![]() |
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
(Post 19517754)
Some of them, from the war years, are individual 2 x 3" negatives. Maybe 1.5 x 2. What kind of camera (or film)would produce such?
Huh? You have some that are both those sizes? 1.5" x 2" sounds roughly like a 645 format (6cm x 4.5cm, or 2.36" x 1.77"). I still have a Mamiya 645 film camera, but I don't think it works. Lugged that thing with a metered view finder, power winder and three lenses across the U.S. and then some during my '99 bike adventure. Took 120 film. |
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
(Post 19516965)
Wife apparently just woke up. She also went to bed at 9 PM. She's getting some high volume base training in for the upcoming sleep championships, I guess.
|
My grandfather had this old twin lens reflex that I used to borrow from time to time. It took 120 film and produced 2 1/4 x 2 1/4 inch negatives.
Can you still buy 120 film, contact paper, Dektol and all that stuff? |
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
(Post 19517294)
I slept in an hour and a half later than nomal. Something in the air(tonight)
|
Originally Posted by Scarbo
(Post 19517863)
My grandfather had this old twin lens reflex that I used to borrow from time to time. It took 120 film and produced 2 1/4 x 2 1/4 inch negatives.
Can you still buy 120 film, contact paper, Dektol and all that stuff? |
Lunch talk- I just love good, rare roast beef from the deli. A lot. With salt and pepper. Mmmmm.
Turned into a delicious sandwich for the 5th day in a row. Never get tired of it. I guess my sodium levels probably do. |
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
(Post 19517884)
Lunch talk- I just love good, rare roast beef from the deli. A lot. With salt and pepper. Mmmmm.
|
^^^^^
Pales in comparison to beet pills, my friend. You really must try them some time. |
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 19517882)
Yes, but what's the point?
Well, yes; but I'd imagine that there are C&V types out there in the photo world who would still get into that sort of thing. |
Originally Posted by WhyFi
(Post 19517440)
Leave it to a Minnesotan to sunbathe in a Speedo at 53°.
No, I didn't take pictures. |
Originally Posted by Jadesfire
(Post 19517649)
FWIW, in my work, tumescence is usually followed a day or so later by purulent discharge. Turgidity (-ness?) usually involves uninfected swelling.
|
Since this is really a bike board, I'd like to report that Mrs.T and I did a 26 mile tandem bike ride.
The log will read: Nice easy tandem ride. 26.0 mi. at 16.2 mph Sunny, 72°, SSE at 5-12 mph Pollen - 11.1 |
Originally Posted by jtaylor996
(Post 19517570)
Although I did have one "moment" Sunday. I was riding down a little banked sweeping area that's a piece of cake, other than the fact it's real loose with golfball sized stones. Normally I just monster truck over everything with my 3" tires, but I actually slid badly this time. I think I was at ~ 30 deg angle to the ground (bars almost touching), but I steered into it (up the bank) and managed to get it under control. It was damn close, though.
I'll show you the spot before too long :innocent: |
Originally Posted by topslop1
(Post 19517914)
That's some wild ****. No idea when this injury suite settles (I think sooner than later actually) but I need to use a small portion for another road bike and or entry level mountain.
|
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
(Post 19517918)
When are you going to take [MENTION=415273]jtaylor996[/MENTION] out to get girldrunk?
|
Originally Posted by Trsnrtr
(Post 19517911)
Since this is really a bike board, I'd like to report that Mrs.T and I did a 26 mile tandem bike ride.
The log will read: Nice easy tandem ride. 26.0 mi. at 16.2 mph Sunny, 72°, SSE at 5-12 mph Pollen - 11.1 |
Originally Posted by Trsnrtr
(Post 19517890)
I was in Panama Beach a few years ago and it was about 50-55° that day with a harsh wind. I was riding my bike and saw a guy in shorts an wife-beater undershirt waxing a Cadillac in the shade. I thought to myself that he must be from Minnesota. When I got close enough to read his plate, my suspicion was confirmed. :)
|
Originally Posted by datlas
(Post 19517932)
Kudos/Kudos.
|
Originally Posted by Trsnrtr
(Post 19517911)
Since this is really a bike board, I'd like to report that Mrs.T and I did a 26 mile tandem bike ride.
The log will read: Nice easy tandem ride. 26.0 mi. at 16.2 mph Sunny, 72°, SSE at 5-12 mph Pollen - 11.1 |
Originally Posted by indyfabz
(Post 19517842)
Huh? You have some that are both those sizes?
1.5" x 2" sounds roughly like a 645 format (6cm x 4.5cm, or 2.36" x 1.77"). I still have a Mamiya 645 film camera, but I don't think it works. Lugged that thing with a metered view finder, power winder and three lenses across the U.S. and then some during my '99 bike adventure. Took 120 film. |
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 19518012)
Bravo.
Indeed. Good you two are getting out there. |
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
(Post 19517780)
Probably 120 film-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/120_film Don't know much about film cameras, but maybe something like a Kodak Brownie would have been era-appropriate. Didn't you tell us at some point that your dad flew bombers? Those would be some amazing photos. |
Originally Posted by Scarbo
(Post 19517887)
^^^^^
Pales in comparison to beet pills, my friend. You really must try them some time. :thumb: |
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
(Post 19518036)
I'll measure them. I'd never seen negatives like that. If they came on a roll, they were later cut up.
|
Originally Posted by topslop1
(Post 19517914)
That's some wild ****. No idea when this injury suite settles (I think sooner than later actually) but I need to use a small portion for another road bike and or entry level mountain.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:28 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.