Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Living Car Free
Reload this Page >

Has "Peak OIl" peaked?

Search
Notices
Living Car Free Do you live car free or car light? Do you prefer to use alternative transportation (bicycles, walking, other human-powered or public transportation) for everyday activities whenever possible? Discuss your lifestyle here.

Has "Peak OIl" peaked?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-12, 05:07 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada, PG BC
Posts: 3,849

Bikes: 27 speed ORYX with over 39,000Kms on it and another 14,000KMs with a BionX E-Assist on it

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1024 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by gerv
Of course one problem is that people are able to grasp the concept of peak oil, but unable or unwilling to adopt personal changes that would make the peak less threatening.

Somehow, though, I seem to be able to deal with people who ignore the problem rather than people who adopt a half-measure. For example, replacing their gas guzzler with a hybrid or electric vehicle. The thought of building an infrastructure (like say hydrogen...) that hadn't been thought through sufficiently.... is really frightening.

If you throw all you eggs in a basket and then discover that basket has a large whole...

IMHO, a good solution for Peak OIl would be to invest heavily in building more densely populated cities and installing a good transportation infrastructure would really help too. Moving the population to more vegetarian diets. Investing in technology to ensure that not every solution is based on plastics or other petroleum derived products...

These would be steps in the right direction.
IMO the solution is right above us every day, sun power, nobody controls it (can't be withheld), doesn't pollute, can already supply most of any house requirements, can/could charge up the electric car, and that's just now... 10 more years of development and bingo, 90% of out energy requirements met, no major change of infrastructure required...
350htrr is offline  
Old 09-25-12, 06:42 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Smallwheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I'm in Helena Montana again.
Posts: 1,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 350htrr
Eh? WOW, Head in the sand much?
North Dakota and Montana have more oil than Saudi Arabia. The problem is it takes a lot of work to get the oil out of the tar sands. The nation will go for that before it will abandon oil. That is a whole lot of buried energy.

There are gigantic coal reserves in the USA that will last us hundreds of years. The natural gas reserves are thought to be the biggest in the world.

All of those sources are enough to power the USA for a very long time. That doesn't mean it will be cheap. It just means it exists.

There are several states that have enough consistent wind to power the nation if there were enough wind farms. The desert Southwest could power half of the nation with solar power if it were possible to cover enough ground with solar panel farms.

With your head not in the sand how is it that you don't know about these things?

So has peak oil peaked? It depends on who you ask.
Smallwheels is offline  
Old 09-25-12, 06:57 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada, PG BC
Posts: 3,849

Bikes: 27 speed ORYX with over 39,000Kms on it and another 14,000KMs with a BionX E-Assist on it

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1024 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by Smallwheels
North Dakota and Montana have more oil than Saudi Arabia. The problem is it takes a lot of work to get the oil out of the tar sands. The nation will go for that before it will abandon oil. That is a whole lot of buried energy.

There are gigantic coal reserves in the USA that will last us hundreds of years. The natural gas reserves are thought to be the biggest in the world.

All of those sources are enough to power the USA for a very long time. That doesn't mean it will be cheap. It just means it exists.

There are several states that have enough consistent wind to power the nation if there were enough wind farms. The desert Southwest could power half of the nation with solar power if it were possible to cover enough ground with solar panel farms.

With your head not in the sand how is it that you don't know about these things?

So has peak oil peaked? It depends on who you ask.
I guess then the real Q is, has cheap oil peaked... And the answer is a resounding YES... What do you think will happen when the price of oil goes up to 10$ a gallon? And your tomatoes and EVERYTHING else you may want to buy would cost 3X as much as the year before? Economic collapse, that's what, starving and freezing in the dark would be the order of the day unless it can be brought on line gradually, which it cant, as it's EXPENSIVE, not cheap... Hundreds of years, ha, ha...


EDIT; Hey, have I got a deal for you, if you are looking for lakefront properties... A steal of a deal, money's to be made on re-sale or you can live there and enjoy the coming good times...

Last edited by 350htrr; 09-25-12 at 07:44 PM.
350htrr is offline  
Old 09-25-12, 08:56 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
ubringliten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 214

Bikes: 2010 Wabi Lightning, 2014 Brompton S2L-X

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...-worlds-needs/

And combine sun power with wind power, we have the best energy source. The whole country of Denmark is getting its 20% of energy from wind turbines alone.
ubringliten is offline  
Old 09-25-12, 08:57 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
ubringliten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 214

Bikes: 2010 Wabi Lightning, 2014 Brompton S2L-X

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 350htrr
IMO the solution is right above us every day, sun power, nobody controls it (can't be withheld), doesn't pollute, can already supply most of any house requirements, can/could charge up the electric car, and that's just now... 10 more years of development and bingo, 90% of out energy requirements met, no major change of infrastructure required...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...-worlds-needs/


And combine sun power with wind power, we have the best energy source. The whole country of Denmark is getting its 20% of energy from wind turbines alone.
ubringliten is offline  
Old 09-26-12, 01:37 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Artkansas
We need to melt Antarctica so we can drill for oil there.
Whatever it takes to keep my bike chain lubed.
iheartbacon is offline  
Old 09-26-12, 08:59 AM
  #32  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Most likely "solution" IMO is adoption of some kind of liquid gasoline-like fuel made from fracked natural gas. This would (temporarily) reduce both costs and greenhous gas emissions.

Meanwhile, even some oil company executives are saying that drilling in the Arctic is too risky for the environment. Since we KNOW that oil companies don't care about the environment, they must have some other agenda when they say this.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 09-26-12, 02:14 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Ekdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seville, Spain
Posts: 4,403

Bikes: Brompton M6R, mountain bikes, Circe Omnis+ tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
Most likely "solution" IMO is adoption of some kind of liquid gasoline-like fuel made from fracked natural gas. This would (temporarily) reduce both costs and greenhous gas emissions.

Meanwhile, even some oil company executives are saying that drilling in the Arctic is too risky for the environment. Since we KNOW that oil companies don't care about the environment, they must have some other agenda when they say this.
Liquified natural gas (LNG) is already a "liquid gasoline-like fuel", isn't it? Another option is compressed natural gas (CNG). But aren't you concerned about the environmental impact of all that fracking?
Ekdog is offline  
Old 09-26-12, 06:50 PM
  #34  
In the right lane
Thread Starter
 
gerv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Des Moines
Posts: 9,557

Bikes: 1974 Huffy 3 speed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ubringliten

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...-worlds-needs/


And combine sun power with wind power, we have the best energy source. The whole country of Denmark is getting its 20% of energy from wind turbines alone.
Interesting article,

We’d have enough energy to power the world. At least in theory. A new study published this week in Nature Climate Change finds that there’s enough wind potential both on the Earth’s surface and up in the atmosphere to power human civilization 100 times over. Right now, humans use about 18 terawatts of power worldwide. And, technically, the study found, we could extract about 400 terawatts of wind power from the Earth’s surface and 1,800 terawatts of power from the upper atmosphere.
I wonder though if the infrastructure was built it might be an awful visual site. Windmills everywhere.

There's also ample room for energy savings, particularly if the grid does not have to support powering automobiles.
gerv is offline  
Old 09-27-12, 09:35 AM
  #35  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Ekdog
Liquified natural gas (LNG) is already a "liquid gasoline-like fuel", isn't it? Another option is compressed natural gas (CNG). But aren't you concerned about the environmental impact of all that fracking?
Of course I'm worried about fracking. I'm even more worried about all the carbon that will be emitted by all that natural gas. But so far we are reducing emissions by switching a lot of our power production from coal to natural gas. For now, natural gas is partially a good thing.

Originally Posted by gerv
lt it might be an awful visual site. Windmills everywhere.
There's been a lot of pushback from environmentalist because they think windmills are ugly. I think they're prettier than the average coal stacks or nuclear cooling towers, or offshore drilling rigs. I think it was stupid to propose offshore windimills in scenic areas like Cape Cod or the Manitou Islands of Lake Michigan. But windmills might look great in Boston Harbor or offshore from the Chicago skyline.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 09-27-12, 05:36 PM
  #36  
In the right lane
Thread Starter
 
gerv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Des Moines
Posts: 9,557

Bikes: 1974 Huffy 3 speed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by iheartbacon
Whatever it takes to keep my bike chain lubed.
This touches on a good point and also suggests why we need to act on this Peak Oil notion. Petroleum products deliver an enormous benefit to our society.... some of which would really damage out way of living.

It's a resource we ought not be wasting.
gerv is offline  
Old 09-27-12, 05:51 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Boston area
Posts: 2,035

Bikes: 1984 Bridgestone 400 1985Univega nouevo sport 650b conversion 1993b'stone RBT 1985 Schwinn Tempo

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 542 Post(s)
Liked 152 Times in 100 Posts
My understanding of the concept of peak oil is that it is the point where demand exceeds supply. We have found, and are depleting, most of the cheap oil, but as prices rise there is more incentive to look for more but this new oil costs a lot to extract. Some countries try to moderate demand by taxing the heck out of gasoline and having good alternatives such as rail and in some cities, bike lanes. Demand is increasing in the emerging economies of the world partly because for billions of our species, the one material thing that shows the world that they have"made it" is thecar.
ironwood is offline  
Old 09-27-12, 08:15 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Ekdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seville, Spain
Posts: 4,403

Bikes: Brompton M6R, mountain bikes, Circe Omnis+ tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
But so far we are reducing emissions by switching a lot of our power production from coal to natural gas. For now, natural gas is partially a good thing.
The move away from coal would be great if it meant the coal wouldn't be mined and burned. Good God! Half of the polar ice cap is missing! It would be tremendous if it led to a moratorium on the practice of Mountaintop Removal (MTR), which is creating a human health emergency in Appalachia, but that isn't what is happening. Big Coal is just shipping their product to China and India instead of selling it in the United States.

https://www.stoptheache.org/about.html
Ekdog is offline  
Old 09-28-12, 10:15 AM
  #39  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by gerv
This touches on a good point and also suggests why we need to act on this Peak Oil notion. Petroleum products deliver an enormous benefit to our society.... some of which would really damage out way of living.

It's a resource we ought not be wasting.
Plastics and carbon fiber are important to our economy and vital to many industries. Plastic gets a bad rap from environmentalists. But look at it this way: the carbon that goes into plastics is "locked up." It won't get into the atmosphere for thousands of years, if it ever will. IMO it's better to put that carbon into plastic than to put it into the air that protects our planet from solar radiation.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 09-28-12, 12:51 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Ekdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seville, Spain
Posts: 4,403

Bikes: Brompton M6R, mountain bikes, Circe Omnis+ tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
Plastics and carbon fiber are important to our economy and vital to many industries. Plastic gets a bad rap from environmentalists. But look at it this way: the carbon that goes into plastics is "locked up." It won't get into the atmosphere for thousands of years, if it ever will. IMO it's better to put that carbon into plastic than to put it into the air that protects our planet from solar radiation.
What about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch and other such swirling masses of plastic?
Ekdog is offline  
Old 09-28-12, 09:03 PM
  #41  
In the right lane
Thread Starter
 
gerv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Des Moines
Posts: 9,557

Bikes: 1974 Huffy 3 speed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
Plastics and carbon fiber are important to our economy and vital to many industries. Plastic gets a bad rap from environmentalists. But look at it this way: the carbon that goes into plastics is "locked up." It won't get into the atmosphere for thousands of years, if it ever will. IMO it's better to put that carbon into plastic than to put it into the air that protects our planet from solar radiation.
Originally Posted by Ekdog
What about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch and other such swirling masses of plastic?
There are petroleuim based products, including plastic, that are appropriately manufactured. For example, I am looking now at a Rubbermaid container that holds some household equipment. It's likely to last 25 years and at that time could be effectively "down-cycled." In the future I expect some plastic products to evolve that could be complete "recycled" with minimal environmental cost. For example, I recycle my Rubbermaid box and it becomes another Rubbermaid box. That's true recycling... but I'm not sure we are there yet.

What we need to stop is the abuse of these materials for products like one-way water bottles. That manufacture should be criminalized. And I suspect it is this type of product that is gumming up areas of the Pacific Ocean.
gerv is offline  
Old 09-28-12, 10:35 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Ekdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seville, Spain
Posts: 4,403

Bikes: Brompton M6R, mountain bikes, Circe Omnis+ tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by gerv
There are petroleuim based products, including plastic, that are appropriately manufactured. For example, I am looking now at a Rubbermaid container that holds some household equipment. It's likely to last 25 years and at that time could be effectively "down-cycled." In the future I expect some plastic products to evolve that could be complete "recycled" with minimal environmental cost. For example, I recycle my Rubbermaid box and it becomes another Rubbermaid box. That's true recycling... but I'm not sure we are there yet.

What we need to stop is the abuse of these materials for products like one-way water bottles. That manufacture should be criminalized. And I suspect it is this type of product that is gumming up areas of the Pacific Ocean.
Yes, it's the one-use plastic, like plastic shopping bags and water bottles that are so harmful and unneccesary, and then there are things like this, which are taking all of this to a disgusting new level: https://gizmodo.com/5945306/pre+peele...apocalypse-yet

Last edited by Ekdog; 09-28-12 at 10:38 PM.
Ekdog is offline  
Old 09-28-12, 11:43 PM
  #43  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Ekdog
What about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch and other such swirling masses of plastic?
That one-time use of plastic is inappropriate, and it also points to a disposal problem rather than a problem with the material itself.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 09-29-12, 12:59 AM
  #44  
bragi
 
bragi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 2,911

Bikes: LHT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by wahoonc
I cannot find the reference, but the general consensus seems that we reached the peak of conventional oil production between 2006-2008. There is also an article out about the cost of getting and processing oil. In the 1950's the ratio was better than 3:1 today it is much closer to 1:1, in other words, it costs nearly as much to get oil out of the ground as to what it is worth. The investment to get to much of the "new" oil supplies is staggering and cost prohibitive.

Aaron
I'm not quite sure I agree with this one; if the production cost-to-yield ratio were really 1:1, wouldn't that mean that oil would be so expensive as to make it useless as a fuel?

I think the new fossil fuel resources - natural gas and oil from tar sands and shale- are a costly, damaging reprieve, but one that's necessary. We need more time to develop energy resources that that sustainable and don't contribute to warming. I just hope we're not too greedy and stupid to take advantage of this extra decade or so.
bragi is offline  
Old 09-29-12, 05:15 AM
  #45  
Pedaled too far.
 
Artkansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by bragi
I'm not quite sure I agree with this one; if the production cost-to-yield ratio were really 1:1, wouldn't that mean that oil would be so expensive as to make it useless as a fuel?

I think the new fossil fuel resources - natural gas and oil from tar sands and shale- are a costly, damaging reprieve, but one that's necessary. We need more time to develop energy resources that that sustainable and don't contribute to warming. I just hope we're not too greedy and stupid to take advantage of this extra decade or so.
We've already known about the problem for 40 years. Research into these problems have been downplayed, underfunded and ignored in favor of subsidies for big energy. Are we going to change our ways in the next decade?
__________________
"He who serves all, best serves himself" Jack London

Originally Posted by Bjforrestal
I don't care if you are on a unicycle, as long as you're not using a motor to get places you get props from me. We're here to support each other. Share ideas, and motivate one another to actually keep doing it.
Artkansas is offline  
Old 09-29-12, 06:32 AM
  #46  
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by bragi
I'm not quite sure I agree with this one; if the production cost-to-yield ratio were really 1:1, wouldn't that mean that oil would be so expensive as to make it useless as a fuel?

I think the new fossil fuel resources - natural gas and oil from tar sands and shale- are a costly, damaging reprieve, but one that's necessary. We need more time to develop energy resources that that sustainable and don't contribute to warming. I just hope we're not too greedy and stupid to take advantage of this extra decade or so.
It isn't there yet, but it is getting closer and closer. I think the current numbers are around 1.6:1. I will see if I can dig up the article and the numbers.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Old 09-29-12, 07:06 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
loneviking61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 378

Bikes: Schwinn Trailwise, Surly Pugsley

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I doubt that we will know if we have passed a 'peak oil' point for some time. It sure seems like we've passed that point, but there's all sorts of drilling oppourtunities up in the Artic and over in Siberia. There's deep water fields that may be discovered yet. There's also a debate among geologists as to how oil is formed. We know that oil comes from ancient fossil deposits, but there is also a school of thought that says oil is also formed deep in the earth under natural processes as well. The only thing I think can be said with certainity is that the price of a gallon of gas is only going to go up!
loneviking61 is offline  
Old 09-29-12, 09:51 AM
  #48  
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by bragi
I'm not quite sure I agree with this one; if the production cost-to-yield ratio were really 1:1, wouldn't that mean that oil would be so expensive as to make it useless as a fuel?
Not at all. People pay not only for the actual joules of energy in gasoline, but for the convenience and performance of gas as a fuel. Like a battery, gasoline is a storage medium. It's easy to transport, fairly safe, very energy dense, and friendly to mechanical parts. So people will pay a large priemium for premium, so to speak.


Originally Posted by bragi
I think the new fossil fuel resources - natural gas and oil from tar sands and shale- are a costly, damaging reprieve, but one that's necessary. We need more time to develop energy resources that that sustainable and don't contribute to warming. I just hope we're not too greedy and stupid to take advantage of this extra decade or so.
The real problem is that fossil fuels are not very costly, compared to the alternatives. And many of the costs are distributed across society rather than paid directly by the producers and users of fossil fuels. (One reason I laugh when conservatives howl that progressives want to redistribute wealth.)
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 09-29-12, 07:29 PM
  #49  
Pedaled too far.
 
Artkansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Peak Wood

Perhaps some lessons can be learned from an earlier fossil fuel crisis, when the forests of Europe had been cut down and people turned to alternative energy sources, wind power and peat.

After Peak Wood
__________________
"He who serves all, best serves himself" Jack London

Originally Posted by Bjforrestal
I don't care if you are on a unicycle, as long as you're not using a motor to get places you get props from me. We're here to support each other. Share ideas, and motivate one another to actually keep doing it.
Artkansas is offline  
Old 09-29-12, 09:24 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
loneviking61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 378

Bikes: Schwinn Trailwise, Surly Pugsley

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Artkansas
Perhaps some lessons can be learned from an earlier fossil fuel crisis, when the forests of Europe had been cut down and people turned to alternative energy sources, wind power and peat.

After Peak Wood
One big difference is that wood doesn't have to peak. You can always plant more trees, and carefully harvest and use mature timber to run things. I know of a sawmill up in the hills of California that uses wood to make steam. The steam then runs everything in that sawmill from the big planing saws all the way down to the lathes. This old sawmill sat unused for many decades until a grandson of one of the original founders of the mill took on the challenge of opening it up again. One of the problems they ran into was finding a mechanical engineer to figure out how some of the equipment worked along with how to fix and maintain the machinery. Today, the mill is going strong and a lot of their business is turning out the small, decorative wine boxes that vintners in the Napa valley use to package gift bottles of wine in. There are options, if you have determination and a willingness to think 'outside of the box'!
loneviking61 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.