Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Hate the new shimano "integration"

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Hate the new shimano "integration"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-03 | 08:38 PM
  #26  
Jim311's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Florida
I have built a VERY nice mountain bike using Shimano's parts VERY sparingly. And actually I probably paid less total than if I'd used equivalent Shimano parts. Oh.. and every part on my bike also works with practically every other manufacturers standard parts, too. Standards are a good thing. I dislike Shimano, so I try like hell to stay away from their parts.. it's pretty simple, really.
Jim311 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-19-03 | 06:21 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
I can't be fussed about who likes Shimano and who does'nt. The facts are :
They make the best hubs $ for pound.
Their shifters are better than anything lese out there.
Their Derailleurs are by far the best SRAM included
Their Crank sets are the best value for money
Their BB's outlast everything else offroad. ISIS? what a load of crap!

Their chains are crap though.

Rapid Rise is the most logical thing they have invented and I hope it never dies. Absolutley brilliant stuff.

Right so you don't want to be locked into using Shimano components. Then don't. buy bits from everywhere else.
Personally I like to be able to walk into any bike shop anywhere in teh world and buy a similar component to the one which has just broken. Who else offers that?

Long live Dual Control
Long Live Rapid Rise
Long live Octalink
Long ive Shimano.
TimB is offline  
Reply
Old 05-19-03 | 06:39 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 7,963
Likes: 1
From: Parrish, FL

Bikes: Lots

Hey Tim, need another derailleur? Rev.Chuck, has one for sale!

L8R
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
a2psyklnut is offline  
Reply
Old 05-19-03 | 10:17 AM
  #29  
Jim311's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Florida
TimB is talking out of his ass.
Jim311 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-19-03 | 10:51 AM
  #30  
Maelstrom's Avatar
Wood Licker
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Originally posted by TimB
The facts are :
They make the best hubs $ for pound.
Yeah cheap. No engagement points and disposable...not the best for the money just the most easy to dispose of.

Their Crank sets are the best value for money
Smoking some funny stuff lately? FSA right now probably offers the strongest most durable cranks for the money with Raceface being up there as well. Shimano definately doesn't own this category.

Their BB's outlast everything else offroad. ISIS? what a load of crap!
Now I hope you are just being sarcastic for the sake of being sarcastic. Please let you be a troller...PLEASE!!! ...

Shimano makes great stuff for xc. Yes they do...xc
Maelstrom is offline  
Reply
Old 05-19-03 | 11:55 AM
  #31  
khuon's Avatar
DEADBEEF
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 12,234
Likes: 10
From: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA

Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte

Originally posted by Maelstrom

Shimano makes great stuff for xc. Yes they do...xc
Even for XC, I defer to other brands where they're superior. Here's the breakdown on my XC bike of components in Shimano's playing field:

Shimano:
-- Front Hub (came stock but will probably switch to Mavic wheelsets in the future)
-- Rear Hub (came stock but will probably switch to Mavic wheelsets in the future)
-- Shifters
-- Brake Levers
-- Computer
-- Cables
-- Front Derailleur
-- Rear Derailleur
-- Cassette

Race Face:
-- Headset
-- Stem
-- Bottom Bracket
-- Crankarms
-- Chainrings

Avid:
-- Front Brake
-- Rear Brake

SRAM:
-- Chain

Pedals:
-- Time

Shoes:
-- Sidi

From past experience with Shimano's MTB stuff, I find that in general, they're pretty good with the intricate parts (Shimano shifting is uber smooth) but get surpassed in the areas where the parts are simpler but need to be more durable.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline  
Reply
Old 05-19-03 | 04:21 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
I'm no troller
and you'e right they stuff is geared toward XC.

If anyone has RR derailleurs they don't want I'll give youmy postaL address and you can send for free.
As faras I'm concerned RR is the bees knees in MTB hifting.

And whats wrong with Shimano Cranks??? They're stiff, quite light excellent finish quality and they're cheap (exceot XTR).

Also the BB's are the most hassle free I've used. Tried ISIS and it failed after 3months. Sold the cranks junked the BB and got a Coda Tarantual running on a ES70. Thats been running for a yr in the british climate. no play , no squeaks, no problemo.

And the hubs, Well if you compare them to King hubs then yeah their engagement is lousy, but Kings make all other hubs look lousy. But £430 for King hubs vs £150 for XTR!! I think I'll stay with the XTR thanks. I can have another set of wheels for the price of the King hubs.

All in all Shimno gives you way more bang for your buck than any of the small manufacturers. Anyone who denies this is deluding himself.
Now if you prefer boutique brands, then say so. I choose function over brand name.
Forme Shimano gets the job done, efficiently and reliably. What more can you ask for.
TimB is offline  
Reply
Old 05-19-03 | 04:34 PM
  #33  
Maelstrom's Avatar
Wood Licker
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

and you'e right they stuff is geared toward XC
Thats probably the issue. This is suppost to be a gruppo dedicated to dhillers and freeriders and I assume this includes urban guys as well.

Originally posted by TimB
And whats wrong with Shimano Cranks??? They're stiff, quite light excellent finish quality and they're cheap (exceot XTR).
To be honest I am not a good enough rider to tell the difference. But being forced to use one or the other is pissy. I also don't like the look.

Also the BB's are the most hassle free I've used. Tried ISIS and it failed after 3months. Sold the cranks junked the BB and got a Coda Tarantual running on a ES70. Thats been running for a yr in the british climate. no play , no squeaks, no problemo.
Xc maybe but I have blown out a couple of shimano bb's. Not to say they are the worst (I don't like truvative as I smoked those in 2 weeks). Raceface and FSA are where it is at for strenght in bb area imo.

And the hubs, Well if you compare them to King hubs then yeah their engagement is lousy, but Kings make all other hubs look lousy. But £430 for King hubs vs £150 for XTR!! I think I'll stay with the XTR thanks. I can have another set of wheels for the price of the King hubs.
Actually compare them to ANYTHING. 90% of the aftermarket hubs have double the engagement points if not more. The aftermarket ones are also more durable and easier to rebuild (in some cases) CK is an exception as I agree dollar for dollar CK don't offer much value for the average rider.

All in all Shimno gives you way more bang for your buck than any of the small manufacturers. Anyone who denies this is deluding himself.
You are right. But McDonalds give me my best bang for buck when it comes to dinner. It still isn't good for me or most hardcore dh and freeriders


Forme Shimano gets the job done, efficiently and reliably. What more can you ask for.
Since this is for the freeride and dh side of things I still think this gruppo leaves a lot to be desired. I have named why and am still 100% sure I am right.

BTW I was kidding about the troller thing
Maelstrom is offline  
Reply
Old 05-20-03 | 04:18 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
LOL!!
Ok for freeriding and DH the XTR was never intended. The where the New saint gruppo fits in. And it has all the right ingredients for an excellent set of parts for that application.

The new XTR type BB/Crank interface is ver very stiff and should be bloody strong. Also easy to service and Q factor is not an issue. It's actually the same as my Coda Taratula which is lower than a Deore LX.
The hubs are still cup and cone and thats far bettter for the kind of loads that free riders and DH 'ers exert on their components. Youdon't find cartridge bearing s in MotoX bikes do you? They're all cup and cone.

And Shimano hubs are dead easy to service. OK the freehubs do have a reputation of exploding although I've never had one break on any ofmy MTB's

I've had Hope Xc hubs and sold them and the spare set. Just required to much maiantenance to keep them running. If I add up the time for the miantenence and service bills at the LBS I would rather have just replaced the freehub each time.
TimB is offline  
Reply
Old 05-20-03 | 10:32 AM
  #35  
Maelstrom's Avatar
Wood Licker
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,966
Likes: 2
From: Whistler,BC

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Originally posted by TimB
LOL!!
Ok for freeriding and DH the XTR was never intended. The where the New saint gruppo fits in. And it has all the right ingredients for an excellent set of parts for that application.
I thought thats what we were talking about. My mistake As for the right ingredients. Don't even get me started. I have posted enough times on why I think this gruppo needs some changes.

And Shimano hubs are dead easy to service. OK the freehubs do have a reputation of exploding although I've never had one break on any ofmy MTB's
I blow a freehub every 2 months or so. And absolutely destroyed the front hub within 6 month (I mean the thing blew up, pretty cool to watch if I hadnt been on the bike)

Any there is no need to keep going round and round. I disagree and don't think the hub/der is a good thing or even the shimano disc brake idea of requiring their brakes. Proprietary sucks. Dont get me wrong I like Shimano but in 1985 I chose PC over Mac for the very reasons I will choose someone (I don't know who yet) over shimano.

I do hav one change to all of the things I have said against the saint group. I said at one point you could not run ANY other chainguide with their bb crank interface. I have been told by a friend I am wrong. It does fit regular chain guides...
Maelstrom is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.