Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Running a 90mm stem

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Running a 90mm stem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-08 | 02:40 PM
  #26  
MPH2's Avatar
Moronic Cubicle Monkey
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
I have an Easton EA 70 90MM 15 degree rise stem for sale if you are interested.
MPH2 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 04:17 PM
  #27  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Fyi, I didn't think the bit fit poorly, but i didn't ride the size down from it (frame only, not built up). The shop owner was insisting that the 90mm stem wasn't for me though, and was talking about how much more stable the handling would be on the 53 vs the 55 (actual top tube on the 55 was 56). He was saying the longer stem would make it more stable... Anyways, I'm just not sure if he's just trying to sell me the bike or if i really should ride the size down. I ride a 55cm top tube on my current bike (not sure the stem length but i'm guessing it's 100mm) and he thought it was too small...
bonzo is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 04:37 PM
  #28  
Ramjm_2000's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 930
Likes: 1
From: Anywhere the government sends me...

Bikes: Too many...

Listen to the shop owner and try the next size down, what do you have to lose?
Ramjm_2000 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 04:39 PM
  #29  
caloso's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,116
From: Sacramento, California, USA

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Personally, if I'm between, I'll go down a size. A lot of that has to do with my stumpy legs and need for top tube clearance, but that may not matter if you're talking about a sloping TT frame.
caloso is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 05:34 PM
  #30  
BarracksSi's Avatar
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,863
Likes: 6
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Tangential question --

Would you (that is, the collective "you") rather have a shorter bike with a longer stem, or a longer bike with a shorter stem?
BarracksSi is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 06:22 PM
  #31  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
I would try the next size down if I could, obviously. Problem is it's a frame only and not built up and he doesn't want to build it up just so I can test ride it.
bonzo is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 10:02 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ramjm_2000
hmm..."I found a bike a bit on large size for me" says otherwise.
+1 Wrong size frame = pile up your money and light it on fire.
oilman_15106 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-17-08 | 06:44 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 2
From: No. Central Ma. USA

Bikes: 2013 Cannondale EVO DA; 09 Giant TCR Advanced SL; 07 Giant TCR Advanced

Originally Posted by bonzo
I would try the next size down if I could, obviously. Problem is it's a frame only and not built up and he doesn't want to build it up just so I can test ride it.
What bike are you looking at?

Don't they have another 54 in stock that's a similar geometry to the bike you're interested in?
BarryJo is offline  
Reply
Old 04-17-08 | 05:27 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,755
Likes: 1,738
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
Tangential question --

Would you (that is, the collective "you") rather have a shorter bike with a longer stem, or a longer bike with a shorter stem?
20 years ago, I would always answer with - down a size. I liked the look and feel of a smallish frame.

Now, if I'm on the cusp, I'd go with the larger for handlebar height. I've realized that minimal standover is absolutely OK and - assuming you can get the reach right with at least an 80 or 90 mm stem - the larger frame will likely allow you to have the handlebars higher relative to the seat height. That's more important to me now than the look and sporty feel of the smallish frame.
Camilo is offline  
Reply
Old 04-17-08 | 07:09 PM
  #35  
Bontrager's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 1
From: Boulder, CO

Bikes: Road, MTB, Folding, Commuting bikes...

Originally Posted by Camilo
Now, if I'm on the cusp, I'd go with the larger for handlebar height.
You can modify stack height and/or angle of the stem to get the necessary height if in between sizes.

I figure it's easier and cheaper to change stems than it is to wish you got a smaller frame if you're in between sizes.
Bontrager is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.