50/34 compact
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
50/34 compact
Morning,
I'm 5'9-5'10 and have 170mm crank arms. I normally ride with about 700-1200ft of climb. I was told that I need to have 11-28 cassette with compact 50/34. I think the 11-28 is fine, however am I hurting my speed with the compact crankw/ 170mm arms?
I'm 5'9-5'10 and have 170mm crank arms. I normally ride with about 700-1200ft of climb. I was told that I need to have 11-28 cassette with compact 50/34. I think the 11-28 is fine, however am I hurting my speed with the compact crankw/ 170mm arms?
#6
Gold Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
From: Haarlem, Netherlands
Bikes: Pinarello Dogma F8, Pinarello Bolide, Argon 18 E-118, Bianchi Oltre, Cervelo S1, Wilier Pista
I ride a 7-day amateur stage race in the mountains in France every year. Four cols per day, with usually about 3000-4000m of climbing every day. Every year somebody shows up trying to be a hero with his 53/39. By the end of the second day that guy is totally baked. It doesn't matter what your speed on the flats is if the road isn't flat. Having a 50/34 will help a lot more than it will hurt if you have to climb a lot. I only run 53/39 on my TT bikes, FWIW. I've never missed those extra teeth on my road bike, I even won a crit on flat ground last year with a compact. I run 170mm cranks too.
So unless your surname is Contador or Froome, I would stick with the compact if you're going to do a lot of serious climbing. Especially if your username "learning2ride" means anything.
So unless your surname is Contador or Froome, I would stick with the compact if you're going to do a lot of serious climbing. Especially if your username "learning2ride" means anything.
#8
You and I are the same height, ride about the same elevation and have the same crank/ring set up as you except I have the 11-32 cassette. I can't imagine riding some of the hills around here without the compact crank.
That said I have some very flat century rides later this summer that I'll be using a mid compact on but other than that the compact stays put.
That said I have some very flat century rides later this summer that I'll be using a mid compact on but other than that the compact stays put.
#9
You and I are the same height, ride about the same elevation and have the same crank/ring set up as you except I have the 11-32 cassette. I can't imagine riding some of the hills around here without the compact crank.
That said I have some very flat century rides later this summer that I'll be using a mid compact on but other than that the compact stays put.
That said I have some very flat century rides later this summer that I'll be using a mid compact on but other than that the compact stays put.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,773
Likes: 105
From: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
#12
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,691
Likes: 150
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Bikes: 2023 Canyon Aeoroad CF SL, 2015 Trek Emonda SLR, 2002 Litespeed Classic, 2005 Bianchi Pista, Some BikesDirect MTB I never ride.
I'd go 12-28 even. 16 > 11 for almost all circumstances. If you are a hardcore racer in non-beginner categories, you may find use for an 11, but 99% of the time the only I ever use an 11 (or 12 for that matter) is when I want to bomb a descent and not coast.
#13
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,682
Likes: 63
From: Houston, TX
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
What does the crank arm length have to do with this question? Sounds short to me, but it shouldn't affect your gearing to a great extent.






