Anyone Running 60MM Wheels
#1
Grupetto Bob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 5,385
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2177 Post(s)
Liked 4,605 Times
in
2,441 Posts
Anyone Running 60MM Wheels
If so, how do you like them?
Max size in MM you would run or smaller in front?
If no way, why?
TIA
Max size in MM you would run or smaller in front?
If no way, why?
TIA
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG
Last edited by rsbob; 01-01-23 at 12:20 AM.
#2
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 20,670
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9024 Post(s)
Liked 3,511 Times
in
1,907 Posts
I did and was fine. The perceived effect of wind declines as you get used to them.
Likes For Bah Humbug:
#3
Senior Member
Enve 6.7
I ran 28mm on both. I have done 25mm before but honestly not worth it.. 28 is just easier and a better fit with today's wider rims.
I ran 28mm on both. I have done 25mm before but honestly not worth it.. 28 is just easier and a better fit with today's wider rims.
Likes For spdntrxi:
#4
Senior Member
I bought 45mm ZIPP 303s wheels a year ago. They're OK, but I ride mountain descents where gusty cross winds are common and I've had some difficulty controlling the bike. Since I don't compete, I don't see the value in these heavier wheels, other than they look cool. I bought a set of BTLOS wheels a couple of months ago with 29mm depth and wider 25mm hookless internal width. I'm running 28mm tires with 52/56 psi.
#5
Senior Member
I have been on 58/50 for 5 yrs and 60/60 for the last 3 daily. They have never given me pause but I don't ride mountains but rarely and have been a sailor all my life and I'm used to responding to the wind with the tiller as much as the bars.
#6
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,221
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1658 Post(s)
Liked 1,233 Times
in
869 Posts
A 40 mm rim height should be enough to let pretty much everyone know that one has CF wheels. Just in case, I bought 45 mm tall wheels.
But seriously, I chose 45 mm tall wheels to minimize the weight penalty over their alloy predecessors.
But seriously, I chose 45 mm tall wheels to minimize the weight penalty over their alloy predecessors.
#7
Grupetto Bob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 5,385
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2177 Post(s)
Liked 4,605 Times
in
2,441 Posts
Makes perfect sense. Always have to ‘weigh’ weight for climbing and acceleration versus the aero gain on the flats. From what I have read, the 45s seem to win as the best compromise.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG
Last edited by rsbob; 01-01-23 at 09:00 PM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Australia
Posts: 766
Bikes: 2002 Trek 5200 (US POSTAL), 2020 Canyon Aeroad SL
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 291 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
308 Posts
I've been running 60mm carbon wheels for years now. I'm a 60kg / 130lb lightweight and in strong blustery crosswinds they can be a handful, but most of the time they are fine.
I don't go around cresting Hors Catégorie mountain passes all day so the little extra weight is easily offset by the extra aero benefits.
I don't go around cresting Hors Catégorie mountain passes all day so the little extra weight is easily offset by the extra aero benefits.
Likes For tempocyclist:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 951
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 289 Post(s)
Liked 156 Times
in
95 Posts
used a prime wheels with 50mm+bracking track for years and the side wind was a bit frustating. Actually i'm running a 35/37mm and seems quite okay in almost every situation. Maybe the gold spot is to swap the rear with one more deep but for now i'm okay with this combo.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,792
Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 459 Post(s)
Liked 178 Times
in
115 Posts
45mm is my max here in Colorado. Some of those steep passes can get windy and I don't like the feeling of the front being pushed suddenly. Some days, even a 45 front seems a bit too much but I am weighty enough to not let it control the bike for long. It seems that the ENVE 3.4 or a 45/45 combo is about the max here. I have been running 28s but am running 32s now on Foundation 45 wheels. My other bike has shallow alloy rims that are around 28mm with 28s.
#11
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,250
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1415 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times
in
341 Posts
With the possible exception of a very steep uphill only TT, aero is going to trump weight almost every time. Aero is just a bigger percentage of the equation than the tiny weight difference. Back in the day, Tyler Hamilton illustrated this winning the US Pro Championship, with multiple climbs up Paris Mountain on Zipp 808’s
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#12
Achtung!
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New England
Posts: 1,673
Bikes: 60.1, Marvel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 515 Post(s)
Liked 268 Times
in
161 Posts
I run 44s and 45s, depending on bike, and here in New England, I find that to be a good compromise, especially when I’m riding along the coast and the wind picks up. I do wish I had picked up a 60-65mm rear specifically for races, but I’m not sure I’d have any appreciable advantage over my current setup. I run 25s on all bikes but have room for 28s and will try them when I need to replace my current tires.
#13
Grupetto Bob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 5,385
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2177 Post(s)
Liked 4,605 Times
in
2,441 Posts
I have 35s as well. On windy days, will put the 35 on the front. Hopefully that will take the teeth out of a cross wind.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 1,814
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 808 Post(s)
Liked 475 Times
in
360 Posts
No way for me. It would be of no use. I climb hills most of the times with average speed of 30ish KPH (19MPH), flat roads are rare. If I were to go with deeper wheels than my current 42mms, I'd go with 50mms.
I tried a few different ones and I find that 42mms is a good all-around wheel.
I tried a few different ones and I find that 42mms is a good all-around wheel.
#15
Grupetto Bob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 5,385
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2177 Post(s)
Liked 4,605 Times
in
2,441 Posts
Ran the wheels yesterday in zero wind and they ran well. When done, Garmin congratulated me on my fastest 40K to date but only did 778’. No PRs but average was up. Winds will probably shoot that kind of run to smithereens.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG
#16
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,251
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 951 Post(s)
Liked 1,119 Times
in
647 Posts
I bought some 56's last year and didn't really like the feeling of the wind (even a gentle breeze) when on winding descents. Didn't feel in danger of crashing, but was ruining my cycling zen, so I built a set of 32's up instead and hung the other ones up after about 2 months. Maybe I would get used to them if I tried them longer as Bah Humbug said, but since I am slow (averaging 13-14 mph nowadays) and not racing, it's just not important for me.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 6,979
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,771 Times
in
1,791 Posts
imo, if running a tube, I'd opt for 60 or 40.
The 60 would be my choice since I am basically an anchor on the bicycle. Also, I prefer less of a spoke length to keep a low hole count wheel more likely to stay true. like to keep the valve length somewhat proportion to how much it protrude out, & just like the way it looks.
40 may seem to be an extreme change in size, but it'll be easier to find a tube that has enough valve length without using an extender or using a tube with a really really long valve. If the rider's lbs isn't oooof'ing, the 40s are less prone to wind drifting. They'll look less aggressive too.
The 60 would be my choice since I am basically an anchor on the bicycle. Also, I prefer less of a spoke length to keep a low hole count wheel more likely to stay true. like to keep the valve length somewhat proportion to how much it protrude out, & just like the way it looks.
40 may seem to be an extreme change in size, but it'll be easier to find a tube that has enough valve length without using an extender or using a tube with a really really long valve. If the rider's lbs isn't oooof'ing, the 40s are less prone to wind drifting. They'll look less aggressive too.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,367
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6566 Post(s)
Liked 10,294 Times
in
4,409 Posts
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 2,823
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1425 Post(s)
Liked 1,446 Times
in
853 Posts
I seriously doubt anyone on this board can actually feel a meaningful difference in cross-wind handling between a 45mm and a 60mm wheel. Don't get me wrong, if you ride 80mm+ wheels on a super windy day it's going to be a handful, but the actual on-the-road handling differences between 45-60mm wheels seems trivial at best. If it's so windy that a 60mm wheel is legitimately dangerous, it's also definitely going to be too windy for a 45mm wheel and probably too windy to ride at all without getting blown all over the road.
The main thing here is that 60mm wheels lose more of their aero advantages in crosswinds than 45mm wheels do and at high yaw angles can actually become slower. That's really the only reason (besides weight) why anyone would need to switch from 60mm to 45mm. This is why pros switch wheels based on conditions, not because the 60mm wheels are too much to handle.
The main thing here is that 60mm wheels lose more of their aero advantages in crosswinds than 45mm wheels do and at high yaw angles can actually become slower. That's really the only reason (besides weight) why anyone would need to switch from 60mm to 45mm. This is why pros switch wheels based on conditions, not because the 60mm wheels are too much to handle.
Likes For msu2001la:
#21
Grupetto Bob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 5,385
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2177 Post(s)
Liked 4,605 Times
in
2,441 Posts
Went out during a high wind warning with a 60 in the back and a 32 in front just to see how bad it could be and was pleasantly surprised I wasn’t blown all over the place. A couple of gusts got my attention, but nothing like last summer when I watched a woman cycle touring in Norway get completely blown over. The tailwind got me up to 28 MPH but had to claw back at 12. Won’t be repeating that experiment again, but at least know what the combination can handle.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG
Likes For rsbob:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,628
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3874 Post(s)
Liked 2,786 Times
in
1,699 Posts
When I first got my 56 mm rims, I felt like I was being blown around and that I needed extra attention to maintain control. But I'm used to them now and they don't give me any problems or cause for concern.
#23
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 20,670
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9024 Post(s)
Liked 3,511 Times
in
1,907 Posts
Went out during a high wind warning with a 60 in the back and a 32 in front just to see how bad it could be and was pleasantly surprised I wasn’t blown all over the place. A couple of gusts got my attention, but nothing like last summer when I watched a woman cycle touring in Norway get completely blown over. The tailwind got me up to 28 MPH but had to claw back at 12. Won’t be repeating that experiment again, but at least know what the combination can handle.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,911
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 840 Post(s)
Liked 708 Times
in
423 Posts
The main thing here is that 60mm wheels lose more of their aero advantages in crosswinds than 45mm wheels do and at high yaw angles can actually become slower. That's really the only reason (besides weight) why anyone would need to switch from 60mm to 45mm. This is why pros switch wheels based on conditions, not because the 60mm wheels are too much to handle.

Negative drag (aka sail effect) at high yaw with deeper rims.
Likes For surak:
#25
Grupetto Bob
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 5,385
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2177 Post(s)
Liked 4,605 Times
in
2,441 Posts
Any definitive studies on fewer/shorter spokes (say 24) with a high aero profile rim versus, a plethora of spokes on a flat rim (say 32)? I know I have been blown around plenty of my 32 spoke count 80s bike.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
”Your lips move but I can’t hear what your saying” DG