Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Weird size question

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Weird size question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-12 | 09:13 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Weird size question

I am in the market for a new MTB. Heavy into road cycling but going for a new MTB. Getting a specialized rockhopper. Cant decide first of all on a traditional 26er, or a 29er? Next, I own a Specialiszed cross trail in a 19". It is a bit too big for me. I have a weird body apparently. I am 6' but have a longer torso and shorter legs. On a road bike, everyone when I tell them I am 6' says on you are a 598cm bike without actually measuring me. Once inseam etc are measured I come out to a 56.2cm bike in a perfect world. So, according to everyone I should be a 19" MTB, however I am debating a 17.5". Also the 29er in a 19" is bigger than a 26er in a 19" and then also the 17.5 in a 29er is bigger than a 26er in a 17.5. Am I crazy for thinking that if I get a 29er I should go with the 17.5 but maybe if I go with the 26er go with the 19? Make any sense? Any BTW please do not respond with, go test ride the bikes and see what feels best. I am looking for opinions etc. Anyone else out there in my position? Anyone out there around 6' ride a 17.5 or should I absolutely be a 19"?
mrfizzed is offline  
Reply
Old 05-15-12 | 09:23 AM
  #2  
cryptid01's Avatar
one less horse
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,601
Likes: 2
From: The Hinterlands
One of my opinions is that you get the smallest possible frame that you feel comfortable on. It'll be lighter, stiffer, more maneuverable, and give you more standover clearance.

Another one of my opinions is that you shouldn't try to apply what you know about road bike sizing and rider positioning to mtbs.

And finally, it is my opinion that opinions are worthless unless you actually test ride the bikes and see what feels best.
cryptid01 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-15-12 | 10:04 AM
  #3  
Daspydyr's Avatar
Pedals, Paddles and Poles
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 69
From: Vegas Valley, NV

Bikes: Santa Cruz Tallboy, Ridley Noah, Scott Spark 20

I'm in a similar situation with more body than legs. (6'3", 33" inseam) I'm kinda thinking that the 29er will have a longer top tube to accommodate the slightly larger wheels, that might help.

What Crypt says is hard to top and fits my thinking. Lighter means less work, smaller means nimble. Comfort means you will want to ride more. Stems and seat adjustment can make up for the tops tube length and get your body in good position.

What is your primary riding interest? XC, downhill, racing, camping, recreational sightseeing?
__________________
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!

I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
Daspydyr is offline  
Reply
Old 05-15-12 | 10:08 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
probably be doing a lot of light tray riding with some occasional single track and lots of recreational riding. also will ride it on the road with my kids when they wanna go for a bike ride
mrfizzed is offline  
Reply
Old 05-16-12 | 05:54 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 621
Likes: 1
More rougher harder riding would mean get the smaller stronger more nimble wheels. Having said that the 29er will be OK at it too - a friend just bought a light 29er - he's very hard to keep up with on smooth trails now.
jolly_ross is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GJD1
Mountain Biking
5
04-03-18 06:45 PM
thehammerdog
Mountain Biking
3
08-25-13 06:22 PM
illdthedj
Mountain Biking
8
10-07-12 12:12 PM
grassfedbeef
Mountain Biking
4
07-16-10 04:24 PM
ApexAZ
Mountain Biking
8
03-16-10 02:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.