Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

58cm or 60cm

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

58cm or 60cm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-08 | 11:29 PM
  #1  
hillcranker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: North Central Ohio

Bikes: Fuji(Miyata), raleigh

58cm or 60cm

How difficult would it be to make a 58cm frame work for a 6ft. guy who has longer legs? I usually ride a 60 cm but was wondering if anyone had experience in riding a smaller frame.
hillcranker is offline  
Reply
Old 02-25-08 | 11:32 PM
  #2  
unbelievably's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
From: Under the Thumb
At 6',
I might consider a 56 or under smaller.
A 60 would leave me stretched out.
unbelievably is offline  
Reply
Old 02-25-08 | 11:35 PM
  #3  
urbanknight's Avatar
Over the hill
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 24,592
Likes: 1,361
From: Los Angeles, CA

Bikes: Pinarello Nytro, Momentum Transend

Of course this is a generalization, but what size stem do you have and how far back is your saddle on your current bike? If you have a cm or two to play around with on each end, you should be fine. If you're on a 120+ stem and your saddle is back as far as it can go, you're running out of room with a 58. Also keep in mind your bars might be lower as a result.

Example: I have trouble running smaller frames because my long thighs like a laid back seat tube.
urbanknight is online now  
Reply
Old 02-25-08 | 11:44 PM
  #4  
timmyquest's Avatar
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,761
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock
60 seems big...

i'm 5'10"-ish and ride a 54...57 is getting big
timmyquest is offline  
Reply
Old 02-25-08 | 11:46 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 2
From: Gilbert AZ

Bikes: Cervelo S5 SRAM Red -

6' 1" and was riding a 56 cervelo. most recently got a 08 Orca and switched to 57 only because Orbea gaps out from 54 to 57cm. I had a 58 specialized and It felt too big. I'm all legs , like a frog. the 57 fits me to perfection. a little more relaxed. the Cervelo was set up very aggressive with steep angle on the stem and had some serious drop from saddle to bars.
vic32amg is offline  
Reply
Old 02-25-08 | 11:49 PM
  #6  
55/Rad's Avatar
Former Hoarder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,734
Likes: 9
From: Portland & Yachats, OR

Bikes: Steve Rex, Seven Axiom, Felt Z1, Dave Moulton Fuso

I'm 6' with a 33.75" cycling inseam. I prefer a 60 and have 3 of them.

I also have seven 58's, all of which fit quite well. It wasn't too hard to get all 10 to fit virtually the same.

55/Rad
__________________
55/Rad is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 12:36 AM
  #7  
Chieftain
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
From: Oakland

Bikes: 2012 Cannondale CAADX 105; Wabi Classic Fixed Gear

I'm 6'1+ and am on a 58 (just went down from a 60) and feel very comfortable, though with the stem that the shop had the bike set up with left me feeling more stretched out than on my 60...go figure. They put on a shorter stem and the bike fits perfectly. Easy answer: ride the bike.
humboldt'sroads is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 06:06 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
I'm 6'1.5" and am on a 58cm bike. My Madone's seat mast barely goes high enough for my legs though. I was also pro-fitted to the bike, and I'm confident with the guy who fitted me. Just as a heads up though, even though a bike may feel comfortable, it still may be the wrong size. I managed to ride across the country on a 62cm bike with a 130mm stem. I was setup for a guy who was 6'4", but it felt fine to me.
roy5000x2 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 06:10 AM
  #9  
RiPHRaPH's Avatar
Don't Believe the Hype
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
From: chicagoland area

Bikes: 1999 Steelman SR525, 2002 Lightspeed Ultimate, 1988 Trek 830, 2008 Scott Addict

a 58cm is not always a 58cm. I ride a '59cm' and the TT is 58.3cm c-to-c.
You will lose big power if your saddle is set too far back or your center of gravity is not correct due to longer stem, etc.
Oh, sure. you could make it work, but the #1 key to riding is comfort & function.

A good deal on an ill fitting bike is not a good deal.
RiPHRaPH is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 06:12 AM
  #10  
merlinextraligh's Avatar
pan y agua
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,810
Likes: 1,232
From: Jacksonville

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

6'1" 34" cycling inseam. I've got a 60cm Paramount, a 59cm Merlin, a M/L Giant which is nominally a 57cm.

They all fit. The point being the nominal measurement of the frame isn't the end of the story, and what you fit on between 2 sizes may vary from frame to frame, depending on geometry, and how that manufacturer measures its frames.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 06:35 AM
  #11  
Campag4life's Avatar
Voice of the Industry
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by hillcranker
How difficult would it be to make a 58cm frame work for a 6ft. guy who has longer legs? I usually ride a 60 cm but was wondering if anyone had experience in riding a smaller frame.
For a long legged rider in particular, all depends on what kind of saddle to bar drop you prefer. I am the same...6'1" with a 35" cycling inseam. I ride a Look 57 c-t-c which = 59 c-t-t. I use a riser stem and some spacers to minimize my saddle to bar drop because I don't like a lot of drop. So ask yourself what kind of drop you like. If you like your bars up higher, then choose a frame with a longer head tube...say a 60 c-t-t. I have ridden a 61 c-t-t Bianchi with 200mm head tube and was pretty comfortable with a 100mm stem. Long legged guys have to pay particular attention to frame sizing. Most that don't want a lot of drop end up on one size bigger bike with a shorter stem.
HTH.
Campag4life is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 06:37 AM
  #12  
Campag4life's Avatar
Voice of the Industry
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
6'1" 34" cycling inseam. I've got a 60cm Paramount, a 59cm Merlin, a M/L Giant which is nominally a 57cm.

They all fit. The point being the nominal measurement of the frame isn't the end of the story, and what you fit on between 2 sizes may vary from frame to frame, depending on geometry, and how that manufacturer measures its frames.
We are about the same size except I have a 35" cycling inseam. I would be on a Large Giant for a bit longer head tube.
Campag4life is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 07:22 AM
  #13  
Aluminium Crusader :-)
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,050
Likes: 11
From: Melbourne, Australia
I'm 6ft with long legs, and I like 58s. My 4 favourite bikes are three 58s and one 57.5

I've got a 56cm Scapin that I feel is bit small for me, as was my 55.8cm Cinelli and my 56.5cm BMC.
The BMC Streetfire was ok; maybe coz it had a large-ish head-tube for a 56.5.

You've gotta check the head-tubes lengths (coz bikes of the same size can vary a bit in length) then figure out if your bars will be high enough for you without stacking too many spacers. My 58cm aluminium Soloist has a much smaller head-tube than my other 58s
531Aussie is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 07:29 AM
  #14  
R900's Avatar
Double Secret Probation
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 4
From: Eastern Indiana

Bikes: Madone 6 series SSL, Cannondale CX9, Trek TTX, Trek 970, Trek T2000

Two many variables. I've ridden several:

61 Bianchi
60 Trek
58 Cannondale

The Bianchi likely fits the best, but has a 105 stem, vs a 120 on the Trek, and a 130/140 stem on the Cannondale.

My Trek is the best bike, and that is what I ride the most.
__________________
Time to Ride...

Last edited by R900; 02-26-08 at 07:45 AM.
R900 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 08:03 AM
  #15  
halfspeed's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 6
From: SE Minnesota

Bikes: are better than yours.

Depends upon the frame, how it's measured, how flexible you are and whether your arms are long too. There's no way to tell without the rest of the information.
halfspeed is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 10:55 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
with a long stem and set back seat post any bike can fit- pros routinely ride smaller frames for weight savings- but only so far
carbonjockey is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 11:50 AM
  #17  
spdrcr5's Avatar
Road, MTB and SS Rider
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY

Bikes: Trek 5200, Yeti Kokopelli, Clockwork

My Trek says it's a 60 but measures out to a 58. I am 6'2". Next bike I will just get measured and see how it works out. Best thing to do is get fit to the bike whatever the frame size might turn out to be.
spdrcr5 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 11:52 AM
  #18  
timmyquest's Avatar
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,761
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock
Originally Posted by spdrcr5
My Trek says it's a 60 but measures out to a 58. I am 6'2". Next bike I will just get measured and see how it works out. Best thing to do is get fit to the bike whatever the frame size might turn out to be.
Try measuring it from the center of the BB to the top of the TT...
timmyquest is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 12:08 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by hillcranker
How difficult would it be to make a 58cm frame work for a 6ft. guy who has longer legs? I usually ride a 60 cm but was wondering if anyone had experience in riding a smaller frame.
What you're hearing is that none of us can say for sure without seeing you on the bike, due to diffs in bike sizing, bike customizing, and your own personal flexibility and preferences. In true BF form, however, I'll throw in my two cents:

I bet you're going to have a tough time finding a bike to fit you. The bike sizing fashion of many manufacturers today favors riders with short legs and long torsos. That means you end up with the seat too high relative to the handlebars. Trying to fix that with a larger size bike means you end up with the handlebars too far from the seat. Trying to fix that with a short stem sometimes works, but if it doesn't, then you're back on the smaller bike and trying stem extensions, which are ugly to say the least.

You're best bets might be to look at bikes designed with more upright geometry (handlebars basically level with the seat). You'll end up raising the seat more than they expect, which will get the handlebars back down where many of us like them, but not too far down - and the reach won't be bad since you're going with a smaller size to begin with. I don't know your price range, but the Bianchi C2C series or Specialized Roubaix series are good places to start if they fit your budget.
Smorgasbord42 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 12:33 PM
  #20  
Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
6'1" 34" cycling inseam. I've got a 60cm Paramount, a 59cm Merlin, a M/L Giant which is nominally a 57cm.

They all fit. The point being the nominal measurement of the frame isn't the end of the story, and what you fit on between 2 sizes may vary from frame to frame, depending on geometry, and how that manufacturer measures its frames.

Indeed. I am 6' with a just about a 34" inseam and I am currently riding an older Lemond that was supposedly a 60cm, but measures 58.5 c-c, with the top tube measuring the same. It fits fine (although my stem is a little long) and is quite comfortable. it's probably a touch too large for me so I am now looking for 58cm. It probably won't be the most aggressive of stances (usually attained by a smaller frame), but I don't need to strive for that look, not to mention that my flexibility is merely adequate.

The problem is that every frames seems to be measured differently or the geometry is so different that conventional measurements don't apply correctly.

A 58cm frame with fairly conventional geometry should fit you fine. The 60 might require less bending and be easier on your back and neck. In part the choice depends on what kind of riding you do. Do you just want to go fast, or do you want to go long distances? Speed = smaller frame; Endurance/distance = larger frame (huge generalization, I know).
LotusMan is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 01:15 PM
  #21  
Fox Farm's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 63
From: Prague, Czech Republic

Bikes: Time ADH01, Merlin Extra Light, Orbea Orca, Ritchey Outback,Tomac Revolver Mountain Bike, Cannondale Crit 3.0 now used for time trials.

No one is talking about top tube length here. I too ride a 59 cm Merlin, am 6'2" and use a 120 stem. The top tube is 58.75 so it's a long relaxed Euro style frame. I also have an older Cannondale 58 with a 57 something top tube and 130 stem. Although the Cannondale is very responsive, it some times feels darty.
Fox Farm is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 04:11 PM
  #22  
maddog17's Avatar
Worker Ant
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Peabody, Mass. U.S.A.

Bikes: Ted Wojcik road and Iron Horse Hollowpoint mtb

my rides are a 59cm Wojcik with a 57.3 tt and my Concorde is a 58cm with a 57cm tt. i got long legs and a short upper body. i think my stems are both 120.
maddog17 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 04:32 PM
  #23  
EGreen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY. Made in France
6'2'' 35 inseam and my 57'' Litespeed provides a perfect fit. Depends on the particular frame and rider. For me the less bike the better. When in doubt I'll go a size smaller.
EGreen is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 05:26 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo, Japan
6'2", 36" inside leg, long arms. I have a 58 and a 61, and the reach is actually longer on the former because of steeper angles and shorter headtube. It took longer to get used to the 58 because of the bigger drop to handlebars, but now I prefer it for most rides. As others have said, the size you end up depends on the bike's geometry, your fitness, riding style, and so on, but at 6' I would start at a 58 and consider working down...
Hendley is offline  
Reply
Old 02-26-08 | 09:52 PM
  #25  
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Frame

I'm 6'1" and a 60 would be big for me. 58 should be fine, I think...
Billsteak is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.