Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Cadence Improvement

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Cadence Improvement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-07 | 01:58 PM
  #26  
wanders's Avatar
going roundy round
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 4
From: High Point, NC
Originally Posted by edzo
...
high rpm's would be about 130rpm for 1/2 hour, non-stop. anything less
really ain't so high.
...
My hip flexors just burst into flames reading that.

edzo is a sewing machine.
wanders is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 02:28 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 1
Um,
What if you live in the land of hills and you own a triple and let’s say you are in your lowest gear when climbing and still can’t get above 50's?
What cadence is expected when climbing?
hero419 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 02:32 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by hero419
Um,
What if you live in the land of hills and you own a triple and let’s say you are in your lowest gear when climbing and still can’t get above 50's?
What cadence is expected when climbing?

well, whatever you need to get up a hill. steady 60-70 is fine, or go granny and go up at 110rpm

if you are in the lowest gear, and you can't break 50, then do not use hills for rpm training,
but shoot for 60rpm on that hill next time, and stick it


but I bet there are downhills too, right ? there is your high rpm training
edzo is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 02:36 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by wanders
My hip flexors just burst into flames reading that.

edzo is a sewing machine.
yeah stuff starts to hurt at mile 5, but by mile 6 it doesn't hurt, it goes away

lungs start a little burn then that settles down...but 130 sustained is plenty
huge enough.


I practice most of my high cadence either at home on the V-bike, or
on the road or mup with the singlespeed. when i have gears I generally
just use whatever makes me fastest or most efficient, which is about
110 sustained, bursts/tailwinds/downhill up to 140-170, hills 70 or above,
[on the SS though, some hills >15% I am pretty much in survival mode]

whatever works.
edzo is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 02:36 PM
  #30  
Duke of Kent's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,850
Likes: 1
From: Blacksburg, VA

Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316

I'd have to say that there is a difference between hipster gearing and track points race gearing...

And I most certainly would not ride the latter as a commuter.
Duke of Kent is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 02:52 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by edzo
well, whatever you need to get up a hill. steady 60-70 is fine, or go granny and go up at 110rpm

if you are in the lowest gear, and you can't break 50, then do not use hills for rpm training,
but shoot for 60rpm on that hill next time, and stick it


but I bet there are downhills too, right ? there is your high rpm training
I posted on the wrong thread. I know realize the subject of this thread is not
"Acceptable climbing cadence"
Sorry all.
I will try to keep my incompetence to a minimum in the future.
hero419 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 03:18 PM
  #32  
BarracksSi's Avatar
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Wait a minute...

180+ rpm? Are we sure about the "rpm" part?

180 rpm would be putting one foot -- say, the left foot -- through three revolutions per second. Those of you who were in marching band would realize that this would be like marching at a tempo of 360 beats per minute, or six footfalls (left-right-left-right-left-right) per second.

I just want to be sure what we're talking about here.
BarracksSi is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 03:23 PM
  #33  
Duke of Kent's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,850
Likes: 1
From: Blacksburg, VA

Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316

Originally Posted by BarracksSi
Wait a minute...

180+ rpm? Are we sure about the "rpm" part?

180 rpm would be putting one foot -- say, the left foot -- through three revolutions per second. Those of you who were in marching band would realize that this would be like marching at a tempo of 360 beats per minute, or six footfalls (left-right-left-right-left-right) per second.

I just want to be sure what we're talking about here.
YouTube "Theo Bos World Record" or similar. You will have a new appreciation for footspeed.
Duke of Kent is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 03:25 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
Wait a minute...

180+ rpm? Are we sure about the "rpm" part?

180 rpm would be putting one foot -- say, the left foot -- through three revolutions per second. Those of you who were in marching band would realize that this would be like marching at a tempo of 360 beats per minute, or six footfalls (left-right-left-right-left-right) per second.

I just want to be sure what we're talking about here.
------------
talking about one magnet on one crankarm and having it record each time the magnet sweeps the sensor
------------

KevinTX is posting 180, and that is actually slow for some peoples idea of cadence training.
(for me, it is the bottom level of the ultra-fast zone)


dude I can max out at 211 rpm, and it isn't pretty, but I can do it after 5 minutes of warmup

and there are others who can trump that by a large factor

yes it is insanely fast. it took some training for me to get there. I couldn't crack 189 initially,
but after some practice, I can do 179 standing and 211 sitting

yeah it aches the inside of my skull...can't describe that feeling but I am hoping
for 230 this winter when I go back to my cadence blowout sessions

it doesn't mean much for normal riding, but what it does for me, is at any particular time
I choose, on nearly any ride in any terrain, i can jump to a high rpm and squirt up over or through
something and give my legs a rest from low rpm grinding. that is the real deal with ultra high rpm
practice. you can jump between 70rpm to 140 rpm all day and give your legs a rest, but maintain
forward speed. when i train at 140, 110 is a snooze. when i practice >200, I am resting at 169...
and 110 seems too slow to even mention. in fact after >200 practice, my natural cadence is usually
133 for about 5 minutes before I decide to lower leg speed. it's weird how the muscles work like that

Last edited by edzo; 11-19-07 at 03:35 PM.
edzo is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 03:30 PM
  #35  
caloso's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,116
From: Sacramento, California, USA

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Get a fixed gear bike with mellow gearing (42x16=69, for example). Find a long gentle hill. Ride down it. Feel your feet spin like mad. Repeat until you spin the pedals instead of the pedals spinning you.
caloso is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 03:32 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
edzo... you crazy... youuuuuuuu crazy!!!

I am not worthy
LIUser22 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 03:38 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by LIUser22
edzo... you crazy... youuuuuuuu crazy!!!

I am not worthy
it started as an experiment years ago, to see how much i could do, period.

when i popped 189, I didn't know how high I could go after that. so i just practice. I started using spinervals and when coach troy sez go as fast as you can, I took it literally (if the workout suffered, so be it) and I found that it presents a whole new dynamic of suffering and mental intensity that just cannot be felt any other way.

to fire your large leg muscles and supply oxygen and remain alert through >200 is ...well.......you gotta try it yourself
edzo is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 03:39 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by caloso
Get a fixed gear bike with mellow gearing (42x16=69, for example). Find a long gentle hill. Ride down it. Feel your feet spin like mad. Repeat until you spin the pedals instead of the pedals spinning you.
This doesn't always work as well as you might think. It's really easy to let your legs go limp and let gravity do the work for you which doesn't improve your cadence at all.

Rollers are much better, as is motor pacing while on a track bike.
Yoshi is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 03:43 PM
  #39  
caloso's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,116
From: Sacramento, California, USA

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

I'm sure you're right that motor pacing and rollers are far superior, but this had a lot of value for me when I first started trying to improve my cadence. It was a way of getting used to having my feet spin a lot faster than I was used to. Then I focused on keeping my butt on the saddle and that forced me to stay on top of the pedals and spin smoothly.
caloso is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 03:45 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by caloso
I'm sure you're right that motor pacing and rollers are far superior, but this had a lot of value for me when I first started trying to improve my cadence. It was a way of getting used to having my feet spin a lot faster than I was used to. Then I focused on keeping my butt on the saddle and that forced me to stay on top of the pedals and spin smoothly.
Yeah it definitely works, but you have to really concentrate (at least in my experience). I usually end up getting lazy or just simply forgetting what I'm doing and letting my legs to limp. You can't really do that when you are on rollers or motorpacing.
Yoshi is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 03:50 PM
  #41  
BarracksSi's Avatar
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Originally Posted by Duke of Kent
YouTube "Theo Bos World Record" or similar. You will have a new appreciation for footspeed.
This video?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=RnOSKYezZ-Q

That's not 180 rpm; he's maxing out at about 155+ after he comes down off the far turn onto the back straight. I'm not saying it's slow, I'm just saying that it's nowhere near 230 like edzo is talking about reaching.

For comparison -- these guys are going about 190 beats per minute, which is like saying that they would be doing 95 rpm on a bike:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=vt-1BqQcD3E&feature=related

I hope we're not getting revolutions per minute mixed up with beats per minute.

(and, yeah, I checked both of these vids against a metronome)
BarracksSi is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 03:53 PM
  #42  
BarracksSi's Avatar
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

And, I'm not saying that greater than 200 rpm isn't possible -- rock drummers who double-bass also get their feet moving at about that speed.
BarracksSi is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 04:56 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 31
I can hit over 170 without trying super hard. And that's with 47 year old legs. I think if I worked at it I MIGHT be able to do over 200 eventually.
Pendergast is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-07 | 08:59 PM
  #44  
PipinFan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
From: Florida

Bikes: 2007 Orbea Onix TDF,2008 Orbea Orca in Red

Some of you guys are killing me !!! I mean ,I'm more than sure I can spin my bike way over 100 rpm's but at a higher gear and my bike wont go 27 mph ... what I'm looking is to bring my cadence higher but I want to go faster too,I more than sure I will accomplish it no doubt.. but some of you can spin over 170 rpm's ?? I bet that bike will not be going really fast or if is going fast will be for 20 seconds..there are a lot of super man out there. Jezzzzzzzzzz !!
PipinFan is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-07 | 07:46 AM
  #45  
Garfield Cat's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,125
Likes: 111
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy

If you want to go faster, then cadence is not what you want. Pedal stroke is the first and foremost thing. Cadence is merely a consequence of pedal stroke efficiency, given the gearing variations.

Make sure your pedal stroke is developed and you know how to use the upstroke as opposed to the downstroke. Going faster means acceleration and maintaining that speed for a certain amount of time. That's all about pedal stroke.

Some will comment that the upstroke is offset by the downstroke of the other leg. But do your own experiment and try exaggerating the upstroke during accereration and you will notice the difference, hopefully an improvement. Learning how to accelerate is the first step to going "faster".
Garfield Cat is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-07 | 07:48 AM
  #46  
botto's Avatar
.
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,377
Likes: 50
Originally Posted by PipinFan
Some of you guys are killing me !!! I mean :e ek::e ek:,I'm more than sure I can spin my bike way over 100 rpm's but at a higher gear and my bike wont go 27 mph ... what I'm looking is to bring my cadence higher but I want to go faster too,I more than sure I will accomplish it no doubt.. but some of you can spin over 170 rpm's ?? I bet that bike will not be going really fast or if is going fast will be for 20 seconds..there are a lot of super man out there. Jezzzzzzzzzz !!: o : o: o
incorrect.
botto is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-07 | 08:31 AM
  #47  
stonecrd's Avatar
OnTheRoad or AtTheBeach
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
From: Weston, FL

Bikes: Ridley Noah RS, Scott CR1 Pro

Originally Posted by PipinFan
Some of you guys are killing me !!! I mean ,I'm more than sure I can spin my bike way over 100 rpm's but at a higher gear and my bike wont go 27 mph ... what I'm looking is to bring my cadence higher but I want to go faster too,I more than sure I will accomplish it no doubt.. but some of you can spin over 170 rpm's ?? I bet that bike will not be going really fast or if is going fast will be for 20 seconds..there are a lot of super man out there. Jezzzzzzzzzz !!
Actually if you want to go fast you have to be able to spin, top end in a 52/11 at 75rpm is about 26mph. If you want to get to 30mph+ your going to have to spin >85rpm
__________________
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard and the shallow end is much too large

2013 Noah RS
stonecrd is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-07 | 09:55 PM
  #48  
Fat Boy's Avatar
Wheelsuck
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,158
Likes: 0
I've got a question about these cadences that are being thrown around.

Ummmmm, what's it really worth. Isn't kind of like a car engine. You can rev the nuts off of an engine, but if it's out of it's powerband, then you're just making noise.

Isn't the whole idea of having gears on a bike to keep you in a cadence range that produces the most speed as opposed to just spinning like crazy? Is there something I'm missing or is this just a pi$$ing contest?

If you were just concerned with spinning at 200 rpm, then wouldn't you build the bike around it with extra low gears, 150mm cranks, etc.? I was thinking about this thread on my ride today and decided that I just didn't get it.
Fat Boy is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-07 | 10:14 PM
  #49  
Duke of Kent's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,850
Likes: 1
From: Blacksburg, VA

Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316

Originally Posted by Fat Boy
I've got a question about these cadences that are being thrown around.

Ummmmm, what's it really worth. Isn't kind of like a car engine. You can rev the nuts off of an engine, but if it's out of it's powerband, then you're just making noise.

Isn't the whole idea of having gears on a bike to keep you in a cadence range that produces the most speed as opposed to just spinning like crazy? Is there something I'm missing or is this just a pi$$ing contest?

If you were just concerned with spinning at 200 rpm, then wouldn't you build the bike around it with extra low gears, 150mm cranks, etc.? I was thinking about this thread on my ride today and decided that I just didn't get it.
The point of being able to spin like that is this:

You gain the ability to accelerate faster, and you have a smoother, and theoretically more effective transfer of power.

It's also nice in crits or road races. Instead of dropping it from your 53x16 to your 53x14 to launch your attack, which everyone and their mother will be able to hear, you just throw another 20rpm into the pedals and hit out.

Not to mention the obvious necessity of it in track racing.
Duke of Kent is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-07 | 10:58 PM
  #50  
marengo's Avatar
# BF-STL-00020
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 323
Likes: 5
From: Austin

Bikes: Cinelli, Pinarello, Rossin, Gitane, Trek

How fast is this BarracksSi?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=F7K4O7YTLQQ
marengo is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.