Cinelli Pressure sizing
#1
Recusant Iconoclast
Thread Starter
Cinelli Pressure sizing
I'm looking at the new Cinelli Pressure. Fit-wise I'm dialed in to current Look 695 size XS, but the geometry falls in between the Cinelli's XS and S in stack, reach, top tube, head tube, etc by ~5 -10 mm or so. Which size should I go for?

Likes For mpath:
#2
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,162
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5843 Post(s)
Liked 4,466 Times
in
3,078 Posts
With all the detailed info you gave us about your size and the bikes, then I'd say get the one that fits. <grin>
Tube lengths don't matter as much as do where the contact points of your body to the bicycle wind up. Differing tube lengths, angles, stem length, handlebar reach/drop, crank length and other things affect that that you won't know by just looking for how long the top tube is.
Tube lengths don't matter as much as do where the contact points of your body to the bicycle wind up. Differing tube lengths, angles, stem length, handlebar reach/drop, crank length and other things affect that that you won't know by just looking for how long the top tube is.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,239
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Trek Y11
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 587 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times
in
244 Posts
I don't know what size you should get, but that bike is flippin' hot.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 676
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 391 Post(s)
Liked 367 Times
in
204 Posts
You can also get that bike in black:
ENGINE11 ? ENGINE11 Mach1 frame set.
For sizing, how do you feel your current bike is? If perfect, I would look for something that is similar and skip this bike. If you always felt it was too short or too long, go in that direction but to me it would be a tough call without a test ride.
ENGINE11 ? ENGINE11 Mach1 frame set.
For sizing, how do you feel your current bike is? If perfect, I would look for something that is similar and skip this bike. If you always felt it was too short or too long, go in that direction but to me it would be a tough call without a test ride.
Last edited by vespasianus; 09-19-20 at 11:44 AM.
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
You can also get that bike in black:
ENGINE11 ? ENGINE11 Mach1 frame set.
For sizing, how do you feel your current bike is? If perfect, I would look for something that is similar and skip this bike. If you always felt it was too short or too long, go in that direction but to me it would be a tough call without a test ride.
ENGINE11 ? ENGINE11 Mach1 frame set.
For sizing, how do you feel your current bike is? If perfect, I would look for something that is similar and skip this bike. If you always felt it was too short or too long, go in that direction but to me it would be a tough call without a test ride.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 676
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 391 Post(s)
Liked 367 Times
in
204 Posts
#7
Recusant Iconoclast
Thread Starter
You can also get that bike in black:
ENGINE11 ? ENGINE11 Mach1 frame set.
For sizing, how do you feel your current bike is? If perfect, I would look for something that is similar and skip this bike. If you always felt it was too short or too long, go in that direction but to me it would be a tough call without a test ride.
ENGINE11 ? ENGINE11 Mach1 frame set.
For sizing, how do you feel your current bike is? If perfect, I would look for something that is similar and skip this bike. If you always felt it was too short or too long, go in that direction but to me it would be a tough call without a test ride.

Geometry-wise, as they say, you can't make a big bike small. So going for the smaller of the two, hopefully I can adjust the seat and perhaps increase the stem length to dial in the fit.
Bellati Sport is current offering the frameset for ~US$3200 but includes the Vision Metron 5D integrated handlebar instead of the unbranded one (probably exactly the same).
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 676
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 391 Post(s)
Liked 367 Times
in
204 Posts
Deliveries won't be until end of the year no chance to test ride it, and doubtful my local LBS would build up in multiple sizes for road tests. My Look has the ideal fit as I can do a century with no pain points or hot spots, other than general fatigue after. I'll be keeping the Look, but I just want another bike - an aero frame this time - without being the big four - Trek, Specialized, Giant, Cannondale (nothing wrong with these!) - or ones my riding buddies have - the Basso Diamante SV, Colnago Concept, De Rosa SK.

Geometry-wise, as they say, you can't make a big bike small. So going for the smaller of the two, hopefully I can adjust the seat and perhaps increase the stem length to dial in the fit.
Bellati Sport is current offering the frameset for ~US$3200 but includes the Vision Metron 5D integrated handlebar instead of the unbranded one (probably exactly the same).

Geometry-wise, as they say, you can't make a big bike small. So going for the smaller of the two, hopefully I can adjust the seat and perhaps increase the stem length to dial in the fit.
Bellati Sport is current offering the frameset for ~US$3200 but includes the Vision Metron 5D integrated handlebar instead of the unbranded one (probably exactly the same).
Also, Antonio Colombo seems like a bit of a crazy wacky dude. Personally, I like that. The silly smily face on the Pressure for example, just classic Colombo.
Last edited by vespasianus; 09-20-20 at 02:39 PM.
Likes For vespasianus:
#9
Recusant Iconoclast
Thread Starter
I hear you regarding the big four. Nothing wrong with them but also nothing wrong with trying to get something different. And for what it is worth, when I had my Cinelli Superstar repaired, I had the shop do a complete scan (ultrasound and internal scope) to check the frame and make sure it was ok. He actually said that it was really well built and better than the Specialized and Treks he normally repairs.
Also, Antonio Colombo seems like a bit of a crazy wacky dude. Personally, I like that. The silly smily face on the Pressure for example, just classic Colombo.
Also, Antonio Colombo seems like a bit of a crazy wacky dude. Personally, I like that. The silly smily face on the Pressure for example, just classic Colombo.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,192
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 526 Times
in
349 Posts
You never stated how your Look 695 is dialed in so it's impossible to say which size Cinelli one would choose.
Other than stack and reach, you have stem length. If your 695 is dialed in with a 120mm stem, then it would make sense to go with the larger Cinelli.
Other than stack and reach, you have stem length. If your 695 is dialed in with a 120mm stem, then it would make sense to go with the larger Cinelli.
#12
Recusant Iconoclast
Thread Starter
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,192
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 526 Times
in
349 Posts
100 mm stem. Here's the comparison from Geometry Geeks: https://geometrygeeks.bike/compare/l...light-2017-xs/
#14
Recusant Iconoclast
Thread Starter
2012 but the data points on Geometry Geek are incomplete so I added the 2017 as well (same frame, just slightly different carbon layup for the aerolight).
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,192
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 526 Times
in
349 Posts
That's just my thought process above.
Likes For jadocs:
#16
Recusant Iconoclast
Thread Starter
Well, going off the 2017 data and the fact that you are currently dialed in with a 100mm stem on the 695....and the XS Cinelli reach is 5mm shorter with a 3mm shorter stack....and also looking at how your 695 is currently setup (you look flexible - in other words you don't have a ton of spacers and decent saddle to bar drop)....I would tend to lean towards the XS Cinelli on a 110mm stem
That's just my thought process above.
That's just my thought process above.