Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Can i put 32 hole hubs on a 36 spoke wheel?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Can i put 32 hole hubs on a 36 spoke wheel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-16 | 06:40 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Can i put 32 hole hubs on a 36 spoke wheel?

So I bought some hubs at a great price online, only to find out they are the wrong hole count. Is it feasable or worth it to try to respoke with 4 less spokes? Has anyone done this? Any information would be great! Thank you so much!
Scott
Yellowbrew997@g is offline  
Reply
Old 07-08-16 | 06:51 PM
  #2  
rpenmanparker's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,682
Likes: 63
From: Houston, TX

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Not by any normal pattern. The easy to work with mis-match is to only use 3/4 of the number of spoke holes in the rim, the hub or both.
rpenmanparker is offline  
Reply
Old 07-08-16 | 08:49 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 13
If you tried then you'd end up needing to calculate a lot of different spoke lengths rather than just needing one length (or two if doing a rear wheel).

Sheldon Brown has some stuff if you feel the need to get all mathematical:
Mismatched Bicycle Wheels by Benjamin Lewis

I think you may find it easier to either return the hub or sell it and get the right one rather than try to build the wheel with what you have.
smarkinson is offline  
Reply
Old 07-08-16 | 09:38 PM
  #4  
commu*ist spy
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 5
From: oregon
no..
spectastic is offline  
Reply
Old 07-09-16 | 03:24 PM
  #5  
Pompiere's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,066
Likes: 2,153
From: NW Ohio

Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-1977 Univega Grand Rally, S LTD, 1973 Sears Free Spirit 531, 197? FW Evans

Technically, it is possible, but takes a lot of calculations to find the correct spoke lengths. 32 spoke rims are not rare, so just get some matching rims and lace them up.
Pompiere is offline  
Reply
Old 07-09-16 | 04:39 PM
  #6  
BenPS's Avatar
will stop for donuts
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Maine
yeah, I guess it CAN be done, but should you? NO. Just get the right hub/rim. jesus
BenPS is offline  
Reply
Old 07-09-16 | 05:13 PM
  #7  
hobkirk's Avatar
Retired dabbler
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Acton, MA (20 miles west of Boston) - GORGEOUS cycling territory!

Bikes: 2007 Specialized Roubaix Elite Triple - 1st ride = century 9/19/2010 , Ultegra

32 hub holes, so 16 per side. 36 holes in the rim.

So what's your idea:
  • Skip every 9th hole in the rim?
  • Get a lot of different lengths of spokes, since nothing will be symmetrical?
  • Adjust tensions in some way to compensate for this asymmetry?
  • Or drill some extra holes in the hub?
I think the Sheldon page is a red herring - 28 rim vs 36 hub means not using 4 holes on each side of the hub, and 4 is plausible. But it's still dumb!

I think the answers in the correct forum (mechanics) would have been less encouraging. But you gave me a big grin.
hobkirk is offline  
Reply
Old 07-09-16 | 05:18 PM
  #8  
rmfnla's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,301
Likes: 14
From: La La Land (We love it!)

Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)

Even if it could be done I'd never sleep at night if that was on my bike...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline  
Reply
Old 07-09-16 | 06:17 PM
  #9  
Ramona_W's Avatar
Casually Deliberate
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 11
From: Should have made a left turn near Albuquerque.

Bikes: 1995 Trek 820, 1994 Trek 930 (project), 1/2 of a 1980s Colin Laing tandem

Originally Posted by hobkirk
32 hub holes, so 16 per side. 36 holes in the rim.

So what's your idea:
  • Skip every 9th hole in the rim?
  • Get a lot of different lengths of spokes, since nothing will be symmetrical?
  • Adjust tensions in some way to compensate for this asymmetry?
  • Or drill some extra holes in the hub?
I think the Sheldon page is a red herring - 28 rim vs 36 hub means not using 4 holes on each side of the hub, and 4 is plausible. But it's still dumb!

I think the answers in the correct forum (mechanics) would have been less encouraging. But you gave me a big grin.
Bonus points for including a bulleted list.
Ramona_W is offline  
Reply
Old 07-09-16 | 06:29 PM
  #10  
rpenmanparker's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,682
Likes: 63
From: Houston, TX

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Actually you can make a good rear pattern out of 27 spokes and 36 holes. 9 radial spokes on the non-drive side and 18 on the drive side. Put each NDS spoke between a crossed pair of DS spokes. Leave an empty hole each set of the crossed pairs.

Last edited by rpenmanparker; 07-09-16 at 06:35 PM.
rpenmanparker is offline  
Reply
Old 07-09-16 | 06:35 PM
  #11  
andr0id's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
Actually you can make a good rear pattern out of 27 spokes and 36 holes. 9 radial spokes on the non-drive side and 18 on the drive side. Put each NDS spoke between a crossed pair of DS spokes. Leave an empty hole each set of the crossed pairs
What about the aerodynamic drag caused by boundary layer air flowing over an empty spoke hole instead of the smooth head of the spoke? That's probably 0.087 milliwatts of energy loss.
andr0id is offline  
Reply
Old 07-09-16 | 06:38 PM
  #12  
rpenmanparker's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,682
Likes: 63
From: Houston, TX

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Originally Posted by andr0id
What about the aerodynamic drag caused by boundary layer air flowing over an empty spoke hole instead of the smooth head of the spoke? That's probably 0.087 milliwatts of energy loss.
Worse. I fill in the rim holes with inverted nipples that have a short piece of spoke filling up the threaded hole. Very poor aero.
rpenmanparker is offline  
Reply
Old 07-10-16 | 05:13 PM
  #13  
AlexCyclistRoch's Avatar
The Infractionator
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 3
From: Rochester, NY

Bikes: Classic road bikes: 1986 Cannondale, 1978 Trek

You could probably make a "clown wheel", you know, the kind that the clowns in the circus ride that are a good 50mm of-center....
AlexCyclistRoch is offline  
Reply
Old 07-11-16 | 04:27 PM
  #14  
rmfnla's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,301
Likes: 14
From: La La Land (We love it!)

Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)

Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
Worse. I fill in the rim holes with inverted nipples that have a short piece of spoke filling up the threaded hole. Very poor aero.
And just think of all that additional rotational weight you have added...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mr. Spadoni
Classic & Vintage
13
12-29-17 09:21 PM
Binxsy
Bicycle Mechanics
12
05-29-12 03:41 AM
geoluv
Bicycle Mechanics
8
07-13-11 05:24 PM
deacon mark
Bicycle Mechanics
18
02-14-11 01:36 AM
norbikes
Bicycle Mechanics
0
08-21-10 05:42 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.