Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Aluminium rigid fork on titanium frame

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Aluminium rigid fork on titanium frame

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-11, 05:42 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Aluminium rigid fork on titanium frame

Has anyone tried an aluminum rigid fork on a TI frame?
I didn't find anything on this, and I was thinking how they would get together.
What do you think?
jules13 is offline  
Old 11-25-11, 07:56 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Hou-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As long as everything mates up fine, you should be ok. If I had a Ti frame and wanted to go rigid, I would go carbon.
Hou-Tex is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 03:56 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
commo_soulja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: C-Ville
Posts: 1,251

Bikes: are fun to ride

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 35 Times in 23 Posts
Agree, you'd best be served running a carbon fork or even a steel or Ti fork.

An aluminum rigid fork will give you a harsh ride up front, negating the ride benefits of the Ti frame.
commo_soulja is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 04:45 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,374
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2483 Post(s)
Liked 2,955 Times in 1,678 Posts
The measured difference in vertical compliance under a given load between a Litespeed Tuscany racing geometry frame and a Cannondale aluminum frame with comparable geometry was 3/200 (0.015) inch. Forks show even less difference in measured vertical compliance. Despite the cherished beliefs of the credulous, no one can feel any difference in flexibility between two forks of comparable design. An aluminum fork is fine; so is a carbon fork.
Trakhak is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 08:33 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
commo_soulja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: C-Ville
Posts: 1,251

Bikes: are fun to ride

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 35 Times in 23 Posts
Lab results are one thing, real world results are another.

Do a couple km ride on rocky rooty trails on a rigid aluminum and then on a comparable steel or carbon fork. I can tell you I feel much less fatigued and my hands and arms less jarred on steel or carbon forks than on a alu rigid fork.
commo_soulja is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 12:53 PM
  #6  
Moar cowbell
 
dminor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The 509
Posts: 12,481

Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Bad idea mixing those metals: galvanic reaction combined with dissimilar resonant frequencies of the tubes will eventually cause the aluminum component to explode and the titanium one to implode. Simultaneously. Catastrophically.
__________________
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
dminor is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 01:17 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Hou-Tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dminor
Bad idea mixing those metals: galvanic reaction combined with dissimilar resonant frequencies of the tubes will eventually cause the aluminum component to explode and the titanium one to implode. Simultaneously. Catastrophically.
You must be an Engineer. But that's why yall need Lab Techs. I would need to run some temp cycles to check for differing expansion/contraction rates with dissimilar materials.
Hou-Tex is offline  
Old 11-27-11, 07:53 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,704
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
The measured difference in vertical compliance under a given load between a Litespeed Tuscany racing geometry frame and a Cannondale aluminum frame with comparable geometry was 3/200 (0.015) inch. Forks show even less difference in measured vertical compliance. Despite the cherished beliefs of the credulous, no one can feel any difference in flexibility between two forks of comparable design. An aluminum fork is fine; so is a carbon fork.
I suppose you have yet to ride a Ritchey Logic fork on a Bridgestone MB. Show me a aluminum fork that can routinely flex 3/4" for more than a few cycles and I will believe you actually know what you are talking about concerning fork choices.
Fred Smedley is offline  
Old 01-15-12, 08:09 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
bellweatherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,104

Bikes: Too many to count

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Trakhak is on the money on this one. Lab results are the same as real worl results. The onus is on the delusional to produce some numbers and not purported "feel" that would support their conjecture.
bellweatherman is offline  
Old 01-15-12, 08:23 PM
  #10  
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939

Bikes: Hecklah

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Trakhak
Forks show even less difference in measured vertical compliance. Despite the cherished beliefs of the credulous, no one can feel any difference in flexibility between two forks of comparable design. An aluminum fork is fine; so is a carbon fork.
I notice alot of fore/aft compliance with my rigid steel fork. It helps take the edge off. Fer sure, but very little vertical compliance. I can see the allure of steel for the right type of rider on the right type of trail though. I can also see why there'd be mildly noticeable vertical compliance on a steel frame versus a steel fork.
ed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CampioneDItalia
Classic & Vintage
30
01-25-18 11:25 AM
box opener
Bicycle Mechanics
10
09-03-17 08:14 AM
Fogre
Road Cycling
0
08-07-15 10:30 AM
Morbo
Mountain Biking
9
11-19-12 04:12 PM
Briareos
Framebuilders
4
06-12-11 09:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.