![]() |
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 20584103)
I have that kind of time.
If someone gives me the list of parts, and an accurate frameset weight, I'll figure it out. On the wheels alone MyTi’s bike gives up over a pound to that bike. I would guess that between tires and cassette we’ll find the next half pound making him King FOS! :D |
Originally Posted by joejack951
(Post 20584140)
Here’s a well-documented 14.5 lb. Vortex build (see page two before serious weight weenie-ism begins): https://weightweenies.starbike.com/f...c.php?t=144117 On the wheels alone MyTi’s bike gives up over a pound to that bike. I would guess that between tires and cassette we’ll find the next half pound making him King FOS! :D The weight for weight's sake thing is so hilarious to me. I think it might be an OCD thing for the hard core peeps. I googled OCD, and once I knew what it is, I created a spreadsheet with calculations based on more google search statistics, and have determined that I am DEFINITELY not OCD. Or, a person in denial. Definitely not that. Even if I was, I wouldn't admit it. I realize I am participating in a total derailing of the thread. As you were. |
Originally Posted by canyoneagle
(Post 20584066)
Your bravado is offputting. Here. With bottle cages installed. You are seriously trolling. That is my (oh so heavy 240g) saddle in the hook. So, a 4 pound (claimed) difference. I'm not seeing this in the Ti choice alone, since your frame and fork are not that much lighter than my frame/fork. For a guy like me, that's less than 2% difference in rider/bike weight. Relax. You are good with your choice. Yours is a good frame. Stop preaching. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...14afc8e651.jpg |
Originally Posted by joejack951
(Post 20584086)
Oh, I fully expect that. And I also expect we’ll be able to find someone on this forum with enough time to add up the weight of all the components on his bike to prove he’s FOS. Not counting cages it comes in right at 17lbs. This doesn't account for the MTB cassette and RD, I don't think those are 6700 shifters, and there is definitely some extra weight in the wheels. I'd say just under 18lbs is probably right. Still, pretty freakin light for the build. |
Originally Posted by MyTi
(Post 20584380)
ok so with pedals you are around 21 pounds, so 5 pound penalty! I was off by a pound. I know there are some light steel frames out there. People forget I am running full carbon wheels, full rim brakes, full deda carbon bars, carbon fork, fabric saddle with Ti rails, etc. this was weighed on a professional scale at a bike shop. yes it’s 16lbs with the egg beaters on. If I went more weight weenie it would not be too hard to get to 15 If you lose the attitude and exaggeration, people will be a little more forgiving. People like to bully a bully. I'm not sure why you started being a bully, but if you quit all this nonsense will quit. I'd lay low for a bit and come back with commenting Hot or Not for a bit and leave all the exclamation marks out of it. |
Originally Posted by MyTi
(Post 20584380)
ok so with pedals you are around 21 pounds, so 5 pound penalty! I was off by a pound. I know there are some light steel frames out there. People forget I am running full carbon wheels, full rim brakes, full deda carbon bars, carbon fork, fabric saddle with Ti rails, etc. this was weighed on a professional scale at a bike shop. yes it’s 16lbs with the egg beaters on. If I went more weight weenie it would not be too hard to get to 15 Enjoy your bike. |
Originally Posted by Bradleykd
(Post 20584435)
Still, pretty freakin light for the build.
|
I check in on this thread from time to time. It appears that MyTi is a shill for the Ti frame industry. The way he is constanting hype beasting ti frames is beyond obsession. If he really wanted to do some actual good for those frames, he would take his act to the Clyde forum. If that bike/build can hold up under his stated weight, then there is a big market for it with the Clydes.
|
Originally Posted by MyTi
(Post 20584380)
ok so with pedals you are around 21 pounds, so 5 pound penalty! I was off by a pound. I know there are some light steel frames out there. People forget I am running full carbon wheels, full rim brakes, full deda carbon bars, carbon fork, fabric saddle with Ti rails, etc. this was weighed on a professional scale at a bike shop. yes it’s 16lbs with the egg beaters on. If I went more weight weenie it would not be too hard to get to 15 Why would you assume no pedals? That weight is as built, which includes pedals. As stated before, much of the stated weight difference is build choice, so it is not just frameset weight. Again this difference is (at most) 3 pounds. Time to get off this crazy train. |
Originally Posted by MyTi
(Post 20582900)
how is this two/three tone mess of a bike even warm. it can’t be helped due to the paint job. I’m finding that people here simply lack good taste. my goodness may the lord have mercy on my eyes. growlerdinky must of had his acid reflux cured after seeing this thing. Ok the blue is nice but blue and neon green? No. as for canyon eagle.... at least it’s not pink. It seems to me that the blue, yellow and gray paint job was both imaginative and well-considered, and on the whole it's quite harmonious - an interesting, down-to-earth and breezy combination of those hues. If you ask me, if he'd gone with the more usual variation of royal blue and gold, or any single color, that would have been less tasteful. I've seen lots of bikes here that showed little imagination and that aren't to my personal taste, but very few that show a lack of taste (I think we're all aficionados here). And while some may have "offended" my sensibilities, none were really in bad taste (that would be pretty unlikely: maybe blades projecting from the hubs, an exposed motor, a syringe and IV tube coming out of a bottle...). |
Originally Posted by MyTi
(Post 20584380)
ok so with pedals you are around 21 pounds, so 5 pound penalty! I was off by a pound. I know there are some light steel frames out there. People forget I am running full carbon wheels, full rim brakes, full deda carbon bars, carbon fork, fabric saddle with Ti rails, etc. this was weighed on a professional scale at a bike shop. yes it’s 16lbs with the egg beaters on. If I went more weight weenie it would not be too hard to get to 15 |
Sorry, but it's only a Litespeed. Ti for the masses.
|
Originally Posted by indyfabz
(Post 20584632)
Sorry, but it's only a Litespeed. Ti for the masses.
but your dismissive comment that litespeed is titanium for the masses is akin to claiming Cannondale is aluminum for the masses or that trek and specialized are carbon for the masses. yup- its all correct- they are aluminum and carbon for the masses. Being dismissive of it is absurd though and thats the logical conclusion to your comment. |
Originally Posted by canyoneagle
(Post 20584572)
<sigh>
Why would you assume no pedals? That weight is as built, which includes pedals. As stated before, much of the stated weight difference is build choice, so it is not just frameset weight. Again this difference is (at most) 3 pounds. Time to get off this crazy train. |
Originally Posted by MyTi
(Post 20584779)
I think your scale might be off |
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 20584813)
I think the scale at your shop might be off.
|
Originally Posted by MyTi
(Post 20584779)
because you did not mention pedals in your post. That is a very good weight then but still over 4 pounds heavier. Typical steel bike would be around 22 and up really. I’m surprised because I thought that frame was big...what size is it?. I think your scale might be off since your fondo was just over eighteen. I had a fondo but with 105 and it was around 20 or 21 I think. Quite heavy for carbon but it was the entry level fondo |
Originally Posted by MyTi
(Post 20584779)
because you did not mention pedals in your post. That is a very good weight then but still over 4 pounds heavier. Typical steel bike would be around 22 and up really. I’m surprised because I thought that frame was big...what size is it?. I think your scale might be off since your fondo was just over eighteen. I had a fondo but with 105 and it was around 20 or 21 I think. Quite heavy for carbon but it was the entry level fondo http://archive.fujibikes.com/archive...modelyear=2012 Top end steel bikes, even in the 80's, were commonly 19.5-21 pounds. Again, do the math. Start with frameset weight and go from there. It's not rocket science. The EL-OS tubeset on my frame (62.5cm) is one of the lighter steel tubesets made, so it only follows that it will result in a relatively light frame. My frame is 4.8 lbs, fork is 1.4. For apples to apples, compare any other frameset with that, and you have your delta, given same build - take the variables out to get a real comparison. Choose to believe what you want, deny everything else. There is nothing I can do to change that. |
Originally Posted by canyoneagle
(Post 20584882)
Choose to believe what you want, deny everything else. There is nothing I can do to change that.
All i I was pointing out is the general advantage of most Ti frames over steel is that it is lighter. You prefer steel and that should be the end of the conversation. I don’t think it will ever see 16 pounds on a professional scale but 20 pounds is very light for steel and am surprised. Amazing feat really given the size of that frame and awesome build. |
Originally Posted by MyTi
(Post 20584899)
i don’t know why people are getting in on this conversation I spoke to you about Ti vs steel in general before. It’s a preference thing I get it but makes no sense why you chose a heavier option. All i I was pointing out is the general advantage of most Ti frames over steel is that it is lighter. You prefer steel and that should be the end of the conversation. I don’t think it will ever see 16 pounds on a professional scale but 20 pounds is very light for steel and am surprised. Amazing feat really given the size of that frame and awesome build. My mistake was not seeing it for the trolling it is. You've got a great bike. enjoy it! |
Originally Posted by MyTi
(Post 20584899)
i don’t know why people are getting in on this conversation I spoke to you about Ti vs steel in general before. It’s a preference thing I get it but makes no sense why you chose a heavier option. All i I was pointing out is the general advantage of most Ti frames over steel is that it is lighter. You prefer steel and that should be the end of the conversation. I don’t think it will ever see 16 pounds on a professional scale but 20 pounds is very light for steel and am surprised. Amazing feat really given the size of that frame and awesome build. |
I came here to see Hot bikes.......
|
Originally Posted by Capo72
(Post 20585102)
I came here to see Hot bikes.......
https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycl...titaniums.html |
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
(Post 20584753)
I get the attempt here, it cuts him down an notch and opens a door to potentially post your bike- 2 birds 1 stone right there.
but your dismissive comment that litespeed is titanium for the masses is akin to claiming Cannondale is aluminum for the masses or that trek and specialized are carbon for the masses. yup- its all correct- they are aluminum and carbon for the masses. Being dismissive of it is absurd though and thats the logical conclusion to your comment. |
R+E Cycles in Seattle can build a 13.5 lb steel road bike.
https://rodbikes.com/catalog/outlaw/outlaw-main.html True Temper S3 tubing isn't cheap. I have a 15.9 lb fixed gear built from the stuff. -Tim- |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.