Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Opinion on this odd frame geometry

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Opinion on this odd frame geometry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-15 | 11:28 AM
  #26  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,176
Likes: 654
From: Minas Ithil
Originally Posted by McBTC
In my size deGroot's HT length at 226 is super tall as you describe it--taller than my 220.
No clue what bike you have but yours is tall to begin with. In my size the Degroot is 159. That isn't real tall.

Originally Posted by McBTC
If the deGroot accommodates larger tires than other comfort/endurance bikes it's only because there is more clearance at the brakes.
The picture clearly shows it has plenty of clearance at the seat tube. More clearance with 28's than my Focus has with 25's.

Originally Posted by McBTC
Many of the latest comfort/endurance road bikes are designed for 25s. A larger tire width isn't a problem but the brake mounts have 28s practically scraping the calipers.
Most are designed for at least 28's and today most have disc brakes.
Lazyass is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-15 | 11:46 AM
  #27  
noodle soup's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,946
Likes: 1,901
Any idea of the frame's weight?
noodle soup is offline  
Reply
Old 12-05-15 | 01:03 PM
  #28  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,176
Likes: 654
From: Minas Ithil
Originally Posted by noodle soup
Any idea of the frame's weight?
No clue. Looks like your standard DB aluminum. They're all pretty light. $808 for the 105 model and a wheelset I wouldn't need to upgrade isn't bad at all, whatever it weighs. Just looks like a good all around comfortable road bike.
Lazyass is offline  
Reply
Old 02-05-16 | 05:36 AM
  #29  
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: SFBA, CA

Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Criss Disc

Hope I'm not necroing this too badly with my first post, but thought I should mention the Alex and Drew DeGroot frames are different, like you'd see with Trek's H1 and H2 Madone/Emonda.

Alex Fit Geometry

In my size, the Alex DeGroot has quite a long effective top tube at 565mm, a 400mm reach and a 540mm stack. That makes it quite long and quite low compared to just about any major brand bike. The closest I could find, again, were the H1 Treks. Anyway, I can appreciate frames like this as I have a slightly longer than average trunk and wingspan.
ceugene is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johngwheeler
Road Cycling
11
05-21-17 06:46 PM
damo010
Touring
21
01-15-16 12:04 AM
slowride454
Mountain Biking
13
01-29-14 07:00 AM
Fat Boy
Cyclocross Racing
11
06-19-12 12:13 PM
vladuz976
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
14
08-09-10 06:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.