SRAM eTap
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Introductory pricing for a new technology is no indicator of the long term pricing. Also don't forget that new technologies are most often not priced based on costs, but rather based on value-what the market will bear.
#77
INSERT_TITLE_HERE
I'm guessing there's $70 worth of servo/rx in each dérailleur. $20 max for the battery...
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't understand the need to shift the front. I'm new to biking but all that matters is the gear ratio right? So why not just have it shift the front automatically to hit the next ratio perfectly? Doesn't Shimano let you do this (through programming the box to tell it what chainring/cassette you have)?
#79
Senior Member
Actually, for something like this, the cost of goods sold is almost secondary compared to looking for a payback on the R&D. The GCN video has an interview with one of the SRAM Engineers who mentions they spent 5 years testing in the lab on top of the product development. That's a factor of 2 or 3 longer than typical electronic developments. This might very well have been a "bet the company" move if you were to look at the financial cost of developing this.
Last edited by JohnJ80; 08-26-15 at 10:10 PM.
#80
Senior Member
Maconi - I believe Shimano does have a mode similar to what you describe in the DI2 Mtb group.
#81
SuperGimp
I don't understand the need to shift the front. I'm new to biking but all that matters is the gear ratio right? So why not just have it shift the front automatically to hit the next ratio perfectly? Doesn't Shimano let you do this (through programming the box to tell it what chainring/cassette you have)?
Thenyou get the replication... 50/22 is nearly identical to 34/15 - why even shift to that ratio.
Interesting question though, maybe if it were smart enough to skip the close duplicates?
#82
Brown Jersey Winner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Bad Woods.
Posts: 8,797
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
sram is like the king of 1x, theyre probably looking ahead
i think this system would rock with a single ring drivetrain
i think this system would rock with a single ring drivetrain
#83
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
With mechanical it is not desirable to double shift, to shift both front and back. That is why there is overlap between the gears available on the two rings. Basically it is two sets of overlapping gear ratios. One for flats, uphill and into the wind, the other for flats, downhill, and with the wind. Ideally you stay on one ring until the terrain or wind direction changes. And you don't try to go from one gear ratio to the next closest when you shift, but rather from one ratio to the next closest on that same ring. Electronic shifting obviates the double shifting problem to some extent, but it is still desirable to only shift the rear as much as possible. What an automatic shift system will look like eventually (in response to changes in power output/requirement) is another story.
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
The combination will surely come about in the 2017 range you would think, or at the very least whenever etap starts filtering down to Force etc.
#85
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,434 Times
in
1,187 Posts
It's surprising that the etap seems to have been developed completely independently of the WiFli and 1x systems, as you'd think the 3 would complement each other very well. No hydraulic brake option either? Do people working on new systems at Sram just not talk to other people at the company working on other new systems?
The combination will surely come about in the 2017 range you would think, or at the very least whenever etap starts filtering down to Force etc.
The combination will surely come about in the 2017 range you would think, or at the very least whenever etap starts filtering down to Force etc.
#87
Brown Jersey Winner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Bad Woods.
Posts: 8,797
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
considering this has supposedly been in development for 5 years, im sure they have a whole slew of **** based on the wireless concept, discs, hydro levers, longer cage rds, 1x, and whatever other "standards" they might want to join in on
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
It is imperative SRAM get this thing out into the market ASAP. Shimano and maybe also Campy must be hot on their heels. This is SRAMs chance for redemption, they don't want to blow it. So picking the biggest potential seller and getting it commercial is the number one priority. Other variations can come along afterward, but SRAM has to plant its flag on this very quickly now. Clearly rim brakes are the base case that has to be introduced first.
#89
Senior Member
It's surprising that the etap seems to have been developed completely independently of the WiFli and 1x systems, as you'd think the 3 would complement each other very well. No hydraulic brake option either? Do people working on new systems at Sram just not talk to other people at the company working on other new systems?
The combination will surely come about in the 2017 range you would think, or at the very least whenever etap starts filtering down to Force etc.
The combination will surely come about in the 2017 range you would think, or at the very least whenever etap starts filtering down to Force etc.
It is imperative SRAM get this thing out into the market ASAP. Shimano and maybe also Campy must be hot on their heels. This is SRAMs chance for redemption, they don't want to blow it. So picking the biggest potential seller and getting it commercial is the number one priority. Other variations can come along afterward, but SRAM has to plant its flag on this very quickly now. Clearly rim brakes are the base case that has to be introduced first.
At this point, speed to market is not going to be as important as getting it right. Shimano and to a much lesser degree Campy are already out there with their systems so it's not like they are beating anyone to market except for FSA. SRAM has had issues with recalls and can't afford to screw this one up. If there was a problem with reliability or missed shifts, the entire product line would be toast and SRAM would forever be stuck with the label of not being able to do electronic shifting. As conservative as the bike equipment world is, it would be decades before they could get past that.
There is also the steep learning curve that is going to come with having production units in the field. General purpose users lack no creativity in making things fail or finding ways to use this stuff that the original designs did not contemplate. SRAM needs that feedback in order to extend the system. If this is a bet the company investment, as I believe it is, they are going to make sure that they don't jeopardize that by jumping the gun in any way. They've already been deliberative in testing this - a very good thing, I think - and hopefully that argues well for this being a long term successful product. I'm not an SRAM fan but we all win when there is good competition and a robust set of competitors so I hope they do this right.
J.
#90
Senior Member
Not sure if Shimano does or doesn't, but if it were me, I'd only want the front der moving when I tell it to. It's slower, for one thing (at least on mechanical systems), and now you're shifting front and back to get the next gear... I don't know, seems like it's not necessary.
Thenyou get the replication... 50/22 is nearly identical to 34/15 - why even shift to that ratio.
Interesting question though, maybe if it were smart enough to skip the close duplicates?
Thenyou get the replication... 50/22 is nearly identical to 34/15 - why even shift to that ratio.
Interesting question though, maybe if it were smart enough to skip the close duplicates?
J.
#91
Senior Member
Sounds like SRAM has been concentrating on functionality and reliability. If they screw either one of those up, they'd be toast in this business. To make all those other changes is going to require a ton of money into tooling. I'm sure they are trying to get the basics right and then will extend. That said, I'm pretty sure this was a bet the company investment for them and branching out into all those other areas can't be done until they get the rest of this right.
#92
Vain, But Lacking Talent
Calling it a "bet the company" move sounds dramatic, and drama is appealing, but is there any evidence for that? SRAM is doing fine, it's hard for me to believe that eTap failing would sink the ship. That notwithstanding, I otherwise agree. There's no good reason for them to try and do too many things at once.
Now all that said, holy crap, when did I get so old? I'm only 32, but in the last year, I got a mortgage and a (used) BMW. Now I'm looking at a new bike build and I'm totally repulsed by electronic shifting and disc brakes. Like I want zero to do with them now. I can already see myself in 15-20 years talking about "the good old days" and attending "vintage" Gran Fondo events with my Domane. I am becoming the boring white guy I've always despised.
Ok, so maybe I do want disc brakes, just not right now. And yeah, I'll probably buy an electric shift bike in 5-10 years. I'm such a sucker.
#93
Senior Member
Calling it a "bet the company" move sounds dramatic, and drama is appealing, but is there any evidence for that? SRAM is doing fine, it's hard for me to believe that eTap failing would sink the ship. That notwithstanding, I otherwise agree. There's no good reason for them to try and do too many things at once.
It seems that the strategic pieces, especially where tech is involved, are getting ever more high stakes. Lots of examples where failing to do the strategic thing correctly earlier led to the demise of the company later. So in that sense, "bet the company" is just as real, maybe even more so, when strategic developments fail.
J.
#94
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Timing the introduction of next gen products is an important skill for marketers. Not jumping the gun is important, but waiting too long is nobody's best plan.
#95
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
This could be, but it would be a horrible business decision. Purposely letting a third competitor into this game with a superior development when you could beat them to it would be foolish indeed. Why play catch up on purpose?
Timing the introduction of next gen products is an important skill for marketers. Not jumping the gun is important, but waiting too long is nobody's best plan.
Timing the introduction of next gen products is an important skill for marketers. Not jumping the gun is important, but waiting too long is nobody's best plan.
#96
Senior Member
This could be, but it would be a horrible business decision. Purposely letting a third competitor into this game with a superior development when you could beat them to it would be foolish indeed. Why play catch up on purpose?
Timing the introduction of next gen products is an important skill for marketers. Not jumping the gun is important, but waiting too long is nobody's best plan.
Timing the introduction of next gen products is an important skill for marketers. Not jumping the gun is important, but waiting too long is nobody's best plan.
Hey, it's their money. I'm willing to let them make their own decisions with it. I was just trying to explain what would be the reasoning behind doing it the way that they are. Getting it right in the bike business counts a lot more than it does in other businesses where you launch at 1.0 and correct all the problems with 2.0. I don't think they have that luxury here so I'd submit they are probably going as fast as they can go.
J.
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Hey, it's their money. I'm willing to let them make their own decisions with it. I was just trying to explain what would be the reasoning behind doing it the way that they are. Getting it right in the bike business counts a lot more than it does in other businesses where you launch at 1.0 and correct all the problems with 2.0. I don't think they have that luxury here so I'd submit they are probably going as fast as they can go.
J.
J.
#98
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 612
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Well, sram website suggests $2,758 MSRP, that's about the same as Dura Ace Di2 isn't it? If they are the same price I would probably take eTAP over DA Di2. assuming I was going to buy a DA anyways.
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Posts: 1,396
Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 285 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 74 Times
in
54 Posts
So one report says the derailleurs have accelerometers on them and put the system to sleep when not moving. So how would you set this up on a stand?
If SRAM comes out with a WiFli RD for this I would be interested, though at the Force level probably more realistic price-wise. I was thinking about fitting a red 22 crankset anyway so maybe could jump-start by waiting for the etap cranks.
scott s.
.
If SRAM comes out with a WiFli RD for this I would be interested, though at the Force level probably more realistic price-wise. I was thinking about fitting a red 22 crankset anyway so maybe could jump-start by waiting for the etap cranks.
scott s.
.
#100
SuperGimp
The point being... almost $3,000 and you don't even have a frame or wheels yet. Mechanical red is a full grand cheaper and if you don't need the microscopic advances and weight advantage of Red, Force is almost a grand cheaper yet. It's just a lot of money to drop on a groupset and I'm not even shy about spending money on bike toys.