Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

What's the deal with a high cadence?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

What's the deal with a high cadence?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-06, 10:25 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
spunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 473
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Paulus
Max cadence the other day on my Echowell was 191rpm (done on the flat in 30/25 on a triple). I was pretty stoked that I could actually spin my legs that fast.
But are you spinning efficiently at that cadence?
It doesn't do alot of good if you're bouncing all over the place wasting energy.

Personally, I think it's valuable to learn to ride at many different cadences.
It gives you a bigger toolbox to work from.
My average cadence is around 90-100 rpms, but I can comfortably spin at 120 for extended periods and I max out at 140 before I get bouncy.
But I find that I'm actually the most efficient when time trialing in bigger gears around 75-80 rpms.
Here's an interesting read on the "perfect cadence." https://www.pezcyclingnews.com/?pg=fullstory&id=4011
spunky is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 12:11 AM
  #27  
Crankenstein
 
bmclaughlin807's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Spokane
Posts: 4,037

Bikes: Novara Randonee (TankerBelle)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by allez
i just looked at this computer because i need a new one for my new build. one question: WHY does this computer need to go up to 185mph? who is going this fast on a bicycle?
Well, what with all the EPO, steroids, and other drugs out there for boosting performance, and then the talk of nano-robots that could go in and build up your muscles, you never know.... Better to be prepared now than have all those cycle computers out there become obsolete, right?
__________________
"There is no greater wonder than the way the face and character of a woman fit so perfectly in a man's mind, and stay there, and he could never tell you why. It just seems it was the thing he most wanted." Robert Louis Stevenson
bmclaughlin807 is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 01:00 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Christchurch, NZ
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spunky
But are you spinning efficiently at that cadence?
It doesn't do alot of good if you're bouncing all over the place wasting energy.

Personally, I think it's valuable to learn to ride at many different cadences.
It gives you a bigger toolbox to work from.
My average cadence is around 90-100 rpms, but I can comfortably spin at 120 for extended periods and I max out at 140 before I get bouncy.
But I find that I'm actually the most efficient when time trialing in bigger gears around 75-80 rpms.
Here's an interesting read on the "perfect cadence." https://www.pezcyclingnews.com/?pg=fullstory&id=4011
Efficiently? Absolutely not. Suprisingly I wasn't bouncing but there was no real power there. More interesting as a test of how fast you can spin. Note I was using 30/25 gearing (triple). I do prefer spinning at a highish cadence though and will often run close to 110rpm instead of the 90rpm most people use.
Paulus is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 03:30 AM
  #29  
lurking nightrider
 
LittleGinseng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 576

Bikes: '84 Lotus Supreme, '85 Club Fuji, '86 Schwinn Peloton, '87 DS Ironman Expert, '87 Maruishi Professional, '88 Takara

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 73 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by ElJamoquio
Nah, go to www.sheldonbrown.com, and print out his MPH vs. Gear-you're-supposed to be in charts. Tape it to your bike.
+1

Once you hit your target speed using the gear calculator, you'll automatically be in your target cadence.
__________________
"If there hadn't been women we'd still be squatting in a cave eating raw meat, because we made civilization in order to impress our girl friends. And they tolerated it and let us go ahead and play with our toys." Orson Welles
LittleGinseng is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 04:06 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 373
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bruce19
I've been told that cyclists have two kinds of "energy" that we use. The first is stored in muscles and the second in body fat. When the energy in muscles is depleted, the only way to re-energize is with rest. When the body fat energy is depleted it can be renewed by eating and drinking. Mashing gears uses muscle energy and spinning uses body fat energy. Therefore, if you spin rather than mash gears, one can ride longer by continuing to stoke the body fat stores.
Yeah, kinda sort of. There's actually a continuous range between burning 100% fat to burning 100% glycogen (carbs) and it's related to your max muscle-strength and LT-lactate threshold. LT is actually a muscular-force point, not heart-rate, but it can be correlated if you keep certain things like speed & cadence constant. The LT point is where your muscles go from aerobic glycolysis go anaerobic fermentation for energy. The differences in efficiency is extreme, aerobic generates 38-ATP while anaerobic makes only 2-ATP. The LT point is usually 50-75% of max-exertion 1-rep force.

Here's what happens when you're riding, if you're cruising along at 10mph, pushing on the pedals with something like just 20-lbs of force, you're gonna be far away from LT and burning mostly fats. You also won't be feeling any strain on your muscles or knees at all.

Let's say you increase your speed to 20mph by pushing 90% of your maximum force at 80rpms. You're over your LT, your muscles will ache and get sore and you won't be able to keep it up for long. You'll also be burning 100% glycogen as well and will bonk in about 2-hours.

Then you shift down two or three gears at the same speed, 20mph, but spin 100rpms instead. Working through the physics equation of POWER = (force*distance)/time, you'll find that you can generate the exact same power as before to go 20mph, but you'll only need to be pushing on the pedals at 68% of your maximum strength instead. This amount of pedal-force is well below your max and slightly below your LT, so the muscles will be much more efficient and burn a mix of fats & carbs. Probably 30% fat & 70% carbs depending upon your fitness.

So overall, using two to three gears lower and spinning at 100rpms at the same 20mph speed will lower the stress on your knees by 25%, increase your muscle's efficiency by pushing them at a lower-percentage of their max, and you'll be able to ride that same speed for much longer. Endurance will also increase because you're burning more fat and you'll be able to ride 3 hours before bonking instead of just two.

Note that riding at higher RPMs at the same speed tends to use more oxygen. But that's not of a big concern because both of those are below your VO2-max. It's the muscle's LT that you're really worried about and keeping them as far below LT as possible for any given speed will give you much more efficiency and lower muscle-fatigue, allowing you to go further at that speed.

Last edited by Mothra; 07-09-06 at 04:14 AM.
Mothra is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 04:42 AM
  #31  
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by -VELOCITY-
I normally ride with a cadence between 80 and 85. Occasionally I'll jump up to 90 or 95 but it feels ackward having to pedal that fast. It doesn't feel normal.

you consider a cadence of 90-95 fast?
botto is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 05:18 AM
  #32  
Sarcopenia: Living Decay
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,812
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by botto
you consider a cadence of 90-95 fast?
90-95rpm can be considered fast if the subject is normally touring at 60-70rpm. It's horses for courses, not a Lance-fest. Everyone's natural cadence is different, some fast, some slow, and it will vary depending on the prevailing conditions (flat, climbing, headwind, temp, humidity, etc). And for those who are willing to put in the time and effort, that natural cadence can be adapted for a new task with training (eg. to convert a strong road rider to a track pursuiter).

The 'perfect cadence' is actually your natural cadence. Most bike riders don't even know what their natural cadence is. Mine's 97rpm, what's your's? How do you find it? At what revs does your action start to break down? Does action breakdown really mean you are no longer able to deliver power to the pedals? Does it mean you can't spin faster? Apologies, for I digress... back to the subject matter at hand:

Is it important for everyone to strive for those "incredible" LA cadences of 120rpm? Of course not. It's far more important for everyone to strive for the cadence range which suits their bioligical makup, specifically the way in which their muscles burn fuel. For some ppl high cadences can be just as taxing as low cadences are at the same speed for others just because of the way their muscles convert energy stores and oxygen into work. Your coach will be able to work out your optimal cadence range with one or two weeks of ride information if they are worth the money you are paying them.

'Scientific studies' on small subject groups (<1000) of ill-defined fitness ("well trained athletes" - WTF is that?) that say one thing or another about just about anything are becoming a bore. Why? Because they shoehorn every athlete into a generalisation, and they allow charletans like RFS to jump on a bandwagon, preach rubbish with impunity, and profit from people's naivity.

If it's any consolation, juniors as young as 10 in our club spin at over 200rpm for long periods of time. When they are older and they're muscle mass increases they will find it hard to keep up more than 199rpm for long periods of time.

Last edited by jock; 07-09-06 at 06:12 AM.
jock is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 05:50 AM
  #33  
Ca-na-da?
 
krazyderek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,025

Bikes: none at the moment

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Spinning is a little easier on your legs and shifts some of that work to your lungs and cardio system. Lance had a huge heart so he could pump more O2 to his muscles and he concentrated on aerobic efficiecy quite a bit after cancer. Your cardio (lungs) can also recover quite a bit faster then your legs can. This is why you can see lance dancing up the mountain stages in those videos, he bridges a gap, rests for 20 seconds, then he's off again. I'm sure someone else explained the science and details behind this alot better then me
krazyderek is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 05:57 AM
  #34  
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by jock
Most bike riders don't even know what their natural cadence is. Mine's 97rpm, what's your's?
around 108.
botto is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 06:13 AM
  #35  
Sarcopenia: Living Decay
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,812
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You're not very good at this game are you Botto?
jock is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 06:25 AM
  #36  
Royal Grand Exalted Pooba
 
smoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Eight Miles High
Posts: 1,361

Bikes: Time VXR ProTeam, Look 695, Pinarello Paris Carbon, Ridley Dean, Time ZXRS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i'm also a masher. 80 rpm is about normal for me. and i'll time trial a few rpm below that. i've tried getting my cadence higher, but it just doesn't seem to work for me. but i've found that i climb faster by getting into a smaller gear and spinning up hills than i did when i'd leave it in a big gear and mash my way up. go figure
smoke is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 06:27 AM
  #37  
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by jock
You're not very good at this game are you Botto?
i'd have to be interested in playing it first
botto is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 06:46 AM
  #38  
Dirt-riding heretic
 
DrPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 17,413

Bikes: Lynskey R230/Red, Blue Triad SL/Red, Cannondale Scalpel 3/X9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by helmets save
Acutally, I just bought a new cycling computer. I recommend VDO computers. Here is their website:

https://www.cycleparts.de/en/startseite/

They have been around for the longest time making speedometers for german cars. I love their display too, its just the right size. I have a cateye double wireless, they just tried to fit too much info on the display. I cant take quick glances just to findout some info. Personally, I just need speed and cadence always displayed.
I had a VDO for a while, the C2DS, and the wireless transmitter was worthless. I just had a really bad experience with it, and I'm quite sure I set everything up as the instructions stated.

DrPete
DrPete is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 07:07 AM
  #39  
部門ニ/自転車オタク
 
NomadVW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 3,173

Bikes: 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, 2012 Blue Norcross CX, 2016 Blue Axino SL, 2016 Scott Scale, Fixie, Fetish Cycles Road Bike (on the trainer)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I remember last year watching a triathlon that I was volunteering at. I couldn't believe how fast they were spinning. At the time, I kept around 90ish. Now, if I go down to 90 - my legs feel it something fierce. I spin right at 100rpm on pace, and no lower than 95. If I'm in a longer pull, it climbs up to around 105. I can go much longer at same pace now with the higher cadence. I worked on it in spinning classes and on the rollers.

VW

PS > Astrale8 +1
__________________
Envision, Energize, Enable
NomadVW is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 07:07 AM
  #40  
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 16,056

Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 17 Posts
Originally Posted by mayukawa
For that guy whose MTB has a rocket strapped to the back...
Obviously, you've never seen me coming down a hill!
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 08:36 AM
  #41  
hill hater
 
nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: norton ohio 5.5 miles from center road tow path trail head
Posts: 2,127

Bikes: cannondale t400 1987 model and a raleigh gran prix from 1973

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bmclaughlin807
It's also easier on your knees!!! I have two torn ligaments, and some (don't know yet how much) damage to the menescus from an incident at work last year... they still haven't decided on whether they should operate on it, or not.

I know that when my cadence drops, and I start to mash, my knee will start to throb, but I can ride at a higher cadence all day and not feel anything from the knee.

It takes a bit to get used to, but I've increased my cadence by more than 20 rpm in less than 2 months. I used to ride everywhere at about 55-65 rpm... that's what I was used to, what I rode at in high school, and what I've done since. A month and a half into it, and my cadence is almost always above 75, and pretty regularly in the mid-90s. I feel fairly comfortable in the 100-110 range for a couple miles.
Just wait till you start to see less and less of a need for the big ring lol.

I avarage 110 for long distances and on a 11 mile ride just now i had a ararage of 105. One time just to see what i could do as a max i gave it all i had on a down hill in lowest gear and flipped my topeak cadence. Im asuming its got a max of 200. Last i dared look on that run i seen 192. I didnt hold that high cadence for very long maybe 30 secounds at most. That was at the end of last season trying right after i got my comp i coudl only muster maybe 120s for less time. Now im not even shocked to look at my max cadence and see 128 130 with avarage over all in low 100s

Once you get to a high avarage cadence its a whole other ball of wax. Like others have said its easyer on the knees because your not stressing the joints. Your avarage speed top speed etc all go up.
nova is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 08:57 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
godspiral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 876
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shakeNbake
Can anyone suggest me a computer with cadence, nothing too fancy, I just need cadence and/or speed.

Thanks.
I noticed they are all pretty expensive. If you know your speed, and your gears, you can calculate your precise cadence.
godspiral is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 09:11 AM
  #43  
hill hater
 
nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: norton ohio 5.5 miles from center road tow path trail head
Posts: 2,127

Bikes: cannondale t400 1987 model and a raleigh gran prix from 1973

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by godspiral
I noticed they are all pretty expensive. If you know your speed, and your gears, you can calculate your precise cadence.

here you go
this is the one i bought and the ebay store i bought from. had the comp in my hands in 4 days
https://cgi.ebay.com/TOPEAK-COMP-140-...QQcmdZViewItem

Its a nice little unit unclips from the mount max cadence current avarage same for speed. I think it has a max cadence of 200 before it flips and represents the cadence via flasshign numbers.

Seems to be quite reliable as well. I got mine about a month after i started riding last year (put 800ish miles on it last year and little over 400 this year.)

Give it a try its a great little comp for the money.

It is a wired unit obviously.
nova is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 01:18 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by -VELOCITY-
I normally ride with a cadence between 80 and 85. Occasionally I'll jump up to 90 or 95 but it feels ackward having to pedal that fast. It doesn't feel normal. Should it feel normal? I keep seeing in various places that they recommend a faster cadence and how it helped Lance win his first tour. But for the everyday non pro rider does a high cadence help. I find that I have to work harder to maintain such a high cadence. My heart rate goes up. Any feedback would be great. Thanks.
Well, riding at a higher cadence will shift the load from your skeletal muscles to your heart muscles, so that's part of the effect you're seeing. You also aren't as efficient at higher cadences.

I suggest doing fast pedal intervals. Make sure you're warmed up first. Start with intervals 1:30 in length. Slowly increase your cadence for the first minute, making sure you aren't bouncing, and then hold it for the remainder of the interval. Do it with a low enough gearing so that your heartrate isn't going too high.

Recover at a comfortable rate for the same amount of time as the interval. Repeat 4 times. Do this a couple times a week, and increase the interval time to 2 minutes as you get more used to it.

I did that this spring. I used to spend most of my time at about 85 RPM, and got uncomfortable at 105 RPM or so. Now I can easily ride for 15 minutes at 110-115 RPM, and saw 143 RPM for 15 seconds or so on a downhill tempo interval last week.

While I do find it useful to shift the load to my heart, I think getting a smoother pedal stroke that uses more muscles is the real benefit.
__________________
Eric

2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)

Read my cycling blog at https://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
Like climbing? Goto https://www.bicycleclimbs.com
ericgu is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 02:22 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
godspiral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 876
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gontchar (winner of last tdf time trial by over 1 minute) thinks you're all *******
godspiral is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 02:40 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
-VELOCITY-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,919

Bikes: Giant Revel 2 & Loco Fixie "The Marley"

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shakeNbake
Can anyone suggest me a computer with cadence, nothing too fancy, I just need cadence and/or speed.

Thanks.
I personally use the Cateye Astrale 8. It's really good. I got no complaints. This morning I tried picking up my cadence for longer intervals. It still feels ackward. A couple of times I went over 100 just to get the feel. But when I wasn't really pedaling hard I started to bounce on the saddle. I guess I gotta give it a little more time to get used to it. One thing I noticed was the ability to pick up my pace easier when I was between 90 and 95 and wanted to take it to 100+. However I didn't have my HRM on but it felt like my heart was gonna pop out of my chest.
-VELOCITY- is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 02:54 PM
  #47  
Crankenstein
 
bmclaughlin807's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Spokane
Posts: 4,037

Bikes: Novara Randonee (TankerBelle)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by nova
Just wait till you start to see less and less of a need for the big ring lol.

I avarage 110 for long distances and on a 11 mile ride just now i had a ararage of 105. One time just to see what i could do as a max i gave it all i had on a down hill in lowest gear and flipped my topeak cadence. Im asuming its got a max of 200. Last i dared look on that run i seen 192.
I've hit 140 rpm for a short stretch, but then... I've got *GASP* platform pedals! I'm not currently working on increasing my cadence, as it is very difficult to sustain 110 or more with platforms. I'll have to wait a month or so till finances allow me to get my clipless pedals and shoes.
__________________
"There is no greater wonder than the way the face and character of a woman fit so perfectly in a man's mind, and stay there, and he could never tell you why. It just seems it was the thing he most wanted." Robert Louis Stevenson
bmclaughlin807 is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 04:05 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
sportbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 243

Bikes: Olmo Gran Fondo and Bianchi Squadra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The way it was described to me is you expend a fixed amount of energy to get from point A to point B. Cadence determines how much of that energy is supplied by the legs and how much is supplied by the cardio system. High cadences mean high cardio outputs with lower leg outputs, and mashing means high leg outputs with low cardio outputs. The advantage to high cadences is that your cardio system will last a lot longer than your leg systems, and once cardio is kaput you still have your legs to draw upon; if you burn through your legs first, the best cardio system in the world can't come to the rescue.
sportbiker is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 04:46 PM
  #49  
hill hater
 
nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: norton ohio 5.5 miles from center road tow path trail head
Posts: 2,127

Bikes: cannondale t400 1987 model and a raleigh gran prix from 1973

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bmclaughlin807
I've hit 140 rpm for a short stretch, but then... I've got *GASP* platform pedals! I'm not currently working on increasing my cadence, as it is very difficult to sustain 110 or more with platforms. I'll have to wait a month or so till finances allow me to get my clipless pedals and shoes.
Thats more than a little scary
145 on plats is damn fast if your doing 100s on plats your prob gona be doing 110 120 on clipless in a realy short period of time.
nova is offline  
Old 07-09-06, 05:15 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 341
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I got to thinking where my cadence came from and came to the conclusion that muscle memory never forgets. In my teen years I lived on my BMX-Freestyle bike. Was even sponsored by SE bicycles for a couple years. 18 years later I think my body remembers that spin you have to maintain on a single-speed bike.

Want to increase your spin, steal the kids bike out of the garage and take it for a ride.
WorldPax is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.