Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Trek marlin 5 sizing

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Trek marlin 5 sizing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-15 | 05:17 PM
  #1  
n2t
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 30
Trek marlin 5 sizing

Ok so my trip to the LBS was scary and I'm glad I made it out alive. I spent two days browsing bikes locally, went to the LBS and ended up looking at a specialized hardrock sport 29er. Two days talking and they quoted me 520 bucks for the bike, I was happy. I ran to walmart for a bike rack as that is what they suggested while they fine tuned parts. I had hydraulic disk brakes, air forks with lockout, double wall rims, I felt really good about my purchase. Then I got back, and was told 640. I showed them the paper they had written me but was told the bike was not what they thought it was and there was a mistake, they offered to go down to 630. I felt that was a bit shady so I left, on my way out to the parking lot, one of the guys inside said he would sell it to me at a later date for 520, I just had to wait for a day when he was working alone. All felt really shady so I decided it was time to go. Went to the local scheels and picked up a trek 3500 disc. The next day they called me in and put me on a marlin 5, it had gone on sale and was actually 30 bucks cheaper than the 3500D, so I am now the owner of a Trek marlin 5. My only issue is, I don't know the sizing very well. When I stand over the bike in sock feet, there is light contact with the top tube, and the seat tube has to be bottomed out to fit me well. It says "actual 16.5/vertiual 17.5" on the down tube. The next size down a 15.5act/16.5vit uses 27.5" tires instead of the 29" on this bike. I'm 5'6 and have a roughly 30-31" inseam. Did I get sized right at 17.5 or should I step down to the 16.5 actual?
n2t is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-15 | 06:44 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 4,400
Likes: 106
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito (Celeste, of course)

Bottomed out seat tube is generally a bad sign. I'm 6'0" and found a 19.5" Trek to be about right for me, so the 17.5" is probably at your upper end.

When you say the seat tube is bottomed out, if you put your heel on the pedal your leg should be almost completely straight? With a properly fitted bike, you will not be able to put your feet flat on the ground while seated, at best you'll be able to put a toe down.

As for sizing, can you test ride both? If so get the that feels most comfortable while riding. Mountain bike sizing is generally more flexible than road bike sizing, so its likely that you can get a decent fit on 15.5, 16.5 or 17.5. The real question is your personal preference for wheel size, which is a personal feel issue.

The Marlin is a good bike, enjoy whatever size you get!
gsa103 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-15 | 08:05 PM
  #3  
n2t
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 30
yeah seat tube all the way down, I can just get the ball of my foot on the peddle. I think the next size down with 27.5" wheels would be a better fit. Everything seems just a bit "long" to me.
n2t is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-15 | 09:35 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 4,400
Likes: 106
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito (Celeste, of course)

Originally Posted by n2t
yeah seat tube all the way down, I can just get the ball of my foot on the peddle. I think the next size down with 27.5" wheels would be a better fit. Everything seems just a bit "long" to me.
Yeah, you might even want to test the 15.5 size.
gsa103 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-15 | 08:17 PM
  #5  
n2t
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 30
There is no 16.5, so I went with a 15.5, they had a sale for 450 on the marlin 5, the six is nice, with the lockout forks and hydraulic brakes, but it was 610. I'm fairly sure I can live with mechanical disks and use the 160 bucks I saved for better forks, am I correct?
n2t is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yosemite Sam
Fitting Your Bike
16
09-16-13 11:43 AM
Chini563
Road Cycling
34
01-09-11 03:23 PM
The Golden Boy
Classic & Vintage
29
08-19-10 10:17 PM
Treefrog3105
Road Cycling
16
03-31-10 12:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.