26" question
02-18-21 | 08:39 AM
#26
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,786
Likes: 1,800
From: North Central Wisconsin
02-18-21 | 09:39 AM
#27
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2,286
From: Mission Viejo
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
02-23-21 | 06:57 PM
#28
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,704
Likes: 354
From: NWNJ
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
I have not mountain biked for years. It's been all road, mostly commuting. Plus some track riding. For pure fun factor I find 26" wheels to be the best for me. Maybe 27.5. But 29" feel too large, though of course they are great for going over the big stuff.
Since I am recreational only, there is nothing wrong with 26" right? My old old old MTB is 26" of course. but looking to upgrade.
Thanks...
Since I am recreational only, there is nothing wrong with 26" right? My old old old MTB is 26" of course. but looking to upgrade.
Thanks...
but after i road my buddies FS29er i was noth sad and jealous.
but i still enjoy the old 26 incher...
when i find $2000 i dont need for anything else... ill upgrade.
02-24-21 | 10:56 AM
#29
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2,286
From: Mission Viejo
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
I can see a return to 26” wheel mtb’s, but not with old bikes or geometry. It probably won’t be mainstream, especially with old people; but I can see kids riding 15+ lb carbon hardtails that can be easily thrown around.
There is something about youth’s disdain for their elders; especially on what can’t be done.
John
There is something about youth’s disdain for their elders; especially on what can’t be done.
John
