Ouzo Comp vs Ouzo Pro
03-28-06 | 05:19 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: West Haven, Utah
Bikes: Lynskey Level 3 Custom, De Bernardi SLX, Felt F1C, Burley Duet Tandem
Ouzo Comp vs Ouzo Pro
Has anyone ever compared the differences with these two forks on their bike? I'm wondering if the ride is noticeably different between the aluminum steerer and composite steerer. Is it really worth the extra money? Please share your testimony with me. Thanks in advance.
03-29-06 | 08:18 AM
#2
Aluminium Crusader :-)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,050
Likes: 11
From: Melbourne, Australia
I've tried and owned quite a few carbon forks -- although, probably less than a dozen, and no Reynolds -- but and ALL the full-carbons have been more comfortable than all the alu or steel steerer models
also much lighter
also much lighter
Last edited by 531Aussie; 03-29-06 at 08:40 AM.
03-29-06 | 12:36 PM
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: West Haven, Utah
Bikes: Lynskey Level 3 Custom, De Bernardi SLX, Felt F1C, Burley Duet Tandem
Originally Posted by 531Aussie
I've tried and owned quite a few carbon forks -- although, probably less than a dozen, and no Reynolds -- but and ALL the full-carbons have been more comfortable than all the alu or steel steerer models
also much lighter
also much lighter
The weight is not an issue with me. But searching on the web I found some people say there is no difference in ride and others that say there is. I challenge anyone to ride two exact bikes one with Ouzo Comp and the other with Ouzo Pro and I'll bet my salary we would have no conclusive answer. Judging by the amount of responses to this thread I would say other than weight....it all bling and wow factor going with the Ouzo Pro.
