Intelligent announcers needed at Universal Sports
#1
cycling fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,162
Bikes: Cannondale T800
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Intelligent announcers needed at Universal Sports
Spoiler below
Nibali gained 6 seconds on Chris Horner in Stage 4 of the Vuelta, taking over the red jersey by 3 seconds. Schlanger and Gogoluski (sp?) didn't think it was possible and ran a replay comparing the seconds between the two. It was not 6 seconds. But both failed to understand that Nibali got the same time as the first person in his group while Horner got the same time as the first person in his group. Come on guys, understand how scoring works.
Now I think there is an argument that there was not a significant gap between the two groups, but that is not what they were arguing. I thought it looked like a one-second+ gap between Moreno and Cancellera, and another 1+ second to the Nibali group, but they all got the same time as Moreno, and I thought there was less than a second between Nibali's group and Horner's, but the camera angle might have skewed those gaps. I see possible grounds for appeal there, but not using the announcers' flawed logic.
Nibali gained 6 seconds on Chris Horner in Stage 4 of the Vuelta, taking over the red jersey by 3 seconds. Schlanger and Gogoluski (sp?) didn't think it was possible and ran a replay comparing the seconds between the two. It was not 6 seconds. But both failed to understand that Nibali got the same time as the first person in his group while Horner got the same time as the first person in his group. Come on guys, understand how scoring works.
Now I think there is an argument that there was not a significant gap between the two groups, but that is not what they were arguing. I thought it looked like a one-second+ gap between Moreno and Cancellera, and another 1+ second to the Nibali group, but they all got the same time as Moreno, and I thought there was less than a second between Nibali's group and Horner's, but the camera angle might have skewed those gaps. I see possible grounds for appeal there, but not using the announcers' flawed logic.
#2
Velo Club La Grange
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: MDR, CA
Posts: 1,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Spoiler below
Nibali gained 6 seconds on Chris Horner in Stage 4 of the Vuelta, taking over the red jersey by 3 seconds. Schlanger and Gogoluski (sp?) didn't think it was possible and ran a replay comparing the seconds between the two. It was not 6 seconds. But both failed to understand that Nibali got the same time as the first person in his group while Horner got the same time as the first person in his group. Come on guys, understand how scoring works.
Nibali gained 6 seconds on Chris Horner in Stage 4 of the Vuelta, taking over the red jersey by 3 seconds. Schlanger and Gogoluski (sp?) didn't think it was possible and ran a replay comparing the seconds between the two. It was not 6 seconds. But both failed to understand that Nibali got the same time as the first person in his group while Horner got the same time as the first person in his group. Come on guys, understand how scoring works.
Weird.
#3
Heretic
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2,246
Bikes: Specialized Sirrus, Giant OCR3, Giant CRS3
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2827 Post(s)
Liked 561 Times
in
429 Posts
If it was Nibali losing out to Horner would they have made such a fuss?
They were just playing to their audience IMO.
They were just playing to their audience IMO.
#4
Senior Member
Now I think there is an argument that there was not a significant gap between the two groups, but that is not what they were arguing. I thought it looked like a one-second+ gap between Moreno and Cancellera, and another 1+ second to the Nibali group, but they all got the same time as Moreno, and I thought there was less than a second between Nibali's group and Horner's, but the camera angle might have skewed those gaps. I see possible grounds for appeal there, but not using the announcers' flawed logic.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 1,299
Bikes: Giant TCR SL3 and Trek 1.5
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The only intelligent coverage of cycling I've seen is on Eurosport. Sometimes I watch the online feeds they have for races even when I can get U.S. coverage because I can't stand Todd Gogoulski.
As an aside, why the hell they feel compelled to wear headphones inside a studio as if they're covering an outdoor event where traditional IFBs (earpieces for anchors) is beyond me.
As an aside, why the hell they feel compelled to wear headphones inside a studio as if they're covering an outdoor event where traditional IFBs (earpieces for anchors) is beyond me.
#6
cycling fanatic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,162
Bikes: Cannondale T800
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
They don't want you to know that they are not in Spain. The announcer who filled in for Schlenger on Saturday made a boo boo and said "here in the states...".
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 1,299
Bikes: Giant TCR SL3 and Trek 1.5
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
They really should merge Universal Sports and Versus and get rid of the rodeo junk and some of the paid programming on Versus. On the plus side, at least the video quality on Universal Sports has improved.
Last edited by cafzali; 08-29-13 at 05:26 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimShep
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
57
09-23-17 07:51 PM