Climbing & elevation grade % for NYC bridges?
#1
Thread Starter
Batüwü Griekgriek


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,927
Likes: 7
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Climbing & elevation grade % for NYC bridges?
Does anyone know the % grade one rides up when crossing the local bridges?
For instance, on the Queensboro bridge, it is listed as 130 ft high, and the approach from Queens is 984 feet, and 1182 from the Manhattan side.
assuming I am doing the calculations right (and I realize the height is less than 130 ft if accounting for the elevation at the onramps, which must be higher than sea level, I get grades of about 13% from Queens and 11% from Manhattan.
Of course, the Manhattan side climbs steeper early on...Those figures actually sound reversed - isn't the climb from Queens longer and less steep? It sure feels that way.
are there any DOT or other links to published grades for it and the other local bridges?
For instance, on the Queensboro bridge, it is listed as 130 ft high, and the approach from Queens is 984 feet, and 1182 from the Manhattan side.
assuming I am doing the calculations right (and I realize the height is less than 130 ft if accounting for the elevation at the onramps, which must be higher than sea level, I get grades of about 13% from Queens and 11% from Manhattan.
Of course, the Manhattan side climbs steeper early on...Those figures actually sound reversed - isn't the climb from Queens longer and less steep? It sure feels that way.
are there any DOT or other links to published grades for it and the other local bridges?
#2
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,162
Likes: 647
From: Brooklyn NY
Bikes: Kuota Kredo/Chorus, Trek 7000 commuter, Trek 8000 MTB and a few others
Those grades sound too high for the amount of effort involved. A 13% grade is a killer grade, and the 59th st bridge is not a killer climb.
I don't know if the bridges are listed, but NYCC.org has a listing of the grades of many of the climbs in the NYC area.https://nycc.org/resources/re_regional_grades.html
They're not listed, but you get the idea.
I don't know if the bridges are listed, but NYCC.org has a listing of the grades of many of the climbs in the NYC area.https://nycc.org/resources/re_regional_grades.html
They're not listed, but you get the idea.
Last edited by zacster; 04-05-09 at 02:34 PM.
#3
Destroyer of Wheels
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,531
Likes: 7
From: Creating some FA-Qs
Bikes: Surly LHT, Dahon folding bike. RIP Nishiki Sport, Downtube IXNS, 1950's MMB3 Russian Folding Bike, MTB
Yup, that's the link from the index thread.
__________________
The Almighty Clyde FAQ || Northeast Index
eTrex Vista References || Road Reference
It's the year of the enema!
The Almighty Clyde FAQ || Northeast Index
eTrex Vista References || Road Reference
It's the year of the enema!
#4
Isn't the pedestrian/bike path on the QBB the old trolley line? I am pretty sure that a trolley isn't capable of a grade much higher than a train, so something less than 8 or 9% seems about the limit.
#5
Thread Starter
Batüwü Griekgriek


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,927
Likes: 7
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Yeah, I can't imagine the bridge being more than 2-3% on either side - if the north hill in Central Park is only 4.45. The Queensboro bridge is definitely easier than that, especially on the queens side.
#7
Thread Starter
Batüwü Griekgriek


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,927
Likes: 7
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Interesting - the Manhattan and Brooklyn seem to be the easiest to me. The QBB and the WBB seem harder....
I believe the Willy B is the longest; I think that is the hardest (esp. on the Manhattan approach). But I like that it has that nice easier section the middle. The QBB has that false flat as you approach the center and it gets really windy up there which doesn't help!
I believe the Willy B is the longest; I think that is the hardest (esp. on the Manhattan approach). But I like that it has that nice easier section the middle. The QBB has that false flat as you approach the center and it gets really windy up there which doesn't help!
__________________
Last edited by pgoat; 09-26-25 at 07:13 AM.
#8
Female Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Bikes: Citizen Tokyo (Silver), Schwinn Collegiate (1980's)
The Brooklyn side of the Manhattan Bridge has that winding steep slope that's a nasty setup for what's ahead but I keep my eyes on the prize and just keep pedaling.
It was really windy on Friday and the headwind was wicked strong but I still made in across and back over the Manhattan Bridge without stopping. So far, I haven't had to stop while going over any bridges yet... But I know once really humid, hot weather hits it'll sap the strength from me super quick... Not looking forward to the summer riding across the bridges again. Ugh.
It was really windy on Friday and the headwind was wicked strong but I still made in across and back over the Manhattan Bridge without stopping. So far, I haven't had to stop while going over any bridges yet... But I know once really humid, hot weather hits it'll sap the strength from me super quick... Not looking forward to the summer riding across the bridges again. Ugh.
#9
I always have a harder time riding east across the Brooklyn Bridge, from Manhattan to Brooklyn, than I do riding west, from Brooklyn to Manhattan. Is it the wind? By comparison the Manhattan Bridge seems much easier, either way, either side.
#10
Destroyer of Wheels
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,531
Likes: 7
From: Creating some FA-Qs
Bikes: Surly LHT, Dahon folding bike. RIP Nishiki Sport, Downtube IXNS, 1950's MMB3 Russian Folding Bike, MTB
On all the east river crossings I'm pretty sure it's steeper but shorter from Manhattan so on the way back the incline is much longer.
__________________
The Almighty Clyde FAQ || Northeast Index
eTrex Vista References || Road Reference
It's the year of the enema!
The Almighty Clyde FAQ || Northeast Index
eTrex Vista References || Road Reference
It's the year of the enema!
#11
Thread Starter
Batüwü Griekgriek


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,927
Likes: 7
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
I agree - it's really pronounced and noticeable on the QBB.
#12
Destroyer of Wheels
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,531
Likes: 7
From: Creating some FA-Qs
Bikes: Surly LHT, Dahon folding bike. RIP Nishiki Sport, Downtube IXNS, 1950's MMB3 Russian Folding Bike, MTB
Especially after midnight, I swear they add like an extra mile to that bridge every night!
__________________
The Almighty Clyde FAQ || Northeast Index
eTrex Vista References || Road Reference
It's the year of the enema!
The Almighty Clyde FAQ || Northeast Index
eTrex Vista References || Road Reference
It's the year of the enema!
#13
Female Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Bikes: Citizen Tokyo (Silver), Schwinn Collegiate (1980's)
#14
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 189
Likes: 1
From: Chilltown
I rode over the Brooklyn & Manhattan Bridges on Saturday with my Garmin 305 (with barometric altimeter), and looking at the maps & elevation/distance data in Ascent, came up with these numbers:
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
Manhattan side to tower: 86' rise over .47 mile -> 3.5% average grade
Manhattan side to crest: 100' rise over .63 mile -> 3.0% grade
Brooklyn side to tower: 92' rise over .46 mile -> 3.8% grade
Brooklyn side to crest: 100' rise over .60 mile -> 3.2% grade
MANHATTAN BRIDGE
Brooklyn side to tower: 79' rise over .45 mile -> 3.5%
Brooklyn side to crest: 98' rise over .56 mile -> 3.3%
Manhattan side to tower: 84' rise over .48 mile -> 3.3%
Manhattan side to crest: 106' rise over .66 mile -> 3.0%
The dots in the pics show where I started counting distance & elevation. In each instance, this was more or less the point where the data showed the elevation starting to increase.

If you went out with surveying equipment you'd probably come up with slightly different #s, but this should be a pretty good representation of the grades & distances relative to one another.
BROOKLYN BRIDGE
Manhattan side to tower: 86' rise over .47 mile -> 3.5% average grade
Manhattan side to crest: 100' rise over .63 mile -> 3.0% grade
Brooklyn side to tower: 92' rise over .46 mile -> 3.8% grade
Brooklyn side to crest: 100' rise over .60 mile -> 3.2% grade
MANHATTAN BRIDGE
Brooklyn side to tower: 79' rise over .45 mile -> 3.5%
Brooklyn side to crest: 98' rise over .56 mile -> 3.3%
Manhattan side to tower: 84' rise over .48 mile -> 3.3%
Manhattan side to crest: 106' rise over .66 mile -> 3.0%
The dots in the pics show where I started counting distance & elevation. In each instance, this was more or less the point where the data showed the elevation starting to increase.

If you went out with surveying equipment you'd probably come up with slightly different #s, but this should be a pretty good representation of the grades & distances relative to one another.
#16
Hey Brian, thanks for posting the data. It's quite a surprise to see actual numbers compared to how it feels crossing the bridges. Maybe the Manhattan Bridge feels easier (to me at least) because the surface is smoother than that boardwalk on the Brooklyn Bridge. Oh yeah... and lack of tourists blocking the way is also a real plus
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 189
Likes: 1
From: Chilltown
I'll have to get out & try the other East River bridges at some point...
#18
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,162
Likes: 647
From: Brooklyn NY
Bikes: Kuota Kredo/Chorus, Trek 7000 commuter, Trek 8000 MTB and a few others
That's what I always thought, enough to feel it on the way up, but nothing that is a struggle. It is only surprising that the BB is slightly steeper than the MB. The one thing about the Manny B is when the train goes by you feel it in your bones, and I ride a carbon bike. I wonder what that would feel like on steel.
#19
Thread Starter
Batüwü Griekgriek


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,927
Likes: 7
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Thanks so much Brian!
Yeah, I'll be curious to see what the WBB and QBB are. I think the Manhattan side of the QBB seems steepest, for the first portion at least. But the Manhattan side of the WBB kills me the most....it just seems lonnngggggg
Yeah, I'll be curious to see what the WBB and QBB are. I think the Manhattan side of the QBB seems steepest, for the first portion at least. But the Manhattan side of the WBB kills me the most....it just seems lonnngggggg
#20
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 850
Likes: 3
From: Brooklyn
Bikes: Schwinns
That's what I always thought, enough to feel it on the way up, but nothing that is a struggle. It is only surprising that the BB is slightly steeper than the MB. The one thing about the Manny B is when the train goes by you feel it in your bones, and I ride a carbon bike. I wonder what that would feel like on steel.
#22
Senior Member


Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
We can thank marathoners because they do a great job documenting the elevation profiles of marathon courses, including the NYC marathon.
I can't link it, but search nyc marathon elevation profile and you'll have exactly what you're looking for.
The main reason for the apparent disparity in grades is that while the center is 130 feet high, you start from a hill of over 50 feet in height.
I can't link it, but search nyc marathon elevation profile and you'll have exactly what you're looking for.
The main reason for the apparent disparity in grades is that while the center is 130 feet high, you start from a hill of over 50 feet in height.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#23
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,162
Likes: 647
From: Brooklyn NY
Bikes: Kuota Kredo/Chorus, Trek 7000 commuter, Trek 8000 MTB and a few others
Funny how 8 years later I remember this thread and posting to it. And it was resurrected by someone asking a different question. Now I use RidewithGPS and get every elevation on every ride. It gives grades too. These things shouldn't be a mystery anymore.
#24
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 183
From: Queens, NY for now...
Bikes: 82 Lotus Unique, 86 Lotus Legend, 88 Basso Loto, 88 Basso PR, 89 Basso PR, 96 Bianchi CDI, 2013 Deda Aegis, 2019 Basso Diamante SV
So what was the final verdict on the grades for the 59th Street Bridge?
#25
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,441
Likes: 235
This site https://www.transalt.org/sites/defau...urces/bridges/ has a lot of information about all NYC's bridges. At first glance, it doesn't seem to list the elevation grades, but the page for each bridge includes a bunch of additional links pertaining to that bridge. Check it out, and my apology in advance if this is a dead-end.
Follow-Up: Oh, jeez. I didn't realize until just now that this thread is older than my oldest granddaughter. Well, I hope the OP got an answer.
Follow-Up: Oh, jeez. I didn't realize until just now that this thread is older than my oldest granddaughter. Well, I hope the OP got an answer.



