Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Differences between an 01 Stumpy and newer

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Differences between an 01 Stumpy and newer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-06 | 08:10 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Mountain Bikes are Art
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Differences between an 01 Stumpy and newer

I am looking at some used bikes. Is the 20001 Stumpjumper the equivalent of the more recent ones in terms of frame quality? The bike has a SID Hydra Air fork. Is it a nice fork compared to the FOX that the new ones come with? Thanks, Bob.
DonValley is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-06 | 08:18 AM
  #2  
Too Much Crazy
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 3
From: NY

Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9

Are you talking FSR or just the hardtail
C Law is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-06 | 08:27 AM
  #3  
LowCel's Avatar
Throw the stick!!!!
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 18,150
Likes: 93
From: Charleston, WV

Bikes: GMC Denali

The 2001 SIDs were known to be flexy forks, not nearly as stiff as a new Fox. They are great race forks for lighter riders however that is their limit. They are by no means an "all-mountain" fork.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-06 | 08:41 AM
  #4  
pinkrobe's Avatar
DNPAIMFB
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,655
Likes: 0
From: Cowtown, AB

Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.

The old Stumps were significantly lighter IIRC. If you're not a heavy person or a hard rider, I'd say it's worth considering the '01.
pinkrobe is offline  
Reply
Old 05-04-06 | 07:34 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Mountain Bikes are Art
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by unsuspended
Are you talking FSR or just the hardtail
It was a hardtail on Ebay....got away as I didn't make it home in time. Oh well. I guess if the SIDS fork is flexy....I am 185 lbs. it was not the best specced bike for me. It did have a lot of nice lightweight components though. Went for $700 plus shipping.
DonValley is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-06 | 06:57 AM
  #6  
Too Much Crazy
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 3
From: NY

Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9

jeebus........it had to have some great components on it hopefully.

Thats alot of money for a 5 year old hardtail.
C Law is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-06 | 09:11 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Mountain Bikes are Art
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by unsuspended
jeebus........it had to have some great components on it hopefully.

Thats alot of money for a 5 year old hardtail.
You are right about that. It had been gone over though with new crankset (XT), Headset, (Chris King), bars, pedals, seat post, and shifters, etc. It seems in Canada we are paying quite a bit more for a bike than in the US. The cheapest Stumpjumper I can find would be last year's base model for about $1650 US with tax. I also have my eye on a Kona Kula Ddeluxe. We pay $2000 G cdn (Currently on a tear at .91 USD) plus 15% tax. I was talking to a forum member who picked one up for $1000 USD. That is a bargain. Anyway, I still am enjoying the test drive process, so it is just as well that a decision has not been made.
DonValley is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.