Compact, half compact or harden up?
#51
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Likes: 235
#52
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,682
Likes: 63
From: Houston, TX
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
#53
Senior Member

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,103
Likes: 96
From: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)
39x11 @ 90rpm is ~25mph on a typical road bike. Plenty of gear for me, too. On my triple bikes, I use the 42T ring a lot (42-12 is about the same as 39-11). The 52T will see use on a few extended downhills or really strong tailwinds (any time I expect to be at 25mph+ for an extended period). I've been experimenting with a compact and 12-25 cassette lately and the 50T ring is plenty big, but as I expected, the lack of overlap between chainrings is really annoying. I'm debating a 48 or 46/34 or 36 crank for that bike since a triple isn't an option (105 5800 groupset). I plan to mainly use it for flatter rides so that will still be enough top end for me and get me a little closer spacing between rings. Having done some steeper stuff with it, I miss my 30-27 low gear!
#54
Jedi Master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 501
From: Lake Forest, IL
Bikes: https://stinkston.blogspot.com/p/my-bikes.html
I like having a 46t big ring for recreational riding. 46-17 is the sweet spot for me, and it's nice to have a couple of single steps up and down from there. At 120 RPM you can go 36 MPH with a 46-12. Do you really need to pedal faster than that?
#55
Custom User Title
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 11,239
Likes: 35
From: SE MN
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
I generally stop pedaling on downhills when I hit 30-33 MPH anyway and just try to get as small as possible.
#57
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,774
Likes: 1,748
I've recently got into road cycling and I'm not particularly strong yet but I absolutely love climbing.
However, I'm very short and thin (5'7" and 130 pounds) and on climbs that average 9%, my cadence is about 60 (at threshold) whilst my usual cadence is about 100-105. After 3km, my legs are completely cooked.
I'm running a 54-39 (or 53?) and 11-28 at the back.
I'm tossing up if I should be getting a compact chainring or semi compact, or if I just need to train harder and stop being a sook.
I'm aiming to do some climbs that have 1km+ of 20% but at least 50% of my training is on flat.
Any suggestions on what I should change to?
However, I'm very short and thin (5'7" and 130 pounds) and on climbs that average 9%, my cadence is about 60 (at threshold) whilst my usual cadence is about 100-105. After 3km, my legs are completely cooked.
I'm running a 54-39 (or 53?) and 11-28 at the back.
I'm tossing up if I should be getting a compact chainring or semi compact, or if I just need to train harder and stop being a sook.
I'm aiming to do some climbs that have 1km+ of 20% but at least 50% of my training is on flat.
Any suggestions on what I should change to?
The only downside to a bike with a very wide range of gears, with very low gears - in other words compact vs. a regular crank and a "wide" cassette vs a "narrow" cassette - is the large jump between the gears. That's significant and should be considered. If you don't need them, don't get them, but if you do, don't hesitate.
#58
Do you ever find yourself missing that one extra gear on bigger hills? That's what you get with a 28. I went from 12-25 to 11-28 on a compact and for me the extra range is quite useful.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cafe
Road Cycling
336
04-29-15 07:59 AM
sffred
Road Cycling
14
04-26-11 09:24 PM







