or car light? Do you prefer to use alternative transportation (bicycles, walking, other human-powered or public transportation) for everyday activities whenever possible? Discuss your lifestyle here.

Car free article in wikipedia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-07, 08:51 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 263
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Car free article in wikipedia

The wikipedia car free article is one of the most poorly written articles that I've read. I'm horrible at that stuff or I'd fix it myself. Does anyone in here have the skills to fix it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car-free_movement
AStomper is offline  
Old 07-29-07, 10:08 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Spur TX
Posts: 1,991

Bikes: Schwinn folder; SixThreeZero EvryJourney

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AStomper
The wikipedia car free article is one of the most poorly written articles that I've read. I'm horrible at that stuff or I'd fix it myself. Does anyone in here have the skills to fix it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car-free_movement
If you're interested in contributing to wikis, the first step to take is to click the "discussion" and "history" buttons at the top of the article. Every article has a talk page where you can read discussions about the article, and a history page where you can see how it's been updated over time. That's how you can get a sense of who are the contributors and what's on their minds. If you aren't confident about making a change to the article itself, you could at least add to the article talk page to express your concerns or make suggestions.

You can always add a reference or two to the article. Or, on the talk page, you can add an opinion about whether the article should be preserved or deleted. Just click the edit button and see what's already there. You can preview the edited page, and nothing is committed to wikipedia until you actually save the edit. You can practice and back out at any time.

The article is about the "Car-Free Movement". I can't personally say much about it because I'm not a participant in or an observer of any such movement.
Platy is offline  
Old 07-30-07, 03:03 AM
  #3  
Neil_B
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by AStomper
The wikipedia car free article is one of the most poorly written articles that I've read. I'm horrible at that stuff or I'd fix it myself. Does anyone in here have the skills to fix it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car-free_movement
It's wikipedia. It's supposed to be horrible.
 
Old 07-30-07, 03:21 AM
  #4  
Just me
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 38

Bikes: Nishiki 401, Rossano 105 Touring with disc brakes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
We should make it unhorrible. That has happened to many articles already. We should make sure that it is neutral, has proper references, maybe even good images for utility cycles etc. Car free lifestyle is worth of good articles.
Teme is offline  
Old 07-30-07, 08:17 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
I didn't think the article was against the car-free movement but only lacked information.
Dahon.Steve is offline  
Old 07-30-07, 09:35 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
hockeyteeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gnv, FL
Posts: 1,890
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah, that was bad. I quickly edited the intro, haha:

Originally Posted by lame-ass wiki article
The car-free movement is composed largely of people who believe that the automobile (and especially private car ownership) has an overall negative impact on people and the planet. However, many people are also car-free by less pretentious motives, including: necessity (legal or financial), environmental concern, frugality, etc.
hockeyteeth is offline  
Old 07-30-07, 09:41 PM
  #7  
Biscuit Boy
 
Cosmoline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Speeenard 'laska
Posts: 1,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
By definition, the vast bulk of the world population is and has always been car free. A powerful minority is in temporary possession of some autos.
Cosmoline is offline  
Old 07-30-07, 09:49 PM
  #8  
In the right lane
 
gerv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Des Moines
Posts: 9,557

Bikes: 1974 Huffy 3 speed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Actually, there's a lot of good material in the article. But I think it was written by my sociology professor...
Car-lite - Either a person or place that is not completely carfree, but uses or allows for a variety of alternative transport modes in addition to the car. On a small scale, this is exemplified by the living street or Woonerf, now widespread in Northern Europe. In the United States and Canada, the term transit-oriented development is applied to some "car-lite" districts. The New Urbanists are a group of Canadian and US architects, developers and planners who promote and build environments that are somewhat car-lite, expressly stating that the automobile must be accommodated. One increasingly popular tool for cutting back on the number of cars in any place is carsharing, by which in a well run scheme anywhere from 5 to 20 cars can be replaced by a single shared vehicle.
gerv is offline  
Old 07-30-07, 09:55 PM
  #9  
In the right lane
 
gerv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Des Moines
Posts: 9,557

Bikes: 1974 Huffy 3 speed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
I added this forum as a reference (but then thought I should have linked to this thread... but that would have been mean-spirited )

(...Then I thought that this forum might degenerate into an endless panic about DIY bike trailers and general utility cycling projects )
gerv is offline  
Old 07-30-07, 10:03 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Spur TX
Posts: 1,991

Bikes: Schwinn folder; SixThreeZero EvryJourney

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hockeyteeth
Yeah, that was bad. I quickly edited the intro, haha:
The history shows some edits today, looks like they may have resulted from this discussion. There's still a lot of room for improvement on that article. Thanks for pointing it out, Astomper.
Platy is offline  
Old 07-31-07, 11:52 AM
  #11  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Also, check the Utility Cycling article in Wikipedia. It's pretty good, but also needs some work.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 07-31-07, 11:56 AM
  #12  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by hockeyteeth
Yeah, that was bad. I quickly edited the intro, haha:

Originally Posted by lame-ass wiki article The car-free movement is composed largely of people who believe that the automobile (and especially private car ownership) has an overall negative impact on people and the planet. However, many people are also car-free by less pretentious motives, including: necessity (legal or financial), environmental concern, frugality, etc.

Your edit attempted to correct one misconception, but your use of the word "pretentious" also expresses an opinion. To make the article better, it should be fact-based rather than opinion-based.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 07-31-07, 11:57 AM
  #13  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
If people start a flame war, Wikipedia will close the article to edits. So be careful.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 07-31-07, 08:46 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 263
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I didn't think about flaming, I just looked at it a year ago and thought "Carless, that if Fooking impossible, and why do they have some third world country in there, it does not pertain to me. Since then I've gone car lite and seen that it is possible.
I think it should have a section on individuals going car free in an automotive society.
AStomper is offline  
Old 08-01-07, 02:36 PM
  #15  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by AStomper
I didn't think about flaming, I just looked at it a year ago and thought "Carless, that if Fooking impossible, and why do they have some third world country in there, it does not pertain to me. Since then I've gone car lite and seen that it is possible.
I think it should have a section on individuals going car free in an automotive society
.

I know you were not talking about flaming. I was referring to another post when I wrote that. (Strangely, that post has been deleted, but you can still read it as quoted in my reply to it. )

I think that fixing the article is a great idea. But the goal of Wikipedia is to have an encyclopedia-style article, so they'll crack down if people start adding what they call "original research" (opinion).
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.