Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Power output

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Power output

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-19 | 04:35 PM
  #51  
TrojanHorse's Avatar
SuperGimp
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 13,346
Likes: 65
From: Whittier, CA

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix

Originally Posted by DrIsotope
The last worthwhile computer Garmin produced was the Edge 500.
TrojanHorse is offline  
Reply
Old 06-01-19 | 04:46 PM
  #52  
LAJ's Avatar
LAJ
So it is
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 22,878
Likes: 6,382
From: Westminster, CO

Bikes: Luzerne, 684, Boreas, Wheelhouse, Alize©®, Bayamo, Cayo

Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
The lap button is so useful. I don't think cyclists use it as much as we could. It's for anything you want stats for, doesn't have to be actual laps. When I do mixed surface rides, the lap button is how I know how many miles of gravel and how many of pavement I covered.

Lap button
Yes it is. I use the crap out of it, as well.
LAJ is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-19 | 08:46 AM
  #53  
jadocs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 529
From: USA

Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C

Originally Posted by rubiksoval
220 watts usually buys me 19.5-20 mph with ~50 feet of climbing a mile at 165 lbs in not-super-windy conditions with an aero bike and fast tire setup and generally more-aggressive riding position. 250 + watts is more in the 20.5-21 mph range. 200 watts is more in the 18.5-19 mph range.

Lots of qualifiers there, because lots and lots of things affect speed at various power outputs.
That sounds pretty high for someone 165lbs. I'm 206lbs (non aero bike) and have a measured solo average of 208 watts with normalized at 215 watts for a 21.1mph average for 20.28 miles under similar conditions. I'm using Stages Gen III non drive side PM.

My other solo rides that average in the 20's have slightly lower values as I would expect, such as 195-205 average with normalized at 206-211.

Not knowing how much the OP weighs and assuming it's less than me...his Strava estimate sounds like it's in the ballpark.
jadocs is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-19 | 09:04 AM
  #54  
DaveLeeNC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 169
From: Pinehurst, NC, US

Bikes: 2020 Trek Emonda SL6, 90's Vintage EL-OS Steel Bianchi with 2014 Campy Chorus Upgrade

At a time that my weight was in the low 150's, I rode a hard 50 miler solo at 235 average watts and an average speed of 21.4 mph. I rode the same basic area as a solo century a couple months later and averaged a smidge over 20 mph and average power of 230. The century ride was a bit windy where the 50 miler was relatively calm. Both were loop kind of things. Garmin Vector (dual) pedals for power.

dave
DaveLeeNC is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-19 | 10:30 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 1,429
From: Music City, USA

Bikes: bikes

Originally Posted by jadocs
That sounds pretty high for someone 165lbs. I'm 206lbs (non aero bike) and have a measured solo average of 208 watts with normalized at 215 watts for a 21.1mph average for 20.28 miles under similar conditions. I'm using Stages Gen III non drive side PM.
.
I'd go with that as being a significant potential issue.

Without riding the same course, it doesn't really matter.
rubiksoval is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-19 | 07:35 AM
  #56  
davidtinker's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Cape Town
Originally Posted by Sojodave
My point about average power not being a good stat to go by was based on if your doing hills or intervals. As an example, your power may be low getting out to the hill or where you do intervals, and it may be low coming back. That doesn't mean you didn't put in a good effort if your overall power average isn't high.
Normalised or weighted average power is the stat to look at, especially if you are doing intervals. And you want to look at that per interval + the intensity factor. Shameless plug: My web app intervals.icu does that quite nicely.
davidtinker is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-19 | 09:25 AM
  #57  
LAJ's Avatar
LAJ
So it is
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 22,878
Likes: 6,382
From: Westminster, CO

Bikes: Luzerne, 684, Boreas, Wheelhouse, Alize©®, Bayamo, Cayo

How do you know what your power is during an interval without hitting the lap button? Lap Power is crucial at that point. Obviously, you can watch real time power, but keeping track just seems so much easier.
LAJ is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-19 | 10:21 AM
  #58  
bbbean's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 511
From: Missouri

Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, BMC Time Machine, Univega Alpina Ultima

Originally Posted by davidtinker
Normalised or weighted average power is the stat to look at, especially if you are doing intervals. And you want to look at that per interval + the intensity factor. Shameless plug: My web app intervals.icu does that quite nicely.
Only if you mean the normalized or avg power during the interval. Knowing AP or NP for the entire ride doesn't tell you what you were doing during the intervals.

BB
__________________

Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton

bbbean is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-19 | 11:48 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 1,429
From: Music City, USA

Bikes: bikes

Originally Posted by davidtinker
Normalised or weighted average power is the stat to look at, especially if you are doing intervals. And you want to look at that per interval + the intensity factor. Shameless plug: My web app intervals.icu does that quite nicely.
Normalized power doesn't work as well for intervals under 20 minutes, and the shorter the duration under that, the less useful it is. The NP for a 29 sec interval is...0.

Definitely not what I look at when doing intervals. Lap power is the stuff.
rubiksoval is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-19 | 12:56 PM
  #60  
davidtinker's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Cape Town
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
Normalized power doesn't work as well for intervals under 20 minutes, and the shorter the duration under that, the less useful it is. The NP for a 29 sec interval is...0.
Definitely not what I look at when doing intervals. Lap power is the stuff.
I agree, I got that wrong in my answer. Its certainly better to look at the avg power (or torque for low rpm work) for each interval.
davidtinker is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hammerinbb
Training & Nutrition
22
01-07-19 03:38 PM
Jarrett2
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
17
09-27-15 10:42 PM
Mithrandir
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
33
10-22-13 10:19 PM
pghbikedude
Road Cycling
9
10-08-13 05:14 PM
JonnyHK
Road Cycling
22
08-02-10 10:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.