Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Looking to go to an easier gearing...

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Looking to go to an easier gearing...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-15 | 09:10 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Looking to go to an easier gearing...

Hey all,

I am looking to go to an easier gearing than what I am currently running in order to spin up more hills in San Francisco. I've been experiencing knee pain and despite constant stretching, attention to form/saddle height and forward/aft position, cleat adjustment, etc., I feel like at the end of the day, the real culprit is that I am still mashing and not spinning on my current setup. Since I am a Clydesdale (down from 300 lbs. to 235-ish now!), I regard the suggestion of the typical combo of a 50/34 compact crank + 11-28t rear cassette as somewhat of a joke. Ha!

I am currently running an Ultegra 6503 Triple Crankset (52-42-30t), 105 5500 front derailleur, Ultegra 6500 rear derailleur, and a rear cassette of 11-30t. This is all 9-Speed (I have 105 9-speed brifters). I have been through several options in my head, but maybe you guys can help me sort out what is best for me?

I could:

1) Switch out the granny ring for a smaller one. But would this make shifting to the middle ring more unreliable?
2) Switch to a mountain crankset. But would this sacrifice my higher gears? Would I need a new front derailleur?
3) The option I'm leaning towards, go to a bigger cassette, like a 11-34t mountain cassette. I have been told this is impossible with the Ultegra 6500 rear derailleur due to the B-screw's limit but that I could swap it for a Saint or and XT. If I go this route, would I look at the Saint M800 and M772 (SGS)? Which one would be better for me?

Are there any other options I'm missing? What would be the cheapest/easiest way to go to an easier gearing?

Here is a picture of my ride:

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
vscocam-photo-1.jpg (100.3 KB, 27 views)
warrennnnnnnnnn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-15 | 09:15 PM
  #2  
UnfilteredDregs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 1
From: NYC, duh Bronx.

Bikes: Salsa Ti Warbird- 2014/ November RAIL52s

Originally Posted by warrennnnnnnnnn
Hey all,

I am looking to go to an easier gearing than what I am currently running in order to spin up more hills in San Francisco. I've been experiencing knee pain and despite constant stretching, attention to form/saddle height and forward/aft position, cleat adjustment, etc.,
Who did your fit?
UnfilteredDregs is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-15 | 10:17 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 9
From: Northern California
XT long cage derailleur and the 11-34 cassette and you'll be set. Note that MTB rear derailleurs don't have barrel adjusters, so unless you already have some inline, you'll want to add an adjuster. with a 30x34 you'll be able to ride anything in the city at a comfortable cadence.

[the M772 SGS is what you'd want.]

Last edited by anotherbrian; 05-08-15 at 10:24 PM.
anotherbrian is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-15 | 10:35 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
From: California
Get a smaller 3rd ring, 30t isn't that tiny.
Bunyanderman is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-15 | 10:48 PM
  #5  
79pmooney's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,191
Likes: 5,326
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Seriously think about going as low as 24 for the inner ring. You may have to give up on some of the small -small gears, but that isn't much of an issue. You may do better with say the 50-38-24 than your 52-42-30, but a 50-11 is still a very high gear! (Like 8% higher tan anyone raced in the early 70s.)

And going to a 24 drops your low 20%, a real number. (Going to a 34 rear gets you 13%.)

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-15 | 11:06 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 9
From: Northern California
Doh. I retract what I said about the 11-34. If you already have an 11-30, the 34T won't make that big of a difference. I have 24T grannies on my road triples, they are all unramped/pinned, and they shift fine to the 39T middle rings I have.
anotherbrian is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PhoenixBiker
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
4
08-27-18 09:58 PM
cynergy
Bicycle Mechanics
6
09-02-13 03:54 PM
1995_Trek_5200
Bicycle Mechanics
37
10-17-12 01:40 PM
JVoigt
Bicycle Mechanics
15
01-30-12 11:09 PM
asp2011
Bicycle Mechanics
47
07-20-11 10:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.