Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Why use non conventional headsets?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Why use non conventional headsets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-05 | 06:47 PM
  #1  
phantomcow2's Avatar
Thread Starter
la vache fantôme
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,266
Likes: 1
From: NH
Why use non conventional headsets?

Im just wondering, why is it that these manufacturers use non conventional headsets? Not all do but a lot use integrated or zero stack. My homegrown calls for the ICBM, which is like a spin off integrated. Im very happy with my ICBM, but i dont see any reason why these companies cant use conventional. Can somebody englighten me, whats the advantage. Or at least whats the claimed advantage
__________________
C://dos
C://dos.run
run.dos.run
phantomcow2 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-05 | 06:57 PM
  #2  
Maelstrom's Avatar
Wood Licker
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Zero stack is useful for the longer travel single crowns. Reduces some of the stack heigh making the front 'shorter'.

I hate integrated. They blow.
Maelstrom is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-05 | 07:00 PM
  #3  
phantomcow2's Avatar
Thread Starter
la vache fantôme
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,266
Likes: 1
From: NH
I ran a zero stack with my previous frame and i liked it as well. IM not sure how well i like having bearings directly contacting frame. But i know for my ICBM those were some big ass bearings, never seen so large bearings for a headset before
__________________
C://dos
C://dos.run
run.dos.run
phantomcow2 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-05 | 08:28 PM
  #4  
Speedub.Nate's Avatar
fanatik
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area, California
Integrated sucks. Proprietary integrated (ICBM) sucks worse.

Zero Stack (aka Internal or semi-integrated) is far superior to integrated due to the fact it uses pressed-in cups.

Zero Stack is nice for a couple of reasons.

Like Maelstrom stated, it can help reduce stack height.

A couple of product managers I've talked to say their instances of headtube ovalization has been severely reduced and eliminated after switching to Zero Stack headtubes.

Also, the larger headtube diameter provides more weldable surface. This allows stronger frame junctions and easier connections to oversized downtubes without relying on severe tube manipulation to pinch the end into a conforming shape.

I'd like to think given some of those benefits, Zero Stack is here to stay. With King on board with their slightly modified Perdido headset, even reluctant conventional holdouts don't have much to complain about (they just need to find a shop that has the reamer to oversize their ZS headtube the required amount).
Speedub.Nate is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-05 | 08:37 PM
  #5  
phantomcow2's Avatar
Thread Starter
la vache fantôme
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,266
Likes: 1
From: NH
why does the ICBM headset suck?
__________________
C://dos
C://dos.run
run.dos.run
phantomcow2 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-05 | 09:11 PM
  #6  
Speedub.Nate's Avatar
fanatik
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area, California
I hate the idea of drop-in bearings in a mountain bike frame -- if something gets a little loosey goosey, it doesn't take long to take the head tube out of round. The proprietary nature of ICBM is even worse. I think Cane Creek is selling a ICBM replacement currently, and it'll be interesting to see how long they continue to support the dwindling number of frames using it.
Speedub.Nate is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-05 | 12:49 AM
  #7  
Raiyn's Avatar
I drink your MILKSHAKE
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 15,061
Likes: 3
From: St. Petersburg, FL

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity

If I can't put a King on it I don't want it.
__________________
Raiyn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-06-05 | 04:10 AM
  #8  
phantomcow2's Avatar
Thread Starter
la vache fantôme
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,266
Likes: 1
From: NH
Originally Posted by Speedub.Nate
I hate the idea of drop-in bearings in a mountain bike frame -- if something gets a little loosey goosey, it doesn't take long to take the head tube out of round. The proprietary nature of ICBM is even worse. I think Cane Creek is selling a ICBM replacement currently, and it'll be interesting to see how long they continue to support the dwindling number of frames using it.
I dunno though, when i was pressing in the bearings it wasa really tight fit, like as tight as if i was pressing in regular cups for a conventional headset. I just dont see it getting loose, i check up on it every so often though
__________________
C://dos
C://dos.run
run.dos.run
phantomcow2 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.