Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

This tall guy needs a 66cm frame?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

This tall guy needs a 66cm frame?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-08 | 12:57 PM
  #1  
darronb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Ectomorph in motion
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, Florida

Bikes: 1988 Schwinn Impact MTB, 2006 Schwinn Varsity 700c, 1976 Royce Union fixie

This tall guy needs a 66cm frame?

Howdy all,

I have recently resumed my long-neglected interest in cycling. For many years my only bike was a 1988 Schwinn Impact MTB with 23" Cro-Mo frame (measured from the center of the crank spindle to the top of the seat tube). It is a bit small, I suppose, but has served me well since it was new.

Wanting to get into road riding, in 2006 I bought a Schwinn Varsity 700c at WalMart (I know, I know...). It has an aluminum frame measuring 55.6cm (measured from the center of the crank spindle to the top of the seat tube, which I realize is not the current c-to-c way that road frames are measured). The top tube is about 56cm, c-to-c.

While at WalMart, I set the seat post all the way up to maximum safe height, and thought the bike felt like it would be OK. Note that I have never even sat astride a large road bike, so I don't know what I'm missing...

But after some miles on the road, I now realize that it's just WAY too small for me. Since my budget is quite small, I thought my best option would be to find a tall frame on eBay, and swap all my Schwinn's parts over to it. I have no problems working on bikes, so the labor doesn't bother me. I realize that the Schwinn's parts are not exactly great, but they'll do for now, until I can scrounge some better parts as needed and as affordable. I don't know if the aluminum frame and steel fork from the Schwinn will be worth anything on eBay, but I'll give it a shot.

My problem is deciding on what frame size to seek. I am just under 6'6" tall, and my inseam is about 37" with bare feet. I'll have to try the straddling a broomstick method while wearing shoes to nail down my maximum stand over height. It seems that I will need a 66cm frame, perhaps taller, to really fit me well. I don't mind having the top tube quite close to my nethers, if that large frame will make me more comfortable in the saddle. I especially want to keep the handlebar up at a good height without needing a stem riser or goofy tall stem- that has been the biggest "pain" in riding the wee Schwinn- having to lean over so far to reach the drops. I also prefer a fairly long top tube and wheelbase for potential use a long distance tourer. Steel (even mild steel) is just fine with me, as is aluminum. I'm not going to get too exited about a few pounds of frame weight one way or the other, as I weigh 185+.

But in my searches so far, it seems that 66cm and larger road frames are rare on the 'Bay. Any ideas on where else to search? I live in the boonies of upstate NY, so Craig's List is not likely to offer many bikes on high.

Darron
Brantingham, NY
darronb is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 01:39 PM
  #2  
Mariner Fan's Avatar
59'er
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 12
From: Alexandria, IN

Bikes: LeMond Maillot Jaune, Vintage Trek 520 (1985), 1976 Schwinn Voyageur 2, Miyata 1000 (1985)

Here's a cool thread for you to look at.

https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/372847-show-us-yer-big-road-frames.html

You can get a tall frame custom made for you, or look at Waterford's https://waterfordbikes.com/now/geos.php?Model=2174

I think there are a few others that are large as well.

I'm 6'3" and ride a 63cm frame.
__________________
Mariner Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 01:50 PM
  #3  
merlinextraligh's Avatar
pan y agua
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,810
Likes: 1,232
From: Jacksonville

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

66cm seems awfully large even at 6'6". The trend in bike fit is toward smaller frames. (I'm 6'1" and my 1989 Paramount is 60cm, but my 2007 Giant is a virtual 57 cm)

I'm guessing that if you can ride a 56cm bike at all, that you could likely get a passable fit on a 62 cm frame which is going to be a heck of a lot easier to find used.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 01:51 PM
  #4  
BillyD's Avatar
Administrator
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 34,326
Likes: 8,480
From: Hudson Valley, NY

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92

I'm 6'4" with a 34.5" inseam so I feel your pain. I know what you're going through. It's going to be tough. Not impossible, but tough. Eventually you will find something in your size, but unless you're lucky it's going to take a while and require a lot of patience.

I ride a 63 or 62cm so I'm estimating you'll need a 65 or 66cm as you said. Look religiously on eBay, but also check out Craigslist in NYC. There's a ton of bikes down there, many of them big bikes, so if you see something down there you'll just have to take a trip. I don't know where you are (where the heck is Brantingham anyway?) but to find something your size may demand the long trip. Keep an eye open at garage sales come springtime as well. Leave no stone unturned.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
BillyD is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 01:55 PM
  #5  
Mariner Fan's Avatar
59'er
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 12
From: Alexandria, IN

Bikes: LeMond Maillot Jaune, Vintage Trek 520 (1985), 1976 Schwinn Voyageur 2, Miyata 1000 (1985)

Sizing on newer bikes are a bit deceiving. My 1985 Miyata is a 63 cm and my 2005 Lemond is a 59 cm. The Lemond feels big because the top tube is so long. You really have to look at top tube length on the newer compact style frames.
__________________
Mariner Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 02:07 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
I'm more or less in the same boat(6'5", longish torso, 37" sleeves), and after ballparking my measurements and building a bike using online fit calculators on wrenchscience.com I came up with my current everyday bike which is 62cm c-c with a 61cm tt. I've found though that now that I'm riding greater distances with greater frequency, it's just not comfortable enough.

I was interested to note that after a while and having multiple bikes, the setup I'd arrived at independently on my mountain bike, road bike and rain bike all had nearly the same saddle to bar reach with different dimmensions on all the bikes - I then used these measurements to set up another bike and nearly nailed it first try. I'm certainly not a fit expert, but maybe check out some of the measurements on yr old bike that are based on your setup and not the component dimensions, like your cockpit and reach and stem height/length, stuff like that to come up with some more ways to look at it.
mascher is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 02:11 PM
  #7  
aballas's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, WV
I'd say you could be comfortable on a smaller frame than that....

I'm 6'2" and I'm most comfortable on a 56cm frame...most fit calculators put me on a 58-60cm frame...

I'm mostly torso though...
__________________
Road: 2001 Bianchi XL Boron
Cross: 2009 Surly Cross Check
XC Mtb: 2007 Bianchi Sok 29er
SS/Rigid Mtb: 2008 Soma Juice 29er
aballas is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 02:45 PM
  #8  
BikeWNC's Avatar
Climbing Above It All
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 3
From: Basking in the Sun.
It really is going to depend on the individual bike. I'm 6'3 and ride a 59cm bike. Calfee make some large frames in stock sizes. I have a 62cm Luna Pro frame in excellent shape if that would work for you. It was too big for me.
BikeWNC is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 02:50 PM
  #9  
JeffS's Avatar
not a role model
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,659
Likes: 2
From: Portland, OR
Bikes like you're describing are hard to come by now. The two best options are an old frame off ebay, or a bike someone has had built custom.

For example, here's a 64, without a huge top tube
https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEWA:IT&ih=019

In general, I'd say don't worry so much about the seat tube measurement, but instead look for a 60+cm bike with a tall head tube.

Some random ebay frames:
https://cgi.ebay.com/80s-vintage-Spec...QQcmdZViewItem
https://cgi.ebay.com/Schwinn-Super-Le...QQcmdZViewItem


Other alternatives would be to find one of the biggest frames of the mainstream (typically a 63cm, or a 61cm compact) and use an upturned stem. Strangely enough, the 2008 tarmac has one of the longest head tubes on the market at 230mm - although that's a big jump from your Schwinn.
JeffS is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 02:58 PM
  #10  
Doggus's Avatar
half man - half sheep
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: Big Mineral arm - Lake Texoma (Pottsboro, Tx)
You're 6'6" and 185 lbs?

What are you 1% body fat? I'm 6'2" and 177 lbs and I get heckled a bit for being too thin (not that I am...I want to get to 170).
Doggus is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 03:18 PM
  #11  
Batüwü Creakcreak
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,802
Likes: 294
From: The illadelph
Why not look at used bikes on craigslist?
ridethecliche is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 03:30 PM
  #12  
NattyTerp's Avatar
Terp Fan
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, NC

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac

I'm 6'6" and I ride a 63 cm Cannondale... link to my bike

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ondale&page=11


I have wondered sometimes if I need a bigger bike...
NattyTerp is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 03:46 PM
  #13  
scotch's Avatar
purity of essence
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 26
From: NH

Bikes: 2018 Giant Trance 2, 2019 Trek Farley 7, 2017 Jamis Renegade Exploit

Originally Posted by aballas
I'd say you could be comfortable on a smaller frame than that....

I'm 6'2" and I'm most comfortable on a 56cm frame...most fit calculators put me on a 58-60cm frame...

I'm mostly torso though...
it's interesting how different everyone is. i'm 5'11" and i ride 58cm. 56 is just too small for me. everytime i've been fitted, they're always amazed that i have such long legs.
scotch is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 04:22 PM
  #14  
darronb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Ectomorph in motion
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, Florida

Bikes: 1988 Schwinn Impact MTB, 2006 Schwinn Varsity 700c, 1976 Royce Union fixie

Thanks for all the responses.

As much as I'd dearly love to have a new titanium beauty, there's no way even a low-end steel custom frame is within my financial means. I will keep watching Craig's List, but driving to NYC to buy a $100 frame or bike is probably not going to happen, unless I can arrange to do something else on the trip. My nearby cities' CL bike listings are meager at best.

It seems my best bet will be to keep watching eBay like a hawk, and swoop down on any good deals I may see. I'd like to get a frame well before Spring, since I will need some time to get it set up the way I want, and be ready to set out on the path to big bike nirvana. I've been using cycling as a treatment for my depression, and it really seems to help, better than any of the meds i've tried. I've been off the road for weeks since I broke a freewheel hub on my MTB when attempting to remove it. I have a new Nashbar freewheel on the way, after a failed attempt to find any good deals on another 6-sp. 4-prong Suntour freewheel on eBay. My new Nokian carbide-studded MTB tires await their first trial by ice. They were VERY pricy, but necessary once the ice base built up on all the roads in town (no salt is used here). I was doing fine riding on snow-covered roads with my 26x2.125" knobbies, but ice under snow is just too scary, especially when you're WAY up there on a tall bike.

I will probably keep whatever road frame/bike I find for a LONG time. I've had my 23" Schwinn MTB for twenty years now, and have no intention of getting rid of it. So I should hold out for the "right" roadie, and not compromise too much. If my fitness reaches an adequate level, I may even set out on some long road trips.

Darron
In the formerly frozen Adirondacks
darronb is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 04:35 PM
  #15  
BillyD's Avatar
Administrator
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 34,326
Likes: 8,480
From: Hudson Valley, NY

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92

Originally Posted by scotch
it's interesting how different everyone is. i'm 5'11" and i ride 58cm. 56 is just too small for me. everytime i've been fitted, they're always amazed that i have such long legs.
I find 6'2" riding a 56 pretty incredible too. Ridiculous is more like it, taking "aero" to the extreme.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
BillyD is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 04:54 PM
  #16  
aballas's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, WV
Originally Posted by BillyD
I find 6'2" riding a 56 pretty incredible too. Ridiculous is more like it, taking "aero" to the extreme.
I only have a 31" inseam...really I technically should be on a 58...but I've yet to find one whose geometry suits my tastes....

My 56cm Cannondale, however, seems to fit me perfectly...

pic in my sig is pre-fitting btw...I've since dropped a few spacers...
__________________
Road: 2001 Bianchi XL Boron
Cross: 2009 Surly Cross Check
XC Mtb: 2007 Bianchi Sok 29er
SS/Rigid Mtb: 2008 Soma Juice 29er
aballas is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 08:27 PM
  #17  
DanielS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide, Australia

Bikes: Surly Pacer, Hillbrick Pista, Avanti Sprint, Commencal Combi Deluxe

Originally Posted by Doggus
You're 6'6" and 185 lbs?

What are you 1% body fat? I'm 6'2" and 177 lbs and I get heckled a bit for being too thin (not that I am...I want to get to 170).
Pffft. I'm 6'4" and about 160 lbs (last time I checked...)

Big bikes can be hard to find on ebay but the good thing is you tend to get less bidding going on, so you get the frame cheaper Whereas all the 54/56/58cm frames go for crazy prices...

I'd actually recommend asking around at bike shops for used or old stock frames. Often they have weird sized frames lying out back that they can't sell... or they can call up their distributors and find old stock in big sizes. You might get a stellar deal this way.
DanielS is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 08:56 PM
  #18  
big john's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,412
Likes: 13,443
From: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
The height of the handlebars isn't determined by the frame or head tube size, it's the length of the steer tube on threadless set-ups. I know, most bikes come with the steer tube cut already, but you can buy a fork and leave it uncut, then get an angled stem, like the one on your Schwinn, to raise it a little more. You could probably get a fork custom made in any length you want.
I have a 35" inseam and I like the bar an inch below the saddle, or so. I have an uncut Kestrel fork on my 62cm Gunnar and I think it's pretty comfortable.
You're right, most makers don't make a frame big enough for you, but Cannondale has made some big frames in the past. I think they used to go up to 66cm. I have a 2002 CAAD 5 in size 63cm.
I've seen some 65cm Colnagos around, but a lot more money there.
big john is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 09:03 PM
  #19  
Bluetick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
6ft 3in with a 36.5 inseam, and ride a 60 cm
Bluetick is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 09:07 PM
  #20  
big john's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,412
Likes: 13,443
From: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Here's a guy with a fit problem.
big john is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 09:11 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
6'6" and I'm on a sloping 60cm frame (Ridley). If the top tube were extended to parallel, the frame size would be closer to 64cm.

Go find a bike shop and see what they fit you to.
NYJayhawk is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-08 | 11:51 PM
  #22  
ILUVUK's Avatar
en fuego
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 0
From: Davenport, IA

Bikes: Trek Madone 3.1

Frames fit so differently...my buddy is 6'5 and rides a 64cm...just need a good fitting.
ILUVUK is offline  
Reply
Old 01-12-08 | 07:43 AM
  #23  
BarracksSi's Avatar
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Originally Posted by big john
Here's a guy with a fit problem.
Man, that guy on the left is SHORT.....



BarracksSi is offline  
Reply
Old 01-12-08 | 08:06 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 15,410
Likes: 188
From: Tariffville, CT

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

+1 on head tube length. You made your bar height a requirement so therefore your head tube length will be critical.

For compact frames (sloping top tubes) I think the Giant OCR is a more upright frame, ditto the Cannondale Synapse, meaning they have longer head tubes for their size.

Cannondale used to make 66 cm frames, typically available only as a frameset except for one or two models. I know because a teammate owned one (6'6" or 6'7" and all legs). He had a mountain bike post at max height (or slightly over) and his legs were pretty bent at the bottom of the pedal stroke, feet flat. We raced in Belgium together, just the two of us, for three weeks. Made quite a sight - two of us on (at the time) strange Cannondales, one teammate on a 66 cm, the other on a 50 cm. Like Laurel and Hardy, although I wasn't fat at the time. We both sucked compared to the just-below-pro guys so the Cannondales were treated as a joke. Now if only we were like Cipollini...

good luck finding a suitable frame,
cdr
carpediemracing is offline  
Reply
Old 01-12-08 | 01:12 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Soma Smoothie ES

https://www.somafab.com/extrasmoothie.html
habcup is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.