Aluminium rigid fork on titanium frame
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Aluminium rigid fork on titanium frame
Has anyone tried an aluminum rigid fork on a TI frame?
I didn't find anything on this, and I was thinking how they would get together.
What do you think?
I didn't find anything on this, and I was thinking how they would get together.
What do you think?
#3
Senior Member
Agree, you'd best be served running a carbon fork or even a steel or Ti fork.
An aluminum rigid fork will give you a harsh ride up front, negating the ride benefits of the Ti frame.
An aluminum rigid fork will give you a harsh ride up front, negating the ride benefits of the Ti frame.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,374
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2483 Post(s)
Liked 2,955 Times
in
1,678 Posts
The measured difference in vertical compliance under a given load between a Litespeed Tuscany racing geometry frame and a Cannondale aluminum frame with comparable geometry was 3/200 (0.015) inch. Forks show even less difference in measured vertical compliance. Despite the cherished beliefs of the credulous, no one can feel any difference in flexibility between two forks of comparable design. An aluminum fork is fine; so is a carbon fork.
#5
Senior Member
Lab results are one thing, real world results are another.
Do a couple km ride on rocky rooty trails on a rigid aluminum and then on a comparable steel or carbon fork. I can tell you I feel much less fatigued and my hands and arms less jarred on steel or carbon forks than on a alu rigid fork.
Do a couple km ride on rocky rooty trails on a rigid aluminum and then on a comparable steel or carbon fork. I can tell you I feel much less fatigued and my hands and arms less jarred on steel or carbon forks than on a alu rigid fork.
#6
Moar cowbell
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The 509
Posts: 12,481
Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Bad idea mixing those metals: galvanic reaction combined with dissimilar resonant frequencies of the tubes will eventually cause the aluminum component to explode and the titanium one to implode. Simultaneously. Catastrophically.
__________________
RST Suspension | Canfield Bikes | 7iDP Protection | Maxxis | Renthal | Hayes | VonZipper Optics | GoPro
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You must be an Engineer. But that's why yall need Lab Techs. I would need to run some temp cycles to check for differing expansion/contraction rates with dissimilar materials.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,704
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The measured difference in vertical compliance under a given load between a Litespeed Tuscany racing geometry frame and a Cannondale aluminum frame with comparable geometry was 3/200 (0.015) inch. Forks show even less difference in measured vertical compliance. Despite the cherished beliefs of the credulous, no one can feel any difference in flexibility between two forks of comparable design. An aluminum fork is fine; so is a carbon fork.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,104
Bikes: Too many to count
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Trakhak is on the money on this one. Lab results are the same as real worl results. The onus is on the delusional to produce some numbers and not purported "feel" that would support their conjecture.
#10
.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939
Bikes: Hecklah
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I notice alot of fore/aft compliance with my rigid steel fork. It helps take the edge off. Fer sure, but very little vertical compliance. I can see the allure of steel for the right type of rider on the right type of trail though. I can also see why there'd be mildly noticeable vertical compliance on a steel frame versus a steel fork.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CampioneDItalia
Classic & Vintage
30
01-25-18 11:25 AM
box opener
Bicycle Mechanics
10
09-03-17 08:14 AM
Morbo
Mountain Biking
9
11-19-12 04:12 PM