Opinion on this odd frame geometry
#26
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,176
Likes: 654
From: Minas Ithil
Most are designed for at least 28's and today most have disc brakes.
#28
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,176
Likes: 654
From: Minas Ithil
#29
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: SFBA, CA
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Criss Disc
Hope I'm not necroing this too badly with my first post, but thought I should mention the Alex and Drew DeGroot frames are different, like you'd see with Trek's H1 and H2 Madone/Emonda.
Alex Fit Geometry
In my size, the Alex DeGroot has quite a long effective top tube at 565mm, a 400mm reach and a 540mm stack. That makes it quite long and quite low compared to just about any major brand bike. The closest I could find, again, were the H1 Treks. Anyway, I can appreciate frames like this as I have a slightly longer than average trunk and wingspan.
Alex Fit Geometry
In my size, the Alex DeGroot has quite a long effective top tube at 565mm, a 400mm reach and a 540mm stack. That makes it quite long and quite low compared to just about any major brand bike. The closest I could find, again, were the H1 Treks. Anyway, I can appreciate frames like this as I have a slightly longer than average trunk and wingspan.






