New frame+fork - which groupset
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
New frame+fork - which groupset
Hello,
I have just acquired a new steel frame+fork and I am undecided in which groupset to use? Tiagra or 105? Is Tiagra good enough for endurance?
The bike, when built, will be used to long distance brevet.
Other groupset suggestions are much welcomed
Thx all
I have just acquired a new steel frame+fork and I am undecided in which groupset to use? Tiagra or 105? Is Tiagra good enough for endurance?
The bike, when built, will be used to long distance brevet.
Other groupset suggestions are much welcomed
Thx all
#2
Donnie Jonhson
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 70
Bikes: Many, mostly old, steel, heavy and beautiful + one titanium bike; pretty much the complete opposite of my other bikes.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi ufa,
Either Tiagra or 105 would work just fine. I would consider the 105 gear over the Tiagra, it is very good value for money, reasonable cheap (in comparison to higher group sets) and in my experience very reliable. This is not to say that the Tiagra gear would not be as reliable, it's probably just as reliable as 105 but slightly heavier and a little cheaper.
Personally, I mix and match the drive train, e.g. if you live in a hilly area you could use 105 or Tiagra shifters and with whatever crankset you prefer, (road/mtn triple/or compact double), and a mountain cassette and rear derailleur. On my touring bike I use Triple Ultegra Shifters, a mountain style crank with 22 36 48 teeth and an XT rear derailleur with 11-34 9 speed cassette. The system works fabulously, huge range of gears for riding with heavy loads on steep long hills. My audax bike ha a similar range of gears however I hardly need to use the lower end and occasionally reach the top end. If you wanted to use 10 speed integrated shifters like on Tiagra or 105 and a Shimano mountain rear drive line, you need a 9 speed rear derailleur. However if you don't live in such a hilly area and don't need such a large range of gears a straight groupset will work just fine.
If you choose to mix and match you will need to do a little homework to ensure your choice of components are compatible. See the bike mechanics forum, there is a wealth of knowledge there.
Hope this helps,
Donnie
Either Tiagra or 105 would work just fine. I would consider the 105 gear over the Tiagra, it is very good value for money, reasonable cheap (in comparison to higher group sets) and in my experience very reliable. This is not to say that the Tiagra gear would not be as reliable, it's probably just as reliable as 105 but slightly heavier and a little cheaper.
Personally, I mix and match the drive train, e.g. if you live in a hilly area you could use 105 or Tiagra shifters and with whatever crankset you prefer, (road/mtn triple/or compact double), and a mountain cassette and rear derailleur. On my touring bike I use Triple Ultegra Shifters, a mountain style crank with 22 36 48 teeth and an XT rear derailleur with 11-34 9 speed cassette. The system works fabulously, huge range of gears for riding with heavy loads on steep long hills. My audax bike ha a similar range of gears however I hardly need to use the lower end and occasionally reach the top end. If you wanted to use 10 speed integrated shifters like on Tiagra or 105 and a Shimano mountain rear drive line, you need a 9 speed rear derailleur. However if you don't live in such a hilly area and don't need such a large range of gears a straight groupset will work just fine.
If you choose to mix and match you will need to do a little homework to ensure your choice of components are compatible. See the bike mechanics forum, there is a wealth of knowledge there.
Hope this helps,
Donnie
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi ufa,
Either Tiagra or 105 would work just fine. I would consider the 105 gear over the Tiagra, it is very good value for money, reasonable cheap (in comparison to higher group sets) and in my experience very reliable. This is not to say that the Tiagra gear would not be as reliable, it's probably just as reliable as 105 but slightly heavier and a little cheaper.
Personally, I mix and match the drive train, e.g. if you live in a hilly area you could use 105 or Tiagra shifters and with whatever crankset you prefer, (road/mtn triple/or compact double), and a mountain cassette and rear derailleur. On my touring bike I use Triple Ultegra Shifters, a mountain style crank with 22 36 48 teeth and an XT rear derailleur with 11-34 9 speed cassette. The system works fabulously, huge range of gears for riding with heavy loads on steep long hills. My audax bike ha a similar range of gears however I hardly need to use the lower end and occasionally reach the top end. If you wanted to use 10 speed integrated shifters like on Tiagra or 105 and a Shimano mountain rear drive line, you need a 9 speed rear derailleur. However if you don't live in such a hilly area and don't need such a large range of gears a straight groupset will work just fine.
If you choose to mix and match you will need to do a little homework to ensure your choice of components are compatible. See the bike mechanics forum, there is a wealth of knowledge there.
Hope this helps,
Donnie
Either Tiagra or 105 would work just fine. I would consider the 105 gear over the Tiagra, it is very good value for money, reasonable cheap (in comparison to higher group sets) and in my experience very reliable. This is not to say that the Tiagra gear would not be as reliable, it's probably just as reliable as 105 but slightly heavier and a little cheaper.
Personally, I mix and match the drive train, e.g. if you live in a hilly area you could use 105 or Tiagra shifters and with whatever crankset you prefer, (road/mtn triple/or compact double), and a mountain cassette and rear derailleur. On my touring bike I use Triple Ultegra Shifters, a mountain style crank with 22 36 48 teeth and an XT rear derailleur with 11-34 9 speed cassette. The system works fabulously, huge range of gears for riding with heavy loads on steep long hills. My audax bike ha a similar range of gears however I hardly need to use the lower end and occasionally reach the top end. If you wanted to use 10 speed integrated shifters like on Tiagra or 105 and a Shimano mountain rear drive line, you need a 9 speed rear derailleur. However if you don't live in such a hilly area and don't need such a large range of gears a straight groupset will work just fine.
If you choose to mix and match you will need to do a little homework to ensure your choice of components are compatible. See the bike mechanics forum, there is a wealth of knowledge there.
Hope this helps,
Donnie
I have bought a Surly Pacer frame+fork and will probably take the "mix and match" approach
Best regards
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
Also you will want to think about what sort of gearing you will need and particularly whether you want a triple given that you plan on doing long distance brevets. The shimano triples are not the best, IMHO, in terms of gearing (it comes stock with a 50/39/30). You might want to look at the sugino xd600 which comes stock with a 46/36/26. I prefer the sugino 110/74 bcd over the shimano bcd 130/74. YMMV.
If you go with a triple, you may want to consider bar end shifters. Some love 'em; others hate 'em. I love them with a triple. Again YMMV.
But you will want to decide whether you want a triple before springing for a group for the bike.
If you go with a triple, you may want to consider bar end shifters. Some love 'em; others hate 'em. I love them with a triple. Again YMMV.
But you will want to decide whether you want a triple before springing for a group for the bike.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Also you will want to think about what sort of gearing you will need and particularly whether you want a triple given that you plan on doing long distance brevets. The shimano triples are not the best, IMHO, in terms of gearing (it comes stock with a 50/39/30). You might want to look at the sugino xd600 which comes stock with a 46/36/26. I prefer the sugino 110/74 bcd over the shimano bcd 130/74. YMMV.
If you go with a triple, you may want to consider bar end shifters. Some love 'em; others hate 'em. I love them with a triple. Again YMMV.
But you will want to decide whether you want a triple before springing for a group for the bike.
If you go with a triple, you may want to consider bar end shifters. Some love 'em; others hate 'em. I love them with a triple. Again YMMV.
But you will want to decide whether you want a triple before springing for a group for the bike.
I am not sure if I want a triple. Won't a compact double be enough?
Just for the record, I have already done a 300k brevet in my SS. I must confess that I ended a little too tired
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
Sure, everyone has a different view. A SS could be an issue, though, if you do a long ride with lots of steep grades; even the pros like gears when climbing steep mountains, . The reason I like a triple is that I prefer not running a wide range on the back but that doesn't matter so much if running 9, 10, or 11 on the back. Still a triple gives you a better bail out gear than a compact and you do plan on being out in the middle of nowhere with no support on a bloody hard ride, right?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,773
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
87 Posts
You need to decide if you want a triple, and the cassette ratios you want, as this will have a big effect on groupset choice, add to that, the freehubs you have as this will determine what cassettes you can and can't run.
Mixing and matching can be done, but not with Tiagra(current 4600) and 105 (current 5800) as suggested as they are different speed groupsets, and have very little compatibility. If you do want to mix and match, you need to look at older generations like 5700.
Mixing and matching can be done, but not with Tiagra(current 4600) and 105 (current 5800) as suggested as they are different speed groupsets, and have very little compatibility. If you do want to mix and match, you need to look at older generations like 5700.
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You need to decide if you want a triple, and the cassette ratios you want, as this will have a big effect on groupset choice, add to that, the freehubs you have as this will determine what cassettes you can and can't run.
Mixing and matching can be done, but not with Tiagra(current 4600) and 105 (current 5800) as suggested as they are different speed groupsets, and have very little compatibility. If you do want to mix and match, you need to look at older generations like 5700.
Mixing and matching can be done, but not with Tiagra(current 4600) and 105 (current 5800) as suggested as they are different speed groupsets, and have very little compatibility. If you do want to mix and match, you need to look at older generations like 5700.
Besides Tiagra and 105, do you recommend something for the "mix and match" in LD?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 2,982
Bikes: LESS than I did a year ago!
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
UFA...you mention the Shimano works...how about SRAM? I have used the SRAM Apex group (very affordable) on many metric centuries...and full centuries. I am not a brevet rider (yet)...but...have had great success with this group. The group got its start with the "Wi-Fli" cassette and double chain ring set up...giving a very wide range of gears with just a double ring. You might want to consider it.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
UFA...you mention the Shimano works...how about SRAM? I have used the SRAM Apex group (very affordable) on many metric centuries...and full centuries. I am not a brevet rider (yet)...but...have had great success with this group. The group got its start with the "Wi-Fli" cassette and double chain ring set up...giving a very wide range of gears with just a double ring. You might want to consider it.
#12
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
For what it's worth, I believe the Pacer uses standard reach brakes (47-57mm), so if you buy a full group, the normal Tiagra or 105 brakes won't reach the rim.
#13
Senior Member
The current Tiagra is the previous 105 and the current Sora is the previous Tiagra. They're all pretty decent. The difference is mostly clever marketing. Any of them will be reliable if properly maintained and any can fail if not (e.g. old cables).
Of course Ultegra is nicer and lighter, but there's probably little benefit for people who are not racing.
Compact double vs. Triple is a personal choice and I'm firmly in the Triple camp. On a long ride with 10+ percent climbs, nothing will outdo low gears for me, except even lower ones! They allow you to keep your cadence high even if your speed drops. I believe that's one reason why I never cramp. They also give you closer spaced gears, either across the cassette or between chain wheels, which I really like. Triples (or lack thereof) are one reason why I would not consider SRAM (except for their cassettes) any more.
Of course Ultegra is nicer and lighter, but there's probably little benefit for people who are not racing.
Compact double vs. Triple is a personal choice and I'm firmly in the Triple camp. On a long ride with 10+ percent climbs, nothing will outdo low gears for me, except even lower ones! They allow you to keep your cadence high even if your speed drops. I believe that's one reason why I never cramp. They also give you closer spaced gears, either across the cassette or between chain wheels, which I really like. Triples (or lack thereof) are one reason why I would not consider SRAM (except for their cassettes) any more.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,773
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
87 Posts
The downside with 11 speed is no triples any more, but you do get a 11-32 option out the box, rather than having to play around with B screws and mixing and matching with SRAM cassettes as you do with 10 speed Shimano.