Computer for DH/FR
#26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain, although I'm Hungarian
Posts: 1,855
Bikes: Check signature
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hopper
Best set up I have seen was by a racer at Thredbo. Don't know the model but had sensor in back wheel and the transmitter on the inside of the swingarm. This thing had more electrical tap holding it down that I've ever seen. The computer was wireless and the reciever had a memory setting and was taped lightly (so can be remvoed to check previous run stats) to the inside of a gusset at the head tube. He then rigged up his own little kill switch he grabbed off a moto and wired it up so he could hit the start/stop button with the flick of his thumb on the handle bars.
The moto kill switch timer is a pretty common thing people rig up though for a timer device.
The moto kill switch timer is a pretty common thing people rig up though for a timer device.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
Your bike will be shaking and rattling on dh runs. Unlike xc runs where the movements aren't so jarring. I don't know the type of dh you are doing but the bike works hard on runs. A ht is even worse for being jarring. the computer monitor will...and I mean WILL spin, the screws can come loose and it CAN fly off. Those quick release ones WILL break off. Not to mention crashing.
Granted I ride a lot of technical XC on my big bike, and only do lift serviced DH a couple times a year, and blue mountain is not whistler.
My brother though had his speedometer rattle apart just riding to work. I guess you have to shop around.
Another higher-budget alternative is to put a GPS in "record tracklog" function and stuff it with some padding in your camelback. In addition to recording all speed functions, it will map and give vertical profiles of all your trails.
Of course, to see your speed in real time you'll need to mount the GPS on the handlebars, which is NOT a good idea for the reasons everyone else is giving.
#28
Taking "s" outta "Fast"
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Zoo York City
Posts: 1,989
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
50 euros? Damn, son. Ebay is your friend!
For reference,high retail for that computer is ~ 50-60 dollars.
For reference,high retail for that computer is ~ 50-60 dollars.
#29
Mullet Boy!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 690
Bikes: a giant upland 03, old europia road bike or something and soon to be getting a Norco Bigfoot or something of the sort
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
hey, get a watch with a stopwatch function, start it, wait till 10 seconds after you press it (you press it at 00:00:00 and start at 00:00:10) and when you finish wait about 10 seconds after you finish the run and stop it (finish at 00:07:32 stop it at 00:07:42) and just take 20 seconds of the final thingy, it's not super accurate but it gives you an approx. time
#30
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by ghettocruiser
Weird. The computer was the ONLY part on my old freeride bike (the old RM6 from '00) that I still have. It faithfully recorded each of the 15,000 km that I logged on the bike, and I never had any problems with it. It was a 1994-vintage vetta C500 wireless unit... I moved it to the new VPfree, it still works fine. I dislike riding without it.
Granted I ride a lot of technical XC on my big bike, and only do lift serviced DH a couple times a year, and blue mountain is not whistler.
My brother though had his speedometer rattle apart just riding to work. I guess you have to shop around.
Another higher-budget alternative is to put a GPS in "record tracklog" function and stuff it with some padding in your camelback. In addition to recording all speed functions, it will map and give vertical profiles of all your trails.
Of course, to see your speed in real time you'll need to mount the GPS on the handlebars, which is NOT a good idea for the reasons everyone else is giving.
Granted I ride a lot of technical XC on my big bike, and only do lift serviced DH a couple times a year, and blue mountain is not whistler.
My brother though had his speedometer rattle apart just riding to work. I guess you have to shop around.
Another higher-budget alternative is to put a GPS in "record tracklog" function and stuff it with some padding in your camelback. In addition to recording all speed functions, it will map and give vertical profiles of all your trails.
Of course, to see your speed in real time you'll need to mount the GPS on the handlebars, which is NOT a good idea for the reasons everyone else is giving.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Maelstrom
I suppose it is possible. I just don't see many up here, and I have tried myself...I found them exceptionally fragile ... I would LOVE one though, being a stats guy I would like to see some numbers once in a while
On the wide-open stretch at Blue mountain some of the DM guys figured they were going 50-60km/h, but I knew that I was clocking in the mid-70s, and those guys were going a LOT faster than me.
I find it odd that people wouldn't want to quantify their rides, at least as an option.
#32
Ride bike or bike ride?
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 1,447
Bikes: MongoosePro DH, Dart custom road bike, .243 Racing FR street bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drunken Chicken
Sounds a bit complicated yet great. So basically he had the little sensor device on his rear wheel and then used lots of tape to secure the transmitter. I don't really understand the receiver part: was it taped inside a gusset (a .243 style frame gusset)? Great idea though, thanks for posting it up.