Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Instead of paying the IRS, I could have...

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Instead of paying the IRS, I could have...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-06 | 06:26 PM
  #1  
apclassic9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Caustic Soccer Mom
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 1
From: Millstone WV
Instead of paying the IRS, I could have...

bought a new bike for one of my sons

paid a chunk of mortgage

put money into my IRA

went on vacation

bought tickets/accomodations for my kid to go to Sonoma for the Nationals

but, no, as a self employed person who ends up paying less than $1,000/year in actual taxes, I just sent off my slightly late payment of $2000 for the social security I'll probably never get.... what could possibly happen with a spare 10K per year??
apclassic9 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-06 | 09:03 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
You could have ...

Well instead of paying your federal taxes you could have:

* Built your own armed forces including ground, naval and air personnell/equipment. In addition, you could would added a nuclear deterrent arsenal complete with submsersible and rail deployment platforms in addition to fixed silo launchers.
* Constructed your own transportation system including roadways, railways and airports.
* Purchased vast tracts of land and instituted your own national park system including personnell and requisite roadways.
* Built your own orbital exploration company who is tasked with satellite communications and earth observation including weather.
* Deploy your own border surveillance and protection force.
* Employ an army of scientists tasked with researching the value and safety of your dietary and pharmeceutical requirements.
* Contract with a private detective firm who would carefully scrutinize all your purchasing decisions for common safety and environmental hazards.
* Protect your wealth from the hordes of people around you who do not have such wealth.

Once upon a time, there were people who did all these types of things themselves. They were called lords and kings. They were the law and the only institutions that mattered on their estates. The law had no protection for common people. It only held protection for the nobility. The exception would be if you were considered property of such a person. Than you would have some protection in that your murderer would have to pay compensation to you lord.

Today we divvy up these tasks in an institution called government. To pay for the right to be protected by the law, we make annual payments. They're called taxes and they are the things you are complaining about.

If you wish to descend into a lawless lasseiz-fair hell, I suggest you purchase a ticket to Baghdad where the unregulated market rules supreme. It is truly the capitalist endgame paradise. And I promise you'll have to pay no taxes whatsoever.
willtsmith_nwi is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 11:52 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by willtsmith_nwi
Well instead of paying your federal taxes you could have:

* Built your own armed forces including ground, naval and air personnell/equipment. In addition, you could would added a nuclear deterrent arsenal complete with submsersible and rail deployment platforms in addition to fixed silo launchers.
* Constructed your own transportation system including roadways, railways and airports.
* Purchased vast tracts of land and instituted your own national park system including personnell and requisite roadways.
* Built your own orbital exploration company who is tasked with satellite communications and earth observation including weather.
* Deploy your own border surveillance and protection force.
* Employ an army of scientists tasked with researching the value and safety of your dietary and pharmeceutical requirements.
* Contract with a private detective firm who would carefully scrutinize all your purchasing decisions for common safety and environmental hazards.
* Protect your wealth from the hordes of people around you who do not have such wealth.

Once upon a time, there were people who did all these types of things themselves. They were called lords and kings. They were the law and the only institutions that mattered on their estates. The law had no protection for common people. It only held protection for the nobility. The exception would be if you were considered property of such a person. Than you would have some protection in that your murderer would have to pay compensation to you lord.

Today we divvy up these tasks in an institution called government. To pay for the right to be protected by the law, we make annual payments. They're called taxes and they are the things you are complaining about.

If you wish to descend into a lawless lasseiz-fair hell, I suggest you purchase a ticket to Baghdad where the unregulated market rules supreme. It is truly the capitalist endgame paradise. And I promise you'll have to pay no taxes whatsoever.
Little up-tight there ay?
I<3Mountain Dew is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 01:37 PM
  #4  
slowandsteady's Avatar
Faster but still slow
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 2
From: Jersey

Bikes: Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006

Little up-tight there ay?
Or maybe he actually realizes that we live in one of the greatest countries in the world and is grateful for what we have, instead of griping about a few thousand dollars. We are taxed far less than most countries. Just talk to anyone in Canada about their taxes. We actually get one heck of a bargain if you compare us to other civilized nations. Not that our government couldn't be more efficient....

It probably didn't even occur to this guy that in many other nations in this world he wouldn't even be allowed to own a business or property.
slowandsteady is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 02:10 PM
  #5  
never's Avatar
Custom User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,739
Likes: 0
From: T0L0K0
Originally Posted by slowandsteady
Just talk to anyone in Canada about their taxes.
But I'd still pick living in Canada over the States any day.
never is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 02:40 PM
  #6  
apclassic9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Caustic Soccer Mom
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 1
From: Millstone WV
Hey - it's the 15% off the top of my income for FICA (social security) that burns me - not the actual income tax......
apclassic9 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 04:02 PM
  #7  
Bockman's Avatar
Castiron Perineum
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
From: Taking a tip from Siu Blue Wind, I too am typing a lengthy passage of text down here to demonstrate the enormous amount of space available should one wish to use it-- in sharp contrast to the avatar text above this part.

Bikes: '06 Salsa Campeon, '84 Cannondale R1000, 80's Nishiki Ariel

Here's an important question: Who owns the fruits of your labor? If a percentage of what you earn is forcibly taken from you-- and by 'forcibly', I mean 'against your will' and with the coercive use of force (after all, if you don't pay your taxes men will come to arrest you, men with guns who will kill you if you resist)-- then you are a slave.

I'll put it another way: Would **** become morally acceptable if Congress passed a law legalizing it?

If you take the position that "No, idiot, **** is not nor would ever be morally acceptable", isn't it just as immoral when Congress legalizes the taking of one person's earnings to give to another? Surely if a private person took money from one person and gave it to another, we'd deem it theft and, as such, immoral. Does the same act become moral when Congress takes people's money to give to farmers, airline companies, Sadaam Hussein, or an impoverished family? No, it's still theft.
Bockman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 04:31 PM
  #8  
you can go backwards?!
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
instead of thinking of a response,
i rode my bike.
wompwomp is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 04:34 PM
  #9  
dminor's Avatar
Moar cowbell
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 7
From: The 509

Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.

See where making an innocent comment gets you apclassic? Hey Maelstrom, I think it's time to move this to Foo - - it's degenerated into a politcal war.
__________________
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
dminor is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 04:51 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
From: South City, Ca
Originally Posted by willtsmith_nwi
Well instead of paying your federal taxes you could have:

* Built your own armed forces including ground, naval and air personnell/equipment. In addition, you could would added a nuclear deterrent arsenal complete with submsersible and rail deployment platforms in addition to fixed silo launchers.
* Constructed your own transportation system including roadways, railways and airports.
* Purchased vast tracts of land and instituted your own national park system including personnell and requisite roadways.
* Built your own orbital exploration company who is tasked with satellite communications and earth observation including weather.
* Deploy your own border surveillance and protection force.
* Employ an army of scientists tasked with researching the value and safety of your dietary and pharmeceutical requirements.
* Contract with a private detective firm who would carefully scrutinize all your purchasing decisions for common safety and environmental hazards.
* Protect your wealth from the hordes of people around you who do not have such wealth.

Once upon a time, there were people who did all these types of things themselves. They were called lords and kings. They were the law and the only institutions that mattered on their estates. The law had no protection for common people. It only held protection for the nobility. The exception would be if you were considered property of such a person. Than you would have some protection in that your murderer would have to pay compensation to you lord.

Today we divvy up these tasks in an institution called government. To pay for the right to be protected by the law, we make annual payments. They're called taxes and they are the things you are complaining about.

If you wish to descend into a lawless lasseiz-fair hell, I suggest you purchase a ticket to Baghdad where the unregulated market rules supreme. It is truly the capitalist endgame paradise. And I promise you'll have to pay no taxes whatsoever.
Lets see her do these things with her money in bahgdad.
bought a new bike for one of my sons, paid a chunk of mortgage, put money into my IRA, went on vacation, bought tickets/accomodations for my kid to go to Sonoma for the Nationals

Originally Posted by never
But I'd still pick living in Canada over the States any day.
That's fine, less people on the good trails
Pheard is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 07:23 PM
  #11  
iamlucky13's Avatar
Footballus vita est
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 7
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: Trek 4500, Kona Dawg

Originally Posted by Bockman
Here's an important question: Who owns the fruits of your labor? If a percentage of what you earn is forcibly taken from you-- and by 'forcibly', I mean 'against your will' and with the coercive use of force (after all, if you don't pay your taxes men will come to arrest you, men with guns who will kill you if you resist)-- then you are a slave.

I'll put it another way: Would **** become morally acceptable if Congress passed a law legalizing it?

If you take the position that "No, idiot, **** is not nor would ever be morally acceptable", isn't it just as immoral when Congress legalizes the taking of one person's earnings to give to another? Surely if a private person took money from one person and gave it to another, we'd deem it theft and, as such, immoral. Does the same act become moral when Congress takes people's money to give to farmers, airline companies, Sadaam Hussein, or an impoverished family? No, it's still theft.
Ideally, the money we take from ourselves (we elected the people who do it remember) comes back to us in the form of public service of various forms. **** is a terrible example to use in an analogy.

Whether or not tax money is being properly used is a seperate discussion from whether or not taxes are acceptable to begin with.

I sympathize with apclassic, though. I've got serious doubts how much of my SS money I will ever see, and I know I could be in better financial position in the future managing it myself. It sure was a convenient way to temporarily inflate the federal coffers though. Oh well. It's just money. Can't take it with you.
__________________
"The internet is a place where absolutely nothing happens. You need to take advantage of that." ~ Strong Bad
iamlucky13 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 07:55 PM
  #12  
ZachS's Avatar
\||||||/
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
From: pdx

Bikes: highly modified specialized crossroads and GT hybrid (really a [formerly] 12-speed bmx cruiser, made before 'hybrid' took on its current meaning), as yet unmodified redline 925, couple of other projects

and just remember, that check was (or should have been) made payable to the "United States Treasury," not "IRS".
ZachS is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 07:58 PM
  #13  
I=Your Mother
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton,Ontario,Canada

Bikes: 2003 Rocky Mountain Element

Originally Posted by slowandsteady
Just talk to anyone in Canada about their taxes.
here in ontario we have to pay 15% tax, which is alot. but it seems alot less when you factor in the free health care. i mean, having a child in the states that is born prematurely and needs special attention in the hospital can cost as much as a house.
Roxter is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 08:02 PM
  #14  
swifferman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Roxter
here in ontario we have to pay 15% tax, which is alot. but it seems alot less when you factor in the free health care. i mean, having a child in the states that is born prematurely and needs special attention in the hospital can cost as much as a house.
that's only provincial tax and goods and services tax

include income tax etc. and about 50% of your gross income is going to the government.
swifferman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 08:28 PM
  #15  
vw addict's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 0
From: East coast

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac Expert, Cannondale R700, Specialized Langster, Iron Horse Hollowpoint Team, Schwinn Homegrown

wow, this thread is a little heated eh?
vw addict is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-06 | 10:35 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Virginia

Bikes: None

Originally Posted by willtsmith_nwi

Once upon a time, there were people who did all these types of things themselves. They were called lords and kings. They were the law and the only institutions that mattered on their estates.

Today we divvy up these tasks in an institution called government. To pay for the right to be protected by the law, we make annual payments. They're called taxes and they are the things you are complaining about.
Your polemic is interesting, but you are clearly out of your depth in terms of historical knowledge. Liberty, fraternity, and equality are different realities than taxation. Monarchs exacted heavy taxes (well up to 50 or 60% of a person's wealth). On average, taxes are less in democratic societies than in feudal societies, especially absolutist societies. In the U.S., many of the things we think of as "public works" (sewage, street construction, etc.) were more or less privately funded well into the 1800's and in some cases still are today. And I think it is clear that surveillance and defense will become increasingly privatized if trends continue. I'm not saying that I disagree with your political position, I'm not coming down either way, but your understanding of history glosses over too much.

Edit: You should know that in America taxation has increased as capitalism has become more developed.

Last edited by FrankJohns; 07-01-06 at 08:59 PM.
FrankJohns is offline  
Reply
Old 07-01-06 | 09:44 AM
  #17  
DoYlE_RiD3r's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Canada, Quebec

Bikes: Norco Rival "06

Instead of Paying IRS you could have your butt kicked
DoYlE_RiD3r is offline  
Reply
Old 07-01-06 | 09:57 AM
  #18  
apclassic9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Caustic Soccer Mom
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 1
From: Millstone WV
Jeez-Louise!! I just posted the quarterly fustration I feel when I hit the EFTPS "send" button!! A little fantasy about better, more enjoyable ways to spend money that I make & the government takes......

But, since some people got upset, a little clarification:
If you work for someone else, you have 7.65% of you paycheck deducted & supposedly sent to the folks at the Social Security Administration, and your employer sends a matching amount; if you are self employed, you get to pay the 15+% all by yourself. In actuallyity, this money DOES go straight to the US Treasure and is NOT reserved for Social Security, which is why the politicians are always decrying the sysytem's solvency. Most people could better manage this money themselves, with a better return - heck - even a 3% savings account would beat the uncertainty of receiving SS in 20 years!
Since this money is being spent as we deliver it, why should I NOT be upset when, as a Student Financial Aid professional, I see people receiving Food Stamps, Medical Cards, HUD pays their rent & utilities, and they have minimal, if any, earned wages - yet they can afford cell phones & lap tops. Add all these benefits together and assign equal value to a WORKING family, and not only would they be struggling to pay bills, but they might not be fully eligible for the basic Federal Pell Grant to further thier education and improve their economic situation.

And, yeah, it's about time to move this thread to FOO.

PS - Pheard - yada yada yada. I have a son in the military, so don't Baghdad me.
apclassic9 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-01-06 | 09:59 AM
  #19  
apclassic9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Caustic Soccer Mom
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 1
From: Millstone WV
Sorry Pheard - I meant that "yada yada" to go to Willt
apclassic9 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.