Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Is there an advantage to hookless rims?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Is there an advantage to hookless rims?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-22 | 12:35 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 886
Likes: 557
From: In the south but from North

Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel, Tommasini Mach Ti Gravel

Originally Posted by Psimet2001
You just touched on why they "work" over there= 15 psi. The issue isn't about burping on road it's quite literally about tires being blown off the rim. Its the other end of the spectrum.

The most troubling thing for me is that the parts of the industry that will talk about it openly just use in house rules of 150% of target pressure. That's a 1.5 safety factor. That's the LOWEST safety factor I have ever run into in my engineering life. Especially in a consumer product. The worst part is that not everyone even agrees on going that "high". Hushed anecdotes say some OE's have been fine with 1.2-1.3. Think about that: If they are rating a particular tire and rim combo to 70 psi then that means they have experienced blow off at 84 psi. Keep in mind that even all these years after we went to "wider" 23mm rims (13 years ago) we are still having an impossible time convincing people not to ride pressures in the 115 psi range for road. Old habits die hard. This is an absolute recipe for more than a handful of deaths. Also...84psi? how accurate is your crappy pump that you've used for 15 years? I've run across new *redacted* pump gauges that are as much as 15-20 psi off at lower pressures.
For road use, you will get no argument from me. My new carbon rims are hooked and I won't ride hookless on gravel or road.
vespasianus is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 12:49 PM
  #27  
himespau's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,769
Likes: 3,945
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
I STILL run into recalled Shimano canti brakes that were recalled in the 80's 90's because the plastic spring retainer would crack. Still. Had a set walk in last week. It's been 40 years.
I think I have a set of those in the parts bin. Didn't know they were recalled, but remember being surprised that someone thought it was a good idea to make a crucial part that took repeated rubbing from the end of a spring out of brittle plastic. Might have chucked them when I could no longer get them adjusted right.
himespau is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 12:55 PM
  #28  
Psimet2001's Avatar
I eat carbide.
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,678
Likes: 1,417
From: Elgin, IL

Bikes: Lots. Chapter2, Van Dessel, Giant, Trek, etc Dealers for BMC, Chapter2

Originally Posted by himespau
I think I have a set of those in the parts bin. Didn't know they were recalled, but remember being surprised that someone thought it was a good idea to make a crucial part that took repeated rubbing from the end of a spring out of brittle plastic. Might have chucked them when I could no longer get them adjusted right.
They no longer cover replacement but they used to send out the replacement parts for years/decades. They now don't cover any of it. If you have them you're on the hook for a set of cheap canti's that work great as replacements.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 01:01 PM
  #29  
Trakhak's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,162
Likes: 6,062
From: Baltimore, MD
Originally Posted by WhyFi
H+Son sell quite a few hard anodized rims. The last set of rim brake wheels that I built up were Archetypes. Good rims. I mean, the brake track looked a bit ass after the first wet, gritty ride, but they were nice.
The larger issue is that the hard anodizing all but guaranteed that the rims would eventually begin cracking at the spoke holes. I went through quite a few MP4 Mavic rims with that problem back in the day.

Poorer braking than silver anodized rims, too. Campy brakes, a.k.a. "speed modulators," were already enough of a while-knuckle experience in panic stops without the added reduction in braking power from hard anodizing.
Trakhak is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 01:23 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,841
Likes: 2,859
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
Dangit - now I am revved up. We are about to record a new episode of the podcast so I am sure I will touch on this and rant slightly. *shameless podcast plug* give us a listen at Road Is Dead.
I'm gonna have to give it a listen.
seypat is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 01:42 PM
  #31  
himespau's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,769
Likes: 3,945
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
They no longer cover replacement but they used to send out the replacement parts for years/decades. They now don't cover any of it. If you have them you're on the hook for a set of cheap canti's that work great as replacements.
Other than a set of super flexy Scott Drop-In bars (that I kind of regret getting rid of now), I don't really ever throw anything from my parts bin away even if I know I'll never use it again. Still have some old plastic friction stem shifters that I kept for God knows what reason. At least knowing there's no more way of fixing them means I might actually throw out those canti brakes the next time I see them when rummaging through one of my tubs.

Actually thought of you a couple nights back because I was racing on Zwift and saw someone with a [PSImet] team tag in my race and was thinking that I didn't remember having raced against one of your riders before. Also had been remembering what you thought about the integrity of Zwift racing.
himespau is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 02:03 PM
  #32  
Racing Dan's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 373
Well ...

Removing the hook = removing one layer of protection from the tyre blowing off of the rim. And ZERO benefits. Why bother?
Racing Dan is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 02:13 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,299
Likes: 11,391

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Originally Posted by Racing Dan
Well ...

Removing the hook = removing one layer of protection from the tyre blowing off of the rim. And ZERO benefits. Why bother?
It's already been stated a few times -- there is a manufacturing benefit.
tomato coupe is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 02:16 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,081
Likes: 2,104
Only benefit that I could find is increased internal width for a given external fixed width making for an allegedly plusher ride.

The lack of sufficient safety margin for blowoffs is why I recently bought hooked rims.
GhostRider62 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 02:19 PM
  #35  
himespau's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,769
Likes: 3,945
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by GhostRider62
Only benefit that I could find is increased internal width for a given external fixed width making for an allegedly plusher ride.

The lack of sufficient safety margin for blowoffs is why I recently bought hooked rims.
Someone once told me it was that it made it slightly easier to get tires on the rims.
himespau is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 02:20 PM
  #36  
Racing Dan's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 373
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
It's already been stated a few times -- there is a manufacturing benefit.
Compromising safety just so ppl can have cheap(er) carbon rims, is not a benefit. Its a liability. By that logic customers might as well buy no name carbon wheels from freabay. Me. Id much rather have a semi no name china wheel than a hook less road wheel from any manufacturer.
Racing Dan is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 02:50 PM
  #37  
mstateglfr's Avatar
Sunshine
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 18,756
Likes: 10,316
From: Des Moines, IA

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Originally Posted by tomato coupe
It's already been stated a few times -- there is a manufacturing benefit.
I think the other poster was implying that they think there is no benefit to the consumer.
The consumer doesnt pay less for hookless, even though manufacturing is faster/easier/less waste.
mstateglfr is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 03:06 PM
  #38  
Full Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 285
Likes: 67
From: Lehigh Valley
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
Dangit - now I am revved up. We are about to record a new episode of the podcast so I am sure I will touch on this and rant slightly. *shameless podcast plug* give us a listen at Road Is Dead.
Subscribed.
force10 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 03:07 PM
  #39  
Full Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 285
Likes: 67
From: Lehigh Valley
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
It's worthwhile to point out that old bikeforums member who "grew up" to become the editor of VeloNews and now Cycling Tips and runs the cycling Tips podcast and Nerd Alert podcast basically came to the same epiphany the other day and took to twitter about it.
Link?
force10 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 03:12 PM
  #40  
79pmooney's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,191
Likes: 5,328
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Wow! I started this to learn of the advantages of those rims. So, maybe a touch stronger, a touch lighter. And definitely cheaper to make. Less waste. Fatter stockholder portfolios. I'm supposed to risk my skin and bones for those advantages?
79pmooney is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 03:17 PM
  #41  
WhyFi's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,737
Likes: 9,745
From: TC, MN

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Originally Posted by 79pmooney
Wow! I started this to learn of the advantages of those rims.
Lol. Yeah, right.
WhyFi is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 03:18 PM
  #42  
Psimet2001's Avatar
I eat carbide.
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,678
Likes: 1,417
From: Elgin, IL

Bikes: Lots. Chapter2, Van Dessel, Giant, Trek, etc Dealers for BMC, Chapter2

Originally Posted by 79pmooney
<snip> I'm supposed to risk my skin and bones for those advantages?
Apparently...yes.

This is truly really like the whole bottom bracket fiasco. A misguided endeavor based in manufacturing savings and trying to solve for bad quality by just eliminating a feature.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 03:30 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 14,935
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
No. There is no benefit for the rider. All real benefits are on the manufacturing side. They are less expensive to mold and there is less scrap. The tradeoffs on the rider side of absolutely little to no control of the tires and their ability to reliably stay on the rims in road applications is borderline criminally negligent in my opinion. My opinion is meaningless though.
It's not meaningless to many of us around here.
Koyote is online now  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 03:32 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,804
Likes: 1,820
From: North Central Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
. The tradeoffs on the rider side of absolutely little to no control of the tires and their ability to reliably stay on the rims in road applications is borderline criminally negligent in my opinion. My opinion is meaningless though.
prj71 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 03:42 PM
  #45  
tyrion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 2,015
From: San Diego, California

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Originally Posted by 79pmooney
Wow! I started this to learn of the advantages of those rims. So, maybe a touch stronger, a touch lighter. And definitely cheaper to make. Less waste. Fatter stockholder portfolios. I'm supposed to risk my skin and bones for those advantages?
If you truly love the stockholders, you will.
tyrion is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 03:45 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,804
Likes: 1,820
From: North Central Wisconsin
Guys,

I recently did a 71 mile gravel race over some pretty rough roads on hookless rims. I didn't die.

I'll just point out that motorcyle wheels, ATV wheels and automobile wheels are all hookless.
prj71 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 03:49 PM
  #47  
WhyFi's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,737
Likes: 9,745
From: TC, MN

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Originally Posted by prj71
Guys,

I recently did a 71 mile gravel race over some pretty rough roads on hookless rims. I didn't die.

I'll just point out that motorcyle wheels, ATV wheels and automobile wheels are all hookless.
​​​​​Since my previous post, I've had one more blowoff and one more death. This brings me up to eight and three, respectively. I figure I'll go back to hooked rims after I die seven times - that'll give me one more plus a bailout.
WhyFi is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 05:15 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,081
Likes: 2,104
Originally Posted by prj71
Guys,

I recently did a 71 mile gravel race over some pretty rough roads on hookless rims. I didn't die.

I'll just point out that motorcyle wheels, ATV wheels and automobile wheels are all hookless.
With steel beads.

I've had a tubeless bicycle tire blow off at below the rated pressure.
GhostRider62 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 05:23 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 578
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

I've been using the new zipp 303s hookless rims for over 1000 miles with no problems. The 23mm internal width allows a lower tire pressure than my 19mm hooked rims. My Pirelli p zero tires were easy to get onto the rim and seated with a very old Silca pump. No problems so far. I've had mine up to 57mph.

Last edited by DaveSSS; 06-09-22 at 08:28 PM.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-22 | 05:31 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,299
Likes: 11,391

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Originally Posted by Racing Dan
Compromising safety just so ppl can have cheap(er) carbon rims, is not a benefit. Its a liability. By that logic customers might as well buy no name carbon wheels from freabay. Me. Id much rather have a semi no name china wheel than a hook less road wheel from any manufacturer.
You didn't specify it was no benefit to the end user, just "ZERO benefits." Hookless is a benefit to the manufacturer.

Originally Posted by mstateglfr
I think the other poster was implying that they think there is no benefit to the consumer.
Okay.
tomato coupe is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.