Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Running a 90mm stem

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Running a 90mm stem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-08 | 12:28 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Running a 90mm stem

i found a bike for a decent deal that is a bit on the large size for me. i'm 5'10" with a 30.5 inch inseam without shoes. top tube length on the bike i'm looking at is 56 and lbs says i'll need a 90mm stem to fit correctly. what do you all think of this? is this too short of a stem or ok?
bonzo is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 01:30 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Portland

Bikes: 04 Bianchi EV Boron

i rock a 90mm stem to shorten up my reach just a little bit and it works fine.
Standard is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 01:56 AM
  #3  
04jtb's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: West Dorset, UK

Bikes: 1983 Dawes Galaxy, 2006 Raleigh Airlite, 1982 Sun Solo (fixed)

I have a 90mm stem on my bike, it makes the handling slightly twitchier than a 110mm but you get used to it after 1 or 2 rides, and I am a lot more comfortable now.
__________________
Originally Posted by cc700
i jam my thumbs up and back into the tubes. this way i can point my fingers straight out in front to split the wind and attain an even more aero profile, and the usual fixed gear - zen - connectedness feeling through the drivetrain is multiplied ten fold because my thumbs become one with the tubing.
A group for all Dawes Galaxy owners to give and recieve information about them
https://flickr.com/groups/dawes_galaxy/
04jtb is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 02:07 AM
  #4  
the beef's Avatar
100% USDA certified
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,023
Likes: 6
From: Seattle -> NYC
No two people are the same, which is why different stem lengths are made. Handling is slightly affected at most.
the beef is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 04:57 AM
  #5  
Campag4life's Avatar
Voice of the Industry
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by the beef
No two people are the same, which is why different stem lengths are made. Handling is slightly affected at most.
If even that. By far the geometry of any bike trumps stem length. OP you are fine in the 70-80 to 120-130 length.
Campag4life is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 05:08 AM
  #6  
bbattle's Avatar
.
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Donating
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,769
Likes: 38
From: Rocket City, No'ala

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose

Originally Posted by bonzo
i found a bike for a decent deal that is a bit on the large size for me. i'm 5'10" with a 30.5 inch inseam without shoes. top tube length on the bike i'm looking at is 56 and lbs says i'll need a 90mm stem to fit correctly. what do you all think of this? is this too short of a stem or ok?
Sounds good. When I got fitted we changed the stem from a 120 to an 80mm. Felt much better. Bike handles great.

Some people have longer arms or torsos compared to their legs. Others, like me, are the opposite. Longer legs for their height with a shorter torso. If the bike fits, Ride!
bbattle is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 05:21 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 51
"for a decent deal that is a bit on the large size for me"

I don't think the stem length is that big of a deal but if you really think you are going to keep the bike long term, I wouldn't buy a bike that "is a little large for me." My last bike was 1 size too big and although it worked (with some adjustments), it never quite felt right. That was one "decent deal" that in the end wasn't worth it. I learned that lesson even more when I finally got a bike that fit perfect.
jrobe is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 05:35 AM
  #8  
04jtb's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: West Dorset, UK

Bikes: 1983 Dawes Galaxy, 2006 Raleigh Airlite, 1982 Sun Solo (fixed)

Originally Posted by bbattle
Some people have longer arms or torsos compared to their legs. Others, like me, are the opposite. Longer legs for their height with a shorter torso. If the bike fits, Ride!
+1
__________________
Originally Posted by cc700
i jam my thumbs up and back into the tubes. this way i can point my fingers straight out in front to split the wind and attain an even more aero profile, and the usual fixed gear - zen - connectedness feeling through the drivetrain is multiplied ten fold because my thumbs become one with the tubing.
A group for all Dawes Galaxy owners to give and recieve information about them
https://flickr.com/groups/dawes_galaxy/
04jtb is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 06:04 AM
  #9  
Ramjm_2000's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 930
Likes: 1
From: Anywhere the government sends me...

Bikes: Too many...

A bike that doesn't fit is no deal at all...
Ramjm_2000 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 06:24 AM
  #10  
ElJamoquio's Avatar
Burning Matches.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 1,025
From: San Jose, CA
....which is why this bike is fine.
__________________
ElJamoquio didn't hate the world, per se; he was just constantly disappointed by humanity.
ElJamoquio is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 06:50 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
I think any top tube that is over 0.5 cm over what you should be riding is too long and a shorter stem won't made it right. You'll get used to it, but it'll never really fit.
charliekeri is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 06:52 AM
  #12  
Ramjm_2000's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 930
Likes: 1
From: Anywhere the government sends me...

Bikes: Too many...

hmm..."I found a bike a bit on large size for me" says otherwise.
Ramjm_2000 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 07:33 AM
  #13  
gfrance's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Originally Posted by bonzo
i found a bike for a decent deal that is a bit on the large size for me. i'm 5'10" with a 30.5 inch inseam without shoes. top tube length on the bike i'm looking at is 56 and lbs says i'll need a 90mm stem to fit correctly. what do you all think of this? is this too short of a stem or ok?
As 56cm bike should be spot on given your height and inseam. I'd be surprised if you really need a 90mm stem unless you have very short arms. (I'm 5' 9.75" run a 110mm stem on a 57cm top tube frame.)
gfrance is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 08:57 AM
  #14  
ElJamoquio's Avatar
Burning Matches.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 1,025
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by Ramjm_2000
hmm..."I found a bike a bit on large size for me" says otherwise.
56 cm. 5' 10. No problem.
__________________
ElJamoquio didn't hate the world, per se; he was just constantly disappointed by humanity.
ElJamoquio is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 09:12 AM
  #15  
Whatever
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Go ride it with the 90mm stem and then tell us if its too large or not. If it feels good to you, its the right size. If it doesn't feel good, then its the wrong one. sizing is much more subjective than some would like to believe.
brad06ag is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 09:23 AM
  #16  
Ramjm_2000's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 930
Likes: 1
From: Anywhere the government sends me...

Bikes: Too many...

Originally Posted by ElJamoquio
56 cm. 5' 10. No problem.


What fits you and what fits the OP at 60" means nothing unless your identical twins with the same flexibility.
Ramjm_2000 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 09:27 AM
  #17  
Ramjm_2000's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 930
Likes: 1
From: Anywhere the government sends me...

Bikes: Too many...

That said, I would have started the OP on a 56 if I were the one fitting him.
Ramjm_2000 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 09:28 AM
  #18  
jimbud's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 1
From: Bring warm clothing!

Bikes: Colnago Dream, Kestrel Evoke, Giant XTC Hardtail

Originally Posted by gfrance
As 56cm bike should be spot on given your height and inseam. I'd be surprised if you really need a 90mm stem unless you have very short arms. (I'm 5' 9.75" run a 110mm stem on a 57cm top tube frame.)
I agree, You might find yourself changing back over to a longer stem after a little bit of saddle time on the bike.
__________________
jimbud is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 10:29 AM
  #19  
billallbritten's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
From: Amherst, MA

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix - previously Bianchi Venice (pictured above)

Originally Posted by brad06ag
Go ride it with the 90mm stem and then tell us if its too large or not. If it feels good to you, its the right size. If it doesn't feel good, then its the wrong one. sizing is much more subjective than some would like to believe.
What he said. I tried several lengths (90,100,110), settled on the 90mm, felt right then and now, eye/handlebar/hub colinearity i(common wisdom, really just a starting point, like KOPS) is good. If I replace it, after having the bike now for a couple of years and some 11000 miles (I'm a bit more flexible in the riding position), I'll try a 100 just to see if that feels better. Or I may flip the 90, or I may not :-) . No pain, no aches from century length rides, either.

Also, a fitting is just a snapshot of your body geometry at a specific point in time. I bet most folks don't ride or stretch for a while before getting fitted; bet there'd be some minor differences if they did. Different stressors on the body in the store v. on the road, etc.

In my case, I've moved the saddle up just a tad (about 4mm) (which also moves it back a bit) from the fitting position and I'm quite happy.

The one change I've made I'm rethinking is, of all things, thicker bar tape, just doesn't quite feel right (probably something about the grip around the bar sending a subtly different position signal to the 'ole noggin), may rewrap in the older brand.

Just record everything, both from the fitting, and any changes in setup so you can return to a known position.
__________________
Specialized Roubaix



billallbritten is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 10:41 AM
  #20  
Bontrager's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 1
From: Boulder, CO

Bikes: Road, MTB, Folding, Commuting bikes...

You didn't tell us your seat fore/aft position or the angle of your 90mm stem. Both will affect wether you think the frame fits you.
Bontrager is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 10:50 AM
  #21  
caloso's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,116
From: Sacramento, California, USA

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Originally Posted by jimbud
I agree, You might find yourself changing back over to a longer stem after a little bit of saddle time on the bike.
Yup. Hold on to the longer stem.
caloso is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 11:35 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 2
From: No. Central Ma. USA

Bikes: 2013 Cannondale EVO DA; 09 Giant TCR Advanced SL; 07 Giant TCR Advanced

Originally Posted by bonzo
i found a bike for a decent deal that is a bit on the large size for me. i'm 5'10" with a 30.5 inch inseam without shoes. top tube length on the bike i'm looking at is 56 and lbs says i'll need a 90mm stem to fit correctly. what do you all think of this? is this too short of a stem or ok?
same exact deal here, 5'10" with 30" inseam. I could not get fitted on a 56, and was even stretched out on a 54 Caad9 w/ the 100mm stem (short arms too).

I was afraid the shorter stem would cause handling problems, but it looks from the notes posted here that they will be minimal.

One thing's for sure, it'll ride better with the 90mm stem than the highrise stem they threw on the bike to compensate for my short limbs. The handling with that setup sucked, especially taking a hard turn with riders on both sides of me.
BarryJo is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 12:16 PM
  #23  
Surferbruce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,308
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles/Aveyron France
shows how everyone is different.
i'm 5' 10" and ride a 56 with a 120 stem.
Surferbruce is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 12:22 PM
  #24  
caloso's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,863
Likes: 3,116
From: Sacramento, California, USA

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Yup. 5'10 on a 54cm with 100mm (might go with 110 if I get new bars).
caloso is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-08 | 02:20 PM
  #25  
Ramjm_2000's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 930
Likes: 1
From: Anywhere the government sends me...

Bikes: Too many...

Originally Posted by Surferbruce
shows how everyone is different.
i'm 5' 10" and ride a 56 with a 120 stem.
That plus the fact that not everey brand's 56cm is measured the same.
Ramjm_2000 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.