Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

2012 SRAM crankset - how are the chainrings?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

2012 SRAM crankset - how are the chainrings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-16, 09:57 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
benshares's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 62
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2012 SRAM crankset - how are the chainrings?

I'm building a mid-budget BB30 road bike and so have been looking at SRAM Force cranksets on Ebay. Someone is selling this one for a pretty good price, but I know that SRAM have completely changed the chainrings in the last few years. Were there any issues with this older style? I can get the newer style for a little more money in a little worse shape, but I'm not sure the value of that tradeoff. I don't care about the weight diff between the two (if there is one)

Photo:


benshares is offline  
Old 12-08-16, 10:00 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
HOWSER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've never had any issues with them. Been running various Force and Red groupsets for years.
HOWSER is offline  
Old 12-08-16, 10:09 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I agree with HOWSER -- had many sets over the years without issue. It's always hard to tell online, but the big ring in the photos you've attached seems decently shark-finned and likely at the end of its life. Luckily, replacements are inexpensive, but something to consider in your purchasing decision.
modman is offline  
Old 12-08-16, 10:37 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
benshares's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 62
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by modman
I agree with HOWSER -- had many sets over the years without issue. It's always hard to tell online, but the big ring in the photos you've attached seems decently shark-finned and likely at the end of its life. Luckily, replacements are inexpensive, but something to consider in your purchasing decision.
Good eye, I think you're right.



Also considering this dirtier, newer crankset



maybe less worn?
benshares is offline  
Old 12-08-16, 10:45 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes; the second crank seems less worn overall, but more evenly worn between the rings. Meaning, in the first crank, the small ring looks new and the large ring looks shot, whereas on the second crank, both rings appear evenly worn, perhaps with 25%-50% of life left. I think you'd still have great shifts on the second set, just watch your chain stretch before you eat up a cassette unnecessarily.
modman is offline  
Old 12-08-16, 01:14 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
benshares's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 62
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by modman
Yes; the second crank seems less worn overall, but more evenly worn between the rings. Meaning, in the first crank, the small ring looks new and the large ring looks shot, whereas on the second crank, both rings appear evenly worn, perhaps with 25%-50% of life left. I think you'd still have great shifts on the second set, just watch your chain stretch before you eat up a cassette unnecessarily.

Thanks for the advice - the second is around $100, might be worth it and then chainrings down the road.
benshares is offline  
Old 12-08-16, 09:59 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Posts: 1,396

Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 285 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 74 Times in 54 Posts
Keep in mind BB30 Force 22 has a longer spindle than 2012 so it can fit Cervelo BBRight so needs a spacer on a 68 shell. Red 22 (or "etap" 2016) doesn't use the spacer.

scott s.
.
scott967 is offline  
Old 12-09-16, 01:35 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 459
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by scott967
Keep in mind BB30 Force 22 has a longer spindle than 2012 so it can fit Cervelo BBRight so needs a spacer on a 68 shell. Red 22 (or "etap" 2016) doesn't use the spacer.

scott s.
.
I didn't know this, thanks for the info
bleui is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flostonf
Bicycle Mechanics
0
04-28-18 11:11 AM
BuTbKa
Bicycle Mechanics
2
05-21-15 06:21 AM
Cyclelogikal
Road Cycling
9
10-24-13 10:03 PM
5shot
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
4
12-14-10 05:56 PM
BikeNSail
Bicycle Mechanics
6
09-05-10 10:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.