Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Recommend a good wireless computer

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Recommend a good wireless computer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-08 | 10:45 PM
  #26  
catherine96821's Avatar
Look 555 fledgling
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: Oahu

Bikes: Vitus road bike, I bought used, graduated to a LOOK 555

We bought two Garmin 305's and I kind of regret it. I'd rather have my cat-eye back or the polar wireless.

My cadence drops on and off...it is always something. I like Garmin products usually. I'm just getting fed up. Our issues are times two, it was the same batch, the early ones.
catherine96821 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 07:16 AM
  #27  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 1
From: Southeast USA
The Sigma sounds good, but what are these O rings everyone speaks of, and what makes them so much of an issue?
Miller2 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 07:31 AM
  #28  
George's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,721
Likes: 100
From: Katy Texas

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix

Originally Posted by voltman
Sigma 1606L DTS.
I had one and it went out in 4 months. I bought another one and that one lasted 6 months. Now I use cat eye Strada. I've had it on for over a year and no problems.
__________________
George
George is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 07:35 AM
  #29  
Murrays's Avatar
Mad Town Biker
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by George
I had one and it went out in 4 months. I bought another one and that one lasted 6 months. Now I use cat eye Strada. I've had it on for over a year and no problems.
OTOH, I bought 1606L DTS for me and a non cadence model for my wife two years ago. Both are going strong.

-murray
Murrays is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 08:22 AM
  #30  
arcticbiker's Avatar
1coolrider
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 479
Likes: 2
My Cateye Astrale finally died so I just picked up a Cateye V3. (I may regret this. The basic Astrale has been a great computer. Simple and sleek.) Anyway, I received it in the mail yesterday and will hook it up today. It's the triple wireless 2.4 ghz model tracking speed, cadence, and heart rate.

The first thing I noticed as I unpacked it is that the sensor is HUGE. Much larger than the single wireless model. You can pick it up for around $165 if you check around the net.

We'll see how the set up and functionality goes. The quick setup guide looks pretty easy. The first thing I need to do is strip off all the wires from my old unit . I'm hoping to be able to switch it between 2 different bikes. I'll keep you posted.
arcticbiker is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 08:34 AM
  #31  
Strong Bad's Avatar
ride lots
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Originally Posted by Murrays
Call me anal, but I like the average speed display to x.xx for those last couple miles when I'm pushing it so I can see my average speed going up. Very few computers I've seen have this, wireless or not.
-murray
Your not that anal, because you don't mind your current speed being rounded to the nearest 0.5.
Strong Bad is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 09:08 AM
  #32  
Murrays's Avatar
Mad Town Biker
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Strong Bad
Your not that anal, because you don't mind your current speed being rounded to the nearest 0.5.
Good point, I'd completely forgotten the Sigma rounded current speed to .5 mph. Seems like a non factor compared to average speed precision since I generally just glance at current speed vs. looking for change in average speed. It's frustrating (less motivating) to finish a ride hard without seeing any change in average speed.

-murray
Murrays is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 12:07 PM
  #33  
stapfam's Avatar
Time for a change.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Originally Posted by Tri JP
My garmin is wireless. I recommend that one.
Just got a Garmin Edge 350 and it does everything I want- Perfectly.

Why did I wait so long?

Easy- they are not cheap but some killer deals to be found with the new range coming out.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 01:13 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 1
From: New York
Easy answer. The company that has support right here on BF
Cjzoller is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 01:18 PM
  #35  
krusty's Avatar
Successful alcoholic
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Anyone else using a Vetta V100? It's one of my favorites so far, but the included mount is only for the bar. I have also had very good luck with VDO units, although they are hard to find. I have a C5+ on my MTB, and it has been trouble free for years.
krusty is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 02:11 PM
  #36  
ILUVUK's Avatar
en fuego
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 0
From: Davenport, IA

Bikes: Trek Madone 3.1

Originally Posted by bonechilling
I've been using the Cateye Micro Wireless for two years now, and I love it. I haven't had to change the battery once.
This is the one I use as well and have not had any problems with it.
ILUVUK is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 02:33 PM
  #37  
s4one's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
I currently use Polar but I would recommend Cateye because it is easier to use. My next computer will be cateye.
s4one is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 05:37 PM
  #38  
darthcheese's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
i just installed a polar cs200cad on my bike and so far so good...although the fact that the batteries are not replaceable is a bit disconcerting...im not sure if i would have bought this if i had known ahead of time...
darthcheese is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 06:25 PM
  #39  
VeganRider's Avatar
Just Do It !
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
From: United States

Bikes: Litespeed Ti, Trek Carbon.

Originally Posted by Geoff326
cateye strada wireless. no cadence with the wireless version though.
+1, they work and look good.
VeganRider is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 06:26 PM
  #40  
badfishgood's Avatar
B(.)(.)BS
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 826
Likes: 0

Bikes: My bicycles?

Originally Posted by voltman
Sigma 1606L DTS.
+1
badfishgood is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 06:59 PM
  #41  
oh turbie twist~!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: '08 QR Lucero/'06 Cannondale CAAD8

Originally Posted by Miller2
Where is the best place to purchase this unit?
Purchased this unit over 1.5 years ago at my LBS.

However, Amazon.com has Sigma Sport BC1606L DTS Wireless Bike Computer with Cadence for $51.95
SpeedyTSO is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-08 | 09:24 PM
  #42  
Mr. Fly's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 662
Likes: 2
From: Silicon Valley, CA.
Originally Posted by Godwin
+1 and very cheap on ebay.
The Cateye Micro Wireless is quite cheap, but I recommend spending the extra $5 to get the Strada Wireless.

I have both and I believe there are two non-function-related shortcomings of the Micro:
  1. The head unit doesn't fit tightly into its holder, and "buzzes" when going over rough roads. I spent a couple of dozen miles trying to track down this buzz, thinking it was my STI levers.
  2. Both the head unit and the sensor are significantly larger for the Micro, compared to the Strada. The Strada is much sleeker and aesthetically pleasing. The "invisible button" design of the Strada is also very cool.

Please note that there is absolutely nothing wrong, functionally, with either the Micro or the Strada. Both meters had performed exceptionally well for me, and I had never noticed any dropped signals like I do for my Polar wireless.
Mr. Fly is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-08 | 11:36 AM
  #43  
Like2Bike
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio

Bikes: 2006 Trek 7200 2008 Trek 5.2

Good post any other suggestions?
xtabi is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-08 | 11:50 AM
  #44  
Jynx's Avatar
.....
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 3
From: Long Island

Bikes: 2006 Cannondale CAAD8

Originally Posted by arcticbiker
My Cateye Astrale finally died so I just picked up a Cateye V3. (I may regret this. The basic Astrale has been a great computer. Simple and sleek.) Anyway, I received it in the mail yesterday and will hook it up today. It's the triple wireless 2.4 ghz model tracking speed, cadence, and heart rate.

The first thing I noticed as I unpacked it is that the sensor is HUGE. Much larger than the single wireless model. You can pick it up for around $165 if you check around the net.

We'll see how the set up and functionality goes. The quick setup guide looks pretty easy. The first thing I need to do is strip off all the wires from my old unit . I'm hoping to be able to switch it between 2 different bikes. I'll keep you posted.

Definately post a write up. i am very interested.

Originally Posted by xtabi
Good post any other suggestions?
Cateye V2c or V3 if you want heart rate too.
Jynx is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-08 | 12:18 PM
  #45  
Ray Dockrey's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 727
Likes: 1
From: Mustang, OK
Originally Posted by Miller2
The Sigma sounds good, but what are these O rings everyone speaks of, and what makes them so much of an issue?
On the sensors there is a U shaped channel on either side of the sensor. The o-ring sits into this u-shaped channel, wraps around the fork or chainstay and then hooks into the u-shaped channel on the other side. The problem is that the o-rings get old and start to crack and then they will break and there goes your sensor. The cadence sensor allows you to use zip ties as an alternative but the speed sensor does not. You can buy the o-rings at any local hardware store, so as long as you catch them before they break it is not an issue. It was rumored at one time that Sigma was going to redesign the speed sensor to use zip ties but to my knowledge they have not done so as of yet.
Ray Dockrey is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-08 | 02:32 PM
  #46  
jstraw97's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0

Bikes: Cannondale Synapse Carbon SL

Originally Posted by Jynx
Cateye V2c or V3 if you want heart rate too.
I just purchased a V2c over the weekend. Unfortunately I have to wait for it to be shipped, so it won't be here for another week or so. Once it arrives and I use it I'll be happy to post a write up.
jstraw97 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-08 | 04:43 PM
  #47  
ZXiMan's Avatar
Raptor Custom Bicycles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
From: Texas

Bikes: Raptor Bicycles... Fully custom carbon bikes... just the way you want them!

I LOVE the Sigma BC2006 MHR. It's wireless. It's also MUCH more accurate than the Trek Incite ACH digital I'm forced to use until I get a new sensor (read below). For every 10 miles, it reads .4ths of a mile SHORT which means it raeds my speed slower and averages slower than normal, inluding mileage. Also the altitude feature reads much higher than my Sigma (ie: not realistic). The Sigma is actually quite accurate and reads several functions on the screen at once instead of having to cycle through each individual section. It reads all the regular distance, speed, averages etc and also includes altitude info and a heart rate monitor. You can find them for less than $100 several places online. The O-rings do stink though. I ended up destroying the speed sensor because it shifted slightly and contacted the magnet and was destroyed (I was doing over 30 mph when it happened). You can set it up where you need it with the o-rings around the fork and then put electrical tape around the o-ring to keep the sensor from moving around. I did that but still had a problem. I'm going to silicone my new sensor to my fork in the proper position, then use the o-rings AND then electrical tape over them. Hopefully I won't have anymore problems!

Last edited by ZXiMan; 03-31-08 at 04:52 PM.
ZXiMan is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-08 | 04:56 PM
  #48  
ZXiMan's Avatar
Raptor Custom Bicycles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
From: Texas

Bikes: Raptor Bicycles... Fully custom carbon bikes... just the way you want them!

Originally Posted by catherine96821
We bought two Garmin 305's and I kind of regret it. I'd rather have my cat-eye back or the polar wireless.

My cadence drops on and off...it is always something. I like Garmin products usually. I'm just getting fed up. Our issues are times two, it was the same batch, the early ones.
I've used the Garmin 305 before. I've noticed it is slow to update speed as you accelerate, which can be fustrating but otherwise it's pretty good.
ZXiMan is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-08 | 05:00 PM
  #49  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
I just got a trek 9i team wireless on clearance for $20. Not sure how their reputation is, but I have found it to be pretty good (thought I just got it a week ago). Worth looking into for the price if you can find on at a local store on clearance. I think they discontinued the model or something.
jr05 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-08 | 05:31 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: BC
Don't buy wireless VDOs. Imo they don't like water and road dirt.
ukie is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.