rim size and tire size
#2
If you're talking about 23mm external width, that's becoming an exceedingly common combination and it work pretty nicely. If you're talking 23mm internal width... well, I'm not sure how it'll work out, but it's probably safe to say that it's not the combination that the rim designer had in mind.
#3
Scroll down to the red & green chart near the bottom.
But be aware the rim sizes are referring to internal width, not the external size.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tyre-sizing.html#width
But be aware the rim sizes are referring to internal width, not the external size.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tyre-sizing.html#width
#5
Scroll down to the red & green chart near the bottom.
But be aware the rim sizes are referring to internal width, not the external size.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tyre-sizing.html#width
But be aware the rim sizes are referring to internal width, not the external size.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tyre-sizing.html#width
#6
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 660
Likes: 173
why is it outdated and why laughable? The chart was created with safety as priority, not aero as priority. If you use a 25mm tire on a rim with 23mm internal width, sure this gives a good tire/rim aero profile... but on the flip side, you know what's gonna happen if the tire gets a catastrophic flat right? That rim is gonna slam into the ground so hard and so fast that there's a good chance that it'll be damaged beyond usable and good chance of a crash too. A wider tire would at least increases the chance of the rim surviving since it's got more rubber to roll on in an event of a catastrophic flat.
A rim with 23mm internal width means that its brake track width is probably around 28-29mm wide (traditional rim with hook).
A 25mm wide tire is not going to be able to spread out over the width of this rim in a flat situation, kiss rim bye bye.
A rim with 23mm internal width means that its brake track width is probably around 28-29mm wide (traditional rim with hook).
A 25mm wide tire is not going to be able to spread out over the width of this rim in a flat situation, kiss rim bye bye.
Last edited by aclinjury; 04-22-19 at 08:17 AM.
#7
If you want the tire/rim combo to be as aero as possible, that is a nearly perfect match.
25mm GP5000 tubeless tires on Light Bicycle 56 mm hoops(23mm internal) end up being about 28.5mm wide.
#105 % rule
25mm GP5000 tubeless tires on Light Bicycle 56 mm hoops(23mm internal) end up being about 28.5mm wide.
#105 % rule
#8
The 56mm LB hoops are 30mm wide(23mm internal), so that 25mm tire becomes an actual 28.2mm when inflated. The hoop is supposed to be a touch wider than the tire for the 105% aero rule.
#9
why is it outdated and why laughable? The chart was created with safety as priority, not aero as priority. If you use a 25mm tire on a rim with 23mm internal width, sure this gives a good tire/rim aero profile... but on the flip side, you know what's gonna happen if the tire gets a catastrophic flat right? That rim is gonna slam into the ground so hard and so fast that there's a good chance that it'll be damaged beyond usable and good chance of a crash too. A wider tire would at least increases the chance of the rim surviving since it's got more rubber to roll on in an event of a catastrophic flat.
A rim with 23mm internal width means that its brake track width is probably around 28-29mm wide (traditional rim with hook).
A 25mm wide tire is not going to be able to spread out over the width of this rim in a flat situation, kiss rim bye bye.
A rim with 23mm internal width means that its brake track width is probably around 28-29mm wide (traditional rim with hook).
A 25mm wide tire is not going to be able to spread out over the width of this rim in a flat situation, kiss rim bye bye.
According to that chart, I should be using 40mm - 50mm wide tires on the Light Bicycle 56mm hoops
Last edited by noodle soup; 04-22-19 at 08:45 AM.
#10
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 350
why is it outdated and why laughable? The chart was created with safety as priority, not aero as priority. If you use a 25mm tire on a rim with 23mm internal width, sure this gives a good tire/rim aero profile... but on the flip side, you know what's gonna happen if the tire gets a catastrophic flat right? That rim is gonna slam into the ground so hard and so fast that there's a good chance that it'll be damaged beyond usable and good chance of a crash too. A wider tire would at least increases the chance of the rim surviving since it's got more rubber to roll on in an event of a catastrophic flat.
A rim with 23mm internal width means that its brake track width is probably around 28-29mm wide (traditional rim with hook).
A 25mm wide tire is not going to be able to spread out over the width of this rim in a flat situation, kiss rim bye bye.
A rim with 23mm internal width means that its brake track width is probably around 28-29mm wide (traditional rim with hook).
A 25mm wide tire is not going to be able to spread out over the width of this rim in a flat situation, kiss rim bye bye.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 660
Likes: 173
Did you not read the intention of the chart with safety as its priority? You do you know that a 25mm wide tire is physically impossible to be spread across a 28mm-30mm wide rim (measured at the external brake track) in a flat situation, right?
Note. I did not ask you to use a 40-50mm tire nor am I saying that a 40-50mm tire would give the best aero combination. I'm merely presenting my logic as to why I think the table exists the way it does, and in the process rebutting against your proposition of using a 25mm wide tire on a 28-30mm wide rim (brake trake). But that's ok man, ignorance can be blissful too.
#12
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,643
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
That chart exists to show ideal rim widths for given tire widths, completing the circle of the tire profile if you will. One can go (and many have gone) outside of the recommendations without dying, it just becomes less optimal for the reasons given.
The standard (ISO 5775 or somesuch) has also been revised recently, to account for people running skinny tires on wide rims. Sheldon's page still has the old chart.
The standard (ISO 5775 or somesuch) has also been revised recently, to account for people running skinny tires on wide rims. Sheldon's page still has the old chart.
Last edited by ThermionicScott; 04-22-19 at 09:25 AM.
#13
"If you use a very wide tyre on a narrow rim, you risk sidewall or rim failure. This combination causes very sloppy handling at low speeds. Unfortunately, current mountain-bike fashion pushes the edge of this. In the interest of weight saving, most current mountain bikes have excessively narrow rims. "
Please show me some current mountain bike that use narrow rims.
"If you use a very narrow tyre on a wide rim, you risk pinch flats"
This is just false
#14
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 660
Likes: 173
It's from this experience that question "noodle soup" usage of too narror tire on a too wide rim in a clincher setup. But apparently he thinks aero trumps safety.
#16
FTR, I'm using 30mm Schwalbe G-One Speed tires(31.4mm actual width) on 30mm wide(23mm internal) rims.
Comfort is my main concern, not aero.
#17
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 660
Likes: 173
Here's why I say that chart is outdated.
"If you use a very wide tyre on a narrow rim, you risk sidewall or rim failure. This combination causes very sloppy handling at low speeds. Unfortunately, current mountain-bike fashion pushes the edge of this. In the interest of weight saving, most current mountain bikes have excessively narrow rims. "
Please show me some current mountain bike that use narrow rims.
"If you use a very narrow tyre on a wide rim, you risk pinch flats"
This is just false
"If you use a very wide tyre on a narrow rim, you risk sidewall or rim failure. This combination causes very sloppy handling at low speeds. Unfortunately, current mountain-bike fashion pushes the edge of this. In the interest of weight saving, most current mountain bikes have excessively narrow rims. "
Please show me some current mountain bike that use narrow rims.
"If you use a very narrow tyre on a wide rim, you risk pinch flats"
This is just false
1. mtb rims have gotten wider over the years, yes that's true, but mtb tires are also have been getting wider too, and mtb tires are still much wider than their rims when compared to a road or gravel setup. So while wider mtb rims have alleviate and somewhat makes the above statement a little less to be of a concerned, the statement is still a valid one since there are still a lot of mtb bikes on older generation rims.
2. having said that, you then use the above statement that you think is outdated to justify your extreme use case: narrow tire on wide rims. You do this for aero reason, which i did not deny. But at the same time you've also failed to address the question about safety which I have clearly laid out in simple terms.
Look man, if aero is your priority, so be it. I get it. Then you should have said something like "I risk a little of safety in exchange for a little of aero advantage". This would have been a fair statement, no?
#18
#19
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 660
Likes: 173
alright man, cool. Let's see, a 30mm wide rim has 31.4mm of real estate of tire to play on in a catastrophic flat. That's .7mm on each side. Personally i wouldn't risk that setup and would go at to at least a 32mm wide tire, especially if comfort is what I want
#20
alright I'll address a couple of distinct issues here
1. mtb rims have gotten wider over the years, yes that's true, but mtb tires are also have been getting wider too, and mtb tires are still much wider than their rims when compared to a road or gravel setup. So while wider mtb rims have alleviate and somewhat makes the above statement a little less to be of a concerned, the statement is still a valid one since there are still a lot of mtb bikes on older generation rims.
1. mtb rims have gotten wider over the years, yes that's true, but mtb tires are also have been getting wider too, and mtb tires are still much wider than their rims when compared to a road or gravel setup. So while wider mtb rims have alleviate and somewhat makes the above statement a little less to be of a concerned, the statement is still a valid one since there are still a lot of mtb bikes on older generation rims.
BTW, you didn't respond to the false claim that "very narrow rims and wide tires causes pinch flats".
#21
You do understand that the contact area gets wider when deflated, right?
#22
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 660
Likes: 173
Mountain bike tires haven't grown that much(unless you are referring to +size bikes), but the rims have gotten huge compared to the Bontrager modified Mavic MA40 hoops that were once popular. 2.1" - 2.35" is still the most common range of mtb tires
BTW, you didn't respond to the false claim that "very narrow rims and wide tires causes pinch flats".
BTW, you didn't respond to the false claim that "very narrow rims and wide tires causes pinch flats".
But see man, just because some components of the chart is outdated, it doesn't mean
1. the chart is useless
2. nor is it completely outdated because there ARE still people running old equipment. I still have a Specialized 2007 Enduro running old school wheels!
#23
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 660
Likes: 173
yes I do, and more than that, I also understand (and experienced) that in catastrophic flat at 40 mph, the rim is gonna be floating all over the place more than that deflated contact patch or even the whole deflated tire. I alluded to this in my tubular setup discussed above.
#24
this is not a false claim (practically speaking). Back in the day, guys would be using wide tires like 2.3" (remember before this they were using 2.0-2.2") and low pressure so they get some better traction. Well as it turns out, it was the lower pressure that was causing the pinch flats. I myself didn't experience much pinch flats under this combo because unlike most guys I run my pressure about 10 psi more (most were running 25 psi, I was running 35 psi). Of course today this is much less of an issue in mtb now because of the switch to wider rim (more volume) and tubeless.
But see man, just because some components of the chart is outdated, it doesn't mean
1. the chart is useless
2. nor is it completely outdated because there ARE still people running old equipment. I still have a Specialized 2007 Enduro running old school wheels!
But see man, just because some components of the chart is outdated, it doesn't mean
1. the chart is useless
2. nor is it completely outdated because there ARE still people running old equipment. I still have a Specialized 2007 Enduro running old school wheels!
1. I never said the chart is useless. I said it was laughable.
2. The chart is outdated, unless your bike is also outdated
#25
Sheldon's chart is definitely outdated.
The following link shows the new updated chart as per ISO4210 and ETRTO redefined regulations for safety. Good article. See section 4 Safety to view the chart.
The Right Tyre Width on the Right Rim. Mavic: Engineer's Talk
The following link shows the new updated chart as per ISO4210 and ETRTO redefined regulations for safety. Good article. See section 4 Safety to view the chart.
The Right Tyre Width on the Right Rim. Mavic: Engineer's Talk




