Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Type of mtb

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Type of mtb

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-18 | 03:01 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Type of mtb

Hi
Most of my riding is on tarmac trials, although at times cover mountains. I run on semi slicks, 26 inch hard tail, which are fine for the mountains I cycle on. Question. 29er or 27.5 as I need a new bike
I'm 5'8
GJD1 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-18 | 08:12 AM
  #2  
Kapusta's Avatar
Advanced Slacker
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,286
Likes: 2,602

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Originally Posted by GJD1
Hi
Most of my riding is on tarmac trials, although at times cover mountains. I run on semi slicks, 26 inch hard tail, which are fine for the mountains I cycle on. Question. 29er or 27.5 as I need a new bike
I'm 5'8
If most of your riding is on tarmac and you are running slicks, why not look at a big tire road bike, such as a “gravel” or “all road bike? Something that can run bike tires (like 42s)?

Otherwise, I would go with a 29er. IMO, the main reason to go with 27.5 (or 26) with an MTB is for the handeling aspects In technical trail riding.

That is my take on it, anyway.
Kapusta is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-18 | 02:06 PM
  #3  
hig4s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 662
Likes: 7
From: Florida

Bikes: Evil Insurgent, Giant Stance, Wife has Liv Cypress, son has Motobecane HT529

I say for any riding, the bike that feels best. If you are just as comfortable on 27.5 and 29, for hardpack and tarmac I say 29.
hig4s is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-18 | 10:17 AM
  #4  
Bigbus's Avatar
Very Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 344
From: Always on the Run

Bikes: More than last week

I know this is an older post, but I just have to add my 2 centavos. I have access to both a 29" and a 27.5". I'm 5'10" tall and I definitely prefer the 27.5" for maneuverability and handling compared to the 29er. Especially on trails with lots of tight corners the 27.5 just seems to cut them tighter and easier. When braking into banked corners, the 29er feels awkward and clumsy compared to the 27.5. Until you've ridden both and can decide for yourself though...
Bigbus is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-18 | 05:41 PM
  #5  
WannaGetGood's Avatar
B*ck From Th* D**d
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 8
From: Lower Mainland, BC

Bikes: 2015 Kona Process 153

It sounds like a 29er would be the best option for you. If you were covering more on the mountain with tight corners, then I would suggest otherwise. Even with that said, people say its something you can get through with enough practice.
WannaGetGood is offline  
Reply
Old 04-03-18 | 06:45 PM
  #6  
rumrunn6's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,465
Likes: 4,547
From: 25 miles northwest of Boston

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

why that & not a 700c "hybrid"? tire width?
rumrunn6 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dieterpi
Mountain Biking
201
11-23-20 06:14 PM
UberIM
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
35
11-21-18 12:27 PM
Skreech
Mountain Biking
16
05-31-16 12:38 PM
magohn
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
92
08-30-12 09:58 AM
meatpants
Mountain Biking
15
10-21-11 08:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.