okay, lets argue about full vs front suspension
#76
Moar cowbell
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The 509
Posts: 12,481
Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by LowCel
Yeah, me either. Now $2,000 for a frame, that I can see.
But I used to think it was insane to spend over $20K on a transportation car (Heck I thought it was insanity when they crept over 10K). I remember that in 1971 there were Ford ads that told you that you could down to your local dealer, plunk down 10 grand and order a DeTomaso Pantera. That was a heady amount for a heady piece of machinery.
__________________
RST Suspension | Canfield Bikes | 7iDP Protection | Maxxis | Renthal | Hayes | VonZipper Optics | GoPro
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
#77
Throw the stick!!!!
Originally Posted by dminor
You are bad!
I remember thinking about how I couldn't believe anyone would pay $1,000 for a bike. It just didn't make sense, not only was a bike not worth it at the time $1,000 was a whole lot of money! Well, things changed. I got more into the sport, rode a couple of nice bikes and found out how nice they felt and rode. I was hooked. Not only that but my financial situation slowly changed as well. I got to the point that I could actually afford to have some nice toys and not take food off of the table. So why not, I work my butt off so why not spend money on things that I enjoy.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Madison, CT
Posts: 680
Bikes: '98 Rhygin SS road,'99 Fat Chance Ti Fat, '95 Azonic Mtn bike, '88 Giant Sedona.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
My Ti Fat Chance was 2395 frame only in 1999. It was worth it. LowCel, if you're interested in trying to find a Yo Eddy, check out this site https://www.retrobike.co.uk/ These guys have a ton of vintage bikes and a lot of info.
#79
Flatland hack
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nowhere near the mountains :/
Posts: 3,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dollar for dollar, HT is so much better.
#80
Throw the stick!!!!
Originally Posted by rbrsddn
My Ti Fat Chance was 2395 frame only in 1999. It was worth it. LowCel, if you're interested in trying to find a Yo Eddy, check out this site https://www.retrobike.co.uk/ These guys have a ton of vintage bikes and a lot of info.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
#81
Stooge
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 847
Bikes: one of each
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is my first post on Bike Forums in a couple months, I bought a FS bike today for the first time after riding a hardtail bike the last year and a half. The hardtail was working fine until I started doing trails with some friends and found that the 700 size mountain tires and cheap shock weren't cutting it. I like to take big jumps and I'm not light so long travel was important. In the end I tried a stumpjumper FSR and immediately liked it better for jumps and overall smooth feel than the hardtails I've been riding since a kid. After an hour and a half today on trails and streets, it's definitely a step above my old bike but a hardtails would cut it if need be. The rear suspension, which I never really considered before, changes the entire feel of the ride on a dirty trail as well as on the concrete. It's so night-and-day, you have to try each and decide for yourself which works for you. Hardtails definitely have their place, especially on paved roads, it's no question which is better. But if you're throwing 200+ lbs around over tree roots and such, boy does a fox suspension front and rear make you feel like the master of your domain!
#83
Throw the stick!!!!
Originally Posted by ashleywood.ash
fs = expensive
xc = cheaper
xc = cheaper
*edit - Oops, just noticed that pete posted pretty much the exact same question at the end of his post.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
Last edited by LowCel; 02-05-07 at 01:52 PM.
#85
Fourth Degree Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: American Gardens Building
Posts: 3,826
Bikes: 2005 Kona Cinder Cone & 2010 Cannondale SuperSix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by santiago
Maybe he meant 'ht' and not 'xc'.
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Madison, CT
Posts: 680
Bikes: '98 Rhygin SS road,'99 Fat Chance Ti Fat, '95 Azonic Mtn bike, '88 Giant Sedona.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
You can spend a lot of money on a hardtail. I know.