Looking for riders 6 foot tall who ride compact frames.
#1
HawaiiCyclist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Looking for riders 6 foot tall who ride compact frames.
Would like to know height/inseam and what size top tube (virtual) you are riding. Thanks in advance.
Lee
Lee
#2
Former Hoarder
#3
SilentRider
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 2,383
Bikes: Trek Madone SLR 7, Giant TCR Advanced Pro, Trek Domane SLR, Trek Emonda SLR Project One (x2), custom Bingham Built Titanium road bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
6'3" ~36" inseam. I ride a 58.5cm (XL). Like Rad, while it rides well etc, I too ride my traditional frame more ..
I forget what the virtual top tube is, but it's a Giant TCR Composite ('05); can look it up online.
I forget what the virtual top tube is, but it's a Giant TCR Composite ('05); can look it up online.
#4
Unique Vintage Steel
6' - only compact is my new flyte. It's a 56cm, all the other info you can find at Flyte1.com. cycling insteam I believe is about a 34.5
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern Ca
Posts: 424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by leesub
Would like to know height/inseam and what size top tube (virtual) you are riding. Thanks in advance.
Lee
Lee
Last edited by OCRider2000; 01-05-07 at 12:39 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 512
Bikes: '08 Specialized Roubaix Pro, '06 Trek Fuelx 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
6'4" with a 37" inseam. I ride a 61cm compact frame (Specialized Roubaix).
I really didn't care if it was a compact or traditional geometry. What I really wanted was a long head tube because of my long inseam. I have to raise my saddle so high that I have 4-5" of saddle-bar drop even with the stem up on most racing frames. I don't feel comfortable with much more than 3".
I really didn't care if it was a compact or traditional geometry. What I really wanted was a long head tube because of my long inseam. I have to raise my saddle so high that I have 4-5" of saddle-bar drop even with the stem up on most racing frames. I don't feel comfortable with much more than 3".
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 962
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
6 feet even, ride a 54cm Specialized with a 55cm virtual top tube. My other bike frames are slightly larger, but all with 55 to 56.5 cm top tubes.
#11
Eternal Cat3 Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,167
Bikes: 2004 Giant TCR2 Composite & 2006 Fuji Touring
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
6'6" with a 37" inseam. I ride an XL Giant TCR with the seat way high in the air with a pretty significant drop to the bars.
I think it's a 60.5 virtual TT.
I think it's a 60.5 virtual TT.
#13
hobo
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CO
Posts: 3,784
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
6'... 6'1" on a good day... no idea what my inseam is... 32-36"ish, maybe? no clue... riding a 56 cervelo soloist with a 110mm stem (TT = 56.5cm). Fits like a glove... just not an OJ Simpson bloody glove... more like a Pearl Izumi Cyclone glove ...
Last edited by grahny; 01-05-07 at 07:04 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 6'-1.5", 34.8" inseam (88.5cm) and I like a 56.0mm to 56.5mm top tube. My 55cm Lemond has a 56.5 virtual top tube and I use a 100mm stem. This is due to long femurs and I have my saddle tip 10.4 cm behind the bottom bracket. Since I'm siting so far back, any longer of a top tube and I'm stretched too far out. The nice tall headtube of the Lemond compensates for the smaller frame with my overall height.
#15
I-M-D bell curve of bikn'
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC mountains
Posts: 2,926
Bikes: 06' Jamis Eclipse in the making.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
6'0" with a 32" inseam. Riding a compact Litespeed Teramo large frame. As to top tube length, who knows, well let me put it this way, I don't know nor care.
__________________
Ego Campana Inflectum of Circuitous
Ego Campana Inflectum of Circuitous
#16
Magnesium Dogmatic
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,939
Bikes: Look 585 Ultra, Pinarello Dogma, Pegoretti Duende, Orbea, Cannondale Capo
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
6', 32.5" inseam, I ride a Litespeed Vortes Compact, size M/L - don't remember the specs, but they can be checked on their website.
#18
staring at the mountains
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Castle Pines, CO
Posts: 4,560
Bikes: Obed GVR, Fairdale Goodship, Salsa Timberjack 29
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times
in
112 Posts
Originally Posted by OCRider2000
Lee just a heads up here: your trunk + arm length is what is gonna determine optimal reach (reach = effective top tube length + stem), not your height/inseam. I suspect that most folks decide what frame size to buy based soley on inseam length and whatever effective top tube length that results from that frame size selection is what they get for better or worse, not the best way to choose a frame...
Bingo. Go get fitted
#20
R.E.Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 863
Bikes: Cannondale, Kirk
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
6"1, and I ride a size Large Litespeed Siena (don't know how that translates in cm, gotta check the site). I'm definitely more legs than torso, so the smaller reach seems to work for me (although I had to shorten the stem to a 110mm).
By the way, I've read elsewhere that Litespeed geometry stays the same in a classic frame or compact. I've also read that Litespeed Geometry fits longer torso riders better. So why it fits me so well, I can't say - but it works.
In the end, I feel it's more important to follow top tube length than seat tube length. Bottom line, get fitted first.
By the way, I've read elsewhere that Litespeed geometry stays the same in a classic frame or compact. I've also read that Litespeed Geometry fits longer torso riders better. So why it fits me so well, I can't say - but it works.
In the end, I feel it's more important to follow top tube length than seat tube length. Bottom line, get fitted first.
#21
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: anywhere there is oxygen
Posts: 1,206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by same time
6 feet even, ride a 54cm Specialized with a 55cm virtual top tube. My other bike frames are slightly larger, but all with 55 to 56.5 cm top tubes.
seems like a small frame for you
#23
HawaiiCyclist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks
Thanks for the info. I know my measurements very well but have not purchased a compact frame before. Am considering the Time Med (56cm) or Large (57cm) or Look 565 (56 cm) top tubes. Am in Hawaii so hard to see any of them before purchasing. Lee
#24
Despite all my rage, I am
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,613
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just wanted to chime in - I'm 6'1" with a 34 inch inseam, and ride a 55 cm LeMond Zurich. I got professionally fitted, so I know it's right. I wear pants with a 30-32 inch inseam - I'm glad to see there are other "Short-legged" tall guys here.