Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Saddle height - the 109% method

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Saddle height - the 109% method

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-08 | 09:03 PM
  #26  
VT to CA's Avatar
Roman Killer
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by operator
Using numbers and formulaes is a surefire way of getting someone elses fit. THe only method you need to know is that too high seat = rocking hips, which means lower until it disappears.
Incorrect.
VT to CA is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-09 | 12:02 PM
  #27  
RoboChrist's Avatar
Swollen Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Toronto ON

Bikes: Linus Roadster 8

Originally Posted by cat0020
The 109% method do not compensate the difference if you're using differnet crankarm length. I use the test ride method and change my saddle height regularly according to my condition, different seat height and fore/aft position allow me to work on different muscles.
It's right in the calculation. If you don't subtract the crank arm length, you're not using the 109% method.

1.09 x inseam - crank arm length = BB to saddle height
RoboChrist is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-09 | 12:14 PM
  #28  
AndyK's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 16
From: Northern N.J.

Bikes: '11 TIME NXR Instinct, '03 De Rosa Planet '79 Paris Sport (Moulton)

Originally Posted by RoboChrist
It's right in the calculation. If you don't subtract the crank arm length, you're not using the 109% method.

1.09 x inseam - crank arm length = BB to saddle height
Yup!

I fiddled around with saddle height until I felt like I got the right height. Then I measured, and it was 109%-crank arm length - within a half centimeter!
AndyK is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-09 | 12:47 PM
  #29  
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,123
Likes: 4
From: Near Portland, OR

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Originally Posted by AndyK
Yup!

I fiddled around with saddle height until I felt like I got the right height. Then I measured, and it was 109%-crank arm length - within a half centimeter!
half a cm in seat height is huge.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-09 | 01:42 PM
  #30  
Hammertoe's Avatar
A Little Bent
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 0
From: Struggling up a hillside in Vermont, USA... ..........................................
109% gives me what my saddle height should be...

This also gives me pain in the knees and rocking hips...

My knees and hips like 109% - 1 cm....
__________________
Hammertoe is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-09 | 06:24 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 577
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

To ballpark the saddle height, I set the foot horizontal with the leg fully extended at the bottom of the stroke, as recommended by Lennard Zinn. From there, it takes 3 cm rise of the heel to produce the commonly recommended 30 degree bend in the leg during normal pedaling. If you don't raise your heels that much, it will feel too high. It's still a decent starting point that takes into account your pedal stack height and the shoe & cleat thickness.

Last edited by DaveSSS; 06-10-09 at 07:39 AM.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-09 | 06:42 PM
  #32  
RoboChrist's Avatar
Swollen Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Toronto ON

Bikes: Linus Roadster 8

Originally Posted by DaveSSS
To ballpark the saddle height, I set the foot horizontal with the leg fully extended at the bottom of the stroke, as recommended by Lennard Zinn. From there, it takes 2-3 cm rise of the heel to produce the commonly recommended 30 degree bend in the leg during normal pedaling. If you don't raise your heels that much, it will feel too high. It's still a decent starting point that takes into account your pedal stack height and the shoe & cleat thickness.
Well shoe thickness might be a bit anal, pretty soon guys will be measuring their foot thickness to see at what point your foot should be impaled on the spindle

Seriously, if you do the 109% and take into account your crank arm length and pedal stack it should be spot on (in my opinion).
RoboChrist is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-09 | 06:47 PM
  #33  
Randochap's Avatar
Recovering mentalist
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 2
From: On the Edge

Bikes: Too many

All methods are starting points. I recommend the inseam (cm) x .883 formula.

See the saddle adjustments section on the VeloWeb bike fit page.
Randochap is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-09 | 07:25 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo, Japan
If you have long legs, the 1.09 method will almost definitely result in a saddle that's (way) too high. The relationship is non-linear, so the longer the legs, the greater the rate at which the indicated saddle height rises--which shouldn't happen. If you have average-to-short leg length, then it will come close to the Lemond formula (.883), which is a decent starting point.
Hendley is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-09 | 07:56 PM
  #35  
RoboChrist's Avatar
Swollen Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Toronto ON

Bikes: Linus Roadster 8

Originally Posted by Hendley
If you have long legs, the 1.09 method will almost definitely result in a saddle that's (way) too high. The relationship is non-linear, so the longer the legs, the greater the rate at which the indicated saddle height rises--which shouldn't happen. If you have average-to-short leg length, then it will come close to the Lemond formula (.883), which is a decent starting point.
I just set my saddle height today using this method and there is a noticable bend in the leg when the pedals are inline with the seat tube. You may not be taking into account the distance than an angled foot will add to the measurement.
RoboChrist is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-09 | 07:25 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 577
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

Originally Posted by RoboChrist
Well shoe thickness might be a bit anal, pretty soon guys will be measuring their foot thickness to see at what point your foot should be impaled on the spindle

Seriously, if you do the 109% and take into account your crank arm length and pedal stack it should be spot on (in my opinion).
With my method, their is nothing to measure and no calculations.

The thickness of the shoe and pedal stack can easily vary by more than 1cm. Both the .883 and 1.09 formulas are quite adequate as starting points for me, but I use a relatively thin carbon soled shoe with low-stack speedplay pedals without the 3mm thick 3-hole adapter. With cheaper shoes and another brand of pedal, my saddle might be 1cm higher.

Last edited by DaveSSS; 06-10-09 at 07:39 AM.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-09 | 07:36 AM
  #37  
Batüwü Creakcreak
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,802
Likes: 294
From: The illadelph
Here's the RTC method:

When you sit on your saddle, push up with your feet at the bottom of the stroke with your foot in the position it is when you pedal. If you push up and your butt comes flying up the seat, raise the saddle till you decrease weight from your backside but don't lift it up more than just a hover.

If you can't put your weight on your foot at the bottom of the stroke, your saddles too low.

Done...
ridethecliche is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-09 | 07:44 AM
  #38  
AndyK's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 16
From: Northern N.J.

Bikes: '11 TIME NXR Instinct, '03 De Rosa Planet '79 Paris Sport (Moulton)

Originally Posted by ridethecliche
Here's the RTC method:

When you sit on your saddle, push up with your feet at the bottom of the stroke with your foot in the position it is when you pedal. If you push up and your butt comes flying up the seat, raise the saddle till you decrease weight from your backside but don't lift it up more than just a hover.

If you can't put your weight on your foot at the bottom of the stroke, your saddles too low.

Done...
This is confusing me!
AndyK is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-09 | 07:51 AM
  #39  
Ex Pres's Avatar
Cat 6
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 236
From: Mountain Brook, AL
109%?
I can't believe you young 'uns with your fancy carbon are still using the same formula we used back when I bought my first "10 speed" in '72.
Ex Pres is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-09 | 01:14 PM
  #40  
RoboChrist's Avatar
Swollen Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Toronto ON

Bikes: Linus Roadster 8

Originally Posted by Bob Barker
109%?
I can't believe you young 'uns with your fancy carbon are still using the same formula we used back when I bought my first "10 speed" in '72.
Yep. Bikes may change but the human body has been the same for long long time
RoboChrist is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-09 | 04:10 PM
  #41  
fordmanvt's Avatar
Refrigerator Raider Hater
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Barre, VT

Bikes: 2008 Sequoia

Originally Posted by ridethecliche
Here's the RTC method:

When you sit on your saddle, push up with your feet at the bottom of the stroke with your foot in the position it is when you pedal. If you push up and your butt comes flying up the seat, raise the saddle till you decrease weight from your backside but don't lift it up more than just a hover.

If you can't put your weight on your foot at the bottom of the stroke, your saddle is too [strike]low[/strike] high.

Done...
fixed
fordmanvt is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-09 | 06:46 PM
  #42  
Batüwü Creakcreak
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,802
Likes: 294
From: The illadelph
Originally Posted by fordmanvt
fixed
Yeha, that's what i meant to say. Sorry.
ridethecliche is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-09 | 06:49 PM
  #43  
Batüwü Creakcreak
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,802
Likes: 294
From: The illadelph
Originally Posted by AndyK
This is confusing me!
Go out for a ride and find your comfortable spot on the saddle. Once there, hold your left or right foot down at the bottom of the stroke as you would while pedaling. This is assuming your cleat position accounts for any discrepancy in leg length.

When your foots at the bottom of the stroke in your normal pedaling motion, push down with the foot that you have at the bottom of the stroke. If your butt rises off the saddle, your saddle's too low. If you can't apply pressure to the pedal at the bottom of the stroke, your saddle's too low and you'll probably have trouble with hard corners.
ridethecliche is offline  
Reply
Old 06-11-09 | 08:37 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 577
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

Originally Posted by ridethecliche
Go out for a ride and find your comfortable spot on the saddle. Once there, hold your left or right foot down at the bottom of the stroke as you would while pedaling. This is assuming your cleat position accounts for any discrepancy in leg length.

When your foots at the bottom of the stroke in your normal pedaling motion, push down with the foot that you have at the bottom of the stroke. If your butt rises off the saddle, your saddle's too low. If you can't apply pressure to the pedal at the bottom of the stroke, your saddle's too low and you'll probably have trouble with hard corners.
I think that your advice is confusing people. Experts advise that the leg have a 25-30 degree bend at the bottom of the stroke during normal pealing. Saddle height will vary depending in the amount of heel rise that the riders finds to be "normal". If you start with a height that places the foot horizontal with the leg fully extended at the bottom of the stroke, it takes about a 3cm rise of the heel to create that 30 degree angle. Riders who pedal with a relatively horizontal foot would find this height too high and some who raise the heel even more will find it too low.

If you put your foot down at the bottom of the stroke and try to push up without pedaling, the heel will naturally drop to nearly horizontal and there would be no raising off the saddle, just like my suggested starting position. If the rider pedals flat-footed, that height would be much too high, with the leg near full extension at the bottom of the stroke, rather than having a 25-30 degree bend.

Last edited by DaveSSS; 06-11-09 at 09:12 AM.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 06-11-09 | 08:44 AM
  #45  
Bob Ross's Avatar
your god hates me
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,902
Likes: 3,572

Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse

Originally Posted by Campag4life
Because those that race tend to be better physical specimens with more flexibility in their hip abductors and can tolerate greater leg extension without hip rocking.
I've heard it explained as due to racers being more willing to tolerate discomfort, period.
Bob Ross is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.