Brooks Saddle Question
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Brooks Saddle Question
So I ended up spilling on my RB when clipping out the other day and it ripped a big chunk out of my stock saddle. Since I am looking at replacing it, I have been thinking about biting the bullet and picking a Brooks saddle. As I have looked at the different models I am stuck between the tide and true B-17 or going with the C-17 or 15 Cambien model. I was wondering if anyone has any experience with the new combine line of seats and can offer an opinion.
#2
Yes. I've put over 20,000 miles on a C17. From the first day, it rides like a well broken-in B17 -- plus, it's weather proof. You never have to worry about rain. For me, it's the most comfortable saddle for any distance.
#3
Advocatus Diaboli

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 9,144
Likes: 1,738
From: Wherever I am
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
I ride a C13 Cambium Carved, but they now come in widths -- so basically can be a carbon railed version of a C15 or C17 I think. I like it, but only a couple hundred miles on it so far. FWIW came from a fizik antares vsx
#4
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Thanks for the information. My current seat is Prologo Kappa 2 and its 147mm wide, the C15 is 140mm and the C17 I believe is 162, do you think going up would be better then going down in size? Im thinking up especially since I am Clyde. The prologo worked fine but I would be a bit nervous going any smaller... Thoughts?
#5
Thanks for the information. My current seat is Prologo Kappa 2 and its 147mm wide, the C15 is 140mm and the C17 I believe is 162, do you think going up would be better then going down in size? Im thinking up especially since I am Clyde. The prologo worked fine but I would be a bit nervous going any smaller... Thoughts?
At 173 pounds, I go with the C13 wide on my road bike and C17 on my gravel bike. Of course, there's more to fitting the saddle than rider weight.
Last edited by FlashBazbo; 01-30-17 at 02:06 PM.
#6
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Flash, I will check them out... I am going to try and measure my sit bones and see what they come out at, not sure If that will work. thanks for the input. Wow, looking at the price, they are really proud of them...lol
Last edited by Sldrvr; 01-30-17 at 02:08 PM.
#7
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 15,315
Likes: 903
From: Tixkokob, Yucatán, México
Bikes: 79 Trek 930, 80 Trek 414, 84 Schwinn Letour Luxe (coupled), 92 Schwinn Paramount PDG 5
I have a C17 and a C15, and like them both. I also have a Team Pro leather saddle that I think will ultimately surpass them both. Keep in mind that the C17 is significantly narrower than the B17, which is significantly too wide for my personal comfort.
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 29
From: Cambridge UK
Bikes: Trek Emonda SL6 .... Miyata One Thousand
Brooks C17 Cambium Carved (the one with the slot/cut-out).... 100% waterproof, designed for long distance/touring, plus you get a 10 year guarantee if you register the serial number on the Brooks website .... comfy straight out of the box
if you want leather.... Gilles Berthoud Aravis... the Rolls Royce of leather saddles but not cheap .... the Aravis has titanium rails
I own them both
if you want leather.... Gilles Berthoud Aravis... the Rolls Royce of leather saddles but not cheap .... the Aravis has titanium rails
I own them both
#10
Senior Member




Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,335
Likes: 9,918
From: Utah
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Well, I find a brand new Brooks Swallow to be more comfortable than the C15 Cambium I have. The swallow I totally forget is there while I'm always aware of the Cambium. I'm also having good luck with the Gyes saddles. I don't know if they will last as long as a Brooks but they are a good bit cheaper and seem well made. I feel like the Gyes are a bit "springier" out of the box than the Brooks.
For comparison of the profiles
The Brooks Cambium C15:

The Brooks Swallow:

The Gyes GS-06:
For comparison of the profiles
The Brooks Cambium C15:

The Brooks Swallow:

The Gyes GS-06:
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 884
Likes: 30
From: SGV So Cal
Bikes: 80's Schwinn High Plains, Motobecane Ti Cyclocross
9000 mi on a B-17 Imperial. wouldn't trade it for anything else.
The Imperial has the cutout, is maybe a bit narrower, so kind of an intermediate between the B-17 and a Swallow?
also pre-punched for lacing and comes with the laces.
The Brooks do have short rails so you may have to find a long setback seatpost depending on your, and the bikes geometry.
The Imperial has the cutout, is maybe a bit narrower, so kind of an intermediate between the B-17 and a Swallow?
also pre-punched for lacing and comes with the laces.
The Brooks do have short rails so you may have to find a long setback seatpost depending on your, and the bikes geometry.
#12
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
I've only ridden the Brooks Pro and Swift - 100K+ miles. I can't comment on the other, but I'd stick with their leather. Expect 3Kmiles to break in :-)
Last edited by Doge; 01-30-17 at 10:52 PM.
#13
Full Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 396
Likes: 70
From: Oceanside, CA
Bikes: 2017 Lynskey Sportive Disc, 2021 Lynskey Pro29, 1977 Schwinn Super LeTour 12.2
Short version: I have both. They're both great, but I'll put Cambiums on all my non-touring bikes in the future.
Longer explanation: The B17 has a wonderful heritage and looks the part. It needs breaking in (> 700 miles on mine and still not there), but it really not that bad, even before.
The Cambium is comfortable right away, it's significantly lighter, and it's waterproof, which is nice for commuters in Seattle. It's vegan, too, if that matters to you. I've noticed a bit of wear on the nubby fabric top in a few places, but nothing that seems critical.
I think the Cambium wins for near-term practicality, and it seems like it will outlast many non-leather saddles. I imagine my B17 will outlast it by 2-3x, though.
Longer explanation: The B17 has a wonderful heritage and looks the part. It needs breaking in (> 700 miles on mine and still not there), but it really not that bad, even before.
The Cambium is comfortable right away, it's significantly lighter, and it's waterproof, which is nice for commuters in Seattle. It's vegan, too, if that matters to you. I've noticed a bit of wear on the nubby fabric top in a few places, but nothing that seems critical.
I think the Cambium wins for near-term practicality, and it seems like it will outlast many non-leather saddles. I imagine my B17 will outlast it by 2-3x, though.
#14
Full Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 396
Likes: 70
From: Oceanside, CA
Bikes: 2017 Lynskey Sportive Disc, 2021 Lynskey Pro29, 1977 Schwinn Super LeTour 12.2
This! I forgot about that. I had an odd-sized frame and couldn't get the B17 far enough back without a setback seatpost. The Cambium rails slid back farther.
#16
Senior Member




Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,335
Likes: 9,918
From: Utah
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Good point. The Swallow version has the longest rails of the Brooks saddles (as a norm) and then the look alike Gyes saddles have longer, more normal rails. I need a lot of setback with my saddles for my fit so this is an important consideration for me.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#17
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,058
Likes: 2,138
From: NW Ohio
Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-1977 Univega Grand Rally, S LTD, 1973 Sears Free Spirit 531, 197? FW Evans
I was very close to buying a C17, but a lot of reviews complained about the color fading and they didn't like how the textured surface gripped their bike shorts. so I bought another B17. I already had two, so I figured I would go with a sure thing. The first one took some breaking in. The second one seemed to be good, right out of the box. I will try the third one once the weather warms up.
#18
I have only had Brooks Pro and Swift. Could never get comfortable on the Swift and bought a new Pro so have them on two bike. Very comfortable and I have found initial brealin to be just a few hundred miles. B17 would be too wide for my road bike.
#19
Advocatus Diaboli

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 9,144
Likes: 1,738
From: Wherever I am
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
I was very close to buying a C17, but a lot of reviews complained about the color fading and they didn't like how the textured surface gripped their bike shorts. so I bought another B17. I already had two, so I figured I would go with a sure thing. The first one took some breaking in. The second one seemed to be good, right out of the box. I will try the third one once the weather warms up.
#22
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 6
From: Lewisburg, TN
Bikes: Mikkelsen custom steel, Santa Cruz Chameleon SS, old trek trainer bike
You went the same way I did last year. I snagged a C13 carved for pretty cheap, but didn't get to ride it a ton last year before the snow started falling. Liked it for the miles I put on it though. This year I will decide for certain if it is for me. Looks awesome, got the grey. Goes really well with my Lynskey R140!
#23
Advocatus Diaboli

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 9,144
Likes: 1,738
From: Wherever I am
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Good choice; I like mine. Now that they have width options (they didn't a year ago; it was originally only available in the narrow option), what width did you get?
It does look nice with a Ti frame fwiw.
It does look nice with a Ti frame fwiw.
#25
Full Member

Joined: May 2013
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Have the Team Pro and a C17. Bought the C17 hoping for a lighter Team Pro, but the Team Pro is definitely a better seat for comfort on long hauls. The C17 is pretty good all of the time, though starts to wear on me at about the 40 mile mark. The Team Pro is comfortable all the time. Either way I needed a wider seat (wide sit bones) and they both work well for that.



